throbber
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
`
`Volume23 • Number 2
`
`June 1991
`
`ORIGINALSTUDIES
`Inaccuracies in Patients
`Simplified Formula for the Calculation of Mitral Valve Area: Potential
`With Tachycardia, Walter C. Brogan III, Richard A. Lange, and L. David Hillis
`Angioplasty of Long or Tandem Coronary Artery Lesions Using a New Longer Balloon Dilatation
`Catheter: A Comparative StUdy, James F. Brymer. Fareed Khaja, and Phillip L. Krall
`Rapid Thrombus Dissolution by Continuous
`Infusion of UrOkinase Through an Intracoronary
`Perfusion Wire Prior to and Following PTCA: Results In Native Coronaries and Patent Saphenous
`Vein Grafts, Anthony T. Chapekis, Barry S. George, and Richard J. Candela
`Coronary Angloplasty Using New 6 French Guiding Catheters, Robert Feldman, Eric Glemser,
`Judy Kaizer, and Mary Standley
`Reduction in Injection Pain Using Buffered Lidocaine as a Local Anesthetic Before Cardiac
`Catheterization, Peter Sapin, Regina Petrozzi, and Gregory J. Dehmer
`Coronary Arteriography
`in Patients With Dextrocardia, James C. Blankenship
`and Jose Antonio F. Ramires
`CASE REPORTS
`In Tortuous Right Coronary Arteries During Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary
`Accordion Effect
`Angioplasty, R. Andrew Rauh, Robert W. Ninneman, David Joseph, Vinod K. Gupta, Dale G. Senior,
`and William P. Miller
`Accordion Right Coronary Artery: An Unusual Complication of PTCA Guidewire Entrapment,
`Ubeydullah Deligonul, Salyanarayana Tatineni, Randy Johnson, and Morton J. Kern
`Subacute Bilateral Coronary Ostial Stenoses Following Cardiac Catheterization and PTCA,
`Vance E. Wilson and Eric R. Bates
`in the
`Lack of Evidence for Small Vessel Disease in a Patient With "Slow Dye Progression"
`Coronary Arteries, Johan Van Lierde, Matty Vrolix, Dlmitris Sionis, Hilaire De Geest, and Jan Piessens ..
`Coronary Artery Narrowing Due to Extrinsic Compression by Myocardial Abscess, Cindy L. Wickline,
`Vasu D. Goli, and James C. Buell
`Coronary Focal Ectasia Formation Following Percutaneous Translumlnal Angioplasty,
`Herbert J. Semler ........................................................•...
`Successful Angioplasty of a Chronically Occluded Saphenous Vein Graft Using a Prolonged
`Urokinase Infusion From the Brachial Route, Andrew J. Doorey, Mark A. Rosenbloom, and
`Mark R. Zoinick
`Case Report of a Coronary Anomaly: Crossing Obtuse Marginal Arteries, Seth D. Bilazarian,
`Alice K. Jacobs, James D. Fonger, and David P. Faxon
`Multiple Coronary Artery-Left Ventricular Fistulae: Clinical, Angiographlc, and Pathologic Findings,
`Ian W. Black, Christine K.C. Loo, and Roger M. Allan
`Congestive Heart Failure Secondary to an Arteriovenous Fistula From Cardiac Catheterization and
`Angioplasty, Alexander O. Sy and Stephen Plantholt
`"End-Hole" Pigtail Catheter: An Unusual Complication of Left Ventriculography, Thomas C. Hilton,
`Ubeydullah Deligonul, Frank Aguirre, and Morton J. Kern
`In Vivo Thrombus Formation on a Guldewire During Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: Evidence for
`Inadequate Heparinization, Paul A. Grayburn, John E. Willard, M. Elizabeth Brickner, and
`Eric J. Eichhorn
`BASIC INVESTIGATION
`of Contrast Media on Coronary Hemodynamics In a Canine
`Effects of Intracoronary Administration
`Post Ischemic Reperfusion Model, Sheng H. Sheu, Ming H. Hwang, Zhen E. Piao, Robert J. Hariman,
`Henry S. Loeb, and Patrick J. Scanlon
`LEITERS TO THE EDITOR
`Pseudoaneurysm Following Balloon Angioplasty? P. Syamasundar Rao
`Pseudoaneurysm Formation Following Balloon Angioplasty for Recurrent Coarctation of the
`Aorta: Reply, Douglas H. Joyce and Lynn B. McGrath
`A Simplified Approach to Cineangiogram Labeling, Abraham A. Embi, Lisa Anseeuw, and
`Dean H. Roller
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`@)WILEY-LISS
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`81
`
`84
`
`89
`93
`
`100
`103
`
`107
`
`111
`
`114
`
`117
`
`121
`
`124
`
`127
`130
`133
`136
`139
`
`141
`
`144
`
`150
`
`151
`
`152
`
`Page 1
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 23:93-99 (1991)
`
`Coronary Angioplasty Using New 6
`French GUiding Catheters
`
`Robert Feldman MD, Eric Glemser BSN, Judy Kaizer RN, and Mary Standley BS
`
`6-French guiding
`constructed
`(PTCA) was performed with specially
`a~giopl~sty
`Coronary
`~Ith an mternallum~n
`of 0.051 inches.
`In 154 patients
`these guiding
`catheters
`catheters
`of configurations
`w.ere ~sed In a variety
`in conjunction
`with miniature
`balloon-on-a-wlre
`in 1.5 to 3.5 mm sizes to perform PTCA .
`dilatation
`catheters
`arteries
`. Overall patient
`success was 94%. PTCA was attempted
`in 24 totally occluded
`rate of 83% and 174 stenoses with a success
`with a success
`rate of 97%. 6 French guiding
`catheters
`can be used to successfully
`perform PTCA.
`
`artery
`coronary
`Key words:
`ease, coronary
`angioplasty
`
`disease,
`
`coronary
`
`revascularization,
`
`ischemic
`
`heart dis-
`
`INTRODUCTION
`One avenue in which percutaneous transluminal cor-
`onary angioplasty (PTCA) technology is rapidly advanc-
`ing is in the miniaturization of equipment, particularly
`balloon-on-a-wire
`dilatation system catheters. These
`miniature PTCA balloons are currently available from 3
`manufacturers
`(Cordis ORION™, Cordis Corp., Miami,
`FL; Sci-Med ACE™, Sci-Med Life Systems, Inc., Min-
`neapolis, MN; and USCI PROBE™, C.R. Bard, Inc.,
`USCI Division, Billerica, MA) in balloon sizes from 1.5
`through 3.5 mm and have balloon profiles in the 0.020-
`0.036 inch range (Table I). The shaft size of these bal-
`loon-on-a-wire
`dilatation catheters
`is 1.7-2.4 French
`(approximately 0.6-0.8 mm or 0.023-0.032 inches). In
`addition,
`a 1.5 mm Dilating Guidewire
`(.018 inches,
`Sci-Med) which can be used alone or placed through
`some over-the-wire balloons is also available.
`Because of their small catheter size these PTCA bal-
`loon dilatation systems can be used with smaller-sized
`guiding catheters than the larger conventional over-the-
`wire PTCA balloons. In fact, anecdotal and several case
`reports have documented use of the USCI PROBE bal-
`loon catheter with diagnostic catheters
`as small as 5
`French
`[1-6]. The 2.0 mm balloon sizes (ACE or
`PROBE)
`can work reasonably well
`through uncoated,
`tapered diagnostic catheters if considerable catheter ma-
`nipulation is not necessary in the target vessel. However,
`in our experience, balloons larger than the 2.0 mm size
`move poorly if at all through a diagnostic catheter. This
`poor movement becomes particularly apparent as the bal-
`loon exits or returns to the preformed curve of the diag-
`nostic catheter
`turned "guide." Any winging of the
`PTCA balloon after it has been inflated either during
`
`© 1991 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`preparation or during dilatation adds to the difficulty in
`movement
`through a diagnostic catheter [4]. This paper
`describes our present experience using 6 French custom-
`made guiding catheters and miniature PTCA balloons in
`a range of clinical circumstances.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The guiding catheters were constructed in conjunction
`with Cordis Corporation. The catheters are similar to the
`6 French Super Torque"
`diagnostic catheter, but differ
`in several important features. First, they are untapered in
`both their outer and internal diameter (.051 inches) from
`the hub to the tip. Second, attached to the distal end is a
`soft,
`radiopaque 2 mm extension, which is the Brite
`TipTM Third, unlike conventional guiding catheters
`where to facilitate balloon movement Teflon" comprises
`the inner layer,
`the internal
`lumen of this catheter
`is
`coated with silicone. An illustration showing relative
`guiding catheter-to-balloon shaft ratios, comparing an 8
`French guiding catheter with an over-the-wire balloon
`and a 6 French guiding catheter with a balloon-on-a-wire
`is shown in Figure I.
`PTCA was otherwise performed in a standard fashion.
`A successful PTCA was defined as a residual stenosis
`
`From the Munroe Regional Medical Center, Ocala Heart
`Ocala, Florida.
`
`Institute,
`
`Received October 2, 1990; revision accepted January 6, 1991.
`
`Address reprint requests to Munroe Regional Medical Center, 131
`S.W. 15th Street, Ocala, FL 32671.
`
`Page 2
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`TABLE I. Balloon-on-a-wlre Dilatation Catheters: Summary of
`Currently Available Profiles (In Inches)
`2.5 mm
`.030
`
`3.0 mm
`.032
`
`3.5 rom
`.036
`
`ACE™
`DGW™
`.030
`.028
`.028
`ORION™
`PROBeM~
`.030
`.020
`.025
`"Not currently available but when released will be available
`as well.
`
`94
`
`Feldman et al.
`
`1.5mm
`.020
`.018
`
`2.0mm
`.022
`
`.032
`
`in 114 sizings
`
`SF System
`0.074"--7""- .....
`
`0.046"--+
`
`6F System
`
`~0.051"
`
`~0.024"
`
`Fig. 1. Proportional comparison of a conventional 8 French
`gUiding catheter with 8 3.5 French over~the-wlre balloon and the
`described 6 French guiding catheter with a 1.8 French shall
`balloon-on-a-wlre.
`
`and no in-hospital angina, myocardial
`«50%)
`tion, bypass surgery, or death.
`
`infarc-
`
`RESULTS
`PTCA was performed using a 6 French guiding cath-
`eter in 154 patients.
`In 152 patients a 6 French guiding
`catheter was the initial guiding catheter chosen.
`In 2
`patients an 8 French guiding catheter was tried first. In
`one of these patients, no conventional 8 French guiding
`catheter would seat
`in' a small right ostium, but a 6
`French JR 4 fit well.
`In the other patient, both an 8
`French JL 4 and an 8 French AL 2, both without side
`holes, functionally occluded the left main artery; how-
`ever, a 6 French AL 2 fit without pressure dampening. A
`femoral approach was used in 144 patients and a percu-
`taneous right or left brachial approach in 10.
`-
`Patient diagnosis varied as expected,
`including silent
`ischemia in 3 patients, stable angina in 10, unstable an-
`gina in 95, evolving acute myocardial
`infarction in 16,
`and myocardial infarction within the past 2 weeks in 30.
`Patient weight averaged 76 kg (range 46 to 133 kg) and
`body surface area averaged 1.85 m2 (range 1.45 to 2.45
`m2). The average age was 66 years (range 38 to 85
`years), 81 of the patients were male, 73 female.
`Complications occurred in 5 patients, in hospital death
`occurred in 2 patients, myocardial
`infarction in 2, and
`coronary bypass surgery before discharge in 4 patients.
`I) An 85-year-old woman with refractory unstable an-
`gina and severe peripheral vascular disease agreed to
`PTCA, but declined surgery under any circumstances.
`PTCA of a subtotal anterior descending using a 6F AL 1
`
`TABLE II. Guiding Catheter Shspes selected
`
`Shape
`JL 5
`JL 4.5
`JL 4
`JL 3.5
`JL 5
`JR 4
`JR 3.5
`AL 2
`AL I
`AR 2
`LSVBG
`RSVBG
`IMA
`Sones
`
`LAD
`
`LM
`I
`
`34
`9
`
`8
`
`LeX
`2
`5
`20
`
`3
`II
`
`2'
`
`RCA
`
`DlAG
`
`GRAFT
`
`2
`I
`
`I
`36
`2
`
`4
`4
`19
`I
`2
`I
`
`2
`5
`4
`2
`
`'Congenitally
`
`aberrant arising from right Sinus of Valsalva.
`
`TABLE III. Balloon-on-a-Wlre Catheters Used
`2.5 rom
`1.5 rom
`I
`2
`I
`NIA
`N/A
`6
`N/A
`33
`
`2.0mm
`3
`
`17
`35
`
`ACE™
`ACS Gold™'
`PROBE™
`ORION™
`
`3.0mm
`3
`I
`12
`46
`
`3.5 rom
`I
`NIA
`NIA
`5
`
`devices.
`"Investigational
`- = Not used.
`N/A = Not available.
`
`and a 2.5 mm Cordis Orion by the percutaneous left
`brachial approach was initially technically successful
`(>90% to 30%). One hour later angina recurred and the
`anterior descending had occluded. Repeat PTCA was
`'complicated by repeated reocclusion. She died I day
`later having sustained an anterior infarction. 2) A 64-
`year-old woman presented in cardiogenic shock second-
`ary to an evolving inferior
`infarction. PTCA using a
`6-French JR 4 and a 3.0 mm Cordis Orion was successful
`in opening the occluded right coronary artery (100% to
`10%) and the patient stabilized. Because her left main
`was narrowed 90%, she underwent coronary bypass sur-
`gery 8 days later. Postoperatively she developed adult
`respiratory distress syndrome and died II days after
`PTCA. 3) A 65-year-old diabetic woman had multivessel
`PTCA. Her anterior descending (99% to 20%) occluded
`24 hours after PTCA and was heralded by recurrent an-
`gina, new nonspecific ST-T wave changes; and minimal
`CPK elevation. Rather than repeat PTCA, she chose by-
`pass surgery which was done 3 days after PTCA. 4) A
`63-year-old woman with silent ischemia and restenosis
`(90%) of a right coronary required emergent bypass. Ini-
`tial dilatation' was through a 6-French left saphenous vein
`bypass graft guide and a 3.0 mm Orion was used. Be-
`cause of residual stenosis of 40%, balloon size was in-
`creased to 3.5 mm (Orion). The final angiographic result
`
`Page 3
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`PlCA Using6 FrenchGuides
`
`95
`
`c
`
`Fig. 2. Patient example from a 47-yea,·old male (BSA 1.99m2,
`weight 86 kg) who presented with new onset unstable sngins.
`At dlagnosllc esthsterlz8tlon tha mid-anterior descending wss
`found to be totslly occluded (A, srrow). For PTCA, the 6 French
`diagnostic
`catheter was exchanged
`for 8 6 French JL 4 gUiding
`estheter
`(8). Tha 3.0 mm Orlon TM esthater easily crossed the
`occluded anterior descending.
`Lesion, vessel, and balloon vi-
`sualization during PTCA was axcellent
`(8). Tha mid-marker of
`tha belloon slthe area of prior occlusion and the wire tip (ar-
`rowheads)
`are clearly seen. Results 01 dilatation were easy to
`asse ..
`; after PTCA (C) the anterior descending was wldaly
`pslent.
`
`(10%) without dissection; but 2 hours later
`was excellent
`chest pain with transient ST changes occurred. Repeat
`angiography showed a new extensive partially occlusive
`dissection. Repeat dilatation with a larger guiding cath-
`eter (7-French, Cordis) and use of an ACS Stack Perfu-
`sion balloon (ACS, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
`lnc., Temecula, California)
`failed to yield an optimal
`result and emergency bypass surgery was done. 5) A
`66-year-old woman with post-infarction
`angina was
`found to have 3-vessel disease including occlusion of the
`right. PTCA with a 6 French JR 4 guiding catheter and a
`3.0 mm Orion resulted in an excellent angiographic re-
`
`suit «
`30%). However repeated, symptomatic reocclu-
`sion led to urgent bypass surgery. None of the compli-
`cations seemed related to choice of initial equipment.
`Although in each case the stenosis was initially techni-
`cally successful crossed and dilated, none of these pa-
`tients or these lesions were counted as successful. No
`peripheral vascular complications requiring surgery oc-
`curred. Two patients had hematomas at the femoral cath-
`eterization site which were managed conservatively.
`PTCA was successful
`in 143 of the 152 patients in
`whom a 6 French guiding catheter was used initially and
`in both of those in whom an 8 French guiding catheter
`
`Page 4
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`96
`
`Feldman et al.
`
`A
`
`c
`
`Fig. 3. Pallent example from a 62-year-old mala (BSA 1.93 m',
`weight 76 kg) who preaanted with recent onset unstable angina.
`The circumflex arises at 8 sharp angle and hal 8 severe, com-
`plex stenosis (A, arrow). Oil_Ion
`was performed with a 6
`
`French JL 4.5 guiding catheter and a 3.5-mm Orton estheter.
`The Brite T1pTM (0), the balloon marker (arrow), wire tip (arrow-
`head), and stenosis (arrow) were easily visualized during PTCA
`(B and C). After PTCA (0) the circumflex was widely patent.
`
`had failed first. In order to achieve a successful dilatation
`a 6 French guiding catheter was changed to a 7 French
`guiding catheter in 4 patients. In each of these cases the
`initial 6 French shape chosen fit
`imperfectly or gave
`inadequate support. A 7 French guiding catheter of a
`different shape not available in 6 French was always
`used; and PTCA was uneventful. We suspect if the same
`
`shape had been available in the 6 French guiding cathe-
`ter, PTCA would have been successful as well. In 2
`patients PTCA was unsuccessful because of inability to
`cross a recent (2-month-old) total occlusion and a long
`tortuous subtotal occlusion, both in the right coronary
`artery. Despite attempts with 8 French guides and a va-
`riety of fixed and over-the-wire balloon systems, neither
`
`Page 5
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`PleA Using 6 French Guides
`
`97
`
`B
`
`c
`
`Patient example from 8 38-year-old male (BSA 2.23 m2,
`Fig. 4.
`weight 107 kg) who resented with 8 posterior
`Infarction compli-
`cated by postinfaretlon
`angina. The circumflex was occluded
`(arrow) in ita mid-portion (A). Dilatation waa accomplished with
`a 6 French JL 4 guiding catheter and a 2.5-mm Orion catheter.
`To obtain extra support
`the gUiding catheter was advanced over
`
`relatively far into the left main stem (8 and
`the balloon-on-a-wlre
`C). The catheter
`tip marker
`(0) was easily seen. Visualization of
`the balloon (arrowhead), wire tip (arrows),
`and lesion during
`PTCA (B and C) was excellent. Alter PTCA (0) the result was
`accaptable.
`
`the occlusion or the stenosis was crossed. Overall !'TCA
`was successful
`in 145 of 154 patients,
`in 178 of 186
`vessels, and in 189 of 198 lesions.
`!'TCA was attempted in 24 total occlusions and was
`successful
`in 21 (83%). These occlusions were usually in
`patients with a recent or evolving acute myocardial
`in-
`
`farction. !'TCA was attempted in 174 stenoses, <100%
`blocked, and was successful in 169 (97%). Visualization
`of the coronary anatomy when the balloon was in the
`guiding catheter or in the coronary arteries was adequate
`for diagnostic and technical purposes in each patient.
`When the balloon was in the guiding catheter or coronary
`
`Page 6
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`98
`Feldmanel al.
`artery, 50:50 or higher mixtures (70:30) of contrast me-
`dium (Omnipaque 350, Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, New
`York, NY; or Optiray 320, Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc.,
`St. Louis, MO) and heparinized normal saline were
`used.
`The selected 6-French guiding catheters had routine
`diagnostic curves and were used successfully in a variety
`of circumstances including vein and internal mammary
`artery bypass grafts and coronary arteries with anoma-
`lous origins (Table II). The sizes and frequency of the
`balloons used are listed in Table III. Angiographic ex-
`amples of lesion visualization before, during and after
`PTCA are shown in Figures 2-4.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Our experience documents that 6 French guiding cath-
`eters can be routinely and successfully used in a variety
`of PTCA patients. The success rate was excellent and no
`major problems attributed to the use of a small guiding
`catheter were identified. Specifically, no patient compli-
`cation occurred by using these smaller guiding catheters
`instead of larger conventional guiding catheters.
`Although there was no apparent learning curve or ma-
`jor difficulty encountered,
`these 6 French guiding cath-
`eter/balloon-on-a-wire dilatation systems have different
`handling characteristics when compared to conventional
`PTCA equipment. As discussed elsewhere, balloon-on-
`a-wire dilatation devices handle differently than standard
`shaft over-the-wire or larger fixed or partially moveable
`wire balloons [6]. The feel, control, stability, and ability
`to opacify the distal vessels differed with these 6 French
`guiding catheters as compared to larger guiding cathe-
`ters. Distal vessel opacification was adequate for diag-
`nostic images, but was obviously less than when these
`small balloons are used with 7 or 8 French guides. Al-
`though vessel opacification was not "quantified,"
`in our
`opinion vessel opacification was comparable to that ob-
`tained using of larger shaft 3.5 French over-the-wire di-
`latation balloons with standard 8 French guiding cathe-
`ters. Opacification 'as expected was better in the right
`than the left coronary system. Suboptimal visualization
`was uncom.mon and did not necessitate changing to a
`larger guide. Although conceptually backup' was ex-
`pected to be only fair at best, the 6-French guiding cath-
`eters offered good backup, Once the balloon-on-a-wire
`was into the coronary artery, the guiding catheter could
`usually,
`if desired, be advanced easily over the balloon
`shaft and provided considerable support (Fig. 4). When
`this maneuver was used,
`the guiding catheter did not
`seem to obstruct the coronary artery as significant pres-
`sure dampening was uncommon and chest pain or elec-
`trocardiographic changes did not occur. Clinical experi-
`
`ence remains limited, but no coronary dissections with
`these small guiding catheters occurred.
`Certain limitations of small guiding catheters are ob-
`vious. These include the inability to use standard bal-
`loon-over-a-wire systems. Specially angled baIloons and
`perfusion baIloons (ACS) are useful in certain circum-
`stances and cannot be used with 6 French guiding cath-
`eters. The ability to maintain access to the distal vessel is
`felt important by some Cardiologists. Control of the di-
`stal vessel can be maintained while using some baIloon-
`on-a-wire dilatation systems if a Probing Catheter™
`(USCI) is also used. However, this 4 French sheath can-
`not fit through a 6-French guiding catheter. Although in
`our opinion this is not a major limitation, others would
`disagree. Obviously capability of distal pressure mea-
`surement or distal dye injection is lost when baIloon-
`on-a-wire systems are used. This is true regardless of
`guiding catheter size.
`AdditionaIly,
`some cardiologists may on occasion
`choose to use distal perfusion with oxygenated blood or
`Fluosol"
`(Alpha Therapeutic Corporation, Los Ange-
`les, CAl which can only be done when using baIloon
`dilatation catheters with a large central lumen. Finally, it
`is not presently possible to simultaneously place multiple
`baIloons through one 6-French guiding catheter.
`In our initial endeavors (unreported cases) to develop
`a useable, smaIl guiding catheter, a 6-French untapered,
`uncoated catheter was first tried. Although most cases
`could be successfuIly completed, considerable resistance
`in baIloon catheter movements above the 2.0-mm size
`was encountered. Resistance was noted particularly in
`the preformed curves in the guiding catheter, as the bal-
`loon exited or after the dilatation as it was withdrawn and
`reentered the guiding catheter. A second generation
`which included an alternate lubricious coating was not
`helpful. The third generation, which this report ad-
`dresses, is promising, but ease of balloon movement re-
`mains less facile than with larger lumen guiding cathe-
`ters. Future developments
`in smaIl French guiding
`catheters are in progress [unpublished data, Feldman et
`al.]. Larger lumen 6 French guiding catheters will soon
`It wiIl soon be
`be available from several companies.
`possible to use over-the-wire balloons such as the new
`ACS Ten™
`and monorail-type standard and perfusion
`baIloons with smaIl French shaft size in 6-French guiding
`catheters.
`In our opinion, 6 and 7 French guiding catheters are
`particularly advantageous in patients with smaIl proximal
`right or left coronary arteries. A smaIl guiding catheter
`may obstruct the proximal coronary less or not at all as
`compared to 8 or 9 French guiding catheters. Addition-
`ally,
`in small vessels, as compared to larger guiding
`catheters, 6 French guiding catheters fit better, generaIly
`allow adequate perfusion, and are more stable. Although
`
`Page 7
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

`

`8 French gniding catheters with side holes allow some
`perfusion,
`the 6 French guiding catheters may also be
`less traumatic by virtue of their smaller diameter and less
`tight fit. If necessary, 6 French guiding catheters could
`certainly have side holes as well. Several of our patients
`had ostial narrowing of the right coronary artery and a 6
`French guiding catheter always fit, but at times did oc-
`clude.
`Other reasons to develop a 6 French guiding catheter
`includes patients with severe peripheral vascular disease.
`In these patients PTCA has usually been performed by a
`brachial cutdown or percutaneously via the axillary or
`brachial approach. For years we had utilized a percuta-
`neous brachial approach with 7 French guiding catheters,
`but were concerned, especially in smaller women, about
`catheter size. Our initial experience with 6-French guid-
`ing catheters placed percutaneously from the right or left
`brachial artery using Amplatz or Judkins shapes has been
`satisfying and no local complications have occurred. In
`addition to patients with occlusive bi-femoral disease,
`we have also used the brachial route with 6 French guid-
`ing catheters for patients with massive obesity. Addition-
`ally, there is a trend toward shorter post-PTCA hospital-
`ization, earlier ambulation and patient discharge [7-8].
`The use of smaller French guiding catheters for PTCA in
`this setting would be similar to the rationale for the use
`of small French diagnostic catheters, especially in pa-
`tients undergoing outpatient diagnostic studies.
`
`PTCAUsing6 FrenchGuides
`
`99
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Kern MJ, Salinger MH: First use of a 5-french diagnostic catheter
`as a guiding catheter for percutaneous transluminal coronary an-
`gioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 18:276-278, 1989.
`2. Panayiotou H, Norris JW, Forman MB: Coronary angioplasty at
`the time of initial catheterization using small diagnostic catheters.
`Am Het J 119:204-205,
`January 1990.
`3. Martinez A, Pichard A, Little T, Lindsay]: Probe "Balloon on a
`Wire" ultra-low-profile coronary catheter: Results ofPTCA in 107
`patients. Cathet Cardiovas Diagn 18:222-226, 1989.
`4. Kern MJ, Talley JD, Deligonul D, SerotaH, Aguire F, Gudipati C,
`Ring M, Joseph A, Yussman ZA: Preliminary experience with 5F
`angiographic catheter as a guiding catheter for coronary angio-
`plasty. Cathet Dardiov Dlagn 19:295-296, 1990.
`5. Shani J, Mylavarapu S, Maddipoti R, Leeman D, Rivera M, Char-
`lap S, Greengart A, Hollander G, Lichstein E: Coronary angio-
`plasty through diagnostic catheters. Clinical Research (AFCR Car-
`diovascular) 37:295A, 1989.
`6. Avcdissian MG, Killeavy ES, Garcia JM, Dear ED: Percutaneous
`transluminal
`coronary angioplasty: A review of current balloon
`dilatation systems. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 18:263-275, 1989.
`7. Cragg DR, Friedman HZ, Almany SL, Gangaharan V, Ramos RG,
`Levine AB, LeBeau TA, O'Neil WW: Early hospital discharge
`after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Car-
`dial 64:1270-t274,
`1989.
`8. Feldman RL: Is short-stay angiopiasty safe? Clinical Cardiology,
`in press.
`
`Page 8
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1471
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket