throbber
Complete Index
`
`GeneralChaptersTOC - GeneralChapters
`
`TableofContents
`
`0 FrontMatter
`
`0 General Notices
`
`- Reagents
`
`ReferenceTables
`
`0 DietarySupplements
`
`- NF Monographs
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.001
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.001
`
`

`

`USP
`AUTHENTICITY CERTIFICATE
`
`34-
`
`29
`
`OFFICIAL
`MAY 1, 2011 - APRIL 30, 2012
`( with Supplements)
`
`The United States Phannacopeia-NationaI Fonnulary
`(USP-NF) is a publication of the
`U.S. Pharmacopeia.
`
`This certificate is your assurance that you
`have a genuine USP publication-the only
`authentic and official print version
`of USP 34-NF 29.
`
`U.S. PHARMACOPEIA __ __,
`The Standard of QualitySM
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.002
`
`

`

`2011
`
`USP 3
`F 29
`Volume 1
`
`RECEi\/ED
`
`FEB O I 2011
`
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`LIBRARY
`
`THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA
`
`THE NATIONAL FORMULARY
`
`By authority of the United States Pharmacopeia/ Convention
`Prepared by the Council of Experts and its Expert Committees
`
`Official from May 1, 2011
`
`The designation on the cover of this publication, "USP NF 2011," is for ease of
`identification only. The publication contains two separate compendia: The United
`States Pharmacopeia, Thirty-Fourth Revision, and The National Formulary, Twenty-Ninth
`Edition.
`
`THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION
`12601 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.003
`
`

`

`SIX-MONTH IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE
`
`The United States Pharmacopeia-National Formu/ary and its supplements become official six months after being released to
`the public. The USP-NF, which is released on November 1 of each year, becomes official on May 1 of the following year.
`This six-month implementation timing gives users more time to bring their methods and procedures into compliance with
`new and revised USP-NF requirements.
`The table below describes the new official dates. The 2010 USP 33-NF 28 Reissue, and the supplements and Interim
`Revision Announcements (IRAs) to that edition, will be official until May 1, 2011, at which time the USP 34-NF 29 becomes
`official.
`
`Publication
`USP 34-NF 29
`
`Release Date
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`Official Date
`May 1, 2011
`
`First Supplement to the
`USP 34-NF 29
`Second Supplement to the
`USP 34-NF 29
`USP 35-NF 30
`
`February 1, 2011
`
`August 1, 2011
`
`June 1, 2011
`
`December 1, 2011
`
`Nov. 1, 2011
`
`May 1, 2012
`
`Official Until
`May 1, 2012 (except as superseded by supplements, IRAs, and Revi-
`sion Bulletins)
`May 1, 2012 (except as superseded by Second Supplement, IRAs, and
`Revision Bulletins)
`May 1, 2012 (except as superseded by IRAs and Revision Bulletins)
`
`May 1, 2013 (except as superseded by supplements, IRAs, and Revi-
`sion Bulletins)
`
`IRAs will continue to become official on the first day of the second month of the Pharmacopeial Forum (PF) issue in which
`they are published as final. For instance, IRAs published as final in the May-June PF (issue 3) will become official on June 1.
`This table gives the details of the IRAs that will apply to USP 33-NF 28 Reissue and USP 34-NF 29.
`
`IRA
`Ian. 1 2011 IRA PF 37(1)
`Mar. 1 2011 IRA PF 37(2)
`Mav 1 2011 IRA PF 37(3)
`lulv 1 2011 IRA PF 37(4)
`Seat. 1 2011 IRA PF 37(5)
`Nov. 1 2011 IRA PF 37(6\
`!an. 1 2011 IRA PF 38(1 l
`Mar. 1. 2011 IRA PF 38(2)
`
`Release Date
`!an. 1 2011
`Mar. 1 2011
`Mav 1 2011
`lulv 1 2011
`Sent 1 2011
`Nov. 1 2011
`Ian. 1 2012
`Mar. 1 2012
`
`Official Date
`Feb. 1 2011
`Aori! 1 2011
`lune 1 2011
`Aua. 1 2011
`Oct. 1 2011
`Dec. 1 2011
`Feb. 1 2012
`Aoril 1 2012
`
`Revises
`USP 33-NF 28 Reissue and its suoolements
`USP 33-NF 28 Reissue and its suoolements
`USP 33-NF 28 Reissue and its suoolements
`USP 33 NF 28 Reissue and its sunnlements
`USP 34-NF 29 and its sunnlements
`USP 34-NF 29 and its sunnlements
`USP 34-NF 29 and its sunnlements
`USP 34-NF 29 and its sunnlements
`
`Revision Bulletins published on the USP website will become official on the date specificed on the Revision Bulletin
`
`NOTICE AND WARNING
`
`Concerning U.S. Patent or Trademark Rights-The inclusion in The United States Pharmacopeia or in the National Formulary ot a
`monograph on any drug in respect to which patent or trademark rights may exist shall not be deemed, and is not intended
`as, a grant of, or authority to exercise, any right or privilege protected by such patent or trademark. All such rights and
`privileges are vested in the patent or trademark owner, and no other person may exercise the same without express
`permission, authority, or license secured from such patent or trademark owner.
`Concerning Use of USP or NF Text-Attention is called to the fact that USP and NF text is fully copyrighted. Authors and
`others wishing to use portions of the text should request permission to do so from the Secretary of the USPC Board of
`Trustees.
`
`t © 2010 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention
`winbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852
`
`All rights reserved.
`ISSN: 0195-7996
`ISBN: 1-889788-92-0
`Printed in the United States by United Book Press, Inc., Baltimore, MD
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.004
`
`

`

`328 (788) Particulate Matter in Injections / Physical Tests
`
`USP
`
`transparent graticule reference circles is used to size white
`and transparent particles, while dark particles are sized by
`using the outer diameter of the black opaque graticule ref(cid:173)
`erence circles.
`In performing the Microscopic Particle Count Test, do not
`attempt to size or enumerate amorphous, semiliquid, or
`otherwise morphologically indistinct materials that have the
`appearance of a stain or discoloration on the membrane
`filter. These materials show little or no surface relief and
`present a gelatinous or film-like appearance. In such cases,
`the interpretation of enumeration may be aided by testing a
`sample of the solution by the Light Obscuration Particle
`Count Test.
`
`Evaluation
`
`For preparations supplied in containers with a nominal
`volume of more than 100 ml, apply the criteria of Test 2.A.
`For preparations supplied in containers with a nominal
`volume of less than 100 ml, appl)( the criteria of Test 2.B.
`For preparations supplied in containers with a nominal
`volume of 100 ml, apply the criteria of Test 2.B. [NOTE-Test
`2.A is used in the Japanese Pharmacopeia.]
`Test 2.A (Solutions for parenteral infusion or solutions for
`injection supplied in containers with a nominal content of more
`than 7 00 mL)-The preparation complies with the test if the
`average number of particles present in the units tested does
`not exceed 12 per ml equal to or greater than 10 µm and
`does not exceed 2 per ml equal to or greater than 25 µm.
`Test 2.B (Solutions for parenteral infusion or solutions for
`injection supplied in containers with a nominal content of less
`than 7 00 mL)-The preparation complies with the test if the
`average number of particles present in the units tested does
`not exceed 3000 per container equal to or greater than 10
`µm and does not exceed 300 per container equal to or
`greater than 25 µm.
`
`(789) PARTICULATE MATTER IN
`OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS
`
`Particulate matter consists of mobile, randomly sourced,
`extraneous substances, other than gas bubbles, that cannot
`be quantitated by chemical analysis because of the small
`amount of material they represent and because of their het(cid:173)
`erogeneous composition. Ophthalmic solutions should be
`essentially free from particles that can be observed on visual
`inspection. The tests described herein are physical tests per(cid:173)
`formed for the purpose of enumerating extraneous particles
`within specific size ranges.
`Every ophthalmic solution for which the monograph in(cid:173)
`cludes a test for Particulate matter is subject to the particu(cid:173)
`late matter limits set forth for the test being applied, unless
`otherwise specified in the individual monograph. When
`higher limits are appropriate, they will be specified in the
`individual monograph. Ophthalmic preparations that are
`suspensions, emulsions, or gels are exempt from these re(cid:173)
`quirements, as are medical devices. Refer to the
`monograph when a question of test applicability occurs.
`light obscuration and microscopic procedures for the de(cid:173)
`termination of particulate matter in ophthalmic solutions are
`identical to those for injections; therefore, where appropri(cid:173)
`ate, Particulate Matter in Injections (788) is cross-referenced.
`This chapter provides a test approach in two stages. The
`ophthalmic solution is first tested by the light obscuration
`procedure (stage 1 ). If it fails to meet the prescribed limits,
`1t must pass the microscopic procedure (stage 2) with its
`
`own set of test limits. Where for technical reasons the
`ophthalmic solution cannot be tested by light obscuration.
`microscopic testing may be used exclusively. Documenta-.'
`tion is required; demonstrating that the light obscuration
`procedure is incapable of testing the ophthalmic solution
`that it produces invalid results.
`It is expected that most articles will meet the require(cid:173)
`ments on the basis of the light obscuration test alone; how..
`ever, it may be necessary to test some articles by the light
`obscuration test followed by the microscopic test to reach a
`conclusion on conformance to requirements. Any product
`that is not a pure solution having a clarity and a viscosity
`approximating those of water may provide erroneous data
`when analyzed by the light obscuration counting method.
`Such materials may be analyzed by the microscopic count(cid:173)
`ing method. In some instances, the viscosity of a material
`be tested may be sufficiently high so as to preclude its
`ysis by either test method. In this event, a quantitative dilu
`tion with an appropriate diluent may be made to decrease
`viscosity, as necessary, to allow the analysis to be

`performed.
`In the tests described below, the results obtained by ex(cid:173)
`amining a discrete unit or group of units for particulate
`matter cannot be extrapolated with certainty to other units
`that remain untested. Thus, sampling plans based on k
`operational factors must be developed if valid inferen
`to be drawn from observed data to characterize the I
`particulate matter in a large group of units. Sampling plans
`need to be based on consideration of product volume, par:
`tide numbers historically found to be present in comparison
`to limits, particle size distribution of particles present, and
`variability of particle counts between units.
`
`LIGHT OBSCURATION PARTICLE COUNT TEST
`
`This test applies to ophthalmic solutions, including solu(cid:173)
`tions constituted from sterile solids, for which a test for Par(cid:173)
`ticulate matter is specified in the individual monograph. The
`test counts suspended particles that are solid or liquid.
`Test Apparatus, Instrument Standardization, Test
`Environment, Test Procedure, and Calculations-Proceed
`as directed for Light Obscuration Particle Count Test under
`Particulate Matter in Injections (788).
`Interpretation-The ophthalmic solution meets the re(cid:173)
`quirements of the test if the average number of particles
`present in the units tested does not exceed the appropriate
`value listed in Table 7. If the average number of particles
`exceeds the limit, test the article by the Microscopic Part/de
`Count Test.
`
`Table 1. Light Obscuration Test Particle Count
`Diameter
`~25 m
`5 er ml
`
`Number of articles
`
`MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT TEST
`
`Some articles cannot be tested meaningfully by light
`scuration. In such cases, individual monographs clearly
`ify that only a microscopic particle count is to be per-
`formed. The micros
`particle count test enumerates
`subvisible, essential!
`d, particulate matter in
`mic
`solutions, after collection on a microporous me
`ter.
`Some ophthalmic solutions, such as solutions that do not
`filter readily because of their high viscosity, may be ex(cid:173)
`empted from analysis using the microscopic test.
`When performing the microscopic test, do not attempt
`size or enumerate amorphous, semiliquid, or otherwise mor(cid:173)
`phologically indistinct materials that have the appearance of.
`a stain or discoloration on the membrane surface. These
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.005
`
`

`

`Physical Tests I (791) pH 329
`
`Potassium
`Tetraoxalate 0.05 m
`1.67
`1.67
`1.68
`1.68
`1.68
`1.69
`1.69
`1.70
`1.71
`1.72
`1.72
`
`pH Values of Buffer Solutions for Standardization
`Potassium
`Equimolal
`Sodium Tetraborate,
`Bi hthalate 0.05 m
`Phos hate 0.05 m
`0.01 m
`4.00
`6.92
`9.33
`4.00
`6.90
`9.28
`4.00
`6.88
`9.23
`4.01
`6.86
`9.18
`4.02
`6.85
`9.14
`4.02
`6.84
`9.10
`4.04
`6.84
`9.07
`4.05
`6.83
`9.04
`4.06
`6.83
`9.01
`4.08
`6.83
`8.99
`4.09
`6.84
`8.96
`
`Calcium Hydroxide,
`Saturated at 25°
`13.00
`12.81
`12.63
`12.45
`12.29
`12.13
`11.98
`11.84
`11.71
`11.57
`11.45
`
`show little or no surface relief and present a gelati-
`1lm-like appearance. Because in solution this mate-
`. of units on the order of 1 µm or less, which may
`d only after aggregation or deformation on an
`membrane, interpretation of enumeration may be
`testing a sample of the solution by the light obscu(cid:173)
`· c1e count method.
`paratus, Test Environment, Test Procedure,
`meration of Particles-Proceed as directed for Mi(cid:173)
`Particle Count Test under Particulate Matter in lnjec•
`8).
`elation-The ophthalmic solution meets the re(cid:173)
`of the test if the average number of particles
`t in the units tested does not exceed the appropriate
`listed in Table 2.
`
`Table 2. Microscopic Method Particle Count
`Diameter
`~25 m
`5 er ml
`
`~ 10 m
`50 er ml
`
`(791) pH
`
`r c~mpendial purposes, pH is defined as the value given
`suitable, properly standardized, potentiometric instru(cid:173)
`t(pH !lleter) capable of reproducing pH values to 0.02
`um! ~sing an indicator electrode sensitive to hydrogen(cid:173)
`acttv1ty, the glass electrode, and a suitable reference
`ro~e. The instrument should be capable of sensing the
`ent.1al across the electrode pair and, for pH standardiza(cid:173)
`purposes applying an adjustable potential to the circuit
`~n of "standard
`," "zero," "asymmetry,"
`' control, and sh
`be able to control the
`livolts per unit change in pH reading through
`e" and/or "slope" control. Measurements are
`at 25 ± 2°, unless otherwise specified in the individual
`or herein.
`scale is defined by the equation:
`
`pH = pHs + (E Es)/k
`
`which E and Es are the measured potentials where the
`cell contains the solution under test, represented
`d the appropriate Buffer Solution for Standardiza(cid:173)
`_resented by pHs, respectively. The value of k is the
`m potential per unit change in pH and is theoreti-
`
`cally [0.05916 + 0.000198(t - 25°)] volts at any tempera(cid:173)
`ture t.
`It should be emphasized that the definitions of pH, the
`pH scale, and the values assigned to the Buffer Solutions for
`Standardization are for the purpose of establishing a practi(cid:173)
`cal, operational system so that results may be compared
`between laboratories. The pH values thus measured do not
`correspond exactly to those obtained by the definition, pH
`= - log aH+, So long as the solution being measured is suffi(cid:173)
`ciently similar in composition to the buffer used for stan(cid:173)
`dardization, the operational pH corresponds fairly closely to
`the theoretical pH. Although no claim is made with respect.
`to the suitability of the system for measuring hydrogen-ion
`activity or concentration, the values obtained are closely re(cid:173)
`lated to the activity of the hydrogen-ion in aqueous
`solutions.
`Where a pH meter is standardized by use of an aqueous
`buffer and then used to measure the ' pH" of a nonaqueous
`solution or suspension, the ionization constant of the acid or
`base, the dielectric constant of the medium, the liquid-junc(cid:173)
`tion potential (which may give rise to errors of approxi(cid:173)
`mately 1 pH unit), and the hydrogen-ion response of the
`glass electrode are all changed. For these reasons, the values
`so obtained with solutions that are only partially aqueous in
`character can be regarded only as apparent pH values.
`
`BUFFER SOLUTIONS FOR STANDARDIZATION
`OF THE pH METER
`
`. Buffer ~olutions for Standardization are to be prepared as
`directed m the accompanying table.· Buffer salts of requisite
`purity can be obtained from the National Institute of Sci(cid:173)
`ence and Technology. Solutions may be stored in hard glass
`or polyethylene bottles fitted with a tight closure or carbon
`dioxide-absorbing tube (soda lime). Fresh solutions should
`be prepared at intervals not to exceed 3 months using car(cid:173)
`bon dioxide-free water. The table indicates the pH of the
`buffer solutions as a function of temperature. The instruc(cid:173)
`tions presented here are for the preparation of solutions
`having the designated molal (m) concentrations. For conve(cid:173)
`nience, and to facilitate their preparation, however, instruc(cid:173)
`tions are given in terms of dilution to a 1000-mL volume
`rather than specifying the use of 1000 g of solvent, which is
`the basis of the molality system of solution concentration.
`The indicated quantities cannot be computed simply with(cid:173)
`out additional information.
`Potassium Tetraoxalate, 0.05 m-Dissolve 12.61 g of
`KH3(C2O4)2 · 2H2O in water to make 1000 ml.
`· Commercially available buffer solutions for pH meter standardization, stan(cid:173)
`dardized by methods traceable to the National Institute of Standards and
`Technology {N1sn, labeled with a pH value accurate to 0.01 pH unit may be
`used. For standardization solutions having a pH lower than 4, a labeled accu(cid:173)
`racy of 0.02 is _acceptable. _Solutions prepared Iron: _ACS reagent grade matf!!r•
`1als or other suitable materials, 1n the stated quantities, may be used provided
`the pH of the resultant solution is the same as that of the solution prepared
`from the NIST certified material.
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1019.006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket