throbber
1
`
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________________________________________
`MEDTRONIC, INC., AND MEDTRONIC
`VASCULAR, INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`vs.
`
`TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`___________________________________________________
`IPR2020-00126 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00127 (Patent 8,048,032 B2)
`IPR2020-00128 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00129 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00130 (Patent RE45,380 E)
`IPR2020-00132 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00134 (Patent RE45,760 E)
`IPR2020-00135 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00136 (Patent RE45,776 E)
`IPR2020-00137 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`IPR2020-00138 (Patent RE47,379 E)
`___________________________________________________
`
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`GREGG SUTTON
`
`DATE: November 6, 2020
`
`TIME: 8:55 a.m. Central Time
`
`PLACE: Veritext Virtual Videoconference
`
`REPORTED BY: PAULA K. RICHTER, RMR, CRR, CRC
`(By videoconference)
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Page 1
`
`IPR2020-01341/-01343
`
`Medtronic Ex.1757
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
`1 INDEX
`
`2 3
`
`PAGE:
`WITNESS: GREGG SUTTON
`4 EXAMINATION BY MS. TREMBLAY................ 6
`5 EXAMINATION BY MS. NORGARD................. 82
`
`6 7 8
`
`EXHIBITS PREVIOUSLY MARKED AND REFERRED TO:
`9 EXHIBIT 1108 U.S. Patent 7,604,612 -
`10 Ressemann Patent............... 8
`11 EXHIBIT 1109 U.S. Patent 5,439,445 -
`12 Kontos Patent.................. 59
`13 EXHIBIT 2002 Lab Notebook 83................ 54
`14 EXHIBIT 2005 GuideLiner Send Report......... 67
`15 EXHIBIT 2119 Declaration of Gregg Sutton.... 45
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1 APPEARANCES
`2 ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS (By videoconference):
`3 Ms. Emily J. Tremblay, Esq.
`4 Ms. Sharon Roberg-Perez, Esq.
`5 Mr. Cyrus A. Morton, Esq.
`6 ROBINS KAPLAN, LLP
`7 800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2800
`8 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
`9 (612) 349-8500
`10 etremblay@robinskaplan.com
`11 sroberg-perez@robinskaplan.com
`12 cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`13
`14 ON BEHALF OF THE PATENT OWNER (By videoconference):
`15 Ms. Tara C. Norgard, Esq.
`16 Mr. Alexander S. Rinn, Esq.
`17 Mr. Derek Vandenburgh, Esq.
`18 CARLSON, CASPERS, VANDENBURGH & LINDQUIST
`19 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`20 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`21 (612) 436-9600
`22 tnorgard@carlsoncaspers.com
`23 arinn@carlsoncaspers.com
`24 dvandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com
`25 (APPEARANCES continued on next page)
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`1
`P R O C E E D I N G S
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We
`2
`3 are going on the record at 8:55 a.m. on November
`4 6th, 2020.
`5 This is Media Unit 1 of the
`6 video-recorded deposition of Gregg Sutton taken by
`7 counsel for the petitioner in the matter of
`8 Medtronic, Inc., et al. versus Teleflex
`9 Innovations, filed in the U.S. Patent and
`10 Trademark Office; Case Number IPR2020-00126.
`11 My name is Tim Perry, certified
`12 legal video specialist. The court reporter is
`13 Paula Richter.
`14 Counsel, will you identify
`15 yourselves for the record, please.
`16 MS. TREMBLAY: Good morning. This
`17 is Emily Tremblay with Robins Kaplan. Also with
`18 me from Robins Kaplan are Cy Morton and Sherry
`19 Roberg-Perez. Also on the line is our expert,
`20 Paul Zalesky.
`21 MS. NORGARD: Good morning. This is
`22 Tara Norgard, and with me today is Alex Rinn. We
`23 are both appearing with the Carlson Caspers law
`24 firm on behalf of the patent owner and the
`25 witness.
`
`1
`
`APPEARANCES (Continued)
`
`23
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
`4 Tim Perry - Videographer
`5 Dina Martin - Veritext Concierge
`6 Paul Zalesky
`7 Greg Smock - Teleflex
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Okay. Thank you.
`2 Please swear in the witness.
`3 GREGG SUTTON,
`4 duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
`5 EXAMINATION
`6 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`7 Q. Good morning, Mr. Sutton.
`8 A. Good morning.
`9 Q. Could you please state your full name for the
`10 record and spell your last name.
`11 A. Gregg Stuart Sutton, last name is
`12 S-U-T-T-O-N.
`13 Q. My name is Emily Tremblay. I'm an attorney
`14 with Robins Kaplan and I'm here representing
`15 Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
`16 You've given a deposition before, Mr. Sutton; is
`17 that correct?
`18 A. Yes, I believe so.
`19 Q. Well, I'm just going to go over a few basic
`20 ground rules as a refresher. Please feel free to
`21 ask questions.
`22 So today I'm going to be asking you
`23 a series of verbal questions and you will do your
`24 best to answer them truthfully and completely and
`25 verbally. The court reporter can't record a head
`
`Page 7
`1 nod or a head shake or hand gestures. We're going
`2 to do our best to speak one at a time and not over
`3 each other, again, for the benefit of the court
`4 reporter as she records what we're saying.
`5 And because we're remote, I'm going
`6 to ask if there's anyone in the room with you
`7 today?
`8 A. No, there is not.
`9 Q. Over the course of today, if you don't
`10 understand one of my questions, please ask me to
`11 clarify or to rephrase. I will assume that if you
`12 do answer my question, you've heard it and you
`13 understood it. Is that fair?
`14 A. That's fair.
`15 Q. We'll be taking breaks, but if you need one
`16 or want one before we take one, please just let me
`17 know. I will only ask that if I've asked you a
`18 question, that you answer it before we take a
`19 break so that we don't leave a question pending on
`20 the record. Do you understand?
`21 A. I do.
`22 Q. Have you consumed any alcohol today?
`23 A. No, I have not.
`24 Q. Have you taken any controlled substances or
`25 prescription medication?
`
`Page 8
`
`1 A. No, I have not.
`2 Q. Is there any reason that you will not be able
`3 to understand my questions and answer truthfully
`4 and completely today?
`5 A. No reasons.
`6 Q. Do you have any questions before we begin?
`7 A. No, I don't.
`8 Q. What did you do to prepare for your
`9 deposition today? And before you answer, I'm not
`10 interested in any advice that you may have
`11 received from your attorneys.
`12 A. What did I do today?
`13 Q. Well, to prepare for today.
`14 A. I reviewed my declaration that was entered in
`15 September.
`16 Q. Did you speak with anyone other than your
`17 attorneys?
`18 A. No.
`19 Q. Did you review any documents other than your
`20 declaration that you just mentioned?
`21 A. No, I did not.
`22 Q. Did you do anything else other than review
`23 your declaration in anticipation of today?
`24 A. No.
`25 Q. Mr. Sutton, I'm going to move an exhibit into
`
`Page 9
`
`1 the Marked Exhibits folder. It will be titled
`2 Exhibit 1108. Do you see it?
`3 A. I do.
`4 Q. Will you please open that exhibit?
`5 MS. NORGARD: If you could hold on
`6 one moment.
`7 MS. TREMBLAY: Oh, sure.
`8 MS. NORGARD: I don't have it yet.
`9 And I think that's because I'm in the wrong
`10 folder.
`11 THE WITNESS: I see it, but I can't
`12 really read it.
`13 MS. TREMBLAY: And there is a
`14 zoom-in feature towards the bottom of the page, if
`15 that helps too. I'm going to give your counsel a
`16 moment to make sure that she can pull it up too.
`17 MS. NORGARD: 1108?
`18 MS. TREMBLAY: Yes.
`19 MS. NORGARD: Thank you.
`20 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`21 Q. Great. So Mr. Sutton, do you recognize
`22 Exhibit 1108?
`23 A. No, I don't.
