throbber
Acta Ophthalmologica 2010
`
`Letter to the Editor
`
`Intravitreal silicone oil
`droplets following
`pegaptanib injection
`
`Selim Kocabora, Kemal
`Mehmet
`Turgay Ozbilen and Kubra Serefoglu
`
`Retina Unit, Vakif Gureba Education
`and Research Hospital, Ophthalmology
`Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
`
`doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01336.x
`
`Editor,
`
`I ntravitreal
`
`injection has recently
`gained in popularity for the treat-
`ment of many retinal diseases. Pegap-
`tanib is an agent used in intravitreal
`injection to treat choroidal neovascu-
`larizations
`by
`repeated
`injections
`administered every 6 weeks. Presumed
`intraocular migration of silicone oil
`droplets caused by intravitreal pegap-
`tanib injections was reported previ-
`ously (Freund et al. 2006).
`We report three cases of intravitreal
`silicone oil droplets following pegapta-
`nib injection for
`the treatment of
`subretinal choroidal neovascular mem-
`branes.
`In July 2007, pegaptanib
`became the first anti-vascular endothe-
`lial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent
`to be approved for ocular use in Tur-
`key. The medication is distributed in
`prefilled
`glass
`syringes
`containing
`0.3 mg pegaptanib in 0.09 ml solution.
`Of 22 eyes
`injected intravitreally
`with pegaptanib between October
`2007 and April 2008,
`three were
`observed to contain presumed intra-
`vitreal silicone oil droplets. The drop-
`lets were firstly noticed occasionally
`during routine ophthalmological exam-
`ination in one patient’s eye. Conse-
`quently, we undertook a
`careful
`examination of all pegaptanib-injected
`patients and we found intravitreal oily
`droplets in two eyes of
`two other
`patients. None of the three patients
`with intravitreal oily droplets com-
`plained of floaters
`in their visual
`fields. The intravitreal droplets were
`small,
`spherical,
`translucent
`foreign
`bodies. Under biomicroscopic exami-
`nation, the droplets resembled silicone
`
`e44
`
`for the presence of silicon (Si) in two
`used and one unused pegaptanib-filled
`syringe. Inductively coupled plasma-
`MS is a highly sensitive method
`routinely used to determine trace ele-
`ments. We demonstrated the presence
`of Si in used and unused syringes and
`also in the pegaptanib solution itself
`(Fig. 3). These findings support
`the
`hypothesis that oily intravitreal drop-
`lets
`following pegaptanib injection
`may be silicone oil
`that originated
`from syringes used to inject pegapta-
`nib.
`Siliconization of the inner syringe
`wall and outer plunger surface serve
`to decrease friction for piston move-
`ment and minimize protein absorption
`to prolong drug stability. Because sili-
`cone oil has a relatively low cohesive-
`ness, it may migrate into the syringe
`and contaminate the drug. The release
`of silicone oil from disposable syringes
`during insulin expulsion has been
`reported to result
`from mechanical
`abrasion and flushing actions on the
`siliconized plastic surfaces of the syr-
`inge barrel and plunger (Chantelau
`et al. 1986). Almost all ophthalmic
`viscosurgical devices (OVDs) injected
`into the anterior chamber were found
`to contain small amounts of silicone
`oil, which is used as a lubricant for
`the prefilled OVD syringe (Ohrstrom
`et al. 2004).
`Pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bev-
`acizumab are the current anti-VEGF
`agents used intravitreally, but bev-
`acizumab is not approved for intra-
`vitreal delivery and thus its use is
`off-label.
`Intravitreal
`injection
`of
`VEGF inhibitors as an invasive proce-
`dure carries the risk of blinding com-
`plications
`such as
`endophthalmitis
`and retinal detachment; moreover,
`potential systemic side-effects include
`arterial hypertension, thromboembolic
`events and gastrointestinal bleeding
`(la Cour 2007).
`
`Fig. 1. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy demonstra-
`ting three oily droplets in the mid-vitreous
`cavity.
`
`oil remnants such as those commonly
`observed in the vitreous cavity of vit-
`rectomized eyes following silicone oil
`removal. By contrast with the vitrec-
`tomized eyes,
`the droplets in these
`three patients’ eyes were embedded in
`the vitreous gel and changed position
`with vitreous after-movements (Fig. 1).
`These small oily bubbles were more
`easily detectable on ocular echography
`(Fig. 2) because of
`their apparently
`exaggerated echogenicity
`and size
`caused by the typical ‘Rayleigh’ scat-
`tering of ultrasound from the vitre-
`ous–oil
`interface,
`as
`reported by
`Spaide et al. (2005).
`We used inductively coupled plasma
`mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to test
`
`Fig. 2. B-scan ultrasonography of the same
`eye as in Fig. 1 demonstrates a typical scat-
`tering with three hyperechogenic opacities.
`
`Fig. 3. Silicon (atomic weight 29 g ⁄ mol) shown by the continuous red line detected in trace
`amounts in the pegaptanib solution by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis.
`(Other lines are blank.)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2008.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2020-01317
`
`

`

`In our experience with intravitreal
`bevacizumab injection over 2 years,
`we have not observed a single case
`of
`intravitreal
`silicone oil droplets.
`Ranibizumab is not yet approved or
`commercially
`available
`in Turkey
`and therefore we have no experience
`with it.
`By contrast with pegaptanib, neither
`ranibizumab nor bevacizumab are
`stored in prefilled syringes. We think
`that intravitreal contamination by sili-
`cone oil droplets is most likely associ-
`ated with the use of prefilled syringes.
`The functional and clinical conse-
`quences of
`intravitreal
`silicone oil
`droplets are unknown, but their occur-
`rence could be avoided by using new-
`generation prefilled syringes that do
`not have an internal silicone coating.
`
`Acta Ophthalmologica 2010
`
`Acknowledgements
`We thank Professor Ahmet Kasgoz
`from the Department of Chemical
`Engineering, University of
`Istanbul
`for
`providing
`inductively
`coupled
`plasma mass spectrometry analysis for
`this study.
`
`Ohrstrom A, Svensson B, Tegenfeldt S,
`Celiker C & Lignell B (2004): Silicone oil
`content in ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.
`J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 1278–1280.
`Spaide RF, Chung JE & Fisher YL (2005):
`Ultrasound detection of silicone oil after its
`removal
`in retinal reattachment surgery.
`Retina 25: 943–945.
`
`References
`Chantelau E, Berger M & Bo¨ hlken B (1986):
`Silicone oil released from disposable insulin
`syringes. Diabetes Care 9: 672–673.
`la Cour M (2007): Intravitreal VEGF-inhibi-
`tors: is Avastin a generic substitute for Lu-
`centis? Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85: 2–4.
`Freund KB, Laud K, Eandi CM & Spaide
`RF (2006): Silicone oil droplets following
`intravitreal injection. Retina 26: 701–703.
`
`Correspondence:
`M. Selim Kocabora
`Sanatcilar Sitesi
`27 E Blok Daire: 12
`Tarabya-Sariyer
`34457 Istanbul
`Turkey
`Tel: + 90 212 534 6900
`Fax: + 90 212 621 7580
`Email: kocabora@gmail.com
`
`e45
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2008.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2020-01317
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket