`
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________
`
`ADOBE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SYNKLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`___________
`
`Case IPR2020-01301
`Patent No. 9,219,780
`___________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,219,780 (the “’780 Patent”)
`
`Prosecution history of U.S. Application No. 14/623,476, which led
`to the issuance of the ’780 Patent
`
`Declaration of Jon Weissman, Ph.D. Regarding U.S. Patent
`No. 9,219,780
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,735,623 (“Prust”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication US2001/0028363 (“Nomoto”)
`
`PCT Publication WO 02/052785, PCT/CA01/01857 (“Major”)
`
`U.S. Patent 6,309,305 (“Kraft”)
`
`International Patent Application Publication WO 01/67233
`(“McCown”)
`
`RFC 1738: “Uniform Resource Locators (URL)”
`
`RFC 793: “Transmission Control Protocol, DARPA Internet
`Program, Protocol Specification”
`
`RFC 959: “File Transfer Protocol (FTP)”
`
`RFC 1945: “Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0”
`
`RFC 2518: “HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring –
`WEBDAV”
`
`“Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System,” James J.
`Kistler and M. Satyanarayanan, ACM Transactions on Computer
`Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, February 1992
`
`“TranSquid: Transcoding and Caching Proxy for Heterogeneous
`E-Commerce Environments,” Maheshwari et al., Proceedings of
`the 12th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data
`Engineering: Engineering e-Commerce/e-Business Systems (RIDE
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`’02), 2002
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`“Managing Update Conflicts in Bayou, a Weakly Connected
`Replicated Storage System,” Terry et al., SOSP ’95: 15th ACM
`Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Copper Mountain
`Colorado USA, December, 1995
`
`“A Mobility-Aware File System for Partially Connected
`Operation” by Dwyer et al., ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems
`Review, January 1997
`
`“Reducing File System Latency using a Predictive Approach” by
`Griffioen et al., USTC ’94: Proceedings of the USENIX Summer
`1994 Technical Conference on USENIX Summer 1994 Technical
`Conference - Volume 1, 1994
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,117,644
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,907,225
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0167316
`(“Bramnick”)
`
`“Wireless Application Protocol Architecture Specification,”
`Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd., (Apr. 30, 1998)
`
`“WebDAV: What It Is, What It Does, Why You Need It,”
`Hernández, et al., SIGUCCS ’03: Proceedings of the 31st annual
`ACM SIGUCCS Fall Conference, 2003
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0067742
`
`Newton’s Telecom Dictionary, 15th Edition, Miller Freeman, Inc.,
`1999 (excerpts)
`
`Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, Third Edition, Microsoft
`Press, 1997 (excerpts)
`
`The New Penguin Dictionary of Computing, Dick Pountain, 2001
`(excerpts)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`Description
`
`Agreed Scheduling Order in SynKloud Technologies LLC v.
`Adobe, Inc., Case No. 6:19-cv-00527-ADA (W.D. Tex.) dated
`January 22, 2020
`
`Agreed Scheduling Order in SynKloud Technologies LLC v.
`Dropbox, Inc., Case No. 6:19-cv-00525-ADA (W.D. Tex.) dated
`January 22, 2020
`
`Agreed Scheduling Order in SynKloud Technologies LLC v.
`Dropbox, Inc., Case No. 6:19-cv-00526-ADA (W.D. Tex.) dated
`January 22, 2020
`
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operations Under the
`Exigent Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic,
`United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
`dated May 8, 2020
`
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operations Under the
`Exigent Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic,
`United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
`dated June 18, 2020
`
`Defendant Adobe Inc.’s Disclosure of Proposed Constructions,
`dated May 15, 2020
`
`Plaintiff SynKloud Technologies, LLC’s Revised Claim
`Construction Chart, dated June 12, 2020
`
`Summon in a Civil Action with Affidavit of Service in SynKloud
`Technologies LLC v. Adobe, Inc., Case No. 6:19-cv-00527-ADA
`(W.D. Tex.)
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement filed in SynKloud
`Technologies, LLC v. HP, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-01360-UNA (D.
`Del.)
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement filed in SynKloud
`Technologies, LLC v. BLU Products, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-
`00553-UNA (D. Del.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`Description
`
`Complaint for Declaratory Judgment filed in Microsoft Corp. v.
`SynKloud Technologies, LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-00007-UNA (D.
`Del.)
`
`Microsoft Corporation’s Opposition to SynKloud’s Motion to
`Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(h)(3), Lack of
`Standing and 12(b)(6)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,098,526 (the “’526 Patent”)
`
`Stipulation
`
`Declaration of Winston Liaw in Support of Petition for Inter
`Partes Review
`
`Order entered in In re Adobe Inc., No. 2020-126 (Fed. Cir. July
`28, 2020)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 6, 2021, the foregoing Petitioner’s Updated
`
`List of Exhibits and Exhibit 1043 were served by electronic means to counsel of
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`gonsalves@capitoliplaw.com
`
`and
`
`Yeasun Yoon
`yoon@capitoliplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ James L. Day
`James L. Day
`Registration No. 72,681
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`record:
`
`
`
`
`
`April 6, 2021
`235 Montgomery Street
`San Francisco, CA
`
`
`
`
`