`24 Q. If you are able to zoom in using the feature
`25 towards the bottom of the screen, you'll see that
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`3 (Pages 6 - 9)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 10
`1 this is titled "Gregg Sutton from 6/20/2018," and
`2 this is a transcript of a deposition that you've
`3 given previously.
`4 Does that refresh your recollection?
`5 A. Yes, only that I read the attorney,
`6 Thomas Vitt, on top.
`7 Q. And you'll see towards the left -- the top
`8 left corner of the first page is the case caption.
`9 It provides QXMedical, LLC versus Vascular
`10 Solutions, LLC, Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L., and
`11 Arrow International. So that would have been the
`12 case that this deposition was given in. Do you
`13 recall that?
`14 A. I do.
`15 Q. So do you remember giving this deposition?
`16 A. Yes, I do.
`17 Q. And you swore an oath prior to giving this
`18 deposition similar to today; is that correct?
`19 A. That's correct.
`20 Q. In which you swore to tell the truth; is that
`21 correct?
`22 A. That's correct.
`23 Q. And you testified truthfully here when you
`24 gave this deposition; is that correct?
`25 A. I did.
`
`Page 11
`1 MS. TREMBLAY: You can set Exhibit
`2 1108 to the side. We may come back to that later.
`3 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`4 Q. I'd like to talk a little bit about your
`5 background. So, Mr. Sutton, what do you currently
`6 do for work?
`7 A. I don't. I retired in February, March time
`8 frame.
`9 Q. Congratulations. What did you do before your
`10 retirement?
`11 A. I had a position as a vice president of
`12 research and development at SurModics,
`13 Incorporated.
`14 Q. And could you briefly describe what SurModics
`15 did?
`16 A. SurModics is a surface coatings company for
`17 medical devices.
`18 Q. You said you -- oh, sorry, go ahead.
`19 A. Sorry. And also was getting into medical
`20 device technology development.
`21 Q. And you said that you were VP of research and
`22 development there; is that correct?
`23 A. That's correct.
`24 Q. And how long were you at SurModics?
`25 A. Four years and two months.
`
`Page 12
`
`1 Q. And before SurModics, where were you
`2 employed?
`3 A. NorMedix, Incorporated.
`4 Q. And what was your position with NorMedix?
`5 A. I was the CEO, owner.
`6 Q. And is that also a medical device company?
`7 A. Yes.
`8 Q. And what year did you found NorMedix?
`9 A. It's either 2009 or '10.
`10 Q. Fine. A rough approximation. Just trying to
`11 get a sense of your background.
`12 A. Sure.
`13 Q. So before you founded NorMedix in the 2009,
`14 2010 time frame, where were you working?
`15 A. Before I founded that, I was at -- back at
`16 Atritech, Inc.
`17 Q. What was your role at that time?
`18 A. Also vice president, research and
`19 development.
`20 Q. And then assuming that Atritech was also a
`21 medical device company; is that correct?
`22 A. Yes, ma'am.
`23 Q. And before Atritech, where were you?
`24 A. Vascular Solutions.
`25 Q. All right. So we've arrived at VSI. And did
`
`Page 13
`
`1 you join VSI in 2004; is that correct?
`2 A. That's correct.
`3 Q. Do you know about what month you joined VSI
`4 in 2004?
`5 A. I think it was late, probably in the fall,
`6 September, October of 2004.
`7 Q. And you joined VSI as vice president of
`8 research and development; is that correct?
`9 A. That is correct.
`10 Q. Did you remain in that role until you left?
`11 A. Yes.
`12 Q. To whom did you report in that role?
`13 A. Mr. Howard Root.
`14 Q. And what was his title at Vascular Solutions?
`15 A. He was the chief executive officer.
`16 Q. And in your role as vice president, research
`17 and development, how many people reported to you,
`18 about?
`19 A. It ranged from when I started to when I left,
`20 from probably 10 to 15.
`21 Q. About 10 when you started, growing to 15 when
`22 you left; is that correct?
`23 A. Approximately, yes.
`24 Q. And when did you leave Vascular Solutions?
`25 A. I believe it was in June of 2006.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`4 (Pages 10 - 13)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
`1 Q. Is that the R&D department then that we're
`2 talking about when we're talking about 10 to 15
`3 people?
`4 A. Yes, ma'am.
`5 Q. And why did you leave VSI in June 2006?
`6 A. I don't recall specifically.
`7 Q. And I know this is going back a ways, but
`8 where were you before you joined VSI in fall 2004?
`9 A. Atritech, Incorporated.
`10 Q. So you had been at Atritech previously before
`11 you joined as vice president of research and
`12 development; is that correct?
`13 A. That's correct, starting in 2000.
`14 Q. And what was your role in 2000 at Atritech?
`15 A. I was a founder and VP, R&D, co-founder.
`16 Q. Could you please describe your educational
`17 background?
`18 A. Sure. I have a mechanical engineering degree
`19 from the University of Minnesota. I graduated in
`20 1986, I believe -- no, '85.
`21 Q. Do you have any other degrees?
`22 A. No.
`23 Q. Any specific specialized training?
`24 A. No. Not other than, you know, my experience
`25 in the med tech industry.
`
`Page 15
`
`1 Q. I'd like to talk about your role as vice
`2 president of research and development when you
`3 were at VSI. What were some of your
`4 responsibilities in that role?
`5 A. Well, generally, to oversee all activities in
`6 research and development in terms of product
`7 innovation and development, oversee the management
`8 of the people involved under my -- in my staff,
`9 and, you know, help bring products to market.
`10 Q. So what does bringing a product to market
`11 involve specifically? I'm wondering if you can
`12 talk about the type of work that you were
`13 performing.
`14 A. In my role, it is confined to device
`15 inventing, developing, and preparing for
`16 manufacturing.
`17 Q. What kind of -- you said your role
`18 specifically involved advice, inventing. What
`19 kind of work did you oversee others perform in the
`20 R&D department?
`21 A. Well, most of my staff was engineering --
`22 engineers at various levels and technicians, and,
`23 you know, so they did the -- all the work product
`24 and device development.
`25 Q. I'd like to get a better sense of the levels
`
`Page 16
`1 of experience and roles in the R&D department.
`2 You mentioned engineers of various levels and
`3 technicians. Could you briefly describe, kind of,
`4 each of those job titles within the R&D department
`5 and a sense of what roles each held?
`6 A. So you want me to break down engineering into
`7 levels or -- I'm not sure what you're asking.
`8 Q. Well, let me ask you this: Are the main
`9 buckets in the R&D department, are they engineers
`10 and technicians; is that correct?
`11 A. That's correct.
`12 Q. Could you tell me a little bit about what the
`13 engineers are doing in terms of new product
`14 development?
`15 A. They are -- they're basically conducting
`16 anywhere from early stage concept and design work,
`17 building prototypes, testing prototypes, creating
`18 CAD-generated drawings, writing specifications.
`19 You know, those are generally what they're working
`20 on.
`21 Q. What about the technicians? What type of
`22 work were they typically doing and how did that
`23 differ from the work that you just described the
`24 engineers doing?
`25 A. Well, they're carrying specific tasks under
`
`Page 17
`1 the direction of mainly the engineers, including,
`2 you know, building prototypes, testing prototypes,
`3 procuring materials, things like that.
`4 Q. So you mentioned obviously a big part of R&D
`5 is product innovation and development. How did
`6 you typically track the development of a new
`7 product?
`8 A. I'm not sure what you're asking. You're
`9 asking plans for development or are you talking
`10 about results of development?
`11 Q. Let me rephrase. Were there typically phases
`12 of, like, new product development, you know, kind
`13 of big picture, were there are phases that a new
`14 product would move through over the course of its
`15 development?
`16 A. I don't recall specifically if we had phases,
`17 but in general, yes.
`18 Q. And how were you typically -- were there
`19 benchmarks or other ways that you tracked
`20 development? I'm just trying to get a sense of
`21 your system as VP of R&D and how you typically
`22 monitored the progress of new product development.
`23 A. Well, generally we had a -- we would track a
`24 project using, you know, a management software and
`25 have basically phases and milestones and
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`5 (Pages 14 - 17)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`1 deliverables for each phase, you know, listed out
`2 on the project management software. And, you
`3 know, that's generally how we tracked projects.
`4 Q. Okay. How many people were typically working
`5 on a new project at a given time?
`6 A. Well, generally an engineer is assigned a
`7 given project, and so it's usually an engineer and
`8 then a technician or two on a given project with,
`9 you know, some level of oversight from myself and
`10 perhaps others.
`11 Q. And was Jeff Welch a member of the R&D
`12 department during your time at VSI?
`13 A. Yes.
`14 Q. And what role did he hold in the department?
`15 A. He had a -- he was -- I can't remember if
`16 it's a manager or director of engineering role.
`17 Q. Okay. So would he have been working on the
`18 new projects, like the engineers, or more in an
`19 oversight role similar to yourself?
`20 A. Both, actually. You know, he -- I believe,
`21 if I recall correctly, he probably was working
`22 heavily on a couple projects, but also overseeing
`23 several others because he had engineers reporting
`24 to him as well.
`25 Q. Did your engineers or other individuals in
`
`Page 20
`1 Q. When you were working on developing a new
`2 project, about how often do you think you would
`3 hold meetings related to that project?
`4 A. It probably -- you know, I don't really
`5 remember, but it would have varied depending on
`6 the project. Once every month, twice a month
`7 maybe.
`8 Q. I'd like to talk about you specifically. Did
`9 you, personally keep records or other written or
`10 electronic documents in your role?
`11 A. I mean, sure. I had a whole, you know,
`12 computer that had files on it.
`13 Q. And what kind of records would you keep in
`14 your role as VP of R&D?
`15 A. Well, any work product documentation, project
`16 planning, e-mails, reports.
`17 Q. And would these be records specific to
`18 certain projects?
`19 A. Sure, yeah.
`20 Q. I'm just trying to get a sense of, kind of,
`21 what notes or records you were keeping for a
`22 specific new project as it was under development.
`23 Were you relying on your engineers to keep testing
`24 notes or did you keep testing notes?
`25 A. My engineers would be keeping detailed notes
`
`Page 19
`1 the R&D department typically work on more than one
`2 project at a time?
`3 A. Yes. In those days, I believe that's
`4 correct.
`5 Q. Did you kind of assign those projects to the
`6 engineers, or how did you manage work allocation?
`7 A. I believe I generally directed project
`8 responsibility.
`9 Q. Did you determine which projects received
`10 priority over others?
`11 A. Not really, no.
`12 Q. Would that have been Mr. Root's role in terms
`13 of prioritizing projects?
`14 A. Yes.
`15 Q. As VP of R&D, did you hold regular meetings
`16 with your department?
`17 A. I held meetings. I'm not -- I don't recall
`18 how regular they were.
`19 Q. Did you have meetings specific to certain
`20 projects?
`21 A. Definitely, yes.
`22 Q. Would someone have been keeping meeting
`23 minutes or notes during those meetings?
`24 A. I don't recall. Perhaps, but I just can't
`25 say yes or no. I don't remember.
`
`Page 21
`
`1 like that.
`2 Q. Did you track new project development work?
`3 Did you have a document to, kind of, track
`4 progress on a specific project?
`5 A. Yeah. I think I answered that already. I
`6 did.
`7 Q. How often would you update your notes on a
`8 specific project?
`9 A. You know, I don't remember. My practice was
`10 every week or so.
`11 Q. Did you provide your engineers and others in
`12 the R&D department specific instructions about
`13 keeping notes related to project development?
`14 A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat the question?
`15 Q. Sure. Did you give the engineers or others
`16 in the research and development department
`17 specific instructions regarding keeping notes on
`18 new project development?
`19 A. I don't remember anything specific on that.
`20 Q. Did VSI have any specific policies about
`21 tracking inventions or new projects?
`22 A. Yeah, I just don't remember. You know, it's
`23 a long time ago.
`24 Q. That's fair. Did you have any reporting
`25 obligations to either Mr. Root or your board of
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`6 (Pages 18 - 21)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`Page 24
`
`1 directors, periodic reports that you'd have to
`2 give?
`3 A. Yes.
`4 Q. About how often would that be?
`5 A. Well, I don't remember specifically, but
`6 let's say the board, you know, probably met every
`7 quarter, so every quarter I'd prepare at least the
`8 R&D section of, you know, the report to the board.
`9 Q. And you would agree that records related to
`10 new project development are important, correct?
`11 A. Sure. I'm not sure what kind of records
`12 you're talking about, but . . .
`13 Q. Well, just the kind that we've been
`14 discussing. Just tracking new project
`15 development, anything related to the work that
`16 your department is doing related to a new project.
`17 A. Sure.
`18 MS. NORGARD: Object to the form.
`19 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`20 Q. And would you agree that records specifically
`21 related to the conception or reduction to practice
`22 with a new invention are important?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. Were there occasions during your time at VSI
`25 in which work performed in the R&D department was
`
`1 Q. Sure. So --
`2 A. And it depends on -- you know, my involvement
`3 in that varied depending on what product
`4 innovation it was.
`5 Q. So if you were the named inventor for a
`6 particular innovation, about how frequently would
`7 you communicate with patent counsel during the
`8 patenting process?
`9 A. Well, there just weren't that many examples
`10 of being the named inventor that I recall, but
`11 I -- as my role of R&D, vice president, I met with
`12 the patent counsel on a regular basis. I can't
`13 remember if it was monthly or quarterly, but
`14 generally, you know, once every two or three
`15 months, just with Mr. Root to get an update on
`16 that occasion and progress and anything else
`17 related to intellectual property matters.
`18 Q. Understood. I'd like to get a sense of
`19 project expenditures during this time period. So
`20 on average, about how much would the R&D
`21 department spend working on developing a new
`22 product over a quarter?
`23 A. I really don't recall that. I can tell you
`24 what generally we were -- I mean, I just don't
`25 remember. I mean, I know how much back then it
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 25
`
`1 patented?
`2 A. Could you repeat that again?
`3 Q. Sure. I'm wondering if there were occasions
`4 during your time at VSI in which the work that the
`5 R&D department was doing was patented?
`6 A. Well, the work that they were doing wasn't
`7 patented, but some ideas and concepts might have
`8 been patented.
`9 Q. Yeah. Let me -- yeah. Let me rephrase.
`10 That was an unartful question.
`11 Were the devices and projects they
`12 were working on patented?
`13 A. The devices were in a few locations.
`14 Q. And what did that process involve?
`15 A. Back then, to the best of my recollection,
`16 there wasn't a process.
`17 Q. Would you work with patent counsel?
`18 A. I mean, yes.
`19 Q. You, personally would work with patent
`20 counsel?
`21 A. It depended on -- in my recollection, it was
`22 never the same, so it depended on the device
`23 invention. For instance, you know, the GuideLiner
`24 started out one way. Another invention might have
`25 started out a different way.
`
`1 generally cost to get a device from zero to
`2 submission of a 510(k).
`3 Q. About how much was that?
`4 A. It was generally between, you know, a million
`5 to, you know, over a million dollars.
`6 Q. And over what time frame would that spend
`7 typically occur, from zero to 510(k) as you said?
`8 A. It -- you know, it depended on the project.
`9 There was --
`10 Q. Is there an average time?
`11 A. Some were six months. Some were three years
`12 or more. But I was only there for less than two
`13 years, so . . .
`14 Q. Fair. So during your time at VSI, was the
`15 company private?
`16 A. No. I believe -- it was a public company.
`17 Q. I'd like to talk a little bit about the
`18 specific projects that the R&D department was
`19 working on during your time at VSI. So do you
`20 recall what some of the projects that you worked
`21 on were?
`22 A. You mean that I oversaw?
`23 Q. Let's start with any that you maybe directly
`24 worked on. Were there any projects that you were
`25 directly working on during your time at VSI?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`7 (Pages 22 - 25)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1 A. Well, other than, say, an inventive role or
`2 direction, there was no projects that I directly
`3 worked on.
`4 Q. Now let's move to overseeing. What projects
`5 were you overseeing during this time, from fall
`6 2004 to June 2006?
`7 A. Well, there's many projects, so I don't
`8 really remember. But the ones I do remember would
`9 have been next-generation Pronto, Twin-Pass.
`10 Yeah. Those are the only ones that come to mind.
`11 Langston.
`12 THE COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear
`13 your whole answer, I apologize. After that --
`14 after Langston.
`15 THE WITNESS: Sorry. Pronto -- the
`16 next-generation Pronto device. There's a Langston
`17 device. There was a --
`18 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry. I
`19 have to stop you. We're getting some
`20 interference. It's cutting your testimony out.
`21 Is anyone else hearing that?
`22 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I'm hearing it as
`23 well. It goes away when someone speaks, but...
`24 MS. TREMBLAY: I'm not getting
`25 anything now.
`
`Page 27
`1 THE WITNESS: I don't hear anything
`2 now.
`3 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`4 Q. Let me re-ask the question, Mr. Sutton, just
`5 so we reorient ourselves.
`6 So you were discussing the projects
`7 that you were overseeing during your time at VSI,
`8 and I believe you identified a next-generation
`9 Pronto; is that correct?
`10 A. Yes. Pronto, Twin-Pass, GuideLiner. There
`11 was a Langston device. Those are the ones that I
`12 remember.
`13 Q. Does Skyway ring a bell? Were you working on
`14 a project called Skyway?
`15 A. Yeah, that's Skyway, Twin-Pass, kind of the
`16 same flavor.
`17 Q. To the extent you remember, let's talk about
`18 maybe some of the key materials that you were
`19 using for each of these projects. Do you remember
`20 what materials or components were used for the
`21 Pronto next generation development?
`22 MS. NORGARD: Excuse me. This is
`23 beyond the scope. Objection.
`24 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`25 Q. You can answer, Mr. Sutton.
`
`1 A. I don't really remember specific materials.
`2 Q. What about the Langston catheter that you
`3 mentioned?
`4 A. What materials?
`5 Q. Yes.
`6 A. Yeah. I -- I mean, I know what materials I
`7 used in medical devices like that, but I don't
`8 remember specifically what the --
`9 Q. Understood. What about Twin-Pass Skyway?
`10 A. Same thing. I don't recall what specific
`11 material was used.
`12 Q. What about -- I believe GuideLiner was the
`13 last one that you mentioned. What about
`14 GuideLiner? Do you remember any of the specific
`15 components used for GuideLiner?
`16 A. Yes, I do.
`17 Q. And why do you remember the components for
`18 GuideLiner, but not Pronto or the others that you
`19 identified?
`20 A. Well, because my memory has been somewhat
`21 refreshed lately, it was one of my inventions, so
`22 I was -- I'm just more in tune to that one.
`23 Q. What about any early concept or exploration
`24 projects? Do you remember working on any of those
`25 during your time from fall 2004 to June 2006?
`
`Page 29
`1 A. What's your definition of early exploration?
`2 Q. Yes. I'm wondering if there are other
`3 projects that maybe didn't have a name, like the
`4 Pronto or the Langston, that you were able to
`5 identify if there was another category that you
`6 remember working on?
`7 A. I don't remember.
`8 Q. Let's talk more specifically about
`9 GuideLiner. So what is the GuideLiner guide
`10 extension catheter?
`11 A. It's a guide catheter invention device that
`12 is used to help provide more backup support for,
`13 you know, interventional cases, PCI cases.
`14 Q. I'm sorry. PCI cases?
`15 A. PCI, coronary angioplasty and stenting cases.
`16 Q. So what is the GuideLiner rapid exchange
`17 guide extension catheter?
`18 A. Well, it's a device to provide backup support
`19 for PCI cases, like I mentioned, and a method of
`20 entry into the body uses what is typically, these
`21 days, is using standard guidewire because the
`22 GuideLiner had a rapid exchange lumen in it.
`23 Q. And what about the GuideLiner over-the-wire
`24 guide extension catheter? How is that different
`25 than the rapid exchange?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`8 (Pages 26 - 29)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1 A. That was a version of the device that was not
`2 rapid exchange, so it was -- it was just, like,
`3 another guide catheter without the distal
`4 curvatures.
`5 Q. And during your time at VSI, you were working
`6 to develop both versions of the GuideLiner; is
`7 that correct, both the rapid exchange and the
`8 over-the-wire version?
`9 A. That's what I remember, yes.
`10 Q. Do you remember when you began working on the
`11 GuideLiner device? Let's start with the rapid
`12 exchange version.
`13 A. I do. It was early in 2005.
`14 Q. If you could estimate what percentage of your
`15 time was devoted to the GuideLiner rapid exchange
`16 after January of 2005?
`17 A. Versus what?
`18 Q. Versus everything else that was on your plate
`19 as VP of R&D. What percentage of your time did
`20 you allocate to the GuideLiner rapid exchange?
`21 A. I could only estimate.
`22 Q. Was it less than 50 percent?
`23 A. Definitely. Less than 25 percent.
`24 Q. Less than 10 percent?
`25 A. Perhaps. But I don't remember specifically.
`
`1 A. Sure, yes.
`2 Q. So was the company prioritizing the
`3 over-the-wire version because of its development
`4 timeline?
`5 A. I don't think they were -- I don't believe --
`6 I don't recall that we were prioritizing the
`7 over-the-wire version.
`8 Q. But the company was working on an
`9 over-the-wire version despite your previous
`10 statements about physician preference; is that
`11 correct?
`12 A. My recollection, it was kind of an option, a
`13 backup plan.
`14 Q. And as an option or a backup plan, was it
`15 being developed in the same time period from
`16 January 2005 on?
`17 A. Yeah. To be clear -- to be clear, I don't
`18 recall personally spending any time on the
`19 over-the-wire version.
`20 Q. Understood. Do you know -- oh.
`21 A. I'm back.
`22 Q. No worries. So --
`23 THE WITNESS: I do have a body in
`24 the room now, my dog, so just --
`25 MS. TREMBLAY: I think we'll allow
`
`Page 31
`
`Page 33
`
`1 Q. Okay. Less than 5 percent?
`2 A. I don't know.
`3 Q. Now it's unclear? Okay.
`4 What about GuideLiner over-the-wire?
`5 When did you begin working on that version of the
`6 device?
`7 A. I don't remember much about that device. It
`8 probably would have been around the -- you know,
`9 again, I don't remember, so -- we just didn't
`10 spend hardly any time on that device because we
`11 just didn't think that was a viable, you know,
`12 commercial device.
`13 Q. And what do you mean by it wasn't a viable
`14 commercial device?
`15 A. I should say, that was my belief. But in
`16 that -- we knew the physicians would prefer to
`17 have a rapid exchange device versus a
`18 over-the-wire device because it becomes more
`19 cumbersome and difficult to use an over-the-wire
`20 device. They have to pull out a long guidewire.
`21 It just makes the procedure more difficult.
`22 Q. And I believe in your declaration you mention
`23 that the over-the-wire version would have been
`24 faster to market than the rapid exchange version;
`25 is that correct?
`
`1 it.
`2 BY MS. TREMBLAY:
`3 Q. So you were saying that you don't recall
`4 personally working on the over-the-wire version;
`5 is that correct?
`6 A. Well, again, personally I didn't really --
`7 other than be involved with direction and seeing
`8 some of the testing perhaps, I wasn't involved
`9 directly with either of these, other than
`10 oversight and direction, so --
`11 Q. Okay. So who was the primary engineer
`12 working on the rapid exchange version? Let's
`13 start there.
`14 A. Initially, mainly in the 2005 time frame, it
`15 was Jim Kauphusman.
`16 Q. And what about the over-the-wire versio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket