throbber
European Heart Journal - Case Reports
`doi:10.1093/ehjcr/yty036
`
`CASE SERIES
`Coronary heart disease
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/2/2/yty036/4958922 by guest on 02 September 2020
`
`Zero contrast retrograde chronic total
`occlusions percutaneous coronary
`intervention: a case series
`
`Raja Hatem1,2,3, Matthew T. Finn1,2, Robert F. Riley4, Moses Mathur4,
`William L. Lombardi4, Ziad A. Ali1,2†, and Dimitri Karmpaliotis1,2*†
`
`1Columbia University, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA; 2Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 1700 Broadway, 8th Floor, New York, NY
`10019, USA; 3Hoˆpital du Sacre´-Coeur de Montre´al, Universite´ de Montre´al, 5400 Boul Gouin O, Montre´al, QC H4J 1C5, Canada; and 4Department of Cardiology, University of
`Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
`
`Received 30 November 2017; accepted 28 March 2018; online publish-ahead-of-print 2 April 2018
`
`Introduction
`
`Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated
`with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and resulting progression of CKD to need for renal replacement
`therapy. Chronic total occlusions (CTO) PCI is increasingly utilized in the treatment of refractory stable angina and
`ischaemic heart failure. Recent studies have described the feasibility of ‘minimal’ or ‘zero’ contrast PCI by employing
`intravascular imaging and intra-coronary physiology to guide successful stent implantation with resolution of ischae-
`mia. We extended these techniques to CTO lesions via the retrograde approach.
`...................................................................................................................................................................................................
`Case
`Two patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <_15 mL/min who presented with angina symptoms and had
`presentation
`subsequent positive stress tests were referred for CTO-PCI. The patients had diagnostic angiography with minimal
`contrast. After a recovery period, the patients underwent successful retrograde zero contrast CTO-PCI with the
`use of adjunctive intravascular ultrasound imaging.
`...................................................................................................................................................................................................
`Discussion
`The described reports are the first two successful attempts at zero contrast retrograde procedures and demon-
`strate the feasibility of imaging and physiology-guided retrograde PCI without contrast administration in two pa-
`tients with significant coronary artery disease requiring intervention. When indicated, zero contrast PCI offers the
`ability to treat obstructive coronary disease without worsening renal function in patients with severe CKD.
`
`䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏
`
`Keywords
`
`Chronic occlusion • Percutaneous coronary intervention • Retrograde • Chronic kidney disease
`• Contrast-induced nephropathy • Case series
`
`Learning points
`• These cases describe a first-in-man technique utilizing zero contrast to perform retrograde chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary
`intervention (PCI) to treat patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
`• The procedure utilizes prior angiographic films together with intravascular imaging and invasive physiological testing to enable zero contrast
`retrograde lesion crossing and stenting.
`• Minimal or zero contrast PCI, when indicated, offers the opportunity to improve overall outcomes related to ischaemic heart disease with-
`out risking worsening renal function or dialysis in patients with CKD.
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel: (212) 305-7060, Fax 212-305-0676, Email: dk2787@cumc.columbia.edu. This case report was reviewed by Joshua Chai and Dejan Milasinovic.
`† These authors contributed equally to this work.
`VC The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
`This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/),
`which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact
`journals.permissions@oup.com
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2148
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/2/2/yty036/4958922 by guest on 02 September 2020
`
`2
`
`Introduction
`
`Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with advanced
`chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a high risk of con-
`trast-induced nephropathy (CIN), risking progression of CKD and
`need for renal replacement therapy.1,2 We have recently described
`the feasibility and safety of imaging and physiology-guided PCI with-
`out contrast utilization by employing intravascular imaging and intra-
`coronary physiology to guide successful stent implantation.3 Chronic
`total occlusions (CTO) PCI is an increasingly utilized approach in the
`treatment of refractory stable angina and ischaemic heart failure with
`data demonstrating improved clinical and functional outcomes in se-
`lected patients.4 We describe the feasibility and safety of imaging and
`physiology-guided PCI without contrast administration in two cases
`
`R. Hatem et al.
`
`...........................................
`
`using the retrograde approach, illustrating a successful method to
`treat this extreme risk subset of patients.
`
`Case 1: clinical background
`A 54-year-old man with a history of Type I diabetes mellitus, hyper-
`tension, and CKD Stage IV with an estimated glomerular filtration
`rate (eGFR) of 15 mg/min/1.73 m2 (normal: >_60 mg/min/1.73 m2)
`presented for diagnostic angiography after a non-invasive nuclear
`scan, done for exertional chest pain, identified a moderate size and
`moderate severity ischaemic defect in the basal half of the inferior
`and inferolateral walls. Diagnostic angiography (20 mL contrast),
`demonstrated a right coronary artery (RCA) CTO (Figure 1A and B;
`Supplementary material online, Videos S1 and S2 Case S1).
`
`Figure 1 (A and B) Diagnostic angiography performed 1-month prior to chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention demonstrat-
`ing a right coronary artery chronic total occlusions and left anterior descending distal and septal collaterals to the right coronary (arrow).
`(C) Retrograde wiring via septal collateral. (D) Positioning of microcatheters at the proximal and distal chronic total occlusions caps to prepare for re-
`verse controlled antegrade or retrograde subintimal tracking. (E) GuideLiner assisted reverse controlled antegrade or retrograde subintimal tracking
`(arrow). (F) Retrograde wire has been externalized and the patient is undergoing pre-stenting angioplasty for lesion preparation. (G) Intravascular
`ultrasound image of the pre-stenting angioplasty demonstrating luminal narrowing. (H and I) Distal and proximal intravascular ultrasound images
`(respectively) after stenting.
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2148
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Zero contrast retrograde CTO-PCI
`
`3
`
`Case 1: procedure description
`The patient returned, after failing to respond to medical therapy,
`for staged CTO-PCI of the RCA 1 month after the initial diagnos-
`tic angiogram. Prior to the procedure, previous angiographic films
`were uploaded to the monitors as a guide for coronary wiring.
`Using those images as reference, a polymer jacketed hydrophilic
`wire (Fielder FC, Asahi Intecc, Japan) was successfully manipulated
`through a septal collateral up to the distal cap of the CTO (Figure
`1C; Supplementary material online, Video S3 Case S1). Once the
`antegrade and retrograde base of operations were confirmed in
`
`...............................
`
`reverse
`a
`angiographic images,
`comparison to the prior
`GuideLiner (Teleflex Vascular Solutions, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
`assisted controlled antegrade or retrograde subintimal tracking
`(RCART) technique was used to cross the CTO with an Asahi
`Gaia Third wire (Figure 1D; Supplementary material online, Video
`S4 Case S1). After externalization, antegrade IVUS guided angio-
`plasty to the RCA was performed with Doppler colour confirm-
`ation of outflow (Figure 1E–I, Supplementary material online, Video
`S5 Case S1). The procedure was completed with 0 mL of contrast,
`a total fluoro time of 38.9 min, and a radiation dosage of 0.491 Gy.
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/2/2/yty036/4958922 by guest on 02 September 2020
`
`Figure 2 (A) Prior angiographic images demonstrating a proximal left anterior descending chronic total occlusions (arrow). (B) Angiography of the
`saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending artery with a high-grade ostial saphenous vein graft stenosis (circle) and retrograde filling of
`the left anterior descending until distal chronic total occlusions cap (arrow). (C) 1, Wire in distal left anterior descending artery from the saphenous
`vein graft to mid-left anterior descending using the retrograde guide; 2, antegrade wire in the left anterior descending artery septal using the
`antegrade guide; 3, antegrade wire in the first diagonal; and 4, wire at the diseased second diagonal next to the proximal chronic total occlusions cap.
`(D) 1, Wire in distal left anterior descending artery from the saphenous vein graft using to the mid-left anterior descending retrograde guide; 2,
`antegrade wire in the left anterior descending artery septal; 3, antegrade wire in the first diagonal; 4, wire at the diseased second diagonal next to the
`proximal chronic total occlusions cap; and 5, Turnpike with pilot 200-wire aimed retrograde at distal chronic total occlusions cap. (E) Chronic total
`occlusions lesion crossed using reverse controlled antegrade or retrograde subintimal tracking technique with entry of the retrograde wire into the
`antegrade GuideLiner for externalization. (F) After utilization of the Twin Pass catheter to access the distal left anterior descending from antegrade, a
`balloon is inflated (arrow) dilating the chronic total occlusions lesion. (G) Intravascular ultrasound of the left anterior descending artery after balloon-
`ing and prior to stenting demonstrating luminal narrowing. (H and I) Distal and proximal intravascular ultrasound images (respectively) after stenting.
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2148
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/2/2/yty036/4958922 by guest on 02 September 2020
`
`4
`
`R. Hatem et al.
`
`The patient was discharged the following day following a normal
`transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). No renal replacement
`therapy was required prior to during the inpatient hospital stay.
`On 6 month follow-up,
`the patient experienced signficant
`improvement in their chest pain symptoms without need for
`hospitalization or initiation of renal replacement therapy.
`
`Case 2: clinical background
`A 73-year-old man with a past history of poorly controlled diabetes
`mellitus Type II, Stage V CKD with an eGFR of 10 mg/min/1.73 m2
`(normal: >_60 mg/min/1.73 m2) ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ejection
`fraction of 40%), moderate aortic stenosis and two separate coron-
`ary artery bypass grafting surgeries with saphenous vein grafts (SVGs)
`to the mid-left anterior descending (LAD) artery (previous LIMA
`to LAD was atretic), first obtuse marginal and right posterior
`descending artery presented with a NSTEMI. The patient previ-
`ously received two layers of drug eluting stents to his SVG-LAD
`graft and initial angiography showed that he had developed recur-
`rent ostial in-stent restenosis (Figure 2A and B, Supplementary ma-
`terial online, Videos S1 and S2 Case S2). He was discharged on
`optimal medical therapy with subsequent stress testing showing a
`large area of moderate ischaemia in the LAD territory. Given his
`high-risk stress test findings and in preparation for renal trans-
`plantation evaluation, a heart team decision was made to proceed
`with percutaneous revascularization of his native LAD approxi-
`mately 3 months after his NSTEMI.
`
`Case 2: procedure description
`Angiographic films from the patient’s initial angiography were up-
`loaded to the monitors to guide contrast-free wiring. First, the distal
`LAD was wired via the SVG. Then, three anterograde wires were
`placed down the septal perforator, the first diagonal artery and the
`diseased second diagonal adjacent to the proximal CTO cap. These
`wire positions allowed improved contrast-free visualization of the
`proximal cap location (Figure 2C and D; Supplementary material on-
`line, Video S3 Case S2). A 7 Fr Trapliner (Teleflex Vascular Solutions,
`Minneapolis, MN, USA), Turnpike microcatheter, and Pilot 200
`(Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) were advanced retrograde from the
`SVG and aimed at the distal CTO cap. Once the antegrade and retro-
`grade base of operations were confirmed in comparison to the previ-
`ous angiogram, a GuideLiner assisted Reverse CART technique was
`used to successfully cross the CTO using an Asahi Confianza Pro 12
`wire (Figure 2E, Supplementary material online, Video S4 Case S2).
`After externalization, a Twin Pass catheter (Teleflex Vascular
`Solutions, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used over the externalized
`wire to help wire the distal LAD from the antegrade guide (Figure 2F,
`Supplementary material online, Video S5 Case S2). IVUS guided PCI
`was then performed (Figure 2G–I, Supplementary material online,
`Video S6 Case S2) and resolution of ischaemia in the LAD was con-
`firmed with post-PCI FFR (0.94) utilizing a balloon occlusion of the
`SVG to LAD to mitigate competitive flow. The procedure was com-
`pleted with 0 mL of contrast, a fluoroscopic time of 95 min and
`3.5 Gy radiation dosage. The patient was discharged on postoperative
`Day 1 with no immediate or follow-up complications. The patient re-
`mained off dialysis at 3 months follow-up and was approved for listing
`for renal transplantation.
`
`........
`
`....................................................................................................................................................................
`
`Timeline
`
`Index Procedure
`
`Case 1
`.................................................................................................
`1 month prior to index
`Exertional Angina, Ischaemia on Nuclear
`procedure
`Stress Test, baseline eGFR 15 ml/min
`Diagnostic Catheterization with 20 ml/min
`Zero Contrast Retrograde CTO PCI -
`Successful
`Significant improvement in angina, no hos-
`6 months post-index
`procedure
`pitalization, no haemodialysis
`.................................................................................................
`Case 2
`.................................................................................................
`3 months prior to index
`Chest pain and NSTEMI, diagnostic cathe-
`procedure
`rization, medical management of CAD
`1 month prior to index
`Renal transplant evaluation, high-risk
`procedure
`stress test
`Index Procedure
`Zero Contrast Retrograde CTO PCI -
`Successful
`Approved for renal transplant, no
`haemodialysis
`
`3 months post-index
`procedure
`
`Discussion
`
`Percutaneous coronary intervention of CTO represents the most
`technically challenging procedure in contemporary interventional
`cardiology. Patients with a CTO generally have increased cardiac risk
`profiles compared with those without CTO. Among this high-risk pa-
`tient subset, patients with advanced CKD are at an even greater risk
`of adverse events, as CIN is directly correlated with higher rates of
`adverse clinical events and progression to end stage renal disease.1
`Performing minimal or zero contrast PCI, when indicated, offers the
`opportunity to improve overall outcomes related to ischaemic heart
`disease without risking worsening renal function or dialysis in this ex-
`treme risk group of patients.3 The present cases demonstrate, for the
`first time, the feasibility of retrograde complex CTO-PCI without
`contrast utilization.
`Careful study of the prior diagnostic angiogram is fundamental to
`successful wire navigation without using contrast. Significant expert-
`ise with IVUS and coronary physiological technology is also quintes-
`sential and only highly trained IVUS interpreters operators should
`attempt these procedures. Use of physiological measurements such
`as FFR or flow-based imaging can aid confirmation of the restoration
`of antegrade flow in the treated vessel at the end of the procedure.
`A high level of preparedness and expertise in managing coronary
`complications is paramount for such procedures. The threshold for
`using contrast in the event of a suspected complication is low and
`close monitoring of these patients during the peri-procedural period
`with pre- and post-TTE is necessary to evaluate for pericardial effu-
`sion from non-visualized coronary perforations during the procedure.
`While the described procedures should currently be limited to ex-
`pert CTO operators only, we feel that this case series has broader
`implications. First, taken together with recent publications on minimal
`contrast PCI, one can infer that in most cases operators are capable
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2148
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/2/2/yty036/4958922 by guest on 02 September 2020
`
`Zero contrast retrograde CTO-PCI
`
`5
`
`of using less contrast than the current standard placing some patients
`with baseline renal dysfunction at additional avoidable risk.
`Secondly, these cases demonstrate that even the most complex
`PCI is possible with zero/minimal contrast. While, we describe two
`cases with zero contrast using planned RCART CTO approaches, it
`is possible that retrograde ‘true-to-true’ wiring could be performed
`with zero contrast once the coronary tree had been mapped using
`antegrade and retrograde wires. Other CTO approaches may not
`permit contrast-free wiring; however, may be successfully completed
`with minimal contrast use.
`imaging and physiology-
`In conclusion, we describe successful
`guided CTO-PCI without contrast utilization. Such techniques may
`be adopted in centres with expertise in complex PCI and use of intra-
`vascular imaging and physiology to provide revascularization without
`the major complications of CIN in these extremely high-risk group of
`patients.
`
`Supplementary material
`
`Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal – Case
`Reports online.
`
`Funding
`National Institutes of Health (T32HL007854 to M.T.F.).
`
`.............................................................................
`
`Consent: The author/s confirm that written consent for submission and
`publication of this case report including image(s) and associated text has
`been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidance.
`
`Conflict of interest: D.K. is speaker honoraria from Abbot Vascular,
`Boston Scientific, Asahi, and Medtronic. Z.A.A. grants
`from St
`Jude Medical and Cardiovascular Systems and personal fees from St Jude
`Medical, Acist Medical outside the submitted work. W.L.L. dis-
`closes equity with Bridgepoint Medical. R.F.R. received speaker honoraria
`from Abiomed and Spectranetics. All other authors have nothing to
`disclose.
`
`References
`1. Giacoppo D, Madhavan MV, Baber U, Warren J, Bansilal S, Witzenbichler B,
`Dangas GD, Kirtane AJ, Xu K, Kornowski R, Brener SJ, Ge´ne´reux P, Stone GW,
`Mehran R. Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after percutaneous cor-
`onary intervention on short- and long-term outcomes: pooled analysis from the
`HORIZONS-AMI and ACUITY Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002475.
`2. Christakopoulos GE, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Yeh RW, Jaffer FA, Wyman RM,
`Lombardi W, Grantham JA, Kandzari DA, Lembo N, Moses JW, Kirtane A, Parikh
`M, Green P, Finn M, Garcia S, Doing A, Patel M, Bahadorani J, Christopoulos G,
`Karatasakis A, Thompson CA, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Contrast utilization during
`chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a con-
`temporary multicenter registry. J Invasive Cardiol 2016;28:288–294.
`3. Ali ZA, Karimi Galougahi K, Nazif T, Maehara A, Hardy MA, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE,
`Collins MB, Moses JW, Kirtane AJ, Stone GW, Karmpaliotis D, Leon MB. Imaging-
`and physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention without contrast ad-
`ministration in advanced renal failure: a feasibility, safety, and outcome study. Eur
`Heart J 2016;37:3090–3095.
`4. Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlu-
`sions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2010;160:179–187.
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Teleflex Ex. 2148
`Medtronic v. Teleflex
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket