throbber

` GUIDELINER® CATHETER
`
`Successful Transradial Use of
`the GuideLiner Catheter to
`Selectively Treat Severe
`Disease in the LAD
`
`facilitated accurate stent sizing and positioning.
`
`PHYSICIAN
`
`Mark Spence, MB BCh BAO Honours, MRCP (Edinburgh), MD
`Colm Hanratty, MD, FRCPI
`Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
`
`PRESENTATION
`
`A male patient presented with an acute coronary syndrome
`and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation. The patient has a medical
`history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. He presented with
`Inferolateral ST depression on 12-lead ECG; troponin level T 0.05.
`An echocardiogram showed asymmetrical septal hypertrophy
`and inferior hypokinesis.
`
`INITIAL FINDINGS
`
`Coronary angiography confirmed severe ostial disease in the
`RCA, extending into the proximal segmentof the artery anda
`long segmentof heavily calcified disease in the mid-LAD (Figure
`1). The LCX showed minimal disease and overall LV function was
`mildly impaired (VEDP 16mmtHg).
`
`TREATMENT
`
`The RCA was treatedsatisfactorily with a Liberté® 3.0 x 12mm
`bare-metal stent. Initial access to treat the LAD was obtained
`
`through the transradial approach using a 7F JL3.5 Asahi
`sheathless guide catheter. A 1.5mm Rotablator® burr was used to
`modify the calcified LAD. The lesion was predilatedserially with
`an Apex® 3.0 x 20mm balloon. Due to the friction encountered
`in the proximal LAD and guide catheter back out, a 3.0 x 38mm
`Taxus® stent could not be delivered to the targetlesion.
`
`TREATMENT OF THE LAD
`
`WITH GUIDELINER SUPPPORT
`
`A 6F GuideLiner catheter was inserted over the in-place .014”
`guidewire and easily passed through the proximal lesion
`and into the mid-LAD (Figure 2). Selective contrast injection
`improved visualization of the target vessel (Figure 3) and
`
`Page 1
`
`(continued on back)
`
`VSIQXM_E00044656
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2193
`Medtronicv. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2193
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`
`
`Interventional Cardiologist.
`
`TREATMENT (CONTINUED)
`
`The GuideLiner catheter was used to successfully deliver a 3.0
`x 38mm Taxus stent to the mid-LAD, which was subsequently
`overlapped with an additional 4.0 x 24mm Taxus stent
`proximally (Figure 4). The GuideLiner catheter was then used
`to deliver a 4.0 x 15mm Quantum™balloon for post-dilatation
`stent expansion.
`
`CONCLUSION AND POST PROCEDURE
`
`There was a good angiographic end result (Figure 5),
`following stenting and post-dilatation. IVUS confirmed
`the stent was apposed and optimally sized and deployed.
`The patient was discharged well, without complication the
`following day and was asymptomatic at 8 week review.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`By overcoming resistance in the proximal LAD, the GuideLiner
`catheter enabled successful delivery of interventional
`equipment to the heavily calcified mid-vessel.
`
`The facility for selective contrast injection via the GuideLiner
`catheter into the target vessel improved visualization
`facilitating optimal stent sizing and placement with limited
`total contrast volume.
`
`Mark Spence, MB BCh BAO
`Honours, MRCP (Edinburgh), MD
`Dr. Spence received his MD from Queen's
`University Belfast in Northern Ireland, UK andis
`an Honorary Senior Lecturer at the University.
`Dr. Spence completed an interventional
`cardiology fellowship, specializing in Coronary
`and Structural Heart Disease, at Royal Jubilee
`Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
`In addition, Dr. Spence completed a fellowship in
`Congenital Heart Disease Intervention at Royal
`Brompton Hospital and Guy's and St. Thomas’
`Hospitals in London, UK. He nowpractices at
`Royal Victoria Hospital in Belfast as a Consultant
`
`the Belfast Trust as a Consultant Interventional
`
`Colm Hanratty, MD, FRCPI
`Dr. Hanratty received his MD from Queen's
`University Belfast in Northern Ireland, UK
`followed bya fellowship at North Shore Hospital
`in Sydney, Australia. He now practices with
`
`Cardiologist.
`
`GuideLiner catheters are intended to be used in conjunction with guide catheters to access discrete regions of the coronary
`and/or peripheral vasculature, and to facilitate placement and exchangeof guidewires and other interventional devices.
`Please see theInstructions for Use fora completelisting ofthe indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
`CAUTION:Federal law (U.S.A.) restricts this device to sale by or on the orderof a physician.
`GuideLineris a registered trademark ofVascular Solutions,Inc.
`All other trademarks and registered trademarks are property oftheir respective owners.
`©2016 Vascular Solutions,Inc. All rights reserved. ML2212 Rev. B 10/16
`
`oe
`Sees
`'
`Y
`feet
`
`ascular
`SOLUTIONS
`
`Vascular Solutions,Inc.
`6464 Sycamore Court North
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369 USA
`,
`CustomerService:
`United States: 888.240.6001
`International: (001) 763.656.4298
`customerservice@vasc.com
`www.vasc.com
`
`Page 2
`
`VSIQXM_E00044657
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2193
`Medtronicv. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2193
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket