`‘W ESTLJL'NW' E DC E
`
`All content
`
`Enter terms, citationsr databases, questions, a nything
`
`Maxed :=-
`
`'
`
`All Fede ral
`
`Search Tips :=-
`
`(- Vascular Solutions LLC et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
`QIQCWJTSD I_Ap;-rox.10§ pages]
`
`-=:r
`
`Document
`
`rs:
`
`-;i.~-
`
`Related Opinionerocketstl}
`
`'I'Imeline
`
`Goto V
`
`,,,,,
`_____
`
`
`
`{HIGHER Next—Onlyj ORDER TEMPORARILY STAYING CASE. On June 30, 2020, the Court heard argument on Medtronic's
`Motion to Stay and for a Protective Order. {ECF No. 250]. The Court took the matter under advisement
`following the hearing. All deadlines in the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order [ECF No. 229] are temporarily
`STAYED pending the Court's resolution of that motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ton):I N. Leung on
`UHZUEUIJRE}{Entered:07f01f202m
`
`2TB
`
`flif’flTrlfllfl
`
`SEALED ORDER granting 250 Motion to Stay and denying as moot :50 Motion for Protective Order. [Written
`Opinion‘lr Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony NA Leung on Tflflfllfl. DRE} (Entered: {momma}
`
`fidd to request
`
`
`
`275
`
`'3: Send Flu nner to Court
`
`Page 1
`
`Medtronic Exhibit 1115
`
`