throbber

`
`GUIDELINER® CATHETER
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`GuideLiner Catheter is Useful
`
`Both for Support and to Minimize
`
`Contrast Load by Super-Selective
`
`Injections in a High-Risk Chronic
`Renal Failure Patient
`
`PHYSICIANS
`Dr. Paolo Danna
`Dr. Alessandra Dozio
`
`Sacco Hospital ofMilan, Italy
`
`PRESENTATION
`
`Male presents with polycystic kidney disease and stage 4
`chronic renal failure; his cardiovascular history is significant
`for ventricular arrhythmia, syncope, hypertension and
`hyperlipidaemia.
`
`He was admitted to the hospital after a syncopal episode with
`post-traumatic renal and retroperitoneal hematoma, which
`was treated with selective embolization ofthe lower branch
`
`of left renal artery.
`
`Several complications occurred during hospitalization:
`progressive bleeding needing several transfusions, ventricular
`tachycardia (VT), acute pulmonary oedema and non—ST
`elevation myocardial infarction. An echocardiogram showed
`hypokinetic cardiomyopathy with severe reduction of ejection
`fraction (EF) and a mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation.
`
`INITIAL FINDINGS
`
`After the stabilization of his hemodynamic state, the patient
`was brought to the cath lab, where coronary angiography
`showed a three-vessel disease.The RCA showed extensive
`
`disease and a small calibre, the LCx showed subcritical
`
`stenosis of the ostium and mid—segment and a severe lesion
`in its distal part involving the PDA, and the LAD exhibited
`focal proximal disease.
`
`TREATMENT
`
`The patient was treated via PCI through the right radial
`approach using a 6F guiding catheter. The angioplasty ofthe
`LAD was optimized with a NO-eluting stent.
`
`(continued on back)
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44787
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2183
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2183
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`TREATMENT WITH GUIDELINER
`
`The PDA was studied with a GuideLiner catheter (Figures 1, 2
`& 3) as the instrument for a selective and minimized injection
`of contrast media. Afterwards, the same system was used to
`support and stabilize the implantation ofan everolimus-eluting
`stent (Figures 4,5 & 6). FFR of LCx was > 0.8, so the vessel was
`not treated.
`
`AFTER PCI
`
`Renal function was unchanged (serum creatinine, 2.2 mg/100ml)
`during the whole post-procedural stay. ECG monitoring showed
`a reduction in ventricular ectopic activity and subsequent evalu—
`ation showed the absence ofactive kidney bleeding.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`This case report shows an adjunctive advantage of the GuideLiner:
`minimization of contrast load in by super—selective coronary injec—
`tions, thereby potentially helping in preventing contrast-induced
`nephropathy.
`
`In our patient, the use ofthe GuideLiner system allowed the reduc-
`tion of the amount of contrast medium thanks to super—selective
`and optimized injection.This is potentially useful to preserve renal
`function in patients with chronic renal failure or other kidney dis-
`ease undergoing angiographic procedures.
`
`It is also important to consider the benefit ofthis system in urgent/
`emergent coronary procedures and in patients without adequate
`preparation against contrast-induced nephropathy.
`
`The GuideLiner system improves the selective evaluation of coro—
`nary anatomy, supports the deliverability of stents, and optimizes
`the use of contrast medium by minimizing its total volume with a
`possible consequent reduction in adverse renal events.
`
`Dr. Paolo Danna
`
`Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Ospedale
`Luigi Sacco, Milano, Italy.
`
`Dr. Alessandra Dozio
`
`Fellow in Cardiology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco,
`Milano, Italy.
`
`
`
`GuldeLinerCatheters areintended to be used in Conjunction with guide Catheters to aCCess discrete regions ofthe Coronary
`and/or peripheral vasculature, and to facilitate placementand exchange ofguideWIres and other interventional devices.
`Pleasesee the lnstructlonsfor Use fora complete listing ofthe indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
`CAUTION: Federal law (U.S.A.) restricts this deviceto sale by or on theorder of a physician.
`GuideLiner is a registered trademarkofVascularSolutions, Inc.
`All othertradernarks and registered trademarks are property oftheir respective owners.
`©2016VascularSolutions, Inc. All rights reserved. ML2682 Rev. B 10/16
`
`: :
`
`:
`
`1.-
`
`:
`.
`.
`‘
`
`? :3: 3
`
`Vasemar
`SOLUTIONS
`
`VascularSqutions,|nc.
`6464 Sycamore Court North
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369 USA
`Customer Service:
`United States: 888.240.6001
`International: (001) 763.656.4298
`customerservice@vasc.com
`www.vasc.com
`
`Page 2
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44788
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2183
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2183
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket