throbber
l E
`
`Chapter 6
`HPLC
`
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`.
`
`Table of Contents
`
`601:
`
`General Information
`
`601 A:
`
`Principles
`
`601 B: Modes of Operation
`Liquid—Solid Chromatography
`Liquid-Liquid Chromatography
`Bonded Phase Chromatography
`Ion Exchange Chromatography
`Size Exclusion Chromatography
`
`601 C:
`
`Instrumentation and Apparatus
`Basic Components
`HPLC System Plumbing
`
`601 D:
`
`Solvents and Reagents
`Potential Problems
`
`Specific Solvents
`
`page
`
`date
`
`601—1
`
`601—2
`601—2
`601—3
`601—3
`601—4
`601—4
`
`601—5
`601—5
`601—7
`
`601—10
`601-10
`
`601-12
`
`1/94
`
`1/94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`1/94
`
`1/94
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`lgmzagtaszigje/QB]
`
`5004
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.001
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`601 E:
`
`Reagent Blanks
`Safety Precautions
`
`Sample Preparation
`Sample Cleanup
`Sample Filtration
`Sample Solvent Degassing
`Choice of Sample Solvent
`
`601 F:
`
`Reference Standards
`
`Stock Solutions
`
`Working Standard Solutions
`Storage
`
`References
`
`602:
`
`Columns
`
`602 A:
`
`Column Selection
`
`602 B:
`
`Analytical Columns
`Liquid—Solid Chromatography
`Bonded Phases
`
`Ion Exchange
`Ion Pair
`
`Size Exclusion
`
`602 C:
`
`Column Evaluation
`
`602 D:
`
`Column Specifications
`
`602 E:
`
`Analytical Column Protection
`Filters
`
`Precolumns
`
`Guard Columns
`
`602 F:
`
`Column Maintenance and Troubleshooting
`Column Care
`
`Column Evaluation by Injection of
`Test Mixtures
`
`Column Storage
`Column Regeneration
`
`References
`
`page
`601-14
`601-14
`
`601-14
`601-14
`601—14
`601-15
`601—15
`
`601—15
`
`601-15
`
`601—16
`601—16
`
`601—16
`
`602—1
`
`602—1
`602—2
`602—2
`
`602—3
`602—4
`
`602—4
`
`602—5
`
`602—6
`
`602—8
`602—8
`
`602—9
`
`602—9
`
`602—9
`602—9
`
`602—10
`
`602—11
`602—11
`
`602—1 2
`
`603:
`
`Mobile Phase Selection, Preparation, and Delivery
`
`603 A: Mobile Phase Selection
`
`Normal Phase Chromatography
`Reverse Phase Chromatography
`Ion Exchange Chromatography
`Ion Pair Chromatography
`Size Exclusion Chromatography
`Gradient Elution in HPLC
`
`603 B: Mobile Phase Preparation
`Filtering Solvents
`Degassing Solvents
`
`603—1
`
`603—1
`603—3
`603—4
`603—5
`603—5
`603—5
`
`603—6
`603—6
`603—6
`
`date
`1/94
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`1/94
`1/94
`1/94
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1/94
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1/94
`1/94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`1 / 94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1/94
`
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 /94
`
`600—2
`
`“mfifil'iialgi'agg‘ééllgfiil
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.002
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`Preparation of Multisolvent Mobile Phases
`Solvent Reservoirs
`
`603 C: Mobile Phase Delivery Systems
`Pumps
`Gradient Programming Systems
`
`603 D: Maintenance and Troubleshooting
`Problems with Pumps
`
`References
`
`604:
`
`Injection Systems
`
`604 A:
`
`Injection Valves
`
`604 B: Automatic Injectors
`
`604 C: Operation, Maintenance, Troubleshooting,
`and Repair of Injection Valves
`
`References
`
`605:
`
`Detectors
`
`605 A:
`
`UV/VIS Absorbance Detectors
`
`Fixed Wavelength UV Detectors
`Variable Wavelength UV Detectors
`Solvents
`
`Performance Characteristics
`
`page
`603—7
`603—7
`
`603—8
`603—8
`603—10
`
`603—1 0
`603—10
`
`603—1 3
`
`604—1
`
`604—3
`
`604—3
`
`date
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1/94
`1/94
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`1 /94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`604-4
`
`1/ 94
`
`605—2
`
`605—3
`605—4
`605—4
`
`605—4
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`1/94
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`1 /94
`1 / 94
`
`1 /94
`
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`1 /94
`
`Multichannel or Photodiode Array Detectors 605—5
`Applications
`605—5
`Problems, Maintenance, and
`605—5
`Troubleshooting
`
`605 B:
`
`Fluorescence Detectors
`
`Detector Design
`Solvents
`
`Performance Characteristics
`
`Parameter Adjustments
`Applications
`Detector Maintenance
`
`605 C:
`
`Electrochemical Detectors
`
`Conductivity Detectors
`Amperometric and Coulometric Detectors
`Performance Characteristics
`
`Applications
`
`605 D:
`
`Photoconductivity Detectors
`Apparatus
`Performance Characteristics
`
`Applications
`
`605 E: Mass Spectrometric Detectors
`
`605 F:
`
`Derivatization for Detection Enhancement
`
`Comparison of Pre— and Post—Column
`Derivatization
`
`605—6
`
`605—6
`605—7
`
`605—7
`
`605—8
`605—8
`605—8
`
`605—8
`
`605—9
`605—9
`605—10
`
`605-11
`
`605—11
`605—11
`605—11
`
`605—1 3
`
`605—1 3
`
`605-14
`
`605-14
`
`12:2??328'22852‘15331/93
`
`BOO—3
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.003
`
`

`

`I
`
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`Post—Column Reactor Design
`References
`
`606:
`
`606 A:
`
`Residue Identification and Quantitation
`Residue identification
`
`Co—chromatography
`Use of Alternative Columns
`
`Spectrometric Confirmation
`
`Quantitation
`Reference
`
`Quality Assurance and Troubleshooting
`
`Liquid Chromatograph Monitoring and
`Performance Testing
`
`606 B:
`
`607:
`
`607 A:
`
`607 B:
`
`608:
`
`page
`605—14
`
`605—16
`
`606—1
`
`606—1
`
`606—2
`
`606—2
`
`606—3
`
`606—3
`
`date
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`607—1
`
`1 / 94
`
`608—1
`
`608—1
`
`608—2
`
`608—2
`
`608—2
`
`601—1
`
`601—2
`
`601—5
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1/94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1/ 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`Troubleshooting from Chromatograms
`
`607—2
`
`1/ 94
`
`Bibliography
`General Texts
`
`Columns
`
`Detectors
`
`Troubleshooting
`
`Application to Pesticides
`
`601—a
`
`601—b
`
`601—c
`
`Figures
`Chromatographic Separation Techniques
`HPLC Modes of Operation
`Guide to Selection of HPLC Mode
`
`601—d
`
`601—e
`
`601-f
`
`601—g
`601-h
`
`602—a
`
`603-a
`
`603-b
`
`603-c
`
`603-d
`
`604—a
`
`604—b
`
`605—a
`
`605—b
`
`605—c
`
`605—d
`
`605—e
`
`Block Diagram of HPLC System
`Column Outlet Fittings
`
`Low Dead Volume Fitting
`Standard Internal Fitting
`Internal Thread Low Dead Volume Fitting
`
`Calculation of Column Performance Parameters
`
`Reciprocating Pump
`Gradient System I
`Gradient System 11
`Gradient System 111
`
`External Loop Injector: Six—Port Injection Valve
`Internal Loop Injector
`
`UV/VIS Detector
`
`Variable Wavelength UV/VIS Detector
`Fluorescence HPLC Detector
`
`Three Electrode Electrochemical Detector
`
`Post—Column Reactors
`
`601—6
`
`601—7
`
`601—7
`
`601—8
`
`601—8
`
`602—5
`
`603—8
`
`603—9
`
`603—9
`
`603—10
`
`604—1
`
`604—2
`
`605—3
`
`605—4
`
`605—6
`
`605—10
`
`605—15
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`9/96
`
`1 / 94
`
`1 / 94
`
`600—4
`
`Transmittal No. ElB-E’l [El/QB]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.004
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`Tables
`
`HPLC Column Specification Elements
`602—a:
`602—b: Minimum Efficiency Values
`
`(SOS—a:
`
`Properties of Common HPLC Solvents with
`Alumina Columns
`
`page
`
`date
`
`602—7
`602—8
`
`603—2
`
`1/94
`1/94
`
`1/94
`
`603—b:
`
`Classification of Solvent Selectivity
`
`603—2
`
`1/94
`
`Transmittal No. 9B-E’l [9/98]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`BOO—5
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.005
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`BOO—B
`
`Transmittal N0. 9B-E’l [9/98]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.006
`
`

`

`SECTION 60"
`I
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`601: GENERAL INFORMATION
`
`In recent years, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has grown in
`popularity as a determinative step for residue analysis, until today it is accepted as
`complementary to the more traditional gas liquid chromatography (GLC). HPLC
`provides capabilities not possible with GLC, most importantly the ability to sepa—
`rate and quantitate residues of polar, nonvolatile, and heat—labile chemicals. These
`characteristics make HPLC the determinative step of choice for many residues
`previously beyond the applicability of multiresidue methodology.
`
`507 A: PRINCIPLES
`
`Figure 601-5:
`Chromatographic Separation
`Techniques
`Chromatography
`
`Gl—k—l
`L'qu'd
`l—k—l
`
`as
`
`Chromatography comprises a family of sepa—
`ration techniques (Figure 601—a), all of which
`share common characteristics. A narrow ini-
`tial'zone of mixture'is applied to a sorptive
`stationary phase hav1ng a large surface area.
`
`Developmentwith mobile phase causes com—
`ponents of a mixture to move through the
`stationary phase at different rates and to
`separate from one another. Differential mi-
`gration occurs because of differences in dis—
`
`Planar
`
`Column
`|—I—|
`Classical
`HPLC
`
`tribution between the two phases. The mo-
`bile phase can be a gas or a liquid. Liquid
`chromatography is divided into two main
`types, planar (thin layer and paper chroma—
`tography) and column. Column liquid chro-
`matography, both the classical (low pressure)
`version and the high performance version
`discussed here, is further subdivided. accord—
`ing to the mechanism of separation into five
`major types: liquid—solid (adsorption) chromatography, LSC; liquid-liquid (parti-
`tion) chromatography, LLC; bonded phase chromatography, BPC; ion exchange
`chromatography, IEC; and size exclusion chromatography, SEC.
`
`LSC
`
`LLC
`
`BPC
`
`IEC
`
`SEC
`
`HPLC developed steadily during the late 1960s as high efficiency, small particle
`packings and improved instrumentation were produced. In contrast to classical
`column liquid chromatography, HPLC uses high pressure pumps; short, narrow
`columns packed with microparticulate phases; and a detector that continuously
`records the concentration of the sample.
`
`HPLC systems use the principles of classical column chromatography in an analyti-
`cal instrument. Development of HPLC has been directly related to availability of
`suitable hardware (columns, pumps, inlet systems, low dead volume fittings, etc.)
`that allows precise flow control under the elevated pressures needed, as well as the
`ability to manufacture a wide variety of column packing materials in particle sizes
`of exacting micron (um) dimensions.
`
`In contrast to GLC, where the gas mobile phase is inert and does not affect
`separation of analytes from one another, the HPLC mobile phase is critical to this
`
`Chapter 6 is revisedfrom a chapter on HPLC writtenfor FDA in 1989-90 byjoseph Sherma,
`Ph.D., Lafayette College, Easton, PA.
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`601—1
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.007
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`SECTION 601
`
`resolution. Choice of mobile phase is second only to the choice of operating
`mode in determining the suitability of the system to produce the desired separa—
`tions.
`
`HPLC had limited use for routine trace multiresidue analysis in the absence of
`sensitive element—selective detectors. Early development work relied primarily on
`refractive index (R1) or fixed wavelength UV absorbance detectors. Neither detec—
`tor demonstrated sufficient sensitivity or selectivity for use in trace residue analysis.
`In the mid—1970s, the fluorescence detector was shown to provide the needed
`sensitivity and specificity for pesticides that are naturally fluorescent or can
`be chemically labeled with a fiuorophore. This resulted in the first practical appli—
`cation of HPLC to multiresidue pesticide determination (see method for
`N—methylcarbamates, Section 401).
`
`More recently, scientists have investigated photoconductivity and electrochemical
`detectors and certain applications of the newer multiwavelength UV detectors.
`This research indicates that these detectors can also fulfill
`the sensitivity and
`selectivity requirements for determination of certain pesticides at residue levels.
`
`501 B: MODES OF OPERATION
`
`Separations by HPLC are achieved
`using the five basic operational modes
`(Figure 601—b). The mode chosen for
`a particular application will depend on
`the properties of the analyte(s) to be
`separated and determined. For residue
`determination, as for HPLC analyses
`in general, BPC is the most widely
`used.
`
`There are two variations within the five
`
`Figure 60“,
`HPLC Modes of Operation
`
`HPLC
`
`LSC
`
`LLC
`
`BPC
`SAX
`|—|—|
`Ion
`Ion
`suppression
`pair
`
`IEC
`
`SCX SEC
`.—|—.
`GPC
`GFC
`
`operational modes of HPLC operation;
`these distinctions are based on the relative polarities of stationary and mobile
`phases:
`
`1) normal phase (NP) chromatography: stationary phase is more polar than
`the mobile phase; the least polar analytes elute first; analyte retention is
`increased by decreasing mobile phase polarity.
`
`2) reverse phase (RP) chromatography: stationary phase is less polar than
`the mobile phase; the most polar analytes elute first; analyte retention is
`increased by increasing mobile phase polarity.
`
`Liquid-Solid Chromatography
`
`LSC, also called adsorption chromatography, uses an adsorbent, usually uncoated
`silica gel. The basis for separation is the selective adsorption of polar compounds,
`presumably by hydrogen bonding, to active silanol (SiOH) groups by orientation
`and on the surface of the silica gel. Analytes that are more polar will be attracted
`more strongly to the active silica gel sites. The solvent strength of the mobile phase
`determines the rate at which adsorbed analytes are desorbed and eluted.
`
`601—2
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.008
`
`

`

`SECTION 60"
`I
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`LSC is useful for separation of isomers and classes of compounds differing in polarity
`and number of functional groups. It works best with compounds that have relatively
`low or intermediate polarity. Highly polar compounds may irreversibly adsorb on the
`column. Poor LSC separations are usually obtained for chemicals containing only
`nonpolar aliphatic substituents.
`
`Liquid-Liquid Chromatography
`
`LLC, also called partition chromatography, involves a solid support, usually silica
`gel or kieselguhr, mechanically coated with a film of an organic liquid. A typical
`system for NP LLC is a column coated with B,B'—oxy dipropionitrile and a nonpolar
`solvent like hexane as the mobile phase. Analytes are separated by partitioning
`between the two phases as in solvent extraction. Components more soluble in the
`stationary liquid move more slowly and elute later. LLC has now been replaced by
`BPC for most applications.
`
`Bonded Phase Chromatography
`
`BPC uses a stationary phase that is chemically bonded to silica gel by reaction of
`silanol groups with a substituted organosilane. Unlike LLC, the stationary phase is
`not altered by mobile phase development or temperature change. All solvents can
`be used, presaturation of the mobile phase with the stationary phase is not re—
`quired, and gradient elution can be used to improve resolution.
`
`Specialized applications of BPC have been developed for ionized compounds,
`which are highly water soluble and generally not well retained on RP BPC col-
`umns. Retention and separation can be increased by adding an appropriate pH
`buffer to suppress ionization (ion suppression chromatography) or by forming a
`lipophilic ion pair (ion pair chromatography) between the analyte and a counter
`ion of opposite charge. The resultant nonionic species are separated by the same
`column techniques used for naturally nonionic organic molecules.
`
`Ion suppression is the preferred method for separation of weak acids and bases,
`for which the pH of the mobile phase can be adjusted to eliminate analyte ioniza—
`tion while remaining within the pH 2—8 stability range of bonded silica phases. The
`analyte is chromatographed by RP HPLC, usually on a C—18 column, using metha—
`nol or acetonitrile plus a buffer as the mobile phase. The technique is often
`preferred over IEC (see below) because C—l8 columns have higher efficiency,
`equilibrate faster, and are generally easier to use reproducibly compared to ion
`exchange phases. Strong acids and bases are usually separated on an ion exchange
`column or by ion pair chromatography.
`
`Ion pair chromatography is used to separate weak or strong acids or bases as well
`as other types of organic ionic compounds. The method involves use of a C—18
`column and a mobile phase buffered to a pH value at which the analyte is com—
`pletely ionized (acid pH for bases, basic pH for acids) and containing an appro—
`priate ion pairing reagent of opposite charge. Trialkylammonium salts are com—
`monly used for complex acidic analytes and alkylsulfonic acids for basic analytes.
`The ion pairs separate as if they are neutral polar molecules, but the exact mecha—
`nism of ion pair chromatography is unclear. Retention and selectivity are affected
`by the chain length and concentration of the pairing reagent, the concentration
`of organic solvent in the mobile phase, and its pH. Retention increases up to a
`point as the chain length of the pairing reagent or its concentration increases,
`then decreases or levels off [1].
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`60" —3
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.009
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`SECTION 601
`
`Compounds not ionized at the operative pH will not pair with the reagent, but
`they may still be strongly retained by a C—18 column depending on their alkyl
`structure. In this case, however, retention will not increase with the addition of an
`ion pairing reagent, and some decrease in retention may occur, probably due to
`reagent competition for the stationary phase [1].
`
`Ion Exchange Chromatography
`
`IEC is used to separate ionic compounds. Microparticulate insoluble organic poly—
`mer resin or silica gel is used as the support. Negatively charged sulfonic acid
`groups chemically bound to the support produce strong acid cation exchange
`(SCX) phases. Positively charged quaternary ammonium ions bound to the sup—
`port produce strong base anion exchange (SAX) phases. The most widely used
`resin support is cross—linked copolymer prepared from styrene and divinylbenzene.
`Mobile phases are aqueous buffers.
`
`Separations in IEC result from competition between the analytes and mobile phase
`ions for sites of opposite charge on the stationary phase. Important factors control—
`ling retention and selectivity include the size and charge of the analyte ions, the
`type and concentration of other ions in the buffer system, pH, temperature, and
`the presence of organic solvents.
`
`Ion chromatography, a subcategory of IEC, has been used primarily for separa—
`tions of inorganic cations or anions. Because a conductivity detector is usually
`employed, some means is required to reduce the ionic concentration and, hence,
`the background conductance of the mobile phase. A second ion exchange sup—
`pressor column to convert mobile phase ions to a nonconducting compound may
`be used. Alternatively, a stationary phase with very low exchange capacity may be
`used with a dilute, low conductance mobile phase containing ions that interact
`strongly with the column.
`
`Size Exclusion Chromatography
`
`SEC separates molecules based on differences in their size and shape in solution.
`SEC cannot separate isomers. SEC is carried out on silica gel or polymer packings
`having open structures with solvent—filled pores of limited size range. Small analyte
`molecules can enter the pores and spend a longer amount of time passing through
`the column than large molecules, which are excluded from the pores. Ideally,
`there should be no interaction between the analytes and the surface of the station—
`ary phase.
`
`Two important subdivisions of SEC are gel permeation chromatography (GPC)
`and gel filtration chromatography (GFC). GPC uses organic solvents for organic
`polymers and other analytes in organic solvents. GFC uses aqueous systems to
`separate and characterize biopolymers such as proteins and nucleic acids.
`
`The chemist developing an HPLC method must first consider the properties of
`the analytes of interest and choose an HPLC separation method that best takes
`advantage of those properties. Many of the references in the bibliography (Section
`608) offer guidance to making these choices. A general, simplified guide for
`selecting an HPLC mode according to the properties of the analyte(s) is illustrated
`in Figure bOl—c; the guide is based on the principles of Snyder and Kirkland [2].
`
`601—4
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.010
`
`

`

`SECTION 60"
`I
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`Figure 601-0
`Guide to Selection of HPLC Mode
`
`[based on analyte characteristics]
`
`Molecular weight >20009
`Y
`
`BS
`
`No
`
`.
`SEC Organic
`soluble?
`
`Molecular sizes
`
`very different?
` No
`
`lonizable?
`
`Ion Suppression
`Chromatography
`
`No
`
`GFC
`
`Yes
`
`(3pc
`
`ch
`
`’ RP
`org—aq
`solvent
`
`BS
`
`Ion
`-
`
`Pa'r'“9
`
`Anionic?
`
`Yele RP [,08 C18]
`
`Anionic
`Counter Ion
`
`org—aq solvent
`
`Cationic
`Counter Ion
`RP [C—8, C—’l 8]
`org—aq solvent
`
`Strongly lipophilic?
`
`“83‘le
`
`aq solvent
`
`aq solvent
`
`lEC Anionic?
`
`BPC
`RP, C—’|8, polar
`org solvent
`
`LSC
`
`silica; polar
`org solvent
`
`BPC
`
`BPC
`’
`RP 08
`org—aq
`solvent
`
`silica;polar
`org solvent
`
`normal phase
`[CN, NHg, diol]
`org solvent
`
`This scheme categorizes analytes as either ionic/ionizable (and therefore water
`soluble) or nonionic/nonionizable (not water soluble). Based on these distinc—
`tions; and on the polarity of the analytes; the diagram provides general rules for
`choosing an HPLC mode of operation likely to separate the analytes.
`
`507 C: INSTRUMENTATION AND APPAFI’A TUB
`
`Basic Components
`
`The following basic components are typically included in an HPLC system (Fig-
`ure bOl—d): solvent reservoir(s); optional gradient-forming device; one or more
`precision solvent delivery pumps;
`injector; analytical column and optional
`precolumn and guard column; column oven; detector; recorder; integrator; or
`computerized digital signal processing device; and associated plumbing and wir-
`ing.
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`601—5
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.011
`
`

`

`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`SECTION 601
`
`Gradient
`device
`
`
`
`
`Pump A—»' I
`
`Sample
`injection
`system
`Thermostatted
`column oven
`
`Column
`
`
`
`
`Recorder or
`readout device
`
`
`Thermostatted
`detector oven
`Detector
`
`Amplifier
`
`.
`Figure 601 _d
`Block Diagram of
`HPLC System
`
`[Reprinted with permission of
`McGraw—Hill Book Company, from
`West, CD. [1987] Essentials of
`Quantitative Analysis, Figure ’l4.’l,
`page 348.]
`
`For analytical HPLC, typical flow rates of 0.5—5 mL/ min are produced by pumps
`operating at 300—6000 psi. Although pumps are capable of high pressure opera—
`tion, state—of—the—art 25 cm x 4 mm id columns with 5 pm packings typically pro-
`duce 1000—2000 psi at 1 mL/min. High pressures should be avoided because they
`contribute to limited column life expectancies.
`
`Sample extract is applied to the column from an injector valve containing a loop
`that has been filled with sample solution from a syringe. After passing through the
`column, the separated analytes are sensed by visible/UV absorption, fluorescence,
`electrochemical, photoconductivity, or R1 detectors. To minimize extra-column
`peak spreading, the instrument components must be connected using low dead
`volume (ldv) fittings and valves and tubing as short and narrow in bore as possible.
`
`Analytical HPLC may use either isocratic or gradient elution methods. Isocratic
`elution uses a mobile phase of constant composition, whereas the strength of the
`mobile phase in gradient elution is made to increase continually in some prede—
`termined manner during the separation. Gradient elution, which requires an
`automatic electronic programmer that pumps solvent from two or more reservoirs,
`reduces analysis time and increases resolution for complex mixtures in a manner
`similar to temperature programming in GLC. Gradient elution capability is highly
`recommended for systems to be used for residue determination. However, it is not
`always possible to employ gradient elution because some HPLC column/solvent
`systems and detectors are not amenable to the rapid solvent and pressure changes
`involved.
`
`Stationary phases are uniform, spherical, or irregular porous particles having
`nominal diameters of 10, 5, or 3 pm. Bonded phases produced by chemically
`bonding different functional groups to the surface of silica gel are most widely
`used, along with unmodified silica gel and size exclusion gels. Columns are usually
`stainless steel, 3—25 cm long and 4.6 mm id, prepacked by commercial manufac—
`turers. There has been increasing use of microbore columns having diameters £2
`mm. Although many HPLC separations can be carried out at ambient tempera—
`ture, column operation in a thermostatted column oven is necessary for reproduc—
`ible, quantitative results, because distribution coefficients and solubilities are tem—
`perature dependent.
`
`Depending on the nature of the analyte(s), certain additional equipment may be
`required. For example, apparatus and reagents for performing post—column
`
`601—6
`
`Transmittal No. 94-1 [’l/El4]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.012
`
`

`

`
`
`1/4"—>
`stainless
`
`steel
`tubing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Stainless
`stgelfrit,
`Hm
`
`Fittings. Figure 601-e illustrates three
`types of column outlet fittings. The
`conventional fitting (i) used in GLC
`and general laboratory plumbing has
`excessive dead volume. It has been
`modified to produce a zero dead vol-
`ume (zdv) fitting (ii)
`in which the
`metal column and the tubing are
`butted up directly against the stainless
`steel frit. There is evidence that the
`
`SECTION 60"
`I
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`derivatization, as used in Section 401 for N—methylcarbamates, may be needed to
`convert analytes to compounds that can be detected with the required sensitivity
`and/ or selectivity.
`
`HPLC System Plumbing
`
`Figure SCH-e
`Column Outlet Fittings
`
`Band broadening can occur not only in the analytical and guard columns, but also
`in dead volume in the injector, detector, or plumbing connecting the various
`components of the HPLC system. This
`effect, called extra—column dispersion,
`must be minimized for high efficiency.
`The proper choice and use of tubing
`and fittings are critical in this regard.
`
`,,
`(—llflgé
`[ii]
`[iii]
`
`[i]
`
`[i] Conventional reducing-union [dead volume is
`Shaded]? [”1 ZdV union; ““1 'dV union.
`
`nature Of thC tubing connection in thC [Reprinted with permission of John Wiley and Sons, Inc., from
`ZdV fitting may 163d t0 SOIHC 1055 in
`Lindsay, 9. [’l987] High Performance Liquid Chromatography,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Figure 2.3a, page 28.]
`effic1ency, espec1ally 1f the connection
`is not made carefully. The ldv fitting
`(iii) improves efficiency by use of a cone—shaped distributor connecting the gauze
`or frit at the end of the column with the tubing. A typical dead volume for the ldv
`fitting is 0.1 uL.
`
`Figure SCH-f
`Low Dead Volume Fitting
`
`Column
`[’| /4" od]
`
`
`
`
`..
`'
`
`Ferrule
`(—2 um porous frit
`
`KTo detector
`
`[Fleprinted with permission of Howard Sloane, Savant,
`from LEI—102 audiovisual program.]
`
`Columns are usually received from
`manufacturers with a 1/4—1/16" zdv or ldv
`
`outlet fitting and a 1/4" nut and cap or
`a reducing union at the inlet (i.€., not
`1/4" in size, but suitable for 1/4" tubing).
`Figure 601-f shows a complete ldv fitting
`connection between a column and a
`
`detector. The column fits snugly inside
`the stainless steel end fitting and is sealed
`by a high compression ferrule. A 2 um
`porous frit is firmly seated between the
`column and end fitting. The column and
`detector are connected by a short length
`of stainless steel (or polymer)
`tubing.
`The column is also connected to the
`
`injection valve using a zdv or ldv fitting
`and a short length of stainless steel tub—
`111g.
`
`Transmittal No. 94-’| [’l/94]
`Form FDA 2905a [8/92]
`
`601—7
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.013
`
`

`

`SECTION 601
`
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`I
`
`Figure 601-9
`Standard Internal Fitting
`
`
`
`’I/1B" tubing —>
`
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`[Fleprinted With permissmn of John Wiley
`and Sons, Inc., from Meyer, VP. [1888]
`Practical High Performance Liquid
`Chromatography, Figure 8.18, page 80.]
`
`External column end fittings (Figures 601—e and 601—
`f), which were formerly popular, are not durable
`during repeated attachments and removals. Thus,
`the internal fitting is practically standard today. This
`uses female threads in the fitting body and a male
`nut (Figure 601—g).
`
`Unions. Unions are fittings that connect two pieces
`of tubing. The most commonly used type is the
`internal thread ldv type (Figure GOl—h). The union
`is not drilled through completely, but a short (0.02")
`web of metal is left between the two pieces of tub—
`ing with a small diameter (approximately 0.02 or
`0.01") hole drilled through. Even though the tub—
`ing ends do not butt against each other as in early
`zdv unions, there is essentially no dead volume added
`to the system through their use. For this reason,
`they are commonly classified as zdv unions. This
`type of union has fewer assembly, re—assembly, and
`tubing interchange problems than the early butt—
`together ZdV type‘
`
`Figure 601-h
`Internal Thread Low Dead Volume Fitting
`
`
`
`Assembly of Fittings. Fittings consist of four parts:
`the body,
`tubing, ferrule, and nut. The nut and
`ferrule are slid onto the tube end, the tube is pushed all the way into the fitting
`body and held there securely, the nut is finger—tightened, and then another three—
`quarter turn is made with a wrench. This procedure should assure that the ferrule
`is pressed (“swaged”) onto the tub—
`ing. To replace the ferrule, the tub—
`ing must be cut and the fitting re—
`made. When using fittings to con—
`nect system components,
`the nut
`should be finger—tightened and then
`tightened a one—half turn more with
`a wrench. If leaking is observed,
`slightly more tightening should be
`sufficient to complete the seal. Over-
`tightening of nuts can lead to fit—
`ting distortion and leaks.
`
`
`
`[Reprinted with permission of Aster Publishing Corporation,
`from Dolan, J.W., and Upchurch, P. [1888] LC—GCB,
`
`Fitting components from different
`manufacturers have dissimilar de—
`
`Figure 3' Page 788-]
`
`signs, sizes, and thread types and are usually not interchangeable. Ferrules from
`different manufacturers have unique shapes, but they are usually interchangeable
`because the front edge is deformed when pressed onto the tubing. However, as a
`general rule, it is best to purchase all fittings and spare parts from one manufac—
`turer. Even fittings from a given manufacturer differ slightly because of manufac—
`turing tolerances. However, this is of concern only with microbore columns, for
`which dead volume is a greater consideration. For these columns, it is best to not
`even interchange fittings from the same manufacturer.
`
`A variety of fittings are available that can be finger—tightened to the degree nec—
`essary to seal stainless steel tubing at 2000—6000 psi. All of these are based on the
`use of polymeric ferrules, but some have a steel nut, whereas others are all plastic.
`
`601—8
`
`Transmittal No. 84-1 [1/84]
`Form FDA 2805a [8/82]
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1053.014
`
`

`

`SECTION 60"
`I
`Pesticide Analytical Manual Vol.
`
`
`They are used mostly on frequently attached and detached high pressure connec—
`tions, such as between the injector and column or column and detector, and for
`polymer tubing waste lines from the injector or detector.
`
`Fittings must be kept free of silica particles, which may scratch surfaces between
`the ferrule and union and cause leaks.
`
`Tubing. Stainless steel tubing is available commercially that is supposedly ready for
`immediate use in HPLC systems. It is machine cut, polished, and deburred to
`provide perfectly square ends. It is also cleaned by sonication, passivated, washed,
`and rinsed with a solvent such as isopropanol to eliminate residual dirt or oils.
`Despite this careful preparation, it is a wise precaution to rinse new tubing with
`mobile phase under operating pressure before using it as part of the HPLC system.
`
`The most commonly used tubing for connecting components of the chromato—
`graph is 316 stainless steel, 1/16" od, with different inside diameters. Tubing with
`0.01" (0.25 mm) id is commonly used in areas where dead volume must be mini-
`mized to maximize efficiency, 6g, between the injector and column, precolumn
`and column, columns in series, and column and detector, and for preparing pulse
`damping spirals.
`
`Typical lengths of tubing connections are 3—6 cm. Tubing with 0.005 or 0.007" id
`is used to connect microbore or short 3 um particle size columns to detectors and
`injectors. Filtering of samples and solvents is especially critical to prevent clogging
`of this narrow bore tubing. Tubing with 0.02—0.05" id is available when ldv is not
`important and low resistance to flow and pressure drop is desirable. For example,
`1 mm (0.04") tubing is often used between the pump and sample injector.
`
`Tubing can be cut to any required length in the laboratory, but it is important not
`to distort the interior or exterior during the process. The simplest method is to
`score the tubing completely around the outside with a file and then bend it back
`and forth while holding it on either side of the score with two smooth-jawed pliers.
`The ends are filed smooth and deburred, and the tubing is thoroughly washed
`with solvent. If the bore should become closed by the bending and filing, the tube
`can be reamed out with an appropriate drill bit before final smoothing and wash-
`ing. A number of types of manual and motorized tubing cutters are available from
`chromatography accessory suppliers. Proper cutting of tubing to make leak—free
`connections is an art that requires considerable practice.
`
`Although stainless steel tubing and fittings are standard for systems using organic
`and salt—free aqueous solvents, corrosion becomes a problem with buffers contain-
`ing salts, particularly halide salts at low pH. HPLC companies have available a
`variety of accessories that can solve this problem. These include titani

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket