throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GUIDELINER® CATHETER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Successful Use of the GuideLiner
`
`Catheter to Treat Sequential
`Distal Carotid Artery Stenoses
`
`PHYSICIAN
`
`George Petrossian, MD
`St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
`
`PRESENTATION
`
`The patient is a male with a history of hypertension and
`hypercholesterolemia. He has a remote history of neck
`surgery for a parotid tumor, followed by radiation.
`
`Five months ago, he presented with a left hemispheric
`CVA, with moderate residual arm weakness. Angiography
`demonstrated a 50% ulcerated right internal carotid stenosis.
`The left carotid contained a proximal 90% stenosis at the
`origin, an 80% tubular mild left ICA stenosis distal to an
`angulated segment, and an 80% stenosis in the distal left ICA
`(petrous segment). At that time, an 8mm x 10mm, tapered
`Xact® stent was placed at the proximal stenosis with distal
`protection.
`
`Two weeks ago, the patient developed one hour of severe
`right arm weakness which resolved. He then underwent
`repeat carotid angiography.
`
`INITIAL FINDINGS
`
`Carotid angiography demonstrated a stable 50% ulcerated
`plaque within the right ICA. The left ICA proximal stent was
`widely patent. The mid left ICA contained an 80% tubular
`stenosis and the distal left ICA (petrous segment) had
`progressed and contained a 95% stenosis (Figure l).
`
`TREATMENT
`
`Without distal protection, a 3mm x 15mm balloon was used
`to perform PTA of the 2 distal stenoses (Figure 2). A 7mm x
`20mm Xact stent would not cross the distal lesion, and was
`
`deployed at the more proximal lesion, with a similar 7mm
`x 20mm stent placedjust proximally. A significant residual
`stenosis was present at the distal stent margin as well as the
`most distal lesion in the petrous segment. Further attempts
`to cross the remaining lesions with a 2.0mm balloon over a
`0.014" guidewire were unsuccessful.
`
`(continued on back)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44667
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2189
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2189
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`TREATMENT WITH GUIDELINER CATHETER
`
`A 0.014" BMW 300cm guidewire was placed distally in the
`left ICA and the GuideLiner catheter was advanced into the
`
`stented segment ofthe left ICA (Figure 3). A 2mm x 15mm
`OTW balloon crossed the distal lesion with GuideLiner
`
`support and a 300cm Wigglem guidewire was placed distally
`after removal of the BMW guidewire.
`
`A 3.5mm x 15mm bare metal stent and a 4.5mm x 18mm bare
`
`metal stent were deployed distally (Figure 4) within the left
`ICA and post dilated (Figure 5). The end result was a widely
`patent left ICA (Figure 6).
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The GuideLiner catheter provided the support necessary to
`advance balloon and stent catheters to the distal left ICA
`
`in a patient with prior radiation, vessel tortuosity and prior
`stent implantation. Without the GuideLiner catheter, this
`procedure would have been unsuccessful.
`
`George Petrossian, MD
`Dr. Petrossian received his MD. from The
`Mount Sinai School of Medicine. He completed
`his Medical and Cardiology training at
`Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, New York
`and his Interventional Cardiology training at
`Massachusetts General Hospital. He is the
`Director of Interventional Cardiovascular
`Procedures, St. Francis Hospital,The Heart
`Center, Roslyn, NY.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GuideLinerCatheters areintended to be used in Conjunction with guide Catheters to aCCess discrete regions ofthe Coronary
`and/or peripheral vasculature, and to facilitate placementand exchange ofguideWires and other interventional devices.
`Pleasesee the lnstructionsfor Use fora complete listing nfthe indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
`CAUTION: Federal law (U.S.A.) restricts this deviceto sale by or on theorder of a physician.
`GuideLiner is a registered trademarkofVascularSolutions, Inc.
`All othertrademarks and registered trademarks are property oftheir respective owners.
`©2016Vascular$olutions, Inc. All rights reserved. ML1316 Rev. B 10/16
`
`Vascular Solutions, Inc.
`6464 Sycamore Court North
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369 USA
`Customer Service:
`United States: 888.240.6001
`International: (001) 763.656.4298
`
`customerservice@vasc.com S 0 L U 'I‘
`
`I U N S
`
`www.vasc.com
`
`Page 2
`
`VSIQXM_EOOO44668
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2189
`
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2189
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket