throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Cecil Key
`Nash, Brian C.; Jay Kesan; Trials
`Finkel, Evan; Hindman, Matthew W.; Gartman, Cody A.; Intel-SRC; Ari Rafilson (arafilson@shorechan.com);
`Henning Schmidt
`RE: Intel v. FG SRC, IPR2020-01449: Patent Owner"s Request to Schedule a Conference Call
`Thursday, May 20, 2021 3:40:17 PM
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors:
`
`Patent Owner objects to the argumentative nature of Petitioner’s email in response to a simple
`request for guidance on the current procedures. Patent Owner will, however, be prepared to
`address the substance of the issues Petitioner seeks to raise during the May 24, 2021 telephone
`conference should the Board so desire.
`
`Cecil E. Key
`DGKeyIp Group
`1750 Tysons Blvd., Suite 1500
`Tysons Corner, Virginia 22102
`Phone: 703-289-5118
`Fax: 703-388-0648
`Cell: 703-472-5976
`Email: ckey@dimuro.com
`
`
`
`From: Nash, Brian C. <brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com>
`Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:12 PM
`To: Jay Kesan <jay@jaykesan.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Finkel, Evan <evan.finkel@pillsburylaw.com>; Hindman, Matthew W.
`<matthew.hindman@pillsburylaw.com>; Gartman, Cody A. <cody.gartman@pillsburylaw.com>;
`Intel-SRC <Intel-SRC@Pillsburylaw.com>; Cecil Key <CKey@dimuro.com>; Ari Rafilson
`(arafilson@shorechan.com) <arafilson@shorechan.com>; Henning Schmidt
`<hschmidt@dimuro.com>
`Subject: RE: Intel v. FG SRC, IPR2020-01449: Patent Owner's Request to Schedule a Conference Call
`
`Dear Board,
`
`To clarify Petitioner’s position, Petitioner has repeatedly asked Patent Owner to identify what exactly
`it is requesting from the Board, but Patent Owner would not do so beyond suggesting that it might
`want to take depositions if the Motion to Supplement is granted. Patent Owner’s stated “request”
`below is similarly noncommittal. Petitioner is not opposed to a conference with the Board, but
`Petitioner is not able to take a position on PO’s request without knowing what is being requested.
`
`

`

`Patent Owner has had ample opportunity to take depositions and to prepare its Response and
`Motion to Amend within the time frame provided by the Scheduling Order (i.e., by May 26), and the
`parties have been aware of the timing on the Motion to Supplement for over a month.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Brian Nash
`Counsel for Petitioner Intel Corporation
`
`
`Brian C. Nash | Partner
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 1700 | Austin, TX 78701-3797
`t +1.512.580.9629
`brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com | website bio
`
`
`From: jay jaykesan.com <jay@jaykesan.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 10:15 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Nash, Brian C. <brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com>; Finkel, Evan <evan.finkel@pillsburylaw.com>;
`Hindman, Matthew W. <matthew.hindman@pillsburylaw.com>; Gartman, Cody A.
`<cody.gartman@pillsburylaw.com>; Intel-SRC <Intel-SRC@Pillsburylaw.com>; Cecil Key
`<CKey@dimuro.com>; Ari Rafilson (arafilson@shorechan.com) <arafilson@shorechan.com>;
`Henning Schmidt <hschmidt@dimuro.com>
`Subject: Intel v. FG SRC, IPR2020-01449: Patent Owner's Request to Schedule a Conference Call
`
`Your Honors:
` Patent Owner requests a conference call with the Board as soon as possible to obtain the
`Board’s guidance regarding the current schedule in light of the Board’s pending decision on
`Petitioner’s Motion to Submit Supplemental Information.
`In accordance with the Board’s Order governing the Conduct of the Proceeding (Paper No.
`18), briefing by both parties on Petitioner’s Motion to Submit Supplemental Information is complete
`as of May 12, 2021.
`Currently, Patent Owner’s Response and Motion to Amend are due on May 26, 2021, and
`whether Patent Owner will seek additional depositions at this stage depends on the Board’s ruling
`on Petitioner’s Motion to Submit Supplemental Information.
`As such, Patent Owner respectfully seeks guidance from the Board on when a ruling on
`Petitioner’s Motion might be expected. In addition, Patent Owner may seek an extension of the due
`date for its Patent Owner Response and Motion to Amend based on the guidance that we receive
`from the Board.
`Petitioner has indicated that it may or may not oppose this request. Accordingly, in light of
`the upcoming May 26, 2021 deadline, Patent Owner respectfully requests a conference call at the
`Board’s earliest convenience to address this request.
`Best regards.
`
`

`

`--Jay Kesan.
`Counsel for Patent Owner, FG SRC.
`
`Jay P. Kesan
`DGKeyIp Group
`1750 Tysons Blvd., Suite 1500
`Tysons Corner, Virginia 22102
`Phone: 703-289-5118
`Cell: 217-377-9905
`
`The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the
`individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is legally
`privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
`hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment,
`is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender or
`the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Service Desk at Tel: 800-477-0770, Option 1, immediately by
`telephone and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Nothing in
`this message may be construed as a digital or electronic signature of any employee of Pillsbury
`Winthrop Shaw Pittman. Thank you.
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket