throbber
IPT 24 2007 3/1/08 13:49 Page 73
`
`Ingredients, Formulations & Excipients
`
`Advances in Prefilled Syringe Technology
`Developments in areas such as component materials, surface
`treatments and filling processes are continuing to boost the appeal
`of prefilled syringes and expand their use with many of today’s
`parenteral products
`
`By Andrea Wagner at Hyaluron Contract Manufacturing
`
`Dr Andrea Wagner, PhD, is the Vice President of Business Development at Hyaluron Contract Manufacturing (HCM), a
`position she has held for six years. Prior to joining HCM, she was employed by the New Jersey Institute of Technology
`and Niton Corporation, in the capacities of Senior Scientist and Business Development Manager, respectively. Andrea
`holds a PhD in Toxicology and a Masters in Analytical Chemistry.
`
`Prefilled syringes are a fast-growing alternative to vials
`for many of today’s parenteral products. According to
`one recent estimate, the market for prefilled systems
`has grown by over 20 per cent in the last three years and
`is likely to see a sustained growth rate of between 10
`and 15 per cent in the foreseeable future (1).
`
`The increased interest in prefilled syringes is largely
`driven by the many advantages they offer relative to
`vials. These include greater ease of use, reduced waste,
`improved dosing accuracy and enhanced product
`differentiation. Recent advances in syringe technology
`promise to further enhance the benefits of a prefilled
`syringe. For example,
`there have been new
`developments in component materials, as well as
`surface treatments and filling/stoppering processes,
`which offer
`important advantages to both the
`manufacturer and the end-user.
`
`sterilise and offers better visibility as well as enhanced
`barrier properties; it also has low reactivity and its
`nature and content are better defined and understood.
`For companies moving their product from a vial to a
`prefilled syringe, this factor is important since they
`know what to expect and how to compensate for any
`challenges that might arise.
`
`Glass, however, contains small amounts of alkali ions
`which can cause a pH shift in some sensitive products
`(2). It can also harbour residual traces of tungsten, a
`byproduct of the glass-forming process, which can
`cause protein aggregation (3). Furthermore, proteins
`and peptides adsorb to glass which can, potentially, lead
`to a decrease in potency of the drug (4). Additionally,
`glass is breakable and requires
`added care when filling and
`handling.
`
`Several studies conducted by a leading provider of
`aseptic manufacturing services to companies in the
`pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors have found
`that the advantages of a prefilled syringe can be
`significantly improved by decreasing the size of the gas
`bubble inside the syringe. The gas bubble is not intrinsic
`to the syringe but is a by-product of sub-optimal filling
`processes. Reducing the gas bubble, these studies
`showed, offers greater assurance with regard to dosing
`accuracy and precision as well as product sterility.
`Additionally, removing the gas bubble entirely from a
`prefilled syringe can improve the stability of many
`oxygen-sensitive compounds, as well as proteins that
`rearrange due to the gas-liquid interface.
`
`COMPONENT MATERIALS
`
`Borosilicate glass has long been the industry standard
`for parenteral products in prefilled syringes. It is easy to
`
`Plastic has been an alternative to
`glass in prefilled syringes since
`the early 1990s. The earliest
`plastics, however, were made of
`polypropylene which did not
`offer the clarity of glass, or many
`of its barrier properties and ease
`of sterilization. Polypropylene
`plastics also presented more
`challenges with
`regard
`to
`extractables and leachables than
`glass due to a lack of historic
`data.
`
`Manufacturers have begun to
`develop new plastics – such as
`cyclic olefin copolymers – that are
`able to hold their own against
`glass. These plastics offer high
`
`Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology
`
`Barrel
`
`Figure 1: A prefillable
`syringe consists of a
`barrel, a plunger rod,
`stopper and tip cap.
`Advances in surface
`treatments used to
`facilitate the movement
`of the individual parts
`have decreased the
`amount of free silicone
`that could potentially
`interact with a drug
`product
`
`Piston
`
`Stopper
`
`73
`
`Tip cap
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2025.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2020-01318
`
`

`

`IPT 24 2007 3/1/08 13:49 Page 74
`
`Figure 2: The
`expansion and
`contraction of a
`bubble inside a
`syringe can cause
`the stopper to rise
`into non-sterile
`areas of the barrel,
`potentially pulling
`silicone and other
`contaminants into
`the product
`
`Hsb
`
`FILLING/STOPPERING PROCESSES
`
`Until recently, there were three principal methods for
`filling and stoppering syringes, each with its own
`advantages and challenges.
`
`The most common filling and stoppering process uses
`high-speed equipment to expel the product into the
`syringe and force the stopper – which is first compressed
`in a narrow insertion tube – into place. The advantages
`of this method include minimal operator intervention
`and high-throughput, making it less costly and faster. A
`significant disadvantage is the large air bubble – 2.5mm
`minimum – which is left in the syringe. This bubble can
`increase the risk of stopper movement during shipping,
`and cause loss of product during expulsion activities
`prior to administration. It can also cause stability issues
`for some proteins and oxygen-sensitive compounds.
`Additionally, online stopper placement does not work
`well with coated stoppers since the compression of the
`stopper in the insertion tube and the force of the
`insertion rod can cause the coating to wrinkle and tear.
`
`The second most common method for filling and
`stoppering syringes is online high-speed filling followed
`by offline vacuum stoppering. With this method,
`syringes that have been filled online are manually moved
`from the filling machine and placed into a vacuum
`chamber. The advantage of this method is that it is
`effective in removing over 99 per cent of the air bubble,
`resulting in a bubble that is significantly smaller
`than that
`left by traditional online stoppering
`methods. One disadvantage, however, is that this
`method requires additional operator handling and
`significantly reduces throughput.
`
`Online vacuum filling followed by online vacuum
`stoppering was recently introduced by fill equipment
`manufacturers and is becoming increasingly popular.
`With this method, a vacuum is applied both before and
`after filling, and vacuum stoppering is done online. The
`primary advantage of this method is reduced operator
`handling and the ability to obtain bubble-free filling of
`viscous liquids. Online vacuum stoppering also works
`well with coated stoppers, as there is no compression of
`the stopper via the insertion rod.
`
`The latest innovation in filling and stoppering syringes
`uses online vacuum
`filling and stoppering
`in
`conjunction with other proprietary technology to
`produce a syringe that is bubble-free. This method,
`known as bubble-free filling, is most advantageous for
`non-viscous products, since viscous products can be
`
`Starting position
`of stopper
`
`Reduced atmospheric
`pressure #1
`
`Back to original
`ambient pressure
`
`Reduced atmospheric
`pressure #2
`
`Back to original
`ambient pressure
`
`Reduced atmospheric
`pressure #3
`
`Back to original
`ambient pressure
`
`heat resistance and a low level of extractables and
`leachables, and are less permeable to water (5). They are
`also more transparent, lightweight and shatter-resistant,
`enhancing visibility and facilitating filling operations as
`well as ease of use.
`
`SURFACE TREATMENTS
`
`In addition to making enhancements to the component
`materials of a container/closure system, syringe
`manufacturers are finding ways to mitigate the effects of
`silicone on sensitive biopharmaceuticals. Unlike a vial,
`the various parts of a syringe must be free to move in
`order to facilitate administration of the product. In the
`past, syringe manufacturers have used silicone to
`lubricate the stopper and plunger, enabling these parts
`to move freely. However, silicone, which is used in
`both glass and plastic syringes, can cause issues with
`product stability.
`
`More recently, some syringe manufacturers have
`started baking the silicone onto the syringe to limit
`the amount of free silicone that is available, thus
`decreasing the potential for interaction with the
`product (3). Others have developed barrier films to
`aid in lubricating the components, while protecting
`the drug product from contaminants that could
`potentially be leached from the elastomeric stopper
`which, in a syringe, is in constant contact with the
`product. West Pharmaceuticals, for example, has
`introduced FluroTec, a fluropolymer barrier film used
`on syringe components to facilitate administration of
`the product and to guard against extractables and
`leachables. This syringe system provides a silicone-
`free container which is advantageous to silicone-
`sensitive products.
`
`74
`
`Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2025.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2020-01318
`
`

`

`IPT 24 2007 3/1/08 13:49 Page 75
`
`filled without bubbles using online vacuum filling and
`stoppering alone.
`
`The advantages of bubble-free filling include:
`
`Enhanced Dosing Accuracy
`Studies show that reducing or eliminating the bubble
`inside a prefilled syringe assures the same dose will be
`delivered regardless of syringe orientation, ensuring the
`end-user receives the entire deliverable dose.
`
`Improved Product Sterility
`A gas bubble inside a syringe can cause the stopper to
`move into non-sterile areas of the syringe when the
`syringe is exposed to changes in atmospheric pressure,
`potentially pulling contaminants and/or silicone oil into
`the product. Reducing the size of the gas bubble limits
`stopper movement, offering greater assurance with
`regard to package integrity and product sterility. Further,
`decreasing the size of the bubble inside a prefilled syringe
`prevents the growth of aerobic microorganisms and
`inhibits the growth of facultative microorganisms.
`
`Decreased Waste/Greater Safety
`The expansion of a gas bubble inside a syringe can result
`in a drip from the needle when the tip cap is removed.
`Decreasing the size of the bubble – or eliminating it
`altogether – ensures that less product will be wasted as a
`result of the drip and reduces the likelihood of
`administrator exposure to cytotoxic compounds.
`
`Increased Product Stability
`The liquid-gas interface inside a prefilled syringe can
`cause molecular rearrangement in some proteins, while
`air bubbles, in conjunction with silicone, may lead to
`protein aggregation. Eliminating the liquid-gas interface
`increases the stability of these products. In addition,
`removing the air from a prefilled syringe enhances the
`stability of oxygen-sensitive compounds.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Figure 3: A bubble
`inside a syringe can
`cause the product to
`drip from the needle
`when the tip cap is
`removed. A bubble-free
`syringe does not leak
`when the tip cap is
`removed, enhancing
`dosing accuracy
`and safety
`
`enhanced ease-of-use and reduced waste, as well as the
`potential to one day lyophilise products in standard,
`commercially available syringes – will continue to boost
`the appeal of prefilled syringes and expand their use
`with many of today’s parenteral products.
`
`The author can be contacted at
`ctracanna@hyaluron.com
`
`Acknowledgement
`The author would like to thank Kelly Jenkins Lin at
`Hyaluron Contract Manufacturing for her assistance
`in the preparation of this article.
`
`References
`
`1. Furness G, Prefilled Syringes: Where have we got to?
`ONdrugDelivery, p4, September 2007
`
`2. Polin JB, Injecting Excitement into Parenteral Drug
`Packaging, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and
`Packaging News, p72, April 2005
`
`As prefilled syringes continue to find favour as an
`alternative to vials for many drug products, advances in
`prefilled syringe technology will continue to provide
`added benefits. These advances include developments
`in component materials, surface treatments and
`filling processes.
`
`One new filling process, bubble-free filling, offers
`improved dosing accuracy and greater assurance with
`regard to product sterility and stability in a prefilled
`syringe. These benefits, together with others – including
`
`3. Lahendro B, The next generation of prefillable
`syringes: specialised plastics lead the way,
`ONdrugDelivery, p7, September 2007
`
`4. DeGrazio FL, Parenteral Packaging Concerns for
`Biotech Drug Products, Drug Delivery Technology,
`p44, May 2006
`
`5. Harrison B and Rios M, Big Shot: Developments
`in Prefilled Syringes, Pharmaceutical Technology,
`March 2007
`
`Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology
`
`75
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2025.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2020-01318
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket