`
`------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Atty.#: BBITV—CIP1—D1
`In Re US. Patent Application Of
`
`: Examiner: Alam, Mushfikh I.
`
`: Group No: 2426
`
`MILTON DIAZ PEREZ
`
`Serial No.: 12/632,745
`
`Filing Date: 12/07/2009
`
`Title: METHOD OF ADDRESSING ON—DEMAND TV
`PROGRAM CONTENT ON TV SERVICES PLATFORM
`OF A DIGITAL TV SERVICES PROVIDER
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`Mail Stop: AMENDMENT
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313—1450
`
`Sir:
`
`In response to the Office Action dated December 18, 2013, please enter the within
`
`Amendment of Claims for the above-identified Application taken in consideration of the following
`
`Remarks.
`
`Reguest for Extension of Time
`
`Applicant hereby requests a three—month extension of
`
`time for
`
`response to the
`
`Examiner's Office Action, i.e., until June 18, 2014. Authorization is given to charge the 3—month
`
`extension fee of $700 (small entity) to the undersigned attorney’s credit card account.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ATT RNEYF RAPPLlCANT
`Leighton K.Chong, USPTOReg.
`
`
` 0. 27,621
`
`lP & Patent Attorney
`133 Kaai Street
`
`Honolulu, HI 96821
`Tel: (808) 375-0078; Fax: (808) 356-0318
`
`572994. I
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 1
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 1
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`REMARKS
`
`The Claims Define Patentable Subiect Matter
`
`Claims 23-30 and 33-42 are pending. By this Amendment, claims 33 and 36 are
`
`amended. Claim 33 remains in independent form.
`
`The Office Action rejects claims 23-28, 30, and 33-42 under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`as unpatentable over US 2002/0104099 (“Novak”) in view of US. Patent No. 7,367,043
`
`(”Dudkiewicz et at”).
`
`Applicant notes that in claim 33 the step of “receiving, at the VOD services platform, the
`
`stored video-on~demand program content associated with the selected title” has been modified
`
`from “retrieving, at the VOD services platform .
`
`.
`
`to clarify that the stored video—on-demand
`
`program content can be either transmitted to the VOD services platform or fetched by the VOD
`
`services platform.
`
`Claim 33 has been further amended to require, inter alia, that the updated electronic
`
`program guide is “accessible by subscribers of the VOD services platform both via electronic
`
`devices connected to the VOD services platform through a TV services platform and via
`
`electronic devices connected through the Internet” (emphasis added). The amended claims
`
`thus require dual access of the electronic program guide, either through a TV platform
`
`connected to the VOD services platform or through an lnternet-connected digital device, which
`
`can connect to the VOD services platform. Support for these amendments is found at least on
`
`page 27, lines 23-28, which incorporates by reference US. Patent Application Ser. No.
`
`11/685,188, issued as US. Patent No. 7,631,336 (the “3% Patent”), which states as follows:
`
`The extension ofTV VOD programming to citizen publishing, and the
`
`convergence of Internet searching with sharing of TV program bookmarks, can
`
`also stimulate diverse new content publishing sources and supporting hardware
`
`and equipment in the converged lnternet—TV universe. For example, TV EPGs
`
`can be exported to via lnternet to Internet-connected digital devices,
`
`including digital phones, media players, game sonsoles [sic], Video
`
`iPodsTM, PDAs, etc., and conversely, TV bookmarks selected from EPGs on the
`
`Internet can be imported back into the viewer's “MyEPG” or “MyVideoLibrary” for
`
`5 72994. 1
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 2
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 2
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH V. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`
`
`their TV through the Web-based Content Management System. This would
`
`enable people to freely select, save, bookmark, and share TV programs with
`
`friends and contacts between their TV viewing environment and their daily mobile
`
`or away-from-home environments. lnternet—connected DVRs, such as those sold
`
`by TiVo, or virtual DVRs offered by the digital TV service provider can also
`
`connect Internet searching and bookmark sharing to the viewer's “MyEPG” or
`
`“MyVideoLibrary” for VOD program viewing.
`
`US. Patent No. 7,631,336, Col. 20, in. 22-40 (emphasis added).
`
`ln light of the amendment to require dual access of the electronic program guide, Applicant
`
`respectfully submits that the rejections in the Office Action are moot. Neither of the cited
`
`references teach dual access of an electronic program guide with the same hierarchical
`
`structure. Nevertheless, Applicant discusses the cited references in turn.
`
`The Office Action relies on Novak as teaching receiving, at a video-on-demand (VOD)
`
`services platform, digital video—on—demand program content and hierarchical metadata
`
`associated with the received program content. For hierarchical metadata, the Examiner cites
`
`Novak’s description of media information. However, Novak fails to teach any form of
`
`hierarchical metadata or category and subcategory information. The Office Action then relies on
`
`Dudkiewicz as teaching a hierarchical structure for identifying a location in an electronic
`
`program guide where the video—on—demand program will be located. Dudkiewicz teaches
`
`automatically determining hierarchy information, which can be used by a client device (which is
`
`a user device and not a VOD services platform) to determine automatically whether a program
`
`may be of interest to the viewer. The invention entails receiving at a VOD services platform
`
`both a video and hierarchical metadata, where the metadata includes category and
`
`subcategory information that identifies a location for the video in an electronic program
`
`guide. Accordingly, the invention allows a content provider to make available a video and
`
`specify the metadata structure in which the video will be displayed in an electronic program
`
`guide. Neither Novak nor Dudkiewicz teach receipt, at a VOD services platform, of video-on-
`
`demand program content and hierarchical metadata for specifying the location of the video-on-
`
`demand program content in an electronic program guide.
`
`Similarly, the Office Action’s reliance on Dudkiewicz to teach “allowing the subscribers to
`
`navigate and select hierarchically-arranged titles of video-on-demand program content listed by
`
`572994.]
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 3
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 3
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`category and subcategory terms from the updated electronic program guide” is incorrect. The
`
`cited portions of Dudkiewicz, namely, Col. 11~12, lines 44-12, only describe the automatic
`
`generation of metadata. Other portions of Dudkiewicz only describe the use of the automatically
`
`generated metadata for automatically determining whether a user would like a particular
`
`program, not for identifying the location of the program in an electronic program guide.
`
`Meanwhile, Novak only describes an interface for arranging a lineup of media programs
`
`for viewing, which lineup includes time slots for each program. There is no need in the
`
`system of Novak for a hierarchy of media program content since the program lineup is
`
`already fixed to form a synthetic channel that can be delivered to users. Thus, there
`
`would be no motivation to modify Novak in that manner. The user does not browse and
`
`select media programs from such a synthetic channel but rather can view the programs in their
`
`designated time slots. Accordingly, use of a hierarchical ordering of program content from
`
`which to navigate and select programs would be unnecessary and out of place in the synthetic
`
`channel system described by Novak. Despite this reality and without a rationale to support a
`
`combination of Novak and Dudkiewicz, the Office Action makes the conclusory statement that “it
`
`would have been obvious to one o[f] ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made
`
`to have provided a metadata hierarchy as taught by Dudkiewicz to the system of Novak to
`
`provide classification of programming data” (Office Action at 4). This rejection is improper.
`
`For at least these reasons, Applicant respectfully submits that the claims are allowable
`
`over the cited references.
`
`Status of Related Applications
`
`For purposes of full and complete information disclosure to the USPTO, Applicant
`
`identifies below the US. patent applications forming a related group of patent filings with the
`
`present Application:
`ATTORNEY
`DOCKET NO.
`SERIAL NO.
`FILING DATE
`STATUS
`
`
`10/909,192
`P1
`2004—07—20
`Issued as US. Patent No. 7,590,997
`11/952,552
`P1-D1
`2007-12-07
`Issued as US. Patent No. 7,774,819
`12/852,663
`P1-D2
`2010—08-09
`Pending —Amendment filed 2014-06-11
`Pending — Preliminary Amendment filed
`2013—06-07, not yet docketed
`Issued as US. Patent No. 7,631,336
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13/830,872
`1_j_/685,188
`
`P1—D3
`C|P1
`
`2013—03-14
`2007-03-12
`
`572994.1
`
`_ 4 _
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 4
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 4
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ 13/830,961
`ClP1-D3
`2013-03—14
`Pending — Final rejection 2014—02-03
`
`11/768,895
`CIP2
`2007-06-26
`Pending - Non-final rejection 2014-04-21
`
`| 12/869,493
`ClP2-D1
`2010—08-26
`Pending - Amendment filed 2014-02-22
`|
`
`12/869,534
`ClP2—D2
`2010—08-26
`Pengjng — Amendment filed 2014-04-14
`Pending — Preliminary Amendment filed
`2014-04-21
`
`I 12/869,466
`
`ClP1-D2
`
`
`
`13/831,042
`
`ClP2-l38w ,,_
`
`2013-03-14
`
`
`
`2010—08-26
`
`Pending - Amendment filed 2014-05-20
`
`
`
`
`
`The Examiner is invited to review the prosecution history of each of these applications to
`
`see the prior art of record and related office actions as he deems appropriate.
`***‘k**
`
`Clarification of the invention subject matter in the amended Claims over prior art
`
`is
`
`submitted for purposes of advancing prosecution, and is not deemed to be a surrender of any
`
`previously recited or equivalent invention subject matter. Any claim amendment(s), claim(s)
`
`added, claim(s) canceled, argument(s), remark(s), and/or any combination(s) thereof made in
`
`this response pertain solely to the specific aspects of this specific claimed invention. Further,
`
`any claim amendment(s), claim(s) added, claim(s) canceled, argument(s), remark(s), and/or any
`
`combination(s) thereof are made without prejudice to or disclaimer of Applicant‘s right to seek
`
`patent protection of any unclaimed subject matter such as, but not
`
`limited,
`
`to narrower
`
`unclaimed subject matter, broader unclaimed subject matter, different unclaimed subject matter,
`
`variations of unclaimed subject matter, any combination thereof, and/or any other unclaimed
`
`subject matter that may or may not be filed, for example,
`
`in any design and/or utility patent
`
`application(s) such as, but not limited to, continuation patent application(s), continuation—in—part
`
`patent
`
`application(s),
`
`and/or divisional
`
`patent
`
`application(s)
`
`and/or
`
`any other patent
`
`application(s).
`
`Applicant‘s silence as to any assertion(s) by the Examiner in the Office Action and/or to
`
`any certain fact(s) or conclusion(s) that may be implied and/or alleged by objections(s) and/or
`
`rejection(s)
`
`in the Office Action is not
`
`in any way a concession by Applicant
`
`that such
`
`assertion(s), implication(s), and/or allegation(s) are accurate, and that all requirements for any
`
`objection(s) and/or a rejection(s) have been met. Accordingly, Applicant reserves the right to
`
`analyze and dispute any such assertion(s), implication(s), and/or allegation(s) in the future.
`
`In view of the above amendments and remarks, prompt and favorable reconsideration of
`
`this Application is respectfully requested.
`
`If, however, the Examiner believes that there are any
`
`572994.l
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 5
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 5
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`unresolved issues, or believes that the Application is not in condition for Allowance, Applicant
`
`respectfully requests that the Examiner contact the undersigned to schedule a telephonic
`
`Examiner lnterview before any further Actions on the merits.
`
`572994.1
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 6
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 6
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`AMENDMENT OF CLAIMS
`
`(Claims 1-22, previously canceled)
`
`(Claim 23, previously presented)
`
`23.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, wherein one or more of the subscriber
`
`selections received via the updated electronic program guide are associated with one or more
`
`revenue-generating services provided by the VOD services platform.
`
`(Claim 24, previously presented)
`
`24.
`
`A method according to Claim 23, wherein said revenue—generating services are
`
`one or more of the group consisting of: TV advertising insertion, premium programming service,
`
`TV service subscription, TV program sponsorship, TV product sales, and pay-per-view TV
`
`transaction.
`
`(Claim 25, previously presented)
`
`25.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, further comprising:
`
`(9) uploading video—on—demand program content from an external web-based video
`
`content management system for delivery to the VOD services platform;
`
`(h) automatically updating the electronic program guide by listing updated titles for the
`
`uploaded video-on—demand program content for the VOD services platform.
`
`(Claim 26, previously presented)
`
`26.
`
`A method according to Claim 25, wherein said uploading of updated video-on—
`
`demand program content to the VOD services platform is associated with one or more revenue-
`
`generating services provided by the VOD services platform.
`
`(Claim 27, previously presented)
`
`27.
`
`A method according to Claim 26, wherein said revenue-generating services are
`
`one or more of the group consisting of: TV advertising insertion, premium programming service,
`
`TV service subscription, TV program sponsorship, TV product sales, and pay—per—view TV
`
`transaction.
`
`572994.]
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 7
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 7
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`(Claim 28, previously presented)
`
`28.
`
`A method according to Claim 25, wherein said uploaded video—on-demand
`
`program content are one or more of the group consisting of: user—generated content from
`
`Internet users, web—based content from video content websites, digital video from mobile
`
`phones, and digital video from Internet-connected portable video devices.
`
`(Claim 29, previously presented)
`
`29.
`
`A method according to Claim 26, further comprising the step of tracking selection
`
`of uploaded video-on-demand program content by subscribers in order to determine their
`
`revenue generation value.
`
`(Claim 30, previously presented)
`
`30.
`
`A method according to Claim 25, further comprising the step of listing the
`
`updated video-on-demand program content titles on Internet-connected websites and device
`
`platforms in order to provide program information of the VOD services platform to Internet users.
`
`(Claims 31-32, previously canceled)
`
`(Claim 33, currently amended)
`
`33.
`
`A method comprising:
`
`(a) receiving, at a video-on-demand (VOD) services platform. digital video-on-demand
`
`program content and hierarehal—hierarchical metadata associated with the received video-on-
`
`demand program content, the metadata comprising a title, one or more category terms, and one
`
`or more subcategory terms using a hierarchi_cal structure for identifying an electronic program
`
`guide location where the title of the received video-on-demand program is to be located
`
`following the same hierarehal—hierarchical structure used in said metadata;
`(b) storing, by the VOD services platform, the received video-on-demand program
`
`content;
`
`(c) updating, by the VOD services platform, an electronic program guide for the VOD
`
`services platform to list the title of the received video-on-demand program in the electronic
`
`program guide location according to the hierarehaLhierarchical structure of the category and
`
`subcategory terms of the associated hierarehal—hierarchical metadata, the updated electronic
`
`program guide being accessible by subscribers of the VOD services platform both via electronic
`
`572994.1
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 8
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 8
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`devices connected to the VOD services platform through a TV services glatform and via
`
`electronic devices connected through the Internet allowing the subscribers to navigate and
`
`select hierarchically-arranged titles of video—on—demand program content listed by category and
`
`subcategory terms from the updated electronic program guide;
`
`(d)
`
`receiving, at the VOD services platform, a selection by a subscriber of a title from the
`
`updated electronic program guide, including information associated with the located title of the
`
`received video—on-demand program, from a subscriber device;
`
`(e) retrieving—receiving, at_the VOD services platform, the stored video-on-demand
`
`program content associated with the selected title; and
`
`(f) transmitting, from the VOD services platform to the subscriber device, the retrieved
`
`received video—on-demand program content for playback on the subscriber device.
`
`(Claim 34, previously presented)
`
`34.
`
`A method according to Claim 25, wherein the video-on-demand program content
`
`is uploaded to the external web-based video content management system from a content
`
`provider’s computer connected by Internet.
`
`(Claim 35, previously presented)
`
`35.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, further comprising:
`
`(9) receiving, at the VOD services platform, a selection by the subscriber to bookmark
`
`the selected title from the electronic program guide from the subscriber device; and
`
`(h) storing an electronic program guide location address for the video-on-demand
`
`program associated with the selected title as a bookmark for later viewing.
`
`(Claim 36, currently amended)
`
`36.
`
`A method according to Claim 34, further comprising:
`
`(9)
`
`receiving, at the VOD services platform, a viewer ID associated Mile—mthe
`
`subscriber from the subscriber device; and
`
`(h) providing to the subscriber device, via the updated electronic program guide, access
`
`to select one or more stored bookmarks.
`
`(Claim 37, previously presented)
`
`37.
`
`A method according to Claim 35, further comprising:
`
`5 72994. 1
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 9
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 9
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`(h) receiving, at the VOD services platform from the subscriber device via the electronic
`
`program guide, a selection from the subscriber to send at least one of the bookmarks to another
`
`subscnber
`
`(Claim 38, previously presented)
`
`38.
`
`A method according to Claim 37, further comprising:
`
`(i) transmitting, by the VOD services platform, an email
`
`including one or more stored
`
`bookmarks to an email address of a user on the Internet.
`
`(Claim 39, previously presented)
`
`39.
`
`A method according to Claim 35, further comprising
`
`(h)
`
`receiving, at
`
`the VOD services platform via the electronic program guide from
`
`another subscriber to the VOD services platform, a bookmark for a video-on-demand program.
`
`(Claim 40, previously presented)
`
`40.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, further comprising:
`
`(h) obtaining, at the VOD services platform via the electronic program guide, a bookmark
`
`for a video-on—demand program on the VOD service platform included in an email sent to the
`
`VOD service platform.
`
`(Claim 41, previously presented)
`
`41.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, wherein the VOD services platform is provided
`
`in a digital TV service system.
`
`(Claim 42, previously presented)
`
`42.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, wherein the VOD services platform is provided
`
`in an IPTV service system.
`
`(Claim 43, new)
`
`43.
`
`A method according to Claim 33, wherein the step of receiving, at the VOD
`
`services platform, the stored video—on—demand program content associated with the selected
`
`title comprises retrieving the stored video-on-demand program content from one or more
`
`databases.
`
`572994.1
`
`_ 10 _
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 10
`DISH Ex-1024, p.10
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH V. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`
`
`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`12632745
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`METHOD OF ADDRESSING ON-DEMAND TV PROGRAM CONTENT ON TV
`SERVICES PLATFORM OF A DIGITAL TV SERVICES PROVIDER
`
`
`
` Extension-of—Time:
`
`
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Milton DIAZ PEREZ
`
`Filer:
`
`Leighton K. M. Chong
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`BBITV—CIPi-Di
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`Utility under 35 USC111(a) Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total In
`
`USD($)
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Petition:
`
`Patent-AppeaIs-and-lnterference:
`
`Post-AlIowance-and-Post-lssuance:
`
`EXtenSIon - 3 months WIth $0 paid
`
`2253 --
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 11
`DISH Ex-1024, p.11
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`lPR2020—01267
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Total in USD (5)
`
`.
`Quantlty
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 12
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 12
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH V. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`
`
`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`1 9307341
`EFS ID:
`
`
`1 2632745
`
`Application Number:
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`4375
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`METHOD OF ADDRESSING ON-DEMAND TV PROGRAM CONTENT ON TV
`
`SERVICES PLATFORM OF A DIGITAL TV SERVICES PROVIDER
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Milton DIAZ PEREZ
`
`Customer Number:
`
`26793
`
`Filer:
`
`Leighton K. M. Chong
`
`
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`Time Stamp:
`
`BBITV-CIP1-D1
`
`
`
`14-JUN-2014
`
`07-DEC-2009
`
`14:17:33
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC111(a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Payment Type
`
`Payment was successfully received in RAM
`RAM confirmation Number
`
`yes
`
`Credit Card
`
`$700
`
`6756
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Authorized User
`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`Number
`
`Document Descri
`
`tion
`
`p
`
`FiIeSize(Bytes)/
`Message Digest
`
`Pages
`Multi
`Part /.zip (ifappl.)
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 13
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 13
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH V. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`
`
`-
`
`443114
`
`Warnings:
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`lfa new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`2
`
`Fee Worksheet ($806)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`30359
`
`82fd9e71723d7e393383b0b302406f87683
`08179
`
`no
`
`2
`
`Information:
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`lfa new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)—(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date ofthe application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`lfa timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 14
`DISH Ex-1024, p.14
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`-
`BBITV ClPl
`D1_Response_to_2013-12-18_
`OA-l .pdf
`
`Amendment/Req. Reconsideration—After
`Non-Final Re‘ect
`l
`
`Zelad
`dsscfszids/sb/Wiass'lmuzbbleecraadd
`
`no
`
`10
`
` 1
`
`
`
`PTO/SB/Oe (09-11)
`Approved for use through 1/31/2014. OMB 0651-0032
`US. Patent and Trademark Office, US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`PATENT APPLICATION FEE DETERMINATION RECORD
`Substitute for Form PTO-875
`
`Application Of Docket Number
`12/632,745
`
`Filing Date
`12/07/2009
`
`[I To be Mailed
`
`APPLICATION AS FILED — PART I
`
`(Column 1)
`
`NUMBER FILED
`
`(Column 2)
`
`NUMBER EXTRA
`
`ENTITY:
`
`|:| LARGE IX SMALL |:| MICRO
`
`(37 CFR 1.16 a, b , or 1e
`
`37 CFR 1.16(k ,
`
`i
`
`, or m
`
`l:l EXAMINATION FEE
`
`TOTAL CLAIMS
`(37 CFR1.16i‘
`lNDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`(37 CFR1.16h
`
`EIAPPLICATION SIZE FEE
`(37 CFR1.16(s))
`
`.
`
`’1
`
`*
`
`.
`minus 20:
`.
`minusS:
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100 sheets
`of paper, the application size fee due is $310 ($155
`for small entity) for each additional 50 sheets or
`fraction thereof. See 35 U.S.C. 41 (a)(1 )(G) and 37
`CFR 1.16(s).
`
`(
`
`=
`
`:
`
`X $
`
`X $
`
`
`
`I:I MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT (37 CFR1.16(j))
`* If the difference in column 1 is less than zero, enter “0" in column 2.
`
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED — PART II
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`*
`
`'
`
`(Column 2)
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`**
`
`06/14/2014
`
`Total (37 CFR
`
`37CFR 1.16 h
`
`(Column 3)
`
`PRESENT EXTRA
`
`ADDITIONAL FEE ((5)
`
`D Application Size Fee (37 CFR1.16(s))
`
`D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR1.16(j))
`
`TOTAL ADD‘L FEE
`
`(Column 2)
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`H
`-
`*
`_ Mm _
`Minus
`
`Total 37CFR
`
`(37 CFR1 1601))
`
`PRESENT EXTRA
`
`ADDITIONAL FEE ($)
`
`El Application Size Pee (37 CFR1.16(s))
`
`D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR1.16(j))
`
`TOTAL ADD’L FEE
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`* If the entry in column 1 is less than the entry in column 2, write “0" in column 3.
`"" lfthe “Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 20, enter “20".
`*** If the “Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 3, enter “’3.
`The “Highest Number Previously Paid Fof’ (Total or Independent) is the highest number found in the appropriate box in column 1.
`This collection 01 information is required by 37 CFR 1.16. The intormation Is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering,
`preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you
`require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, US. Patent and Trademark Office, US.
`Department of Commerce, PO. Box 1450. Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`Ifyou need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800—PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`LlE
`(STANLEY JORDAN/
`
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 15
`DISH Ex-1024, p. 15
`DISH v. BBiTV
`DISH V. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`IPR2020-01267
`
`