throbber
Subadventitial Advancement of a Mother-and-Child
`Catheter to Allow Successful Recanalization of a
`Complex In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion:
`Testing the Resistance of the Adventitia
`
`Luciano Candilio, MD(Res)1,2; Satoru Mitomo, MD1; Mauro Carlino, MD1; Antonio Colombo, MD1;
`Lorenzo Azzalini, MD, PhD, MSc1
`
`ABSTRACT: In-stent chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents a challenging lesion subset for percutaneous coronary intervention
`(PCI), and although a true-to-true lumen crossing is the first-line strategy, a subadventitial approach may become necessary.
`Here we describe a case of successful in-stent right coronary artery CTO-PCI performed with subadventitial crossing, crushing of
`the occluded stents, and advancement of a mother-and-child catheter to the distal right coronary artery through the subadven-
`titial space to allow stent delivery. The use of intracoronary imaging in this setting proved crucial to confirm adequate apposition
`of the newly implanted stents and optimal crushing of the occluded stents.
`
`J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2017;29(12):E190-E194.
`KEY WORDS: chronic total occlusion, in-stent restenosis, subadventitial
`
`Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) represent one of the
`
`most challenging lesion subsets for percutaneous
`coronary intervention (PCI), and those secondary
`to in-stent restenosis have historically been associated with
`higher failure rates.1,2 True-to-true lumen crossing, achieved
`by either a wire-based approach or by means of the CrossBoss
`catheter (Boston Scientific), is the optimal strategy to recana-
`lize in-stent CTOs.3 However, this is sometimes impossible to
`achieve, and alternative crossing strategies need to be pursued.
`Subadventitial crossing followed by external crushing of
`the occluded stent has been anecdotally reported as a feasible
`strategy to overcome “uncrossable” in-stent CTOs.4,5 Howev-
`er, in such cases, the occluded stents were rather short, which
`allowed stent delivery with conventional techniques.
`Herein, we describe a case of successful recanalization of
`a CTO due to a long occlusive restenosis in two overlap-
`ping stents in the mid-to-distal right coronary artery (RCA).
`Since true-to-true crossing could not be achieved, subadven-
`titial crossing with subsequent stent crushing was performed.
`However, the extensive length of the crushed stent segments
`prevented advancement of new stents into the distal true lu-
`men. Therefore, a mother-and-child catheter was successfully
`advanced through the subadventitial channel to allow stent
`delivery. Invasive imaging confirmed optimal apposition of
`the newly implanted stents and adequate crushing of the oc-
`cluded stents.
`
`Case Presentation
`A 54-year-old man was admitted for a third attempt at
`RCA-CTO recanalization. He was known to have hyperten-
`sion, dyslipidemia, smoking habit, and significant coronary
`
`artery disease (CAD), having undergone multiple PCIs to the
`three coronary arteries. In particular, he had received multi-
`ple bare-metal stents in his RCA, which were found to be
`occluded 10 years earlier. The patient remained symptomat-
`ic despite optimal medical therapy and myocardial perfusion
`imaging demonstrated inducible ischemia in the inferior wall.
`Two unsuccessful PCIs of the RCA-CTO were performed
`through both antegrade and retrograde approaches.
`The occlusion extended from the ostium to both the
`posterolateral (PL) branch and posterior descending artery
`(PDA), and presented proximal cap ambiguity, multiple focal
`areas of calcification, and a short island of patent vessel (vi-
`sualized through an ipsilateral epicardial collateral from the
`proximal RCA; Mashayekhi type B6) just proximal to two
`overlapping occluded stents in the mid-to-distal RCA (Fig-
`ures 1A and 1B). The Japanese-CTO score was 5.
`In previously failed CTO-PCIs, antegrade true-to-true
`crossing was attempted with multiple guidewires of different
`tip shape, which consistently tracked outside the occluded
`stents in the mid RCA (Figure 1C) due to gross stent under-
`sizing (Figure 2). A retrograde approach was performed via
`ipsilateral epicardial collaterals from the proximal to the mid
`RCA in an attempt to recanalize the proximal segment of
`the occlusion and therefore to facilitate a staged attempt at
`revascularization of the more distal part of the CTO. How-
`ever, vessel calcification and the steep angle between the
`landing of the epicardial collateral and the occluded vessel
`prevented retrograde microcatheter advancement and wire
`externalization (Figure 1D). Therefore, antegrade balloon
`angioplasty of the occluded proximal RCA was performed
`(investment procedure; Figures 1E and 1F).
`
`E190
`
`The Journal of InvasIve CardIology®
`
`BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
`
`H MP Com munications
`Copyright 2017
`For Personal Use Only
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2136
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 1. First procedure: right coronary artery (RCA) in-stent chronic total occlusion.
`(A) The occlusion is very long, with proximal cap ambiguity, multiple focal areas of cal-
`cification, and a short island of patent vessel just proximal to two overlapping occluded
`stents in the mid-to-distal RCA. (B) Ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (from the proximal
`to the mid RCA), as well as contralateral septal (from the left anterior descending to
`the acute marginal) and epicardial (from the circumflex to the posterolateral) channels
`are visualized. (C) Antegrade true-to-true crossing fails, with wires tracking outside the
`occluded stents in the mid RCA. (D) The retrograde approach through an epicardial
`ipsilateral collateral also fails due to impossibility in overcoming the steep angle, as
`indicated by the arrow. (E) Balloon predilation in the subadventitial space is performed
`(investment procedure). (F) Final result.
`
`For the current procedure, dual
`access was secured via left radial ar-
`tery and right femoral artery with
`7 Fr sheaths. Baseline angiography
`showed similar findings as prior to
`the previous attempt (Figure 3A). The
`retrograde approach was attempted
`with a Turnpike LP microcatheter
`(Vascular Solutions) and a Sion wire
`(Asahi Intecc) via epicardial collater-
`als from the circumflex, to no avail
`due to their extreme tortuosity (Fig-
`ures 3B and 3C).
`An antegrade approach was there-
`fore undertaken with the CrossBoss
`catheter, which tracked outside the
`stents in the mid RCA due to the
`aforementioned
`stent-vessel
`size
`mismatch (Figure 3D). CrossBoss
`wire-redirection was similarly un-
`successful.
`Subsequently, a knuckle wire was
`created with a Fielder FC (Asahi In-
`tecc). Due to difficulty in advanc-
`ing the knuckled wire through the
`subadventitial space in the crushed
`stent area, the Turnpike LP itself was
`knuckled and successfully advanced
`to the distal RCA (Figure 3E). The
`subintimal
`tracking and re-entry
`(STAR) technique was performed
`and the wire crossed into the PL branch (Figure 3F).
`Extensive lesion predilation was then achieved using
`a 2.5 x 20 mm non-compliant (NC) balloon and a
`2.5 x 30 mm semicompliant balloon, with subsequent
`crushing of the occluded stents (Figure 4A). However,
`it was not possible to pass a new stent to the distal
`RCA through the subadventitial space. A 7 Fr Guide-
`Liner mother-and-child catheter (Vascular Solutions)
`was therefore advanced through the channel creat-
`ed in the subadventitial space, outside the occluded/
`crushed stents, using the stepwise repeated distal bal-
`loon anchoring technique7 (Figure 4B; Videos 1 and
`2), with subsequent implantation of five overlapping
`drug-eluting stents (3.0 x 38 mm, 3.5 x 38 mm, 4.0 x
`38 mm, 4.0 x 38 mm, and 5.0 x 12 mm) from the PL
`branch to the ostial RCA. High-pressure postdilation
`was carried out using 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and
`5.0 mm NC balloons from the distal to the proximal
`segments. Excellent angiographic result was obtained
`(Figures 4C and 4D), and both intravascular ultrasound
`(IVUS) and optical coherence tomography confirmed
`optimal crushing of the occluded stents and expansion
`of the newly implanted stents (Figure 5).
`
`FIGURE 2. Quantitative coronary analysis of the occluded stents with
`relative measurements. Two overlapping stents for a total length of 30
`mm are visualized in the mid-to-distal right coronary artery, with evi-
`dence of gross stent undersizing at the level of the distal part of the
`overlapping segment.
`
`vol. 29, no. 12, deCember 2017
`
`E191
`
`Subadventitial advancement for a complex cto
`
`candilio, et al.
`
`H MP Com munications
`Copyright 2017
`For Personal Use Only
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2136
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`The patient was discharged the
`following day on long-term dual-an-
`tiplatelet therapy and was asymptom-
`atic at subsequent follow-up exam.
`
`Discussion
`CTO due to in-stent occlusive
`restenosis represents a particularly
`challenging lesion subset and can be
`secondary to neointima formation,
`neoatherosclerosis, adverse reaction
`to polymer, or stent thrombosis, frac-
`ture, malapposition, or under-expan-
`sion.3,8 Despite potential advantages
`deriving from the use of previously
`implanted stents as a roadmap9 to
`guide through the occluded vessel,
`in-stent CTO-PCI has traditionally
`been associated with lower success
`rates when compared with PCI for
`de novo CTOs.1,2 Inability to wire
`the occlusion is the most frequent
`mechanism of failure of both in-stent
`and native coronary artery CTO-
`PCI; however, balloon-uncrossable
`and balloon-unexpandable
`lesions
`are more frequent with in-stent
`CTO1 due to the resistance offered
`by stent struts in close proximity
`to the guidewire.9 Nevertheless, as
`a result of technical developments
`(lower-profile microcatheters and
`balloons, steerable wires, CrossBoss)
`and the introduction of the hybrid
`algorithm,10 procedural success rates
`of in-stent CTO-PCIs have recently
`become comparable to those for de
`novo CTOs.3,11
`
`FIGURE 4. (A) Subadventitial crushing of
`the occluded stents is performed with
`2.5 mm balloons. (B) A 7 Fr GuideLiner
`is advanced to the distal right coronary
`artery (RCA) through the subadventitial
`space using the stepwise repeated dis-
`tal balloon anchoring technique.7 Five
`drug-eluting stents were
`implanted
`from the posterolateral branch to the
`RCA ostium, with optimal angiograph-
`ic result confirmed with intravascular
`ultrasound imaging (C and D). Note the
`much larger final lumen diameter (C)
`compared with the baseline situation
`shown in Figure 2.
`
`E192
`
`FIGURE 3. Second procedure. (A) Baseline angiography is unchanged from the initial
`attempt. (B) Tortuous epicardial collaterals from the circumflex are accessed (C) with a
`Turnpike LP microcatheter and a Sion wire, to no avail due to extreme tortuosity. (D) The
`CrossBoss tracks outside the occluded stents. (E) The Turnpike LP and a Fielder FC wire
`are knuckled in the subadventitial space and (F) advanced, reaching the true lumen in the
`posterolateral branch (arrow).
`
`The Journal of InvasIve CardIology®
`
`Subadventitial advancement for a complex cto
`
`candilio, et al.
`
`H MP Com munications
`Copyright 2017
`For Personal Use Only
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2136
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 5. Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography showing adequate crushing of the occluded stents and
`optimal expansion and apposition of the newly implanted stents. Arrowheads indicate crushed stent struts.
`
`In particular, the use of the CrossBoss, an over-the-wire
`catheter with a blunt, atraumatic 3 Fr tip, offers the oppor-
`tunity of a quick, safe, within-stent, true-to-true crossing,
`utilizing the “fast-spin” technique.9 However, in the current
`case, we could not manage to engage the CrossBoss into
`the occluded stent, likely due to the lower resistance of the
`subadventitial space compared with the intraplaque plane,
`as well as the gross stent under-sizing. Wire redirection was
`also unsuccessful.
`Alternative techniques, including antegrade-wire esca-
`lation and the retrograde approach through ipsilateral and
`contralateral epicardial collaterals, were attempted to no
`avail. Subadventitial crossing with subsequent crushing,
`which has previously been shown feasible both antegradely5
`and retrogradely,4 appeared the only remaining option to re-
`canalize such a complex occlusion in a severely symptomatic
`patient. An important point of concern is represented by the
`possibility of vessel perforation/laceration from predilation
`underneath the thin adventitial layer and against the resis-
`tant metallic stent. For this reason, some operators advocate
`against performing aggressive stent sizing and postdilation,
`which could, however, lead to subsequent new episodes of
`in-stent restenosis.
`Crucially, experimental evidence indicates that the ad-
`ventitia possesses very high tensile strength compared with
`inner layers,12 thus allowing aggressive manipulation (includ-
`ing rotational atherectomy13) and safe CTO recanalization, as
`long as advancement of wires and other devices takes place
`through a plane that is longitudinal to the vessel main axis.14
`
`In the current case, a large-bore device – a 7 Fr Guide-
`Liner – was advanced through a long subadventitial channel
`from the mid to the distal RCA. To the best of our knowl-
`edge, this is the first description of this technique. This ma-
`neuver became necessary because stent delivery to the distal
`vessel was impossible, despite extensive crushing of the oc-
`cluded stents. Fully expanded balloons in this setting (Figure
`4A) indicated that the underlying mechanism was subadven-
`titial space recoil. Therefore, utilization of a device able to
`prevent collapse of the subadventitial space, such as a moth-
`er-and-child catheter, appeared the best choice. Advancing
`the GuideLiner with the stepwise repeated distal-balloon
`anchoring technique7 (Figure 4B) was crucial to the deliv-
`ery of long stents to the distal vessel, thus avoiding friction
`and interference by the distorted struts of the long, crushed,
`occluded stents. This novel utilization of a mother-and-child
`catheter through a long subadventitial channel following ex-
`ternal crushing of occluded stents confirms the high tensile
`strength of the adventitia.12
`Another important element in the safe and successful per-
`formance of such an aggressive intervention is represented by
`the use of intravascular imaging to confirm optimal apposition
`of the newly implanted stents and adequate crushing of the
`occluded stents. There is solid evidence indicating that com-
`pared to angiography guidance alone, IVUS-guided CTO-
`PCI is associated with better mid-term outcomes, including
`lower incidence of myocardial infarction and target-vessel
`revascularization.15 In the setting of in-stent CTO treated
`with subadventitial crushing of a long segment of occluded
`
`vol. 29, no. 12, deCember 2017
`
`E193
`
`Subadventitial advancement for a complex cto
`
`candilio, et al.
`
`H MP Com munications
`Copyright 2017
`For Personal Use Only
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2136
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`stents, the indication for invasive imaging appears even more
`compelling. However, specific outcome data are lacking due
`to the very low frequency of such procedures, and evidence
`derives from anecdotal case reports.4,5
`
`Conclusion
`We report a challenging case of successful in-stent CTO
`recanalization achieved with an unconventional approach
`represented by the combination of subadventitial crushing
`of occluded stents and the innovative use of a mother-and-
`child catheter through the subadventitial space and along-
`side the crushed stents. Invasive imaging confirmed opti-
`mal apposition of the newly implanted stents. Clearly, the
`techniques described in this article should be considered by
`operators with advanced skills tackling complex cases, and
`when conventional techniques and maneuvers have proved
`unsuccessful.
`
`References
`1. Abbas AE, Brewington SD, Dixon SR, Boura J, Grines CL, O’Neill WW.
`Success, safety, and mechanisms of failure of percutaneous coro-
`nary intervention for occlusive non-drug-eluting in-stent resteno-
`sis versus native artery total occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1462-
`1466.
`2. Werner GS, Moehlis H, Tischer K. Management of total restenotic oc-
`clusions. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:D79-D83.
`3. Azzalini L, Dautov R, Ojeda S, et al. Procedural and long-term outcomes
`of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent chronic total occlu-
`sion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:892-902. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
`4. Capretti G, Mitomo S, Giglio M, et al. Subintimal crush of an occluded
`stent to recanalize a chronic total occlusion due to in-stent resteno-
`sis: insights from a multimodality imaging approach. JACC Cardiovasc
`Interv. 2017;10:e81-e83.
`5. Roy J, Lucking A, Strange J, Spratt JC. The difference between success
`and failure: subintimal stenting around an occluded stent for treat-
`ment of a chronic total occlusion due to in-stent restenosis. J Invasive
`Cardiol. 2016;28:E136-E138.
`6. Mashayekhi K, Behnes M, Akin I, Kaiser T, Neuser H. Novel retro-
`grade approach for percutaneous treatment of chronic total oc-
`clusions of the right coronary artery using ipsilateral collateral
`connections: a European centre experience. EuroIntervention.
`2016;11:e1231-e1236.
`7. Andreou C, Karalis I, Maniotis C, Jukema JW, Koutouzis M. Guide ex-
`tension catheter stepwise advancement facilitated by repeated distal
`balloon anchoring. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18:66-69.
`8. Mori H, Lutter C, Yahagi K, et al. Pathology of chronic total occlusion
`in bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents: implications for revascular-
`ization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:367-378.
`9. Wilson WM, Walsh S, Hanratty C, et al. A novel approach to the man-
`agement of occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR). EuroIntervention.
`2014;9:1285-1293.
`10. Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, et al. A percutaneous treatment
`algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardio-
`vasc Interv. 2012;5:367-379.
`11. Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The efficacy of “hy-
`brid” percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions
`caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry.
`Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:646-651.
`
`12. Teng Z, Tang D, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Hoffman AH. An experimental
`study on the ultimate strength of the adventitia and media of human
`atherosclerotic carotid arteries in circumferential and axial directions.
`Clin Lymphoma. 2009;42:2535-2539.
`13. Capretti G, Carlino M, Colombo A, Azzalini L. Rotational atherectomy
`in the subadventitial space to allow safe and successful chronic total
`occlusion recanalization: pushing the limit further. Catheter Cardio-
`vasc Interv. 2017 Apr 18 (Epub ahead of print).
`14. Azzalini L, Carlino M, Brilakis ES, et al. Subadventitial techniques for
`chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: the con-
`cept of “vessel architecture.” Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 17
`(Epub ahead of print).
`15. Shin DH, Hong SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Effects of intravascular ul-
`trasound-guided
`versus
`angiography-guided new-generation
`drug-eluting stent implantation: meta-analysis with individual pa-
`tient-level data from 2,345 randomized patients. JACC Cardiovasc
`Interv. 2016;9:2232-2239.
`
`From 1the Division of Interventional Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Depart-
`ment, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; and the 2Department of Car-
`diology, The Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
`
`Disclosure: The authors have completed and returned the ICMJE Form for Disclo-
`sure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Azzalini reports personal fees from Guer-
`bet and grant funds from Acist Medical Systems. The remaining authors report no
`conflicts of interest regarding the content herein.
`
`Manuscript submitted March 30, 2017 and accepted April 20, 2017.
`
`Address for correspondence: Lorenzo Azzalini, MD, PhD, MSc, Division of Inter-
`ventional Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scien-
`tific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Email: azzalini.lorenzo@hsr.it
`
`E194
`
`The Journal of InvasIve CardIology®
`
`Subadventitial advancement for a complex cto
`
`candilio, et al.
`
`H MP Com munications
`Copyright 2017
`For Personal Use Only
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2136
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket