throbber
(cid:56)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:31)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:19)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:19)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:89)(cid:20)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:30)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:30)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:16)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:78)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)
`(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:87)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:57)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:47)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:76)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:123)(cid:5)(cid:51)(cid:84)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)
`(cid:26)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:25)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:90)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:39)(cid:84)(cid:94)(cid:81)(cid:74)
`(cid:58)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:89)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:51)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:81)(cid:74)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:28)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:24)(cid:17)(cid:25)(cid:29)(cid:27)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:42)(cid:38)(cid:41)(cid:56)
`(cid:23)(cid:17)(cid:30)(cid:24)(cid:28)
`
`(cid:47)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:55)(cid:5)(cid:55)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:87)
`(cid:47)(cid:84)(cid:77)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:45)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:74)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:30)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:24)(cid:17)(cid:27)(cid:25)(cid:26)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:84)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:53)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:89)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:41)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:82)(cid:94)(cid:84)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:91)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:45)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:43)(cid:70)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:71)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:39)(cid:84)(cid:94)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:22)(cid:28)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:28)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:57)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:86)(cid:90)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:19)
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2146
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Review
`
`Catheter-Induced Coronary Artery Dissection: Risk Factors,
`Prevention and Management
`
`Andrew J. Boyle, MBBS, PhD, Michael Chan, MD, Joud Dib, MD, Jon Resar, MD
`
`ABSTRACT: Guide catheter-induced
`dissection of the coronary arteries is an
`uncommon but potentially catastrophic
`complication of diagnostic and intervention-
`al cardiac catheterization. Several factors
`placing the individual at higher risk of this
`complication have been identified. We dis-
`cuss these risk factors and utilize them to
`propose methods to prevent dissections.
`Management options of coronary artery dis-
`section are also discussed.
`J INVASIVE CARDIOL
`2006;18:500–503
`
`Figure 1. Catheter-induced dissection of the right coronary artery. (A) Diagnostic angiogram
`demonstrates a 90% lesion in the RCA (arrow). (B) Extensive dissection of the RCA antegrade
`from the catheter results in occlusion in the mid-RCA. A wire is seen distally in the vessel, but it
`cannot be determined if the wire is in the true lumen or false lumen. (C) Contrast injection
`through an over-the-wire balloon confirms the position of the balloon catheter in the true lumen.
`(D) Extensive stenting of the artery restores patency and TIMI-3 flow.
`
`Catheter-induced coronary artery
`dissection is an uncommon complica-
`tion of percutaneous coronary interven-
`tion and cardiac catheterization, but
`when it occurs, the outcomes can be
`devastating. The exact incidence
`remains unknown, with some suggesting
`it may be underreported.1 There are
`numerous reports of retrograde dissec-
`tion into the aortic root in the literature,
`as this subgroup appears to capture the
`imagination more than the more com-
`mon antegrade dissections. However,
`the outcomes of antegrade coronary
`artery dissection caused by coronary
`catheters can also be catastrophic. Still,
`there remains a paucity of data regarding
`the incidence, risk factors and manage-
`ment of iatrogenic catheter-induced dissection of coronary
`arteries per se. Additionally, the natural history of catheter-
`induced coronary artery dissection is incompletely described,
`but published reports describe varied outcomes. The choice
`of treatment, therefore, when confronted with catheter-
`induced coronary artery dissection, is currently made on a
`case-by-case basis, with no evidence-based guidelines to assist
`the operator. We present a case of catheter-induced coronary
`dissection and review the risk factors for this complication in
`
`From Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
`The authors report no conflicts of interest regarding the content herein.
`Manuscript submitted April 3, 2006 and accepted June 30, 2006.
`Address for correspondence: Jon R. Resar, MD, Director of Interventional Car-
`diology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, 600 North
`Wolfe Street, Blalock 524, Baltimore, MD, 21287. E-mail: jresar@jhmi.edu
`
`order to highlight methods to avoid its occurrence. We also dis-
`cuss the literature on management options when it does occur.
`
`Case Presentation
`A61-year-old male with a history of dyslipidemia and gas-
`troesophageal reflux disease was admitted with unstable angina.
`Cardiac catheterization showed a 90% proximal left anterior
`descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis and a right coronary
`artery (RCA) proximal 90% stenosis and mid-vessel 50% steno-
`sis (Figure 1A). Two-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention
`(PCI) was the preferred treatment strategy. The LAD was treat-
`ed with angioplasty and stenting, which was uncomplicated. The
`RCA was engaged with a 6 Fr Launcher Judkins Right 4 (JR4)
`guiding catheter (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota)
`which was unable to gain adequate engagement, and so was
`changed for a 6 Fr Launcher Noto guide catheter (Medtronic).
`
`500
`
`The Journal of Invasive Cardiology
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2146
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`The first fluoroscopic test injection demonstrated a spiral dissec-
`tion from the catheter to the mid-RCA where there was occlusion
`of flow, and the patient suddenly complained of severe chest pain.
`There was ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads of the electro-
`cardiogram (ECG). A Luge™ soft-tip guidewire (Boston Scientific
`Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) was rapidly inserted, and a
`Maverick®2.5 x 9 mm over-the-wire balloon catheter (Boston Sci-
`entific) was advanced into the artery to beyond the occlusion
`(Figure 1B). Position within the true lumen was confirmed by
`contrast injection through the balloon catheter (Figure 1C). The
`artery was stented with 3 Cypher®sirolimus-eluting stents (Cordis
`Corp., Miami, Florida) 2.5 x 28 mm, 2.75 x 33 mm and 3.0 x
`33 mm from the distal to proximal segments. The procedural
`result was excellent with TIMI-3 flow distally, no residual steno-
`sis and resolution of the patient’s chest pain and ECG changes
`(Figure 1D). There was no postprocedural cardiac enzyme eleva-
`tion, and the patient was discharged the following day.
`
`Discussion
`The incidence of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection at
`the time of cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary
`intervention is not known. Catheter-induced dissection with
`retrograde extension to the aortic root, a feared complication
`of cardiac catheterization, is rare and has been estimated to
`occur in approximately 0.008 to 0.02% of diagnostic
`catheterizations and 0.06 to 0.07% of percutaneous coronary
`interventions,2,3 but the overall incidence of catheter-induced
`dissections remains unknown. The natural history of coro-
`nary artery dissections is varied. In some cases, dissections
`lead to acute closure of the vessel with resultant myocardial
`infarction.4 In other circumstances, retrograde extension of
`the dissection back to involve the aorta can occur,5,6 and in
`some cases, dissections of the coronary artery have been asso-
`ciated with persistently normal (TIMI-3) flow into the distal
`arterial bed, with no damage to the heart muscle, and have
`healed without any intervention.7 It is this wide variety of
`potential clinical outcomes that hampers attempts to stan-
`dardize treatment for iatrogenic coronary artery dissections. It
`is critical, therefore, that each clinical scenario is evaluated on
`its own merits. A number of features mandate immediate
`revascularization, but in other situations, an expectant
`approach can be considered. We discuss the salient features of
`catheter-induced coronary artery dissection and propose an
`approach to this clinical situation.
`Risk factors for catheter-induced coronary artery dis-
`section. A number of factors are associated with increased
`risk for coronary artery dissection:
`1. Left main disease. Left main disease has been demon-
`strated as a risk factor for catheter-induced dissection, as well
`as being associated with poor outcomes. Devlin and colleagues
`detailed the association of left main disease, and even left main
`calcification in the absence of visible atherosclerosis and
`catheter-induced dissection of the left main coronary artery.8
`In the same series, 14 of the 20 left main dissections were due
`to contact of the catheter with the plaque. This highlights the
`importance of using catheters that are appropriately sized,
`positioned and coaxially aligned with the artery.
`
`Catheter-Induced Dissection
`
`2. The use of Amplatz-shaped catheters.6
`3. Catheterization for acute myocardial infarction.6
`Possible, but not definite, factors that have been suggested
`to increase the likelihood of coronary artery dissection include:
`1. Catheter manipulations.9
`2. Vigorous contrast injection.4
`3. Deep intubations of the catheter within the coronary
`artery.9
`4. Variant anatomy of the coronary ostia.10
`5. Vigorous, deep inspiration.11
`Prevention of catheter-induced coronary artery dissec-
`tion. Some of the above factors are modifiable, such as choice
`of guide catheter and handling techniques, whereas others can-
`not be altered, such as acute myocardial infarction. In these
`cases, awareness of the potential risk may aid in rapid recogni-
`tion of complications, and therefore potentially improve the
`speed with which definitive therapy may be instituted.
`We recommend using appropriately sized and shaped
`catheters to avoid the contrast injection being directed at a
`plaque. Initial contrast injections should not be forceful until
`correct coaxial alignment of the catheter has been demon-
`strated. Contrast should not be injected if the pressure is
`damped, as this may be due to the catheter resting against a
`plaque in the artery. Finally, the choice of guide catheter is a
`risk-benefit tradeoff between extra backup and the possibility
`of deep intubation and subsequent coronary artery dissection.
`This decision must be at the operator’s discretion and must
`be made on a case-by-case basis, however, the operator
`should be aware of the possibility of dissection when using
`more aggressive guide catheters.
`Management of catheter-induced coronary artery dissec-
`tion. The outcomes of coronary artery dissection, and therefore
`the management of the condition, depend on the patency of the
`distal vessel and the extent of propagation of the dissection. If
`there is compromise to the distal artery bed, such as acute closure
`of the artery, urgent revascularization is mandated to prevent
`infarction of that myocardial territory. This may be achieved by
`percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery
`bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and the decision on which revas-
`cularization method is used must be at the discretion of the oper-
`ators. There have been reports of successful outcomes with
`coronary artery stenting,9,12,13 and CABG.4,14,15 Similarly, even in
`the absence of acute vessel closure, if there is any suggestion of
`myocardial ischemia, such as new ECG changes or chest pain,
`urgent revascularization should also be undertaken to prevent
`myocardial infarction, as myocardial infarction may be seen even
`with TIMI-2 or -3 flow.3 However, if the vessel remains patent,
`but a dissection is seen angiographically without obstruction to
`flow, then the therapeutic options are less clear. Conservative
`management of guide catheter-induced coronary artery dissec-
`tion has met with successful outcomes in selected patients.4,7 The
`choice of stenting versus conservative management is therefore
`made on a case-by-case basis.
`The extent of propagation of the dissection may alter
`management decisions. Dissections may remain localized, or
`they may extend in the antegrade or retrograde directions, or
`
`Vol. 18, No. 10, October 2006
`
`501
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2146
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`BOYLE, et al.
`
`Dissection recognized
`
`Consider IABP insertion
`
`Advance soft-tip wire
`into true lumen
`
`Confirm intraluminal
`position with OTW
`balloon
`
`Intraluminal
`
`False lumen
`
`Stent distal-to-
`proximal
`
`Rewire into true
`lumen
`
`Retrograde propagation
`to ascending aorta?
`
`Unable to access
`true lumen
`
`Emergency
`CABG
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`Extensive dissection,
`hemodynamic
`instability, ischemia?
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`Emergency surgery
`
`Perform ancillary imaging (CT, TEE, MRI)
`to define extent of dissection
`
`Consider surgery or observation
`
`Figure 2. Algorithm for risk assessment and treatment of guide catheter-induced coronary artery dissection.
`
`502
`
`The Journal of Invasive Cardiology
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2146
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`both. Localized dissection flaps have been successfully treated
`conservatively,4 although others have described aggressive
`healing of these dissections, resulting in scar formation
`obstructing coronary flow.16 There may, therefore, be some
`benefit to more definitive revascularization therapy at the
`time the dissection occurs in order to prevent this late steno-
`sis. However, in this situation, there is not enough evidence
`to guide therapy, and the decision must be made individually
`for each patient, taking into account the risk of the procedure
`and subsequent antiplatelet therapy, versus the risks of treat-
`ing the patient medically.
`Extensive antegrade dissection can result in acute vessel
`closure and infarction of the vascular territory supplied by
`that artery. These dissections can often be treated by percu-
`taneous intervention and, therefore, most operators would
`advocate that antegrade dissections be treated with PCI as
`soon as they are recognized. Soft-tip wires should be used
`to carefully attempt to access the true lumen,12,17 and con-
`trast should be injected through an over-the-wire balloon
`to confirm location in the true lumen. If the initial attempt
`fails and enters the false lumen, another soft-tip wire
`should be carefully manipulated into the true lumen.17
`Consideration should be given to insertion of an intra-aor-
`tic balloon pump (IABP). If there is any delay in restora-
`tion of flow, the cardiac surgeons should be consulted
`regarding urgent bypass surgery.
`If there is retrograde propagation of the dissection to
`involve the aortic wall, the extent to which the aorta or its
`branches are involved will dictate the immediate manage-
`ment. Aorto-coronary dissections can remain localized to the
`sinus of Valsalva, or may extend into the ascending aorta.2,3,18
`They have even been described to extend to the aortic bifur-
`cation.19 It has been recommended that cases of localized
`aorto-coronary dissection not complicated by ischemia or
`hemodynamic instability can be managed conservatively.1
`However, if ischemia of any of the aortic branches occurs, if
`there is extensive dissection or if there is hemodynamic insta-
`bility, urgent surgery is the treatment of choice. Retrograde
`dissection involving the aorta should be assessed on clinical
`grounds and by urgent transesophageal echocardiography in
`the catheterization laboratory or by urgent computed tomog-
`raphy scan. It is reasonable to attempt to seal the entry site of
`the dissection with PCI and stenting first, and then the
`extent of dissection can be assessed. A cardiac surgical opin-
`ion should be sought early. Any ischemia, hemodynamic
`compromise or extensive dissection should prompt immedi-
`ate treatment with surgical repair of the aortic dissection.
`However, in the absence of these high-risk features, class I or
`II dissections may be managed conservatively.
`A proposal has been made by Dunning and colleagues6
`for a classification system based upon the extent of aortic
`
`Catheter-Induced Dissection
`
`involvement: Class 1: the contrast staining involves only the
`coronary cusp; Class II: contrast extends up the aortic wall
`< 40 mm; Class III: contrast extends > 40 mm up the aortic
`wall. In their series, the extent of propagation of aortic dis-
`section yielded prognostic information, with Class III dis-
`sections having uniformly poor outcomes. This classification
`may be useful for risk stratification.
`We propose, in Figure 2, a management protocol for
`catheter-induced coronary artery dissection that takes into
`account the few known high-risk features and prognostic
`indicators to guide management. Hopefully, with careful
`attention to avoid known predisposing factors, this complica-
`tion can be avoided where possible and, if encountered, can
`be managed in an appropriate and timely manner.
`
`References
`1. Brinker JA. Editorial comment: Geeez! Oh my God! Oops! #&*&††? Cathet Car-
`diovasc Diagn1998;43:280–281.
`2. Perez-Castellano N, GarcÌa-Fernandez MA, GarcÌa EJ, Delcan JL. Dissection of the
`aortic sinus of valsalva complicating coronary catheterization: Cause, mechanism,
`evolution, and management. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn1998;43:273–279.
`3. Carter AJ, Brinker JA. Dissection of the ascending aorta associated with coronary
`angiography. Am J Cardiol1994;73:922–923.
`4. Awadalla H, Sabet S, Sebaie AE, et al. Catheter-induced left main dissection inci-
`dence, predisposition and therapeutic strategies: Experience from two sides of the
`hemisphere. JInvasive Cardiol2005;17:233–236.
`5. Goldstein JA, Casserly IP, Katsiyiannis WT, et al. Aortocoronary dissection compli-
`cating a percutaneous coronary intervention. JInvasive Cardiol2003;15:89–92.
`6. Dunning DW, Kahn JK, Hawkins ET, O'Neill WW. Iatrogenic coronary artery
`dissections extending into and involving the aortic root. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
`2000;51:387–393.
`7. Nikolsky E, Boulos M, Amikam S. Spontaneous healing of a long, catheter-induced
`right coronary artery dissection. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent2003;5:211.
`8. Devlin G, Lazzam L, Schwartz L. Mortality related to diagnostic cardiac catheriza-
`tion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging(formerly Cardiac Imaging) 1997;13:379–384.
`9. Jain D, Kurowski V, Katus HA, Richardt G. Catheter-induced dissection of the left
`main coronary artery, the nemesis of an invasive cardiologist. Zeitschrift fur Kardi-
`ologie2002;91:840.
`10. Curtis MJ, Traboulsi M, Knudtson ML, Lester WM. Left main coronary artery dis-
`section during cardiac catheterization. Can J Cardiol1992;8:725–728.
`11. Biel SI, Krone RJ. Left coronary artery dissection with an amplatz-shaped catheter.
`The role of vigorous inspiration during contrast injection. Chest1984;86:640–641.
`12. Al-Saif S, Liu M, Al-Mubarak N, et al. Percutaneous treatment of catheter-induced
`dissection of the left main coronary artery and adjacent aortic wall. Catheter Cardio-
`vasc Interv2000;49:86–89.
`13. Kim J-Y, Yoon J, Jung H-S, et al. Percutaneous coronary stenting in guide-induced
`aortocoronary dissection: Angiographic and CT findings. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
`(formerly Cardiac Imaging)2005;21:375–378.
`14. Awadalla H, Salloum J, Smalling RW, Sdringola S. Catheter-induced dissection of
`the left main coronary artery with and without extension to the aortic root: A report
`of two cases and a review of the literature. JIntervent Cardiol 2004;17:253–257.
`15. Gur M, Yilmaz R, Demirbag R, Kunt A. Large atherosclerotic plaque related severe
`right coronary artery dissection during coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc
`Imaging (formerly Cardiac Imaging)2006;22:1–5.
`16. Mulvihill NT, Boccalatte M, Fajadet J, Marco J. Catheter-induced left main dissec-
`tion: A treatment dilemma. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2003;59:214–216.
`17. Chai H-T, Yang C-H, Wu C-J, et al. Utilization of a double-wire technique to treat
`long extended spiral dissection of the right coronary artery. Evaluation of incidence
`and mechanisms. Int Heart J2005;46:35–44.
`18. Alfonso F, Almeria C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, et al. Aortic dissection occurring during
`coronary angioplasty: Angiographic and transesophageal echocardiographic find-
`ings. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn1997;42:412–415.
`19. Moles VP, Chappuis F, Simonet F, et al. Aortic dissection as complication of per-
`cutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
`1992;26:8–11.
`
`Vol. 18, No. 10, October 2006
`
`
`
`View publication statsView publication stats
`
`503
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2146
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket