throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
`
`PAICE LLC and THE ABELL FOUNDATION,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE A.G., and
`BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 19-CV-3348-SAG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANTS BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE, AG AND BMW OF NORTH
`AMERICA, LLC’S RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`1
`
`PAICE 2006
`BMW v. Paice
`IPR2020-01299
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No. 51) and Local Rule 805.1(d),
`
`Defendants Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG (“BMWAG”) and BMW of North America, LLC
`
`(“BMWNA”) (collectively, “BMW” or “Defendants”) hereby provide the following Responsive
`
`Claim Construction Statement. BMW’s proposed constructions reflect its current knowledge and
`
`understanding as of this date in this Action. BMW’s proposed constructions are based in whole or
`
`in part on its present understanding of Paice’s apparent positions as to the construction of certain
`
`terms of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,104,347 (“the ’347 patent”); 7,237,634 (“the
`
`’634 patent”); and 8,630,761 (“the ’761 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). BMW
`
`reserves the right to seek leave to revise, amend, modify and/or supplement its proposed
`
`constructions based on additional discovery or other positions raised by Paice in this Action or any
`
`related action.
`
`II.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF CLAIM TERMS, PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS, AND
`SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`BMW identifies the following claim terms, proposed constructions, and supporting
`
`exemplary intrinsic and extrinsic evidence in the charts below. The charts include the claim terms
`
`being construed, the Asserted Claims in which the terms appear, BMW’s proposed construction
`
`for each of the term, and both intrinsic and extrinsic evidence in support of the proposed
`
`constructions.
`
`For all other claim terms not included herein, BMW submits that no construction is
`
`required and/or that the term should be given its plain and ordinary meaning. In its Proposed Claim
`
`Construction Statement, Paice has provided two terms that require construction. BMW agrees with
`
`the following constructions proposed by Paice:
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`2
`
`

`

`Claim Term
`
`“road load” or
`“RL”
`
`“setpoint” or
`“SP”
`
`Asserted Claim(s)
`’347 patent, claims 11 and 33; ’634
`patent, claims 33, 37, 39, 40, 41, 43,
`50, 188, 202, 204, 206, and 208; ’761
`patent, claims 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 12
`’347 patent, claims 2 and 24; ’634
`patent, claims 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 40,
`43, 55, 188, 202, 205, 206, and 213
`
`Proposed Construction
`“the amount of instantaneous
`torque required to propel the
`vehicle, be it positive or negative”
`
`“a predetermined torque value that
`may or may not be reset”
`
`In addition to these agreed-upon terms and constructions, BMW hereby identifies the
`
`following terms, constructions, and evidence in support of its constructions:
`
`A.
`
`The ’347 Patent
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction
`“monitor[] a driver’s repeated
`driving operations over time”
`
`“monitor[]
`patterns of
`vehicle
`operation over
`time” (claims 2
`and 24)
`
`“shafts are connected by a
`non-slipping clutch, a non-
`conventional automotive
`friction clutch that does not
`allow for extensive relative
`slipping before the shafts are
`fully engaged”
`
`“shafts may be
`connected by a
`non-slipping
`clutch” (claim
`38)
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`3
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence
`’347 patent at 40:56-41:9; 44:23-39.
`
`Final Written Decision in IPR2014-00884.
`
`Claim Construction Order (No. 21) in ITC
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1042.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“monitor[] patterns of vehicle operation
`over time” as would be understood by a
`POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`’347 patent at 26:25-50; Fig. 4, clutch 51
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“shafts may be connected by a non-
`slipping clutch” as would be understood by
`a POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`
`

`

`B.
`
`The ’634 Patent
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction
`“monitor[] a driver’s repeated
`driving operations over time”
`
`“monitor[]
`patterns of
`vehicle
`operation over
`time” (claim
`33)
`
`“monitor[] the
`RL over time”
`(claims 39, 40,
`and 80)
`
`“abnormal and
`transient
`conditions”
`(claim 55)
`
`Plain meaning or no
`construction necessary
`
`abnormal and transient
`conditions “include starting
`and stopping the engine”
`
`“turbocharger
`operated . . .
`when desired”
`(claims 49)
`
`“operating the turbocharger
`when the road load has
`exceeded the engine’s
`maximum torque output for a
`specified period of time”
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`4
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence
`’634 patent at 40:50-41:3; 44:15-31.
`
`See also Section A.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“monitor[] patterns of vehicle operation
`over time” as would be understood by a
`POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“monitor[] the RL over time” as would be
`understood by a POSA, including in view
`of the well-understood meaning in the
`relevant fields of art, as well as in view of
`the claims, specification, prosecution
`histories, and cited references.
`U.S. Patent Application 10/382,577.
`
`’347 patent at 60:17-21.
`
`Final Written Decisions in IPR2015-
`00722; IPR2015-00785; IPR2015-00787;
`IPR2015-00790; IPR2015-00801.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“abnormal and transient conditions” as
`would be understood by a POSA, including
`in view of the well-understood meaning in
`the relevant fields of art, as well as in view
`of the claims, specification, prosecution
`histories, and cited references.
`’634 patent at 21:12-17; 44:52-50:11.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“turbocharger operated . . . when desired”
`as would be understood by a POSA,
`
`

`

`including in view of the well-understood
`meaning in the relevant fields of art, as
`well as in view of the claims, specification,
`prosecution histories, and cited references.
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence
`’761 patent at 39:47-40:43.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of “a
`predicted near-term pattern of operation”
`and “anticipated patterns of vehicle
`operation” as would be understood by a
`POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`’761 patent at 39:47-40:46.
`
`See also Section A.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“monitoring operation of said hybrid
`vehicle” as would be understood by a
`POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`’761 patent at 39:48-51; 43:15-22.
`
`BMW may offer expert testimony
`regarding the proposed construction of
`“repetitive pattern of operation of said
`hybrid vehicle” as would be understood by
`a POSA, including in view of the well-
`understood meaning in the relevant fields
`of art, as well as in view of the claims,
`specification, prosecution histories, and
`cited references.
`
`C.
`
`The ’761 Patent
`
`Proposed Construction
`“a pattern of operation of the
`vehicle expected based on
`monitoring the driver’s
`repeated driving operations
`over time”
`
`“monitoring a driver’s
`repeated driving operations
`over time”
`
`“a pattern of operation of the
`hybrid vehicle derived from
`monitoring the vehicle’s
`operation over a period of
`days or weeks”
`
`Claim Term
`
`“a predicted
`near-term
`pattern of
`operation”
`(claims 1 and 7)
`and “anticipated
`patterns of
`vehicle
`operation”
`(claims 6 and
`12)
`
`“monitoring
`operation of
`said hybrid
`vehicle” (claims
`1 and 7)
`
`“repetitive
`pattern of
`operation of
`said hybrid
`vehicle” (claims
`2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and
`10)
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`5
`
`

`

`Dated: July 9, 2020
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph P. Lavelle (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`500 Eighth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 799-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 799-5000
`joe.lavelle@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Stephanie Lim (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606-0089
`Phone: (312) 368-4000
`Fax: (312) 236-7516
`stephanie.lim@us.dlapiper.com
`
`/s/ Joseph P. Lavelle
`Joel A. Dewey
`The Marbury Building
`6225 Smith Avenue
`Baltimore, MD 21209-3600
`Telephone: (410) 580-4135
`Facsimile: (410) 580-3135
`joel.dewey@us.dlapiper.com
`
`David Knudson (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101-4297
`Phone: (619) 699-2700
`Fax: (619) 699-2701
`david.knudson@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG and
`BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`6
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 9th day of July 2020, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Defendant Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG and BMW of North America, LLC’s
`
`Responsive Claim Construction Statement to be served by electronic mail on the counsel of
`
`record listed below.
`
`James P Ulwick
`Kramon and Graham PA
`One South St Ste 2600
`Baltimore, MD 21202
`14107526030
`Fax: 14105391269
`Email: julwick@kg-law.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs Paice LLC &
`The Abell Foundation, Inc.
`
`Brian Livedalen
`Indranil Mukerji
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Fish and Richardson PC
`1000 Maine Ave. SW Ste. 1000
`Washington, DC 20024
`2027835070
`Fax: 2027832331
`Email:
`livedalen@fr.com
`mukerji@fr.com
`cordell@fr.com
`
`/s/ Joseph P. Lavelle
`Joseph P. Lavelle
`
`EAST\175056276.2
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket