throbber

`
`GUIDELINER® CATHETER AND R350""GUIDEWIRE
`
`Contemporary Chronic Total
`Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary
`Intervention: GuideLiner Catheter
`
`and R350 Guidewire Facilitated
`
`Reverse-CART
`
`PHYSICIAN
`J. Aaron Grantham, MD, FACC, FSCAI
`
`Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`balloon (Figure 4).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PRESENTATION
`
`A male with inferior Ml two years ago was treated with
`primary PCI using a drug eluting stent deployed in the mid—
`right coronary artery (RCA). He presents now to his local
`cardiologist complaining of exertional shortness ofair for the
`preceding six months. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging
`demonstrated a large reversible defect in the RCA distribution
`involving 15% of the myocardium.
`
`INITIAL FINDINGS
`
`Coronary angiography revealed a chronic total occlusion
`(CTO) of the RCA beyond the previously deployed stent
`(Figure I). Attempted percutaneous coronary intervention
`(PCI) with antegrade wiring was unsuccessful. The occlusion
`extended past the bifurcation into the RPLV and PDA. He was
`referred for retrograde CTO-PCI, using the hybrid approachi.
`
`TREATMENT
`
`The CTO of the RCA was approached with retrograde crossing
`through a septal collateral from the LAD first septal perforator
`(Figure 2) using the Corsair® microcatheter and a Sion®
`wire (both from Asahi-Intecc, Nagoya, Japan). Retrograde
`dissection and re—entry was performed using the reverse
`controlled antegrade and retrograde dissection technique
`(XCART, Figure 3)2. After balloon inflation on the antegrade
`wire (long arrow) the retrograde wire could not be passed
`into the antegrade true lumen. A GuideLiner catheter was
`advanced antegrade into the distal RCA over a wire and
`
`Page 1
`
`(continued on back)
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44654
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2181
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2181
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`TREATMENT CONTINUED
`
`The GuideLiner was intubated (Figure 4, long arrow) with the
`retrograde wire (Confianza® Pro 12, Asahi—Intecc, Nagoya, Japan)
`via the Corsair (Figure 4, short arrow). The Corsair (Figure 5,
`short arrow) was then advanced into the GuideLiner (Figure
`5, long arrow) and the Confianza Pro 12 wire removed. An
`R350 guidewire was passed through the Corsair from the
`retrograde guide all the way out the antegrade guide and used
`for antegrade ballooning and stenting with rapid exchange
`gear. The RPLV branch could not be treated as the retrograde
`distal cap was ambiguous and could not be penetrated with
`retrograde wires. Final angiography revealed a large PDA with
`TIMI-III antegrade flow after deploying a 3.0 x 38mm long drug
`eluting stent in the distal RCA (Figure 6).
`
`CONCLUSION AND POST PROCEDURE
`
`The patient was dismissed the following day symptom free.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Vascular Solutions, Inc. has developed a portfolio of useful
`devices when approaching patients with complex chronic total
`occlusions. This case demonstrates the utility of the GuideLiner
`in facilitating reverse CART when re-entry with the retrograde
`wire is difficult. The R350 guidewire is a stainless steel wire with
`a 0.013" diameter that can be used as an externalization wire
`
`through the Corsair channel dilator for retrograde CTO-PCI.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1Brilakis E.S., Grantham J.A., et al., (201 2). J. Am. Coll. Card;
`Cardiovascular In t., 5, 368—79.
`
`2Saito S., (2008). Catheter and Cardiovascular Inter, F1, 8-19.
`
`J. Aaron Grantham, MD, FACC, FSCAI
`Dr. Grantham is an Associate Professor of
`Medicine at the University of Missouri, Kansas
`City and an Interventional Cardiologist at Saint
`Luke's Mid America Heart Institute.
`
`www.ctofundamentalsorg.
`
`For more information on the Hybrid approach to
`CTO—PCI, Dr. Grantham suggests physicians visit
`
`GuldeLinerCatheters areintended to be used in Conjunction with guide Catheters to aCCess discrete regions ofthe Coronary
`and/or peripheral vasculature, and to facilitate placementand exchange ofguideWIres and other interventional devices.
`Pleasesee the lnstructlonsfor Use fora complete listing ofthe indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
`CAUTION: Federal law (U.S.A.) restricts this deviceto sale by or on theorder of a physician.
`GuideLiner is a registered trademarkofVascularSolutions, Inc. R550 is a trademark of VascularSolutions, Inc.
`All other tradema rks and registered trademarks are property oftheir respective owners.
`©2016VascularSolutions, Inc. All rights reserved. ML2760 Rev. B 10/16
`
`
`
`aSCular
`S 0 L U 'I‘
`I U N S
`
`Page 2
`
`Vascular Solutions, Inc.
`6464 Sycamore Court North
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369 USA
`Customer Service:
`United States: 888.240.6001
`International: (001) 763.656.4298
`customerservice@vasc.com
`www.vasc.com
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44655
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2181
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2181
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket