throbber
, «mnnA'i'lo-‘IAL LifihkAsa-i' u'i; n....__~_‘--_;-'-‘<.’_='
`> »
`.—..raw_._.;~w._.__.._____.__.‘
`
`Heart and Vessels
`
`Volume 21 Number1 January 2006
`
`Q 3mm;
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`§ :4
`WIN NATIONAL
`LIBRARY or a
`_—n MEDICINE
`
`
`
`
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`Page 1
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`Heart
`Vesse
`
`W
`
`Volume 21 Number 1
`
`January 2006
`
`Original articles
`
`I Clinical investigation
`
`J. Yokoyama, M, Kushibikl, T Fuiiwara Y, Tamura. N. Maeda.
`i. Higuma, 5. Sasaki, I’. Yoshlmacni, T. Matsunaga. H Hanada.
`T. Osanai, K. Okumura
`Feasibility and safety of thrombectomy with TVAc aspiration
`catheter system for patients with acute myocardial
`infarction
`1
`
`B Amasyali S. Kr'jse. K. Aytemir. I. Can. G Kabakci, L. Tokgozoglu.
`H. Ozkuzlu. N. Nazli, E. Isik. A. Oto
`The effect 0! WI pacing on P-wave dispersion in patients with
`dual-chamber pacemakers
`8
`T Palecek. A Linnari, JL‘. Lubanda. S Magage, D Karerova,
`J. BulIas, M Aschermann
`Early diastolic mitral annular velocity and color M-mode flow
`propagation velocity in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic
`function in patients with Fabry disease
`13
`M. Bonacchi. E Prifil, M. Maian . G l-rati. NS. Nathan.
`M Leaccne
`Mitral valve surgery simultaneous to coronary revascularization in
`patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy 20
`F Nicolim, G Zoiioli. G Cagnoni, A. Agosnnelh, A Colli. c Fragmm,
`B Borrello C. Beghl, T. Gherli
`Mitrat valve annuloplasty and myocardial revascularization in the
`treatment of ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy 28
`D. Yesilburea, A Serdar. T. Senluik, Z. Serdar S. Sag. J. Gordan
`Effect oi N-acetylcysteine on oxidative stress and ventricular
`function in patients with myocardial infarction 33
`RE Ulusoy. E. erralp, A. Kirilmaz. F. Kilicaslan, N. Ozmen.
`N Kucukarslan. E. Kardesoglu, L. Tutuncu. O lxeskin. BS. Cebecr
`Aortic elastic properties in young pregnant women 38
`
`G. Orhan, N. Yapici, M. Yuksel, M. Sarg n. S Senay. AS. Yale-in.
`Z Aykac. SA Aka
`Effects of N-acetylcysteine on myocardial ischemia—repenusion
`injury in bypass surgery 42
`
`I Basic science
`
`J.-S. Kwon. S.-J Lee, Y VG Kim. J AW. Bae, K.»K. Hwang, M AC. Cho.
`D.—W. Kim
`Ettect of pressure overload and its recovery on the rat carotid
`artery: change of vascular reactivity and remodeling process
`
`43
`
`Case reports
`H. Kooak, S Karapolai, C. Gimdogdu. to Bozkurt. Y Unit]
`Primary cardiac osteosarcoma in a pregnant woman 56
`M. Tanaka. Y Gore, 8. SLMUKI.
`l. Mom. Y. Otsuka, S. Miyalakr
`H. Nonogi
`Postinfarction cardiac rupture despite immediate repertusion
`therapy in a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis
`59
`M, May. Y. Finkbeiner, 8. Gunia. M. Seenaler. J. KnQ'rg. R Hetzer
`Metastasizing testicular germ-cell tumor with infiltration of the
`right heart: indication for primary metastasectomy 63
`
`Graphic report
`N. lkeda. H. Hara, R Naitajima, M. Shiba, M, Wada, T. TSUII.
`R Iljln’la, i. Yoshitama.T Tsunoda, M Nakamura M Suzuki.
`H Hase. K. Sugi
`An example that presented giant aneurysm ot the angina pectoris
`after percutaneous coronary intervention
`66
`
`Erratum ea
`
`indexed in index Medicus, Current Contents, EMBASE
`
`
`
`@ Springgsrl‘filiz'réErma-d
`
`I1
`0 fieart Vessels ISSN 0910-8327 HEVEE 0 21(1) 1-68 (2006)
`Subject USEapryrIg t Laws
`
`Page 2
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`Page 2
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

` l cart
`Vessels
`
`and
`
`
`
`An International Journal
`
`
`
`Coryrigm
`
`Submission of a manuscript implies: that the
`work described has not been published
`before (Except in the form of an abstract or
`as part of a published lecture, review or
`[he-“'19; that it is not under consideration for
`PIUbliCation elsewhere: that
`its publication
`ill.“ been approved by all co-authors, if any
`as Well'as ~ tacitly or explicitly — by the
`rclsrjonsible authorities at
`the institution
`3‘19? the work was carried out. Transfer of
`" Syright to Springer becomes effective if
`3(1)” \Vlitiii‘th‘c article is accepted for publica-
`right
`ild‘:
`lLjiiéiyiight covers the exclusive
`the cx'teilu 1.! . government employees:
`to
`distribute
`lranstcrable)’to reproduce and
`lr‘iu‘l‘
`.
`tic article.
`including reprints.
`mticgiitions, photographic
`reproductions,
`or (ill) trim, electronic form (offline. online)
`ici reproductions ol similar nature.
`
`{tgtghtilcles published in‘this journal are pro-
`sivc
`, 11y éoiiyriglit, which covers the exciti-
`1 1' ‘lr‘ig its to reproduce and distribute the
`if“: L (Pr... as offprints), as well as all trans-
`j2)milimrilgllits.L bio material published in this
`or Storcddy 7c reproduced photographieally
`my“ vidxoni'n-mmhhm in electronic data
`inn wimp“) L isks, etc, Without [irst obtain-
`Tlie use bl] permission from the publisher.
`names tmdg‘cn'eial descriptive names. trade
`even ii not cmar‘k‘s, etc.,_ in this publication.
`imply that llspecrfically identified. does not
`the r ‘1 ‘ "
`icse names are not protected by
`L (.le11 laws and regulations.
`
`lit/iiiiii‘altilgcbkidymc and information in this
`the date of .ic‘vcd to bc‘true and accurate at
`thors the dits publication. neither the au-
`Cept in l‘e' :l‘ll§~ “Or the publisher can ac-
`Omissioii 'Ltgld responsrbility for any errors or
`makes 11 3
`int may be made. The publisher
`rs. j
`ow“rr21111y.pxpi‘ess or implied, with
`Lspect to the material contained herein.
`
`Special regulations for photocopies in the
`t/S/l. Photocopies may be made for per-
`sonal or iii-house use beyond the limitations
`stipulated under Section 107 or 108 of U S
`Copyright Law, provided a fee is paid. All
`fees should be paid to the Copvrig/it Clear—
`ance Center, Inc. 222 Rosewood Drive
`Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Tel; H.978:
`750-6400,
`Fax:
`,1, 1-978-646-8600,
`littpzl/
`www.copyrightcom. stating the lSSN 0910-
`23327. the volume, and the first and last page
`numbers of each article copied. The copy-
`right owner‘s consent does not include copy-
`ing for general distribution, promotion, new
`works. or resale. In these cases, specific writ-
`ten permission inust first be obtained from
`the publisher.
`
`'l'lie Canada Iiistitule for Scientific and
`,t’t'llillClll III/invnuti'tm (CIS'I‘I) provides a
`
`comprehensive, world-wide document deliv-
`ery service for all Springer journals. For
`more information, or to place an order for
`a
`copyright—cleared Springer document.
`please contact Client Assistant. Document
`Delivery, ClSTl, Ottawa KIA 082. Canada
`(Tel. 4-1-613-9939251, Fax +1-613-9528243,
`c-niail: cisti.docdel@rirc.ca).
`
`Subscription Information
`
`0910-8327
`lSSN print edition
`ISSN electronic edition 1615-2573
`
`Volume 22 (6 issues) will appear iii 2007.
`
`Subscription rates
`For information on subscription rates please
`contact:
`Japan: Customer Support. orders@springcr.
`.ll’
`North
`and South America: Customer
`Service. journals-nyteispringcrxcom
`Outside Japan and North and South
`America: Customer Service, subscriptions©
`springcrcorn
`
`Orders and inquiries
`Japan:
`via
`a bookseller or Springer
`Japan. Sales Department, No. 2 Funato
`Bldg.
`l-ll-ll Kudau-Kita. Cliiyoda-ku.
`Tokyo 102-0073. Tel. 0368311004. Fax
`03-6831—7006. c-mail: orderth‘spt‘ingcixjp
`North
`and South America: Springer
`New York, Journal l'i‘ulfillment, PO. Box
`2485, Seeaucus. NJ 07096. USA. Tel. +1-
`SOtl-SI’RINGER.
`+l-2tll-34S-4ll33
`or
`+1-212-4601500.
`Fax
`+1—201-348-4505.
`earrail: journals-ny@springcixcom
`Outside Japan and North and South
`America: via
`a bookseller or Springer.
`Customer Service Journals. Haberstrasse 7,
`69126 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel. +49-6221-
`345-0,
`Fax
`+49—6221-345422‘),
`e—mail:
`subscriptions@springer.com
`
`Cancellations must be received by Septem-
`ber 30 to take effect at the end of the same
`year.
`
`Changes of address. Allow six weeks for all
`changes to become effective. All communi-
`cations should include both old and new ad-
`dresses (with postal codes) and should be
`accompanied by a mailing label from a re-
`cent issue.
`
`According to § 4 Sect. 3 of the German
`Postal Services Data Protection Regula-
`tions. it' a subscriber’s address changes, the
`German Post Office can inform the pub—
`lislier of the new address even if the sub—
`seriber
`has
`not
`submitted
`a
`formal
`application for mail
`to be
`forwarded
`Subscribers not
`in agreement with this
`
`This material was copied
`attire NLM and may be
`Eu Eject US Copyright Laws
`
`procedure may send a written complaint to
`Customer Service Journals. within 14 days of
`publication of this issue.
`Back volumes. Prices are
`l‘qulCSl.
`
`available on
`
`Electronic edition
`An electronic edition of this journal is avail-
`able at springcrhnkcom.
`
`Production
`Springer Japan
`Production Department
`No. 2 Funato Bldg. L] 1-11 Kudan-Kita,
`Chiyeda-ku, Tokyo 102—0073, Japan
`Tel.: +81-3-6831-7OU‘); Fax: +Sl—3v683l-7010
`
`Typesetter and printer
`SNP Best~set 'l‘ypesctter Ltd, l‘long Kong
`
`Printed on acid-free paper
`
`Springer is a part of
`Springer Seience+Busmess Media
`
`sprin gcrzcom
`
`Ownership and Copyright
`© Springer
`Printed in lloug Kong
`
`GENERAL INFORMATION
`
`2; springermm
`ELECTRONIC CONTENT
`
`[v.2
`
`@177}? springerlink.com
`
`Q Springer
`
`Page 3
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`Page 3
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`Heart Vessels (2006) 21:1–7
`DOI 10.1007/s00380-005-0850-8
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLE
`
`© Springer-Verlag 2006
`
`Jin Yokoyama · Motoi Kushibiki · Takayuki Fujiwara
`Yujin Tamura · Naotaka Maeda · Takumi Higuma
`Shingo Sasaki · Fuminobu Yoshimachi
`Toshiro Matsunaga · Hiroyuki Hanada · Tomohiro Osanai
`Ken Okumura
`Feasibility and safety of thrombectomy with TVAC aspiration catheter
`system for patients with acute myocardial infarction
`
`Received: August 23, 2004 / Accepted: July 8, 2005
`
`Abstract Early reperfusion with angioplasty and stenting is
`established as a central, effective treatment for acute myo-
`cardial infarction (AMI). The role of thrombectomy prior
`to angioplasty remains to be elucidated. To evaluate its
`feasibility, safety, and efficacy, thrombectomy using a
`TVAC aspiration catheter system was attempted prior to
`angioplasty and stenting in 40 consecutive patients with
`AMI. Fifty consecutive patients with AMI in whom
`angioplasty and stenting were performed without prior
`thrombectomy served as controls. Neither distribution of
`Killip classification nor culprit lesion was different between
`the two groups. In patients treated with the TVAC system,
`the procedure was successful in 39/40 patients (98%) and
`there were no procedure-related complications. In the final
`coronary angiogram, TIMI-3 (Thrombolysis in Myocardial
`Infarction) flow was obtained in 37/40 (93%) in patients
`treated with the TVAC system and 43/50 (86%) in control
`patients. Electrocardiograms before and after coronary in-
`tervention were analyzed in patients with ST elevation AMI
`(35 patients treated with the TVAC system and 41 control
`patients). ST elevation recovery >50% of the initial value
`was observed after coronary intervention in 26/35 (74%) in
`patients treated with the TVAC system and 26/41 (63%) in
`control patients (P = 0.33). In the case of anterior AMI, ST
`elevation recovery >50% of the initial value was observed in
`13/17 (76%) in patients treated with the TVAC system and
`8/20 (40%) in control patients (P = 0.045). Thus, thrombec-
`tomy using a TVAC system is feasible, safe, and may have
`the potential to enhance ST-segment resolution in patients
`with anterior AMI.
`
`Key words Acute myocardial infarction · Primary angio-
`plasty · Thrombectomy · ST resolution
`
`J. Yokoyama (*) · M. Kushibiki · T. Fujiwara · Y. Tamura ·
`N. Maeda · T. Higuma · S. Sasaki · F. Yoshimachi · T. Matsunaga ·
`H. Hanada · T. Osanai · K. Okumura
`Second Department of Internal Medicine, Hirosaki University
`School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan
`Tel. +81-172-39-5057; Fax +81-172-35-9190
`e-mail: yokoyama@cardiologist.jp
`
`Introduction
`
`Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is caused by thrombotic
`coronary artery occlusion following plaque rupture in
`most patients.1,2 Primary coronary intervention with balloon
`angioplasty and stenting has been established as a first-line
`therapy for AMI.3–5 During this catheter-based interven-
`tion, however, thrombo- and/or atheroembolization in the
`coronary artery segment distal to the culprit lesion may
`occur, and a consequent slow flow or no-reflow phenom-
`enon may result in adverse clinical outcomes.6–11 Thus, not
`only theoretically but practically, thrombus removal from
`the coronary artery occlusive lesion may be advisable in
`order to reduce the thrombotic burden, and to improve
`coronary flow and procedural results. Recently, a new
`thrombus aspiration catheter system, TVAC (Nipro,
`Osaka, Japan) has been designed to remove thrombo-
`occlusive tissue from the coronary artery and saphenous
`vein graft. The present report evaluates the feasibility,
`safety, and efficacy of this TVAC catheter system as a pri-
`mary catheter-based intervention for AMI.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Aspiration system
`
`The TVAC aspiration catheter system consists of a very
`flexible, 4.5-F catheter that can be advanced over a 0.014-
`inch guidewire through a 7-F guiding catheter using a
`monorail system, an extension tube, a vacuum pump, and
`a collection bottle. The catheter has a unique oblique tip
`shaped like the beak of duck’s bill that provides a wide
`opening area and large lumen for aspiration as compared
`with the RESCUE PT catheter (Boston Scientific, Maple
`Grove, MN, USA) and the Export aspiration catheter
`(PercuSurge System, Medtronic AVE, Danvers, MA, USA)
`(Fig. 1). A marker is embedded at the distal end of the
`catheter so that its position can be identified under fluoros-
`copy. While the tip of the TVAC catheter is advanced and
`
`Page 4
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`2
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`Fig. 1A–C. The TVAC system consists of a 4.5-F aspiration catheter (A), with the distal shaft shaped like the bill of a duck (B) and a vacuum
`pump (0.9 atm) with a connection bottle (C)
`
`pulled back through the thrombus, continuous suction with
`a negative pressure at 0.9 atm is applied. Approximately 20–
`40 ml of arterial blood can be withdrawn during one attempt
`at thrombus removal.
`
`Patients
`
`The study included those patients with AMI who presented
`symptoms within 24 h before admission, with a total or sub-
`total occlusive lesion in the infarct-related coronary artery,
`with the lumen diameter of the coronary artery segment
`proximal to the occlusion site being >2 mm, and without a
`significant stenotic lesion in the main trunk of the left coro-
`nary artery. Those patients manifesting cardiogenic shock
`and with contraindications for coronary intervention were
`excluded. Thrombectomy with the TVAC system was initi-
`ated in May 2003, and was attempted in 40 consecutive
`patients with AMI, before balloon angioplasty and stenting,
`for a period of 8 months. Another group of 50 consecutive
`patients with AMI in whom angioplasty and stenting was
`performed without prior thrombectomy served as controls.
`These control AMI patients had been admitted to our hos-
`pital before the initialtion of the use of a thrombectomy
`device, including the TVAC system. In all patients, AMI
`was diagnosed by severe chest pain lasting >30 min, persis-
`tent ST segment elevation or depression on ECG, and ab-
`normal rises of biochemical markers such as troponin T and
`the MB fraction of creatine kinase. Cardiac catheterization
`procedures including aspiration of intracoronary thrombus
`and primary coronary angioplasty were explained to all
`patients, and informed consent was obtained before the
`procedures. In all patients, aspirin (200 mg) was orally ad-
`
`ministered just after admission to the emergency room,
`and 10 000IU heparin was administered intravenously at
`the beginning of the catheterization procedure. Activated
`coagultion time was maintained at >240 s throughout the
`procedure by administering additional 1000-IU doses of
`heparin at an appropriate interval. None of the patients was
`pretreated with a thrombolytic agent and a glycoprotein
`IIb/IIIa inhibitor, since the latter agent was not available in
`Japan. Nicorandil was administered prior to primary percu-
`taneous coronary intervention (PCI) in none of the patients
`in the TVAC group and in 31 patients in the control group.
`Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II
`receptor blocker were administered to all patients. Statin
`and b-adrenergic receptor blocker were administered to 29
`and 34 patients, respectively, in the group treated with the
`TVAC system, and 15 and 35 patients, respectively, in the
`control group.
`
`Cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention
`
`In both groups of patients, after intracoronary adminis-
`tration of isosorbide dinitrate (2mg), using 4-F Judkins
`catheters, the arteriograms of the infarct- and non-
`infarct-related arteries were taken from multiple projec-
`tions. The 7-F guiding catheter was engaged to the orifice
`of the infarct-related coronary artery, and a 0.014-inch
`guidewire was advanced to the periphery of the infarct-
`related artery while penetrating the occluded lesion. In con-
`trol AMI patients, conventional PCI (ballooning and
`stenting with either an NIR stent (Boston Scientific, Maple
`Grove, MN, USA), a S670/660 stent (Medtronic AVE,
`Danvers, MA, USA) or a BX Velocity stent (Cordis,
`
`Page 5
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`Miami, FL, USA) was performed. In patients treated with
`the TVAC system, while applying continuous aspiration the
`TVAC aspiration catheter was inserted into the infarct-
`related artery along the guidewire, and advanced until the
`tip of the catheter reached the occlusion site before balloon-
`ing and stenting. The aspiration catheter was further
`advanced to the segment distal to the occlusion site when
`this could be performed without any excessive pressure.
`The aspiration catheter was pulled back while aspirating the
`blood, and removed from the guiding catheter. The blood in
`the guiding catheter was removed for the case in which a
`thrombus was left in the lumen of the guiding catheter. The
`lumen of the aspiration catheter was washed with heparin-
`ized saline, and the same procedure was repeated until an
`angiographically defective shadow(s) suggesting the pres-
`ence of intralumen thrombus disappeared in the infarct-
`related artery, or the volume of the arterial blood aspirated
`to the collection bottle reached 80ml. Then, a conventional
`balloon angioplasty and stenting with either a multilink
`Penta stent (Guidant Vascular Intervention Group,
`Lakeside Drive, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or a S670 stent
`were performed when significant stenosis >75% of the
`lumen diameter was present at the lesion.
`
`Evaluation of the effect of thrombectomy
`
`Angiographic analysis was performed by two independent
`investigators to evaluate the procedural results and the oc-
`currence of distal embolization for each patient. The coro-
`nary flow grade in the infarct-related artery was determined
`before and after coronary intervention using a Thromboly-
`sis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade classifica-
`tion.12 In the patients with ST elevation AMI (35 patients
`treated with the TVAC system and 41 control patients), 12-
`lead ECGs before and after coronary intervention were
`analyzed and a sum of the degree of ST elevation in the
`three ECG leads showing manifest ST elevation was mea-
`sured. Persistent ST elevation >50% of the degree of ST
`elevation observed before the intervention was considered
`to represent impaired reperfusion.13,14
`
`3
`
`Follow-up
`
`Aspirin (200mg daily), ticlopidine (200mg daily for 4
`weeks), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or
`angiotensin II receptor blocker were administered to all
`patients. Statin and b-adrenergic receptor blocker were ad-
`ministered to 29 and 34 patients, respectively, in the group
`treated with the TVAC system, and to 15 and 35 patients,
`respectively, in control group. In-hospital outcomes and
`those within 3 months after discharge were evaluated in all
`patients.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`All data are shown as mean ± 1 standard deviation. Differ-
`ence in categorized data was analyzed using the Fisher exact
`probability test. P < 0.05 was considered to the significant.
`
`Results
`
`Effect of thrombectomy using the TVAC system
`
`Clinical characteristics of the study patients are summarized
`in Tables 1, 2, and 4. In the patients treated with the TVAC
`system, the procedure of thrombectomy was successful in
`39/40 patients (98%). In one patient, the TVAC system
`delivery was unsuccessful because of the vessel tortuosity.
`Of the 39 patients with successful delivery of the system,
`TIMI-3 flow was obtained in 29 patients and TIMI-1 or -2
`flow in 10 after thrombectomy. TIMI flow grade at each
`stage of the procedures is shown in Fig. 2. There was no
`procedure-related complication. Representative cases of
`successful TVAC thrombecomy are shown in Fig. 3. After
`the procedure of coronary intervention, no patient required
`target vessel revascularization during their stay in hospital.
`Also, there was no death and stroke in any of the patients.
`In the 3 months following coronary intervention there was
`also no death, no subacute thrombosis, and no stroke in any
`
`Table 1. Clinical baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients
`TVAC (n = 40)
`Control (n = 50)
`
`Age (years)
`Male
`Hypertension
`Hyperlipidemia
`Diabetes mellitus
`Current smoker
`Culprit lesion
`Left anterior descending artery
`Left circumflex artery
`Right coronary artery
`Severity of CAD
`Single-vessel disease
`Double-vessel disease
`Triple-vessel disease
`
`CAD, coronary artery disease
`
`64 ± 10
`34 (84%)
`20 (50%)
`19 (48%)
`15 (38%)
`27 (67%)
`
`18 (45%)
`6 (15%)
`16 (40%)
`
`18 (45%)
`10 (25%)
`12 (30%)
`
`63 ± 12
`38 (76%)
`24 (48%)
`21 (42%)
`20 (40%)
`35 (70%)
`
`23 (46%)
`8 (16%)
`19 (38%)
`
`27 (54%)
`17 (34%)
`6 (12%)
`
`P
`
`0.756
`0.604
`>0.999
`0.672
`0.831
`0.822
`
`>0.999
`>0.999
`>0.999
`
`0.525
`0.488
`0.061
`
`Page 6
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`4
`
`Table 2. Severity of myocardial infarction of in the two groups of patients
`TVAC (n = 40)
`Control (n = 50)
`
`Killip classification
`1
`2
`3
`4
`Initial TIMI grade
`0
`1
`2
`3
`Time to recanalization (min)
`Max CPK (IU/l)
`LVEF (acute phase) (%)
`IABP utilization
`
`38 (95%)
`1 (3%)
`1 (3%)
`0 (0%)
`
`29 (73%)
`1 (3%)
`6 (15%)
`4 (10%)
`307 ± 228
`2706 ± 1804
`50.4 ± 7.6
`8 (20%)
`
`43 (86%)
`7 (14%)
`0 (0%)
`0 (0%)
`
`30 (60%)
`6 (12%)
`12 (24%)
`2 (4%)
`359 ± 294
`3242 ± 2242
`51.2 ± 7.7
`10 (20%)
`
`P
`
`0.502
`0.289
`0.444
`>0.999
`
`0.267
`0.127
`0.427
`0.401
`0.478
`0.254
`0.199
`>0.999
`
`TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; IABP,
`intra-aortic balloon pumping; CPK, creatine phosphokinase
`
`41) (P = 0.241) (Table 3). ST elevation recovery >50% of
`the initial degree of ST elevation was observed after coro-
`nary intervention in 26/35 (74%) patients treated with the
`TVAC system and in 26/41 (63%) control patients (P =
`0.33). In the cases of anterior AMI, resolution of ST eleva-
`tion was 60% ± 26% in patients treated with the TVAC
`system (n = 17) and 40% ± 24% in control patients (n = 20)
`(P = 0.017). ST elevation recovery >50% of the initial de-
`gree of ST elevation was observed after coronary interven-
`tion in 13/17 (76%) patients treated with the TVAC system
`and in 8/20 (40%) control patients (P = 0.045) (Table 5).
`
`Discussion
`
`Fig. 2. Changes in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow
`grade in the two groups of patients
`
`Feasibility and safety of thrombectomy with
`the TVAC system in AMI
`
`patients. Of the 39 patients in whom thrombectomy was
`successfully performed, no visible thrombus or plaque seg-
`ment was detected in 27 patients, while in the other 12
`patients red thrombus was detected in 9, white thrombus
`in 3, plaque segment containing macrophages in 5, and
`cholesterine crystals in 4.
`
`Comparison of the results of coronary intervention with
`and without prior TVAC system
`
`In the final coronary angiogram after coronary intervention,
`TIMI-3 flow was obtained in 37/40 (93%) patients treated
`with the TVAC system and in 43/50 (86%) control patients
`(P = 0.502) (Table 3). Electrocardiograms before and after
`coronary intervention were analyzed in patients with ST
`elevation AMI. Resolution of ST elevation after interven-
`tion was 62% ± 24% of the baseline value of ST elevation in
`patients treated with the TVAC system (n = 35) and 53% ±
`34% in control patients treated with conventional PCI (n =
`
`Clinical evidence obtained from previous coronary an-
`gioplasty trials showed that the presence of angiographic
`thrombus is associated with increased incidences of abrupt
`closure and early and late post-procedure occlusion of the
`infarct-related artery.7,10 Although new treatments for acute
`coronary syndrome and high-risk angioplasty have been
`under development, a new device that can easily, rapidly,
`and safely remove occlusive tissue, thrombus, and friable
`materials from the coronary arteries remains necessary.
`With the use of a TVAC system, a new thrombectomy
`catheter system developed in Japan, in patients with AMI,
`we demonstrated that the thrombectomy system improved
`coronary flow in the infarct-related artery, assessed by
`TIMI flow grade. TIMI-3 flow was obtained in 29/40 (75%)
`patients treated with the TVAC system immediately after
`thrombectomy (Fig. 2). There were no procedure-related
`complications. After thrombectomy, a standard angioplasty
`including stent implantation was successfully accomplished
`in all patients. Further, there was no death, no stroke, and
`no revascularization therapy required while the patients
`were in hospital. In the 3 months following coronary inter-
`
`Page 7
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`5
`
`B
`
`Fig. 3. A Thrombotic occlusion
`in the middle of the left anterior
`descending coronary artery
`(indicated by an arrow). B
`Initial recanalization with the
`TVAC system. An arrow
`indicates the occlusion site
`before treatment. C Final left
`coronary angiogram after
`treatment with the TVAC
`system. An arrow indicates the
`occlusion site before treatment
`
`A
`
`C
`
`Table 3. Clinical outcomes of the two groups of patients
`TVAC (n = 40)
`
`Control (n = 50)
`
`P
`
`Clinical success
`Rate of TIMI-3 at the final angiogram
`ST resolution from the initial value
`Rate of recovery of ST elevation >50%
`of the initial value
`
`40 (100%)
`93%
`62% ± 24%
`74%
`
`50 (100%)
`86%
`53% ± 34%
`63%
`
`>0.999
`0.502
`0.241
`0.33
`
`Clinical success: successful angioplasty without cardiac death, reinfarction, emergency bypass
`surgery, and stroke in hospital
`
`vention there was also no death, no subacute thrombosis,
`and no stroke in any of the patients. Thus, thrombectomy
`with the present TVAC system was found to be feasible and
`safe.
`The TVAC system used in this study is a specially de-
`signed monorail catheter which is as flexible as a balloon
`catheter and can be advanced distally to the lesion with
`thrombus. Furthermore, the unique oblique tip with a shape
`like the beak of duck’s bill allows a passage through a
`stenotic lesion and increases trackability in tortuous tra-
`jectories. Compared with other aspiration catheters, the
`TVAC has a wide opening area (5.59mm2 in TVAC vs
`
`1.37 mm2 in RESCUE PT and 3.90mm2 in Export) and large
`lumen (0.90 mm2 in TVAC vs 0.60mm2 in RESCUE PT and
`0.82 mm2 in Export) for aspiration. The system is simple,
`and extensive experience or a long learning period is not
`necessary, as may be the case with the other aspiration
`catheters.15,16
`
`Efficacy of thrombectomy with the TVAC system in AMI
`
`This study showed that, in the final arteriogram of the inf-
`arct-related artery, TIMI-3 grade flow was obtained in 37/40
`
`Page 8
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`6
`
`Table 4. Clinical baseline of the two groups of patients (anterior AMI)
`TVAC (n = 18)
`Control (n = 23)
`
`Age (years)
`Male
`Hypertension
`Hyperlipidemia
`Diabetes mellitus
`Current smoker
`Severity of CAD
`Single-vessel disease
`Double-vessel disease
`Triple-vessel disease
`Killip classfication
`1
`2
`3
`4
`Initial TIMI grade
`0
`1
`2
`3
`Time to recanalization (min)
`Max CPK (IU/l)
`LVEF (acute phase) (%)
`IABP utilization
`
`62 ± 11
`13 (72%)
`9 (50%)
`10 (56%)
`7 (39%)
`11 (61%)
`
`8 (44%)
`5 (28%)
`5 (28%)
`
`18 (100%)
`0 (0%)
`0 (0%)
`0 (0%)
`
`12 (67%)
`1 (6%)
`4 (22%)
`1 (6%)
`297 ± 209
`3351 ± 2241
`48.0 ± 10.3
`6 (33%)
`
`60 ± 13
`17 (74%)
`13 (57%)
`11 (48%)
`8 (35%)
`15 (65%)
`
`17 (74%)
`5 (22%)
`1 (4%)
`
`20 (87%)
`3 (13%)
`0 (0%)
`0 (0%)
`
`13 (57%)
`4 (17%)
`6 (26%)
`0 (0%)
`451 ± 341
`3007 ± 2213
`47.1 ± 8.7
`7 (30%)
`
`P
`
`0.689
`>0.999
`0.758
`0.756
`>0.999
`>0.999
`
`0.106
`0.725
`0.07
`
`0.243
`0.243
`>0.999
`>0.999
`
`0.54
`0.363
`>0.999
`0.439
`0.11
`0.626
`0.805
`>0.999
`
`Table 5. Clinical outcomes in patients with anterior AMI
`TVAC (n = 17)
`
`Control (n = 20)
`
`P
`
`Rate of TIMI-3 at the final angiogram
`ST resolution from the initial value
`Rate of recovery of ST elevation >50%
`of the initial value
`
`83%
`60% ± 26%
`76%
`
`87%
`40% ± 24%
`40%
`
`0.502
`0.017
`0.045
`
`(93%) patients treated with the TVAC system followed by
`angioplasty and stenting, compared with 43/50 (86%) in
`control patients treated with angioplasty and stenting with-
`out prior thrombectomy. Although not significant, primary
`angioplasty with prior thrombectomy with the TVAC sys-
`tem was found to be of use in the treatment of AMI. It
`should be pointed out that this study was not done in
`a prospective, randomized fashion. Thus, thrombectomy
`using the TVAC system was attempted in 40 consecutive
`AMI patients. Another group of 50 consecutive patients
`with AMI in whom angioplasty and stenting were per-
`formed without prior thrombectomy served as a control
`group, since at that time no thrombectomy device was avail-
`able. There was no difference in the clinical characteristics
`between the two groups, including the distribution of the
`infarct-related artery and the degree of coronary flow
`before coronary intervention.
`Although epicardial coronary flow has been identified as
`an important predictor for clinical outcomes, it is well
`known that patency of the epicardial vessel does not neces-
`sarily indicate adequate reperfusion at the level of coronary
`microcirculation.17 Impairment of microvascular function
`may occur particularly during mechanical reperfusion pro-
`cedures. Thus, primary angioplasty for AMI may induce
`
`dislodgment of thrombi, causing distal macroembolization
`and microembolization. Further, mechanical dilation re-
`sults in plaque disruption and may induce distal emboliza-
`tion with atheromatous gruel and plaque components.18
`Distal embolization and subsequent slow flow or no-reflow
`have been reported to occur in up to 30% of patients
`treated with primary angioplasty.19–22
`An analysis of ST-segment resolution has been validated
`as a surrogate marker for restoration of microvascular
`functiohn. In patients with ST elevation AMI, early re-
`solution of ST elevation >50% of the initial degree of ST
`elevation has been shown to be associated with greater
`myocardial salvage and improved clinical outcome.13,14,23 In
`the present study, the degree of resolution of ST elevation
`after primary coronary intervention and the number of pa-
`tients with ST elevation recovery more than 50% of the
`initial degree of ST elevation after primary coronary inter-
`vention were both greater in the patient group treated with
`the TVAC system than in the group without prior throm-
`bectomy, although the difference did not reach statistical
`significance. When the same analysis was made in the pa-
`tients with anterior AMI, both parameters were signifi-
`cantly greater in the group treated with the TVAC system
`than in the group without prior thrombectomy. Thus,
`
`Page 9
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1474
`
`

`

`though not done in a prospective, randomized fashion, this
`study suggested that thrombectomy with the TVAC system
`prior to primary coronary intervention may enhance ST-
`segment resolution in the infarct-related artery in patients
`with AMI. It may be pointed out that the TVAC system was
`more effective in patients with anterior AMI that in those
`with nonanterior AMI. In fact, in nonanterior AMI the
`results of ST resolution were similar between the patient
`groups with and without treatment with the TVAC system.
`The present study could not clarify the reason for the differ-
`ence in the effect between anterior and nonanterior AMI.
`Anterior AMI may be at a higher risk of microvascular
`dysfunction than nonanterior AMI because of the differ-
`ences in the number of side branches and the size of the
`perfusion territory. Further studies in this respect are
`required.
`
`Study limitations
`
`This study was not done in a prospective, randomized fash-
`ion, and a comparison of the clinical outcomes between the
`patient groups treated with and without prior thrombec-
`tomy may be inappropriate in reaching some conclusions.
`Further prospective studies are necessary to establish the
`effectiveness of the TVAC thrombectomy system. Also,
`the present study did not show the long-term effect of
`the TVAC system. Since the prognosis of the patients
`with AMI is influenced by many factors including the
`size of infarction, left ventricular function, ventricular
`arrhythmias, and residual myocardial ischemia, the long-
`term effect of the TVAC system on the prognosis should be
`evaluated cautiously.
`
`Conclusions
`
`Thrombectomy with the TVAC system before balloon
`angioplasty and stent implantation in patients with AMI is
`feasible and safe, and may have the potential to mini

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket