throbber
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 83:929–932 (2014)
`
`The Utility of a GuidelinerTM Catheter in Retrograde
`Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of a Chronic Total
`Occlusion With Reverse CART—The “Capture”
`Technique
`
`Abdul M. Mozid,1* BMedSci, MRCP, MD, John R. Davies,1
`James C. Spratt,2
`FRCP, MD, FACC, FESC
`
`MRCP, PhD, and
`
`The hybrid approach to percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) of
`coronary arteries requires both antegrade and retrograde skillsets. In the retrograde
`approach, wire externalization through the antegrade guide catheter often requires the
`use of a short donor guide catheter and a long (>150 cm) micro-catheter. Despite this
`there are occasions where the micro-catheter is unable to reach the anterograde guide
`catheter because of long collateral channels particularly when the retrograde limb
`involves a bypass graft. We report such a case where retrograde intervention was
`used to treat a right coronary artery (RCA) CTO in a patient with stable angina. The ret-
`rograde limb involved a saphenous vein graft to the native circumflex artery, which in
`turn provided collateral channels to the distal RCA. After performing reverse controlled
`anterograde and retrograde sub-intimal tracking (CART), the retrograde micro-catheter
`was only able to reach the mid RCA. To solve this, a GuidelinerTM catheter was passed
`on the antegrade wire and successfully advanced over and “captured” the retrograde
`micro-catheter. Wire externalization was then completed and the RCA was subse-
`quently stented with a good final angiographic result. This case illustrates a novel
`approach to completing wire externalization and provides a further indication for the
`role of the GuidelinerTM catheter in treating CTOs.
`VC 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
`
`Key words: chronic total occlusion; retrograde PCI; reverse CART
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a coronary artery
`is identified in 15–30% of patients undergoing diagnos-
`tic angiography [1,2]. This complex lesion subset
`remains a strong predictor for referral for coronary ar-
`tery bypass surgery (CABG) [2]. However, in patients
`with single vessel disease or those with multi-vessel
`disease and low/intermediate SYNTAX scores, percuta-
`neous coronary intervention (PCI) should be considered
`[3]. Successful re-canalization of a CTO is associated
`with improved cardiac function and clinical outcome
`[4]. Historically, an antegrade only approach to CTO
`re-canalization is associated with a success rate of 60–
`70% [4]. However, in recent years there have been sig-
`nificant developments in techniques and equipment so
`that there now exists multiple intervention strategies. A
`“hybrid” approach to CTO intervention has been pro-
`posed with a treatment algorithm based upon initial
`angiographic evaluation of the coronary anatomy and
`
`VC 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
`
`prompt progression to an alternative strategy in case of
`failure [5].
`Retrograde PCI has rapidly evolved since its first
`description [6] and has enabled improved procedure
`
`1The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, Essex SS16
`5NL, United Kingdom
`2Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, United
`Kingdom
`
`Conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
`
`*Correspondence to: Dr. Abdul M. Mozid, The Essex Cardiothora-
`cic Centre, Basildon, Essex SS16 5NL, UK. E-mail: ammozid@
`hotmail.com
`
`Received 25 June 2013; Revision accepted 12 September 2013
`
`DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25205
`Published online 2 October 2013 in Wiley Online Library
`(wileyonlinelibrary.com)
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2135
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`930
`
`Mozid et al.
`
`Fig. 1. Top panel: Dual contrast injections demonstrating (a) occluded native RCA with am-
`biguous proximal cap and long occlusion length and (b) retrograde collaterals from distal Cir-
`cumflex artery to distal RCA. Bottom panel: (c) sub-intimal tracking (knuckle technique) of
`both antegrade and retrograde wires with Corsair micro-catheter support; (d) antegrade sub-
`intimal space enlarged with a 2.5 mm 3 15 mm compliant balloon inflation (marked with
`arrow).
`
`snared in the aorta). In this case report, we describe an
`alternative approach to wire externalization when the
`retrograde micro-catheter is unable to reach the ante-
`grade guide catheter.
`
`success rate [7]. Reverse controlled anterograde and
`retrograde sub-intimal tracking (CART) involves sub-
`intimal entry of both antegrade and retrograde wires,
`with subsequent balloon expansion permitting commu-
`nication through the previously occluded section [6]. A
`key step of the retrograde approach is wire externaliza-
`tion through the antegrade guide catheter. To enable
`this, a short (90 cm) retrograde (or donor) guide cathe-
`ter may be required as well as a long micro-catheter
`(such as the 150 cm Corsair, Asahi Intecc.). Wire
`externalization usually requires the retrograde micro-
`catheter to enter the antegrade guide so that the wire
`can be exchanged to a long guidewire. However, there
`maybe occasions where the micro-catheter is unable to
`reach the guide catheter and a long wire has to be used
`to wire the antegrade guide (either directly or by being
`Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions DOI 10.1002/ccd.
`Published on behalf of The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI).
`
`CASE REPORT
`
`A 73-year-old man, with recurrence of angina, was
`admitted to our tertiary center for elective PCI to a
`chronically occluded right coronary artery (RCA). He
`had prior history of CABG surgery with left internal
`mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending
`(LAD) artery and saphenous vein grafts (SVG) to RCA
`and circumflex coronary arteries. Diagnostic angiogra-
`phy had showed a recent occlusion of the SVG to the
`RCA and a cardiac MRI scan demonstrated an induci-
`ble perfusion defect in the RCA territory.
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2135
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Utility of GuidelinerTM Catheter in Retrograde PCI
`
`931
`
`(a) The retrograde wire and Corsair micro-catheter advanced into same plane as the
`Fig. 2.
`antegrade wire at the mid-RCA level; (b) GuidelinerTM catheter advanced antegradely to cap-
`ture the retrograde Corsair micro-catheter (tip of Corsair catheter marked with * and
`GuidelinerTM tip marked with arrow).
`
`The procedure was carried out via bilateral femoral
`artery access with 8 Fr 45 cm sheaths. The RCA was
`intubated with a standard length (110 cm) 8 Fr AR2
`guide catheter and the SVG to circumflex was intuba-
`ted with a short (90 cm) AL1 guide.
`long
`Dual contrast
`injections confirmed proximal
`occlusion of the native RCA (Fig. 1a) and good retro-
`grade interventional collateral channels from the native
`circumflex artery (Fig. 1b).
`Due to ambiguity of the proximal cap and the long
`occlusion length (20 mm), a primary retrograde
`approach was chosen using the SVG to circumflex and
`collateral epicardial channels from the native circum-
`flex artery.
`A Sion wire (Asahi Intecc) and 150 cm Corsair
`micro-catheter (Asahi Intecc.) were advanced from the
`epicardial collateral channel to the distal RCA. The ret-
`rograde wire was exchanged to a Pilot 200 (Abbott
`Vascular), which was then “knuckled” (by forming a
`small loop and dissecting the sub-intimal/sub-adventi-
`tial plane) across the distal occlusion with Corsair cath-
`eter support (Fig. 1c).
`A Fielder XT wire (Asahi Intecc.) was “knuckled”
`antegradely at the proximal occlusion site into the sub-
`intimal space with a 135 cm Corsair micro-catheter
`support (Fig. 1c). The antegrade and retrograde corsair
`catheters were advanced so that they were overlapping,
`which was confirmed in separate orthogonal planes.
`The antegrade sub-intimal space was enlarged by bal-
`loon inflation (2.5 mm  15 mm) (marked with arrow
`in Fig. 1d). The retrograde wire and Corsair catheter
`were then successfully advanced into same plane as the
`antegrade wire at the mid-RCA level (Fig. 2a).
`However,
`the long length of the retrograde limb
`from the SVG meant
`that
`the 150 cm Corsair was
`
`Fig. 3. Final angiographic result following implantation of
`three drug eluting stents.
`
`unable to reach the antegrade guide catheter despite
`the short (90 cm) contralateral guide catheter. To solve
`this issue, a 6 Fr GuidelinerTM catheter (Vascular Solu-
`tions) was advanced antegradely and was able to suc-
`cessfully advance over and capture the retrograde
`Corsair catheter (Fig. 2b). The retrograde Pilot 200
`was then exchanged for a 330 cm RG3 wire (Asahi
`Intecc.), which was then externalized. PCI was then
`completed antegradely on the RG3 wire and the vessel
`was stented from distal to ostium with three overlap-
`ping everolimus drug-eluting stents with a good final
`angiographic result (Fig. 3).
`Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions DOI 10.1002/ccd.
`Published on behalf of The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI).
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2135
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`932
`
`Mozid et al.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Retrograde PCI with retrograde dissection re-entry
`techniques has improved the success of recanalization
`with of CTOs. The advent of
`the Corsair
`(Asahi
`Intecc.) channel dilator has further simplified collateral
`crossing [8]. A long 150 cm Corsair catheter is usually
`able to reach the antegrade guide catheter thereby ena-
`bling wire exchange to a long wire (e.g., 330 cm RG3
`(Asahi Intecc.) or 335 cm ViperWire (Cardiovascular
`Systems Inc.)) and therefore wire externalization. How-
`ever, in cases of long tortuous retrograde channels, par-
`ticularly when also involving a graft,
`the Corsair
`catheter may be unable to reach the antegrade guide
`catheter. In this situation, potential solutions include
`exchanging for a long wire and using this to enter the
`antegrade catheter directly—although this can be diffi-
`cult, particularly if the wire has to negotiate long seg-
`ments of diseased artery. The long wire can also be
`snared in the aorta using standard snare devices deliv-
`ered through the antegrade guide catheter. An alterna-
`tive is to exchange the Corsair catheter for an over-
`the-wire or long rapid exchange balloon and perform
`retrograde angioplasty to allow passage of an antegrade
`wire.
`We have demonstrated in our case report a third
`option utilizing the GuidelinerTM (Vascular Solutions)
`mother-and-child catheter. This rapid-exchange device
`consists of a 20 cm soft flexible tube connected to a
`stainless-steel rod and can be used to deeply intubate a
`coronary artery to provide additional back-up support.
`This ability to extend the guide deep into the artery
`offers the solution of connecting the retrograde micro-
`catheter to the antegrade guide catheter. Providing the
`retrograde Corsair catheter is in the same tissue plane
`as the antegrade wire, the GuidelinerTM catheter can be
`advanced over and “capture” the Corsair catheter. This
`technique may provide a simpler method for complet-
`ing wire externalization than the previous options.
`Other advantages of the GuidelinerTM system include
`circumventing the need for the retrograde wire to nego-
`tiate long sections of diseased artery; the ability to pro-
`vide a scaffold for the artery by preventing collapse of
`space created by antegrade balloon inflation; providing
`
`extra support to aid with stent delivery and reducing
`the need for contrast.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Retrograde access is an important skill-set required
`for CTO PCI. When the retrograde limb involves a
`graft and/or tortuous collateral channels the retrograde
`Corsair catheter maybe too short to reach the antegrade
`guide catheter even with the use of a shortened donor
`guide. In this situation, advancing an antegrade Guide-
`linerTM over the retrograde Corsair micro-catheter, the
`“capture technique,” facilitates wire externalization.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Kahn JK. Angiographic suitability for catheter revascularization
`of total coronary occlusions in patients from a community hos-
`pital setting. Am Heart J 1993;126(3 Part 1):561–564.
`2. Christofferson RD, Lehmann KG, Martin GV, Every N,
`Caldwell JH, Kapadia SR. Effect of chronic total coronary
`occlusion on treatment strategy. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:1088–
`1091.
`3. Shah PB. Management of coronary chronic total occlusion. Cir-
`culation 2011;123:1780–1784.
`4. Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of
`chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
`Am Heart J 2010;160:179–187.
`5. Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, Wyman RM, Burke MN,
`Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Pershad A, Kandzari DE, Buller CE,
`DeMartini T, Lombardi WL, Thompson CA. A percutaneous
`treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlu-
`sions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:367–379.
`6. Surmely JF, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Nishida Y, Nakayama M,
`Nakamura S, Oida A, Hattori E, Suzuki T. New concept for
`CTO recanalization using controlled antegrade and retrograde
`subintimal tracking: The CART technique. J Invasive Cardiol
`2006;18:334–338.
`7. Thompson CA, Jayne JE, Robb JF, Friedman BJ, Kaplan AV,
`Hettleman BD, Niles NW, Lombardi WL. Retrograde techniques
`and the impact of operator volume on percutaneous intervention
`for coronary chronic total occlusions an early U.S. experience.
`JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:834–842.
`8. Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Kimura M, Nasu K, Kinoshita Y,
`Suzuki T. The first clinical experience with a novel catheter for
`collateral channel tracking in retrograde approach for chronic
`coronary total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:165–
`171.
`
`Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions DOI 10.1002/ccd.
`Published on behalf of The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI).
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2135
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket