throbber
CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1of55
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
`
`Vascular Solutions, Inc.,
`
`Civil File No. 0: 13-cv-01172 (JRT-SER)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Boston Scientific Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF HOWARD ROOT
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
`MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
`INJUNCTION
`
`I, Howard Root, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am the Chief Executive Officer of Plaintiff Vascular Solutions, Inc.
`
`("VSI"). I make this Declaration in connection with VSI's motion for a preliminary
`
`injunction. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below and, if called as a
`
`witness, I could and would testify as follows.
`
`Background
`
`2.
`
`I was originally trained as a lawyer and worked in private practice from
`
`1985-90. In 1990, I left private practice to serve as General Counsel to ATS Medical,
`
`Inc., a medical device company. I left ATS Medical and founded VSI in 1997, and I
`
`have acted as the Chief Executive Officer ofVSI since its founding. Since 1997, I have
`
`been personally involved in the creation and development ofVSl's products. I am a
`
`named inventor on 10 patents relating to a variety ofVSI's products, including patents in
`
`the following areas: vascular access closure systems, coaxial guide extension catheters,
`
`guidewire tipped laser fibers, screw tipped penetrating catheters, and retraction belts.
`
`VSIQXM_E00049694
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`/
`
`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 2 of 55
`
`3.
`
`At different times during the company's history, I have directly managed the
`
`VSI sales force, product development and marketing departments, and during all times
`
`have been personally active in VSI's sales, product development, legal and marketing
`
`efforts.
`
`4.
`
`VSI is a medical device company focused on bringing new clinically unique
`
`solutions for vascular diseases to physicians worldwide. VSI has developed and markets
`
`over 75 different medical device products through its 91employee U.S. sales force and
`
`international distribution network covering 49 countries. VSI had revenue of $98 million
`
`in 2012.
`
`Background on the Technology of this Case
`
`5.
`
`The technology involved in this case involves cardiac (heart) catheterization,
`
`and more specifically, a medical advance that enables cardiologists to navigate medical
`
`instruments such as stents through narrow and tortuous arteries in order to treat arterial
`
`disease in coronary vessels that often could not be reached with previous technologies.
`
`6.
`
`In coronary artery disease, a coronary artery is narrowed or occluded, often
`
`by the buildup of plaque which can reduce or entirely obstruct blood flow through the
`
`artery. A narrowing in an artery is referred to as a lesion or a stenosis. If a stenosis
`
`becomes severe, the heart muscle will not receive sufficient blood flow to continue to
`
`function appropriately, which can result in an acute myocardial infarction, commonly
`
`known as a heart attack. A coronary artery stenosis is depicted in the drawing below:
`
`2
`
`VSIQXM E00049695
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 3 of 55
`
`Coronary Artery
`Stenosis
`
`7. When a patient is suspected of having a significant stenosis in a coronary
`
`artery, the cardiologist often will perform a diagnostic coronary catheterization procedure
`
`to confirm the condition. A diagnostic catheterization consists of injecting contrast
`
`(radiopaque dye visible on an x-ray) through a diagnostic catheter (a long, thin tube)
`
`placed into the beginning of the coronary artery while viewing the artery under x-ray.
`
`The x-ray will show the presence of the radiopaque dye in the open portion of the
`
`coronary artery and the absence of dye in the area of the stenosis. A drawing of a
`
`diagnostic catheterization and an x-ray image from a diagnostic catheterization are shown
`
`below:
`
`Catheter
`
`Right Coronary
`Artery
`
`Radiopaque dye in
`coronary artery
`
`Diagnostic catheter
`
`left Coronary
`Artery
`
`Stenosis
`(blockage)
`
`3
`
`-
`VSIQXM_E00049696
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 4 of 55
`
`8.
`
`If the diagnostic catheterization confirms a clinically significant stenos is
`
`(such as identified in the x-ray above), the cardiologist will often perform what is called
`
`an interventional catheterization to treat (or intervene) by opening the stenosis. An
`
`interventional catheterization procedure consists of delivering medical instruments such
`
`as stents and balloons into the coronary artery and across the stenosis and then expanding
`
`the balloon and/or stent to push the stenosis to the arterial wall and re-open flow through
`
`the artery. Below is a drawing of a stent that has been opened to push a stenosis to the
`
`arterial wall and restore flow through the artery:
`
`Stent
`(deployed)
`
`9.
`
`Cardiac catheterization procedures, whether diagnostic or interventional, are
`
`non-surgical, minimally invasive medical procedures. A cardiac catheterization starts
`
`with a needle puncture in the radial (wrist) or femoral (leg) artery of the patient in order
`
`to gain access to the arterial system. Through the hollow needle that punctured the artery
`
`a guidewire is inserted, after which the needle is removed and an introducer sheath (a
`
`short, thin tube with a valve on the end outside the body to prevent blood from leaking
`
`out) is inserted over the wire and into the artery. The introducer sheath is then used to
`
`provide continued access to the artery for the introduction of guidewires, catheters and
`
`stents during the procedure. This type of arterial access is commonly known as the
`
`4
`
`VSIQXM_E00049697
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 5 of 55
`
`Seldinger technique, and is shown in the drawings below
`
`1. Needle puncture
`
`2. Guidewire inserted
`throu!!h needle /
`
`3. Needle removed
`
`4. Introducer Sheath
`inserted over wire y
`
`10. Using the introducer sheath as the conduit, to perform a diagnostic
`
`catheterization procedure the cardiologist will advance a diagnostic catheter into and
`
`through the aorta until it is pointing at the opening (ostium) of the coronary artery to be
`
`diagnosed (the right or left coronary artery). Once in position, dye is injected through the
`
`diagnostic catheter and into the coronary artery to allow the size and shape (and any
`
`lesions) of the artery to be observed under x-ray (see the drawing and image in paragraph
`
`7 above). Because only dye (which is in liquid form) is injected into the coronary artery
`
`during a diagnostic catheterization procedure, a diagnostic catheter can have a small inner
`
`diameter and the tip of the diagnostic catheter does not need to precisely match the shape
`
`of the ostium of the coronary artery.
`
`11.
`
`In an interventional catheterization procedure, instead of using a diagnostic
`
`catheter the cardiologist will use what is commonly referred to as a "guide catheter" to
`
`deliver (or guide) medical devices (such as stents) into the coronary artery to the site of
`
`5
`
`VSIQXM E00049698
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 6 of 55
`
`the stenosis to perform the intervention. Because the purpose of an interventional
`
`catheterization is to deliver medical instruments such as stents deep into the coronary
`
`artery and across the stenosis, a guide catheter must have a large enough inner diameter
`
`to allow passage of the commonly-used stents as well as an appropriate shape and
`
`structure to prevent dislodgement during delivery of the devices. Below is a drawing of a
`
`guide catheter seated in the coronary artery ostium (shown at 60) with an unexpanded
`
`stent in place across a stenosis (shown at 66) from Figure 7 ofVSI's U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,048,032 ('032 patent):
`
`Guide
`catheter
`
`Stent
`(undeployed)
`
`6
`
`VSIQXM_E00049699
`
`
`Page 6
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 7 of 55
`
`12. The guide catheter is a critical component of an interventional coronary
`
`catheterization procedure, as it is a required tool to provide the pathway for medical
`
`devices to be delivered from a distal arterial access point to a lesion for treatment. Many
`
`companies manufacture and sell guide catheters, including Boston Scientific. A standard
`
`guide catheter has a length of 1 OOcm and has a diameter measured on the French scale
`
`(abbreviated "F"), where lF is 1/3mm. The most common size of guide catheter is 6F
`
`(i.e., it has an outside diameter of 2mm (0.079in)), while other common sizes are 7F and
`
`8F. Below is a drawing of a guide catheter:
`
`Guide catheter
`
`13. During use, the proximal end (i.e., the end outside the body) of a guide
`
`catheter must be sealed to prevent blood loss during the catheterization procedure. To
`
`provide this seal (while still allowing the guide catheter to be opened for delivery of
`
`medical devices), a hemostasis valve (such as the one depicted below) is attached to the
`
`proximal end of the guide catheter.
`
`Hemostasis valve
`
`7
`
`VSIQXM E00049700
`
`
`Page 7
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 8 of 55
`
`14. A guide catheter must be sufficiently rigid to allow it to maintain its distal
`
`curve (the distal end being the far end, deepest inside the body) while medical devices
`
`such as stents (which are relatively inflexible) are directed from the aorta through a 90°
`
`bend and into the ostium of the coronary artery to be treated. The guide catheter also
`
`must provide sufficient "backup" support to prevent the guide catheter from moving
`
`backwards and becoming dislodged from the ostium as the medical devices are pushed
`
`through a tight stenosis. Without this combination of guide catheter rigidity and backup
`
`support, medical devices such as stents may not be able to traverse the artery and cross
`
`the stenosis, causing the intervention to fail. Because the shape and location of coronary
`
`ostia vary widely among patients, guide catheters are manufactured with a wide variety of
`
`curve shapes to provide orientation and back-up support in these variations. Below are
`
`three common distal curve styles of guide catheters for right (JR4 and Hockey Stick) and
`
`left (EBU) coronary artery catheterizations:
`
`8
`
`-
`
`- - -~---- - - · ~---·-----
`
`VSIQXM_E00049701
`
`
`Page 8
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 9 of 55
`
`15. However, because of the curve and rigidity of a guide catheter, it generally
`
`cannot be safely "deep seated" (i.e., extended past the ostium) into the coronary artery,
`
`and instead must rest in the ostium. Therefore, while deep-seating of the guide would be
`
`helpful to significantly increase the resistance to backup and dislodgement during the
`
`stent delivery, it is generally not performed. The resulting limitation on backup support
`
`can result in dislodgement of the guide catheter and failure to deliver the treatment in
`
`challenging cases where the anatomy is tortuous and the lesion is severe, which are
`
`precisely the cases where treatment is often most needed.
`
`16. There have been prior attempts to solve this desire to safely deep seat a
`
`guide catheter, as discussed in VSI's '032 patent, at col. 1, In. 41, to col. 2, In. 44. One
`
`prior approach is referred to as a "mother and child" guide catheter. It involves inserting,
`
`for example, a 5F, 120cm "child" guide catheter that has a relatively flexible and straight
`
`distal tip through a standard 6F, 1 OOcm "mother" guide catheter that is already in place at
`
`the ostium of the coronary artery. The distal end of the child catheter, being flexible and
`
`straight, can therefore safely extend through the ostium, into the bend in the artery and
`
`provide excellent backup support. Drawings of a mother and child guide catheter system
`
`and its use in a coronary artery are below:
`
`Mother and child OTW system
`
`"Mother" guide catheter
`
`•
`
`"Child" guide catheter
`
`Hemostatic valves
`
`9
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`VSIQXM_E00049702
`
`
`Page 9
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 10 of 55
`
`"Child" guide catheter
`
`17. The Heartrail guide catheter manufactured by Terumo Corporation is an
`
`example of this "mother and child" guide catheter system, comprised of a 120cm long 5F
`
`child guide catheter extension paired with a 1 OOcm long 6F mother guide catheter. The
`
`radiographic image below depicts the Terumo Heartrail mother and child system in use
`
`under x-ray visualization, with a stent extended through both the mother and child:
`
`18. The mother and child system promoted by Terumo, however, has several
`
`drawbacks. One drawback is that the system requires two hemostatic valves: one to seal
`
`10
`
`VSIQXM_E00049703
`
`
`Page 10
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 11of55
`
`the mother catheter, and a second to seal the child catheter. This tends to make the
`
`system cumbersome to use. Another drawback is the length of the system - the mother
`
`and child combination results in a 120cm long guide catheter, which limits the sites that
`
`can be treated since balloons, stents and wires are designed to be used with 1 OOcm guide
`
`catheters. Third, to insert or remove the child catheter, all of the previously inserted
`
`medical devices, such as guidewires, must be removed. This is particularly problematic
`
`in situations where the cardiologist did not originally plan to use a child catheter, but
`
`instead the need arose in the middle of the procedure, but then requires removing all
`
`guidewires that have already been appropriately placed and starting the intervention over
`
`from the first step. As a result, before the GuideLiner, the mother and child system was
`
`rarely used.
`
`19. The mother and child guide system utilized by Terumo is an example of an
`
`over-the-wire, or OTW, catheter. An OTW catheter has at least one uninterrupted lumen
`
`that runs the entire length of the catheter which is used for delivery of the catheter over a
`
`guidewire (i.e., the entire length of the OTW catheter is delivered "over the wire") and
`
`into the artery. Because an OTW catheter is generally between lOOcm and 150cm in
`
`length, it usually requires a long (between 260 and 300cm) guidewire for deployment,
`
`which necessitates two operators to control both ends of the catheter at the same time as it
`
`is being deployed. Shown below is a schematic drawing of a standard OTW catheter
`
`with a guidewire extending through it:
`
`Over-the-wire (OTW) catheter
`
`11
`
`VSIQXM_E00049704
`
`
`Page 11
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 12 of 55
`
`20. An alternative type of catheter used in coronary catheterization procedures is
`
`referred to as monorail, rapid exchange, single operator, or sliding rail. All of these
`
`names refer to the same type of catheter construction with a relatively short (generally
`
`20cm - 40cm) lumen used to deliver the catheter over a guidewire, attached to a longer
`
`and stiffer push rod that is used to push and retract the catheter but runs independent of
`
`and next to the guidewire. With the monorail construction, a single operator is able to
`
`deliver the catheter and control both ends during delivery. It also allows the use of
`
`shorter guidewires (between 150cm and 190cm in length). This rail technique is
`
`explained in an article by Bonzel et al., Z. Kardiol. 1987; 76 Suppl. 6:119-22. A true and
`
`correct copy of the Bonzel et al. article is attached as Exhibit 1. Shown below is a
`
`schematic drawing showing a standard "rail" or rapid exchange catheter with a guidewire
`
`placed through it:
`
`Rail (rapid exchange) catheter
`
`VSl's Development of the GuideLiner® Catheter and the Patents-in-Suit
`
`21.
`
`Starting in 2004, I, along with other VSI employees Gregg Sutton, Jeffrey
`
`Welch, and Jason Garrity, conceived of and began to work on a new idea for a guide
`
`extension catheter that would provide "mother and child" guide extension, but without
`
`the disadvantages of the OTW construction. After years of research and testing, we
`
`developed our idea into VSI's GuideLiner catheter, which was first sold in 2009. The
`
`GuideLiner catheter provides the advantages of "mother and child" guide extension with
`
`12
`
`VSIQXM_E00049705
`
`
`Page 12
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 13 of 55
`
`the ease of monorail or rapid exchange delivery. The original GuideLiner catheter is
`
`depicted below.
`
`t
`Flexible tube
`with lumen
`
`VSl's GuideLiner catheter
`t
`t
`Rigid collar
`Substantially rigid push rod
`with no lumen
`
`22. The distal end (yellow and blue portion) of the GuideLiner catheter is a
`
`relatively flexible tube with a lumen. This flexible portion has three zones: a very
`
`flexible yellow tip, a less flexible yellow coil reinforced portion, and a further less
`
`flexible blue portion made from a stiffer polymer as shown below:
`
`GuideLiner
`very flexible tip
`
`Coil reinforced portion
`More flexible
`Less flexible
`
`23. The flexible tube portion of the GuideLiner is joined to a relatively
`
`inflexible metal collar where the lumen ends with a sloped opening:
`
`GuideLiner collar side view
`
`GuideLiner collar top down view
`
`13
`
`VSIQXM_E00049706
`
`
`Page 13
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 14 of 55
`
`24. The collar is then connected to a substantially rigid push rod that extends for
`
`the remainder of the length of the GuideLiner catheter:
`
`GuideLiner substantially rigid push rod
`
`25. The proximal end of the push rod is embedded into a tab used to identify the
`
`GuideLiner catheter and prevent it from being inadvertently pushed through the
`
`hemostatic valve:
`
`GuideLiner proximal tab
`
`26.
`
`In use, the "child" GuideLiner catheter is inserted into the "mother" guide
`
`catheter by threading the lumen of the GuideLiner catheter' s tubular portion over the in(cid:173)
`
`place guidewire. The GuideLiner catheter's flexible tip is pushed through the guide
`
`catheter by the attached push rod and out the distal end of the "mother" guide catheter for
`
`deep seating into the coronary artery. After the GuideLiner catheter has been fully
`
`inserted into the guide catheter, when a cardiologist inserts a device such as a stent into
`
`the guide catheter, the device will travel down the guide catheter, next to the push rod,
`
`until it encounters the collar, where it will pass through the sloped opening in the collar
`
`14
`
`VSIQXM_E00049707
`
`
`Page 14
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 15 of 55
`
`and into the flexible tip portion and continue until it exits the distal end of the GuideLiner
`
`catheter's flexible tip portion, into the artery to be treated.
`
`27. By extending past the distal tip of the guide catheter and into the artery to be
`
`treated, the GuideLiner catheter provides superior back-up support through effective deep
`
`seating. And because the GuideLiner catheter's tip is flexible, the catheter can be deep
`
`seated without the risks associated with deep seating standard, much more rigid guide
`
`catheters.
`
`28. The use of the GuideLiner catheter is illustrated in the two figures below. In
`
`the figure on the left, without the GuideLiner in place, the guide catheter has backed out
`
`of the coronary ostium, possibly from the force exerted on advancing the guidewire. In
`
`the figure on the right, the GuideLiner catheter extension has been deep seated, thus
`
`providing added support for the advancement of guidewires and stents into the artery.
`
`Without GuideLiner
`(backed out of ostium)
`
`With GuideLiner
`(deep seated)
`
`Guide catheter
`(blue)
`
`GuideLiner
`(yellow) ----.......
`
`15
`
`VSIQXM_E00049708
`
`
`Page 15
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`•
`
`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 16 of 55
`
`29.
`
`In another example of the use of the GuideLiner, in the illustration below on
`
`the left, without the use of a GuideLiner catheter the rigid stent cannot navigate the sharp
`
`downward turn of the vessel to reach the lesion, and therefore the procedure cannot be
`
`completed. In the figure on the right, with the use of the GuideLiner the angulated
`
`vessel's sharp angle is turned into a gentle curve, which allows the stent to make the tum
`
`and be delivered to the lesion.
`
`Without GuideLiner
`(failure to deliver stent)
`
`With GuideLiner
`(stent delivered to stenosis)
`
`~ Guide catheter
`~ (blue)
`
`GuideLiner
`(yellow) ~
`
`Stent~
`(across stenosis)
`
`30. The monorail construction of the GuideLiner catheter provides multiple
`
`advantages to the user over the OTW construction used in prior "mother and child"
`
`systems. Because only the push rod extends through the hemostatic valve when using the
`
`GuideLiner catheter, a second hemostatic valve is not needed. In addition, since only one
`
`hemostatic valve is used, there is no need to use longer devices to reach the lesion or any
`
`limitation on the length of devices used. Furthermore, the monorail construction allows
`
`16
`
`VSIQXM_E00049709
`
`
`Page 16
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 17 of 55
`
`the existing guidewires to remain in place while delivering the GuideLiner catheter into
`
`the artery, which is particularly beneficial in unplanned uses.
`
`31. A second version of the GuideLiner catheter named the V2 was developed
`
`and sold beginning in 2012. The changes in the V2 version did not change the
`
`deployment, use or general construction of the GuideLiner catheter. The only changes
`
`made in the V2 version from the original GuideLiner (now called Vl) were (a) the length
`
`of the guide extension segment was increased from 20cm to 25cm, (b) a second
`
`radiopaque marker band was added to the collar section of the catheter, and ( c) the metal
`
`of the collar section was replaced with a polymer material. The first figure below is a
`
`schematic of the original ("VI ") GuideLiner catheter, and the second figure is a
`
`schematic of the second version ("V2") of the GuideLiner catheter.
`
`1-
`
`LI I
`
`GuideLiner V1
`
`145cm
`
`20cm
`
`c ~---=\\---_-_.....--,.,.r----r--r;
`
`------~=-"
`
`Guideliner V2
`
`150cm
`
`25cm
`
`17
`
`VSIQXM_E00049710
`
`
`Page 17
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 18 of 55
`
`32. On May 3, 2006, my coinventors and I filed a patent application on our
`
`invention in the U.S. Patent Office. Our application led to three U.S. patents, each of
`
`which is assigned to VSI: the '032 patent, which issued November 1, 2011; U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,142,413 ('413 patent), which issued March 27, 2012; and U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,292,850 ('850 patent), which issued October 23, 2012. Each of these patents is entitled
`
`"Coaxial Guide Catheter for Interventional Cardiology Procedures."
`
`33. A true and correct copy ofVSI's '032 patent is attached as Exhibit 2.
`
`34. A true and correct copy of VSI's '413 patent is attached as Exhibit 3.
`
`35. A true and correct copy of VSI's '850 patent is attached as Exhibit 4.
`
`36. Both the GuideLiner Vl and the GuideLiner V2 are embodiments of the
`
`coaxial guide catheter described and claimed in the VSI patents. In general, the '032
`
`patent claims the device, the '413 patent claims methods of using the device, and the '850
`
`patent claims systems combining the GuideLiner device with a guide catheter. For
`
`example, claim 1 of the '032 patent claims a device for use with a standard guide catheter
`
`to provide guide extension, with the device having a "flexible tip portion" and a
`
`"substantially rigid portion" as described above in my description of the GuideLiner
`
`products.
`
`Success of VSl's GuideLiner catheter
`
`37. VSI obtained CE mark clearance from its European notified body and
`
`commenced international sales of the GuideLiner catheter in September 2009.
`
`38. VSI obtained 510(k) regulatory clearance from the U.S. Food & Drug
`
`Administration and commenced U.S. sales of the GuideLiner catheter in November 2009.
`
`18
`
`VSIQXM_E00049711
`
`
`Page 18
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 19 of 55
`
`39. The GuideLiner catheter has been a very successful product for VSI.
`
`Worldwide sales of the GuideLiner catheter since launch are provided in the table below.
`
`Year
`2009
`(4th quarter only)
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`(1st quarter only)
`Total
`(throu2h March 31, 2013)
`
`Worldwide
`Sales
`
`$318,000
`
`$4,632,000
`$9,753,000
`$14,742,000
`
`$4,781,000
`
`$34,226,000
`
`40.
`
`From 2010 to current, the GuideLiner catheter has been VSI's fastest
`
`growing product, with sales growth of 48% in the first quarter of 2013 over the first
`
`quarter of 2012.
`
`41.
`
`In 2012, the GuideLiner catheter was VSI's third highest-selling product in
`
`the United States, and second highest-selling product worldwide. I expect that
`
`GuideLiner catheters will be VSI's highest-selling product both in the United States and
`
`worldwide in 2013. GuideLiner catheter sales currently represent approximately 20% of
`
`VSI's total revenue.
`
`42. Because of the completely unique nature of the GuideLiner catheter, it
`
`provides our sales force access to hospitals to sell other VSI products, and gives our sales
`
`force added credibility in that sales process. Many U.S. hospitals that have purchased the
`
`GuideLiner catheter had not purchased a VSI product in the year prior to their initial
`
`19
`
`VSIQXM_E00049712
`
`
`Page 19
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 20 of 55
`
`purchase of a GuideLiner catheter. VSI would not have had access to these customers,
`
`and most of these customers subsequently purchased additional VSI products. I have
`
`prepared as Exhibit 41 a chart setting out the total number of U.S. hospitals that have
`
`purchased a GuideLiner catheter since launch, the number of those customers who were
`
`new customers to VSI, in the sense that they had not purchased a VSI product in the year
`
`before their purchase of the GuideLiner catheter, and the average number of additional
`
`VSI products purchased by these new customers after purchasing the GuideLiner. VSI
`
`considers this level of detailed customer information to be confidential, and I respectfully
`
`ask that the Court allow us to file that exhibit under seal. I understand that counsel will
`
`be filing a separate motion seeking permission to file Exhibit 41 under seal.
`
`43.
`
`Since 2010, twenty-two articles have been published in medical journals on
`
`the GuideLiner catheter and five medical symposia have been held on the GuideLiner
`
`catheter at medical meetings held in the United States and Europe. In addition, VSI has
`
`published twelve case reports on a range of beneficial clinical uses of the GuideLiner
`
`catheter. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a bibliography listing
`
`GuideLiner catheter publications, symposia, and case reports. Attached as Exhibits 6-13
`
`are true and correct copies of articles on the GuideLiner catheter. Attached as Exhibit 14
`
`are clinical case reports on GuideLiner published by VSI.
`
`44. The GuideLiner catheter has been recognized by physicians as a unique and
`
`substantial advance in cardiac catheterization. For example:
`
`a.
`
`From the article Device of the Month: Catheter addresses
`
`challenging coronary interventions (Ex. 6):
`
`20
`
`VSIQXM E00049713
`
`
`Page 20
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 21of55
`
`• "The GuideLiner catheter, released in November 2009 and now available
`for sale in the United States and Europe, is being called a 'game-changer'
`for the treatment of complex endovascular lesions."
`
`•
`
`"[Use of GuideLiner] greatly facilitates stent delivery, leading to a
`successful outcome after failure of conventional techniques. This allows
`complex disease to be treated more confidently, more easily and more
`safely." (quoting Douglas G. Fraser, MD, BM, BChir)
`
`• "I've been able to treat arteries previously deemed ' untreatable' and have
`reported on this. It is not hyperbole to refer to the GuideLiner as a game(cid:173)
`changing device." (quoting Kanwar P. Singh, MD, FACC)
`
`•
`
`"According to Singh, currently in the United States, there is no competitor
`device to the GuideLiner."
`
`b.
`
`From the article The GuideLiner™ "child" catheter (Ex. 7):
`
`• "In this case, stent delivery was impossible despite the use of a highly
`supportive guiding catheter. By using the GuideLiner™, the stent was
`deployed easily and successfully because of the extra-back up support and
`deep intubation without any displacement of the guide catheter or any
`vessel trauma. The GuideLiner™ provides a new alternative for
`performing complex interventions."
`
`c.
`
`From the article Usefalness and safety of the GuideLiner catheter to
`
`enhance intubation and support of guide catheters: insights from the Twente GuideLiner
`
`registry (Ex. 8):
`
`• "[GuideLiner] use resulted in increased back-up and guide catheter
`alignment for stent delivery in unfavourable tortuous anatomies and
`complex, heavily calcified, and often distally located lesions, which
`otherwise may have been considered unsuitable for PCI [percutaneous
`coronary intervention]. Procedural success rate was high and there were no
`major complications."
`
`• GuideLiner "is a novel rapid exchange guide catheter extension system."
`
`•
`
`"During the first months, the GL was used as a bailout device in
`challenging cases, when the 'old familiar tricks' (e.g., deep-seating
`manoeuvres or use of buddy wires) had failed."
`
`21
`
`VSIQXM E00049714
`
`
`Page 21
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 22 of 55
`
`d.
`
`From the article GuideLiner Catheter Facilitated PC/ -A Novel
`
`Device with Multiple Applications (Ex. 9):
`
`•
`
`•
`
`"The GuideLiner catheter (Vascular Solutions, Inc.) is a novel device that is
`FDA approved and CE marked for assistance with device delivery during
`coronary interventional procedures."
`
`"The GuideLiner catheter has greatly simplified coronary intervention and
`broadened the lesion subsets that can be safely treated with 6 Fr guiding
`catheters and via the radial approach."
`
`e.
`
`From the article Use of the GuideLiner Catheter for the Treatment of
`
`a Bifurcational Total Occlusion of the Native Left Anterior Descending Artery through a
`
`Tortuous Composite Venous Graft (Ex. 11):
`
`• "Our case illustrates the efficacy of the GuideLiner catheter in providing
`the support needed for crossing a CTO and for stent delivery in challenging
`cases. We used it up front due to previous failure in advancing a guidewire
`and a support catheter through the SVG."
`
`•
`
`"We report the first case of GuideLiner use in complex native coronary
`artery intervention through a venous graft. The atraumatic deep-seating
`allowed by this device provided the extra support needed to cross a CTO
`beyond tortuous segments and to advance devices through sharp
`angulations. In addition, its monorail design allowed its easy advancement
`through the hemostatic valve and easy handling of balloons and stents."
`
`f.
`
`From the article The GuideLiner "Child" Catheter for Percutaneous
`
`Coronary Intervention - Early Clinical Experience (Ex. 12):
`
`•
`
`"All cases involved intervention of the RCA, for which extra backup
`support is often required. In some cases, stent delivery was impossible
`despite the use of a highly supportive guiding catheter, buddy wires and a
`buddy balloon. The GuideLiner catheter provided the additional backup
`support required for stent delivery. Deep target-vessel intubation was
`possible without displacement of the guiding catheter/wire or vessel
`trauma."
`
`22
`
`VSIQXM E00049715
`
`
`Page 22
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2046
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`CASE 0:13-cv-01172-JRT-SER Document 12 Filed 06/10/13 Page 23 of 55
`
`g.
`
`From the article Distal Stent Delivery With Guideliner Catheter:
`
`First in Man Experience (Ex. 13):
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`"The GuideLiner catheter was used for

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket