throbber
Paper: 19
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: April 22 , 2021
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT &
`BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-01299 (Patent 8,630,761 B2)
`IPR2020-01386 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`__________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`ARTHUR M. PESLAK, Administrative Patent Judges.1
`
`PESLAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jacob Z. Zambrzycki
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in each of the
`above-captioned proceedings. We therefore exercise our discretion to issue
`one Order to be filed in each proceeding. The proceedings have not been
`consolidated, and the Parties are not authorized to use this style heading in
`any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01299 (Patent 8,630,761 B2)
`IPR2020-01386 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`
`Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft and BMW of North
`America, LLC (collectively “Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Jacob Z. Zambrzycki in each of the above-captioned
`proceedings. Paper 16 (“Mot.”, “Motion”).2 Petitioner states in each
`Motion that “Patent Owners have indicated that they do not oppose this
`motion.” Mot. 2. The Motions are granted.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Paper 4, 2 (citing
`Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB
`Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission”)) (“Notice”).
`In each Motion, Petitioner states that there is good cause for the Board
`to recognize Jacob Z. Zambrzycki pro hac vice during these proceedings
`because “Mr. Zambrzycki is an experienced litigation attorney,” “has been
`involved in numerous litigations involving patent infringement in U.S.
`District Courts across the country, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit, and the International Trade Commission,” and “has been a litigation
`attorney for over 10 years, and has represented a wide range of clients in
`patent litigation matters.” Mot. 2. Petitioner further states that “Mr.
`
`
`2 We cite to Papers in IPR2020-01299. Similar items were filed in
`IPR2020-01386.
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01299 (Patent 8,630,761 B2)
`IPR2020-01386 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`Zambrzycki is extremely familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`proceeding” because he “was involved in preparing the Petition in this
`proceeding[] and in the related [IPRs],” in which he is applying for or has
`been granted permission to appear pro hac vice, and, “[t]hroughout this
`process, Mr. Zambrzycki has gained relevant technical knowledge and
`experience in the field of electric hybrid vehicles and the various prior art
`references cited in the Petition.” Id. at 3.
`Each Motion is supported by a Declaration (including a biography) of
`Mr. Zambrzycki (Ex. 1087, “Decl.”) that attests to the statements above and
`complies with the requirements set forth in the Notice. See Decl. ¶¶ 1–9.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated that Mr. Zambrzycki
`has sufficient legal and technical qualifications and familiarity with the
`subject matter at issue, and that there is a need for Petitioner to have counsel
`with his experience. See, e.g., Decl. ¶¶ 1, 7, 9; Mot. 2–4. Petitioner
`therefore has established good cause for admitting Mr. Zambrzycki pro hac
`vice in each of the above-captioned proceedings.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Jacob Z. Zambrzycki in the above-captioned proceedings are granted;
`Mr. Zambrzycki is authorized to act as back-up counsel in these proceedings
`only;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Zambrzycki shall comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019), and
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01299 (Patent 8,630,761 B2)
`IPR2020-01386 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37,
`Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Zambrzycki is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules of
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01299 (Patent 8,630,761 B2)
`IPR2020-01386 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Vincent J. Galluzzo
`Scott L. Bittman
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`jsanok@crowell.com
`vgalluzzo@crowell.com
`sbittman@crowell.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Brian J. Livedalen
`Timothy W. Riffe
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`cordell@fr.com
`bvl@fr.com
`riffe@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket