DISH Network L.L.C.
`v.
`Broadband iTV, Inc.
`
`IPR2020-01267
`U.S. Patent No. 10,028,026
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`
`v.
`Broadband iTV, Inc.
`
`IPR2020-01267
`U.S. Patent No. 10,028,026
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`
`
`’ 026 Patent: Inv alidity Grounds
`
`I. Petition Ground: Gonder, Son and/or Kelts
`
`II.
`
`Institution Grounds:
`
`• Ground 1: Obvious by Gonder in view of Son (claims 1-10)
`
`• Ground 2: Obvious by Gonder and Son in view of Kelts (claims 1-16)
`
`•
`
`(Kelts cited for claim 1, and the dependent limitations of claims 4, 6-8, and 11-16)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`’ 026 Patent: Clai m Cons truc tion
`
`The Board has adopted the following constructions:
`
`Web-based content
`management system
`
`“a system accessible over the Internet, including
`the Web, for managing content”
`
`Internet Protocol TV
`(IPTV) System
`
`“a system that provides digital television services
`over closed, proprietary broadband connections
`employing TCP/IP data transport protocol”
`
`Decision to Institute at 35-36
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`
`
`’ 026 Patent: Clai m Cons truc tion
`
`Relevant construction from the District Court:
`
`Internet-connected
`digital device
`
`“a device configured to send and receive information via
`the Internet” (Agreed)
`
`EX1051 (Joint Claim Construction Statement) at 1, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 2
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Gonder is Prior Art to the ’026 Patent
`
`CableLabs’ ADI Format Is Incorporated Into Gonder by Reference
`
`Claim Mapping Disputes
`
`Motivation to Combine
`
`Secondary Considerations of Non-obviousness
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`
`
`Gonder is Prior Art to the ’026 Patent
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s Pri or Inv entorship Theory
`
`March 12, 2007
`New Matter Added in
`Continuation-in-Part Application
`U.S. Patent App. No.10/685/188
`
`March 31, 2004
`Alleged Date
`of Conception
`
`May 27, 2004
`Gonder filed
`
`July 30, 2004
`Alleged Constructive
`Reduction to Practice
`U.S. Patent App. No.10/909/192
`
`June 24, 2016
`The ’026 Patent,
`Including the Same
`New Matter Was Filed
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`EX1001 (’026 patent) at (60), (22); see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 1-2
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s Pri or Inv entorship Argument Fai ls
`
`I. No Reduction to Practice of “Internet-Connected Digital Device”
`in July 2004
`
`II. No Conception of “Internet-Connected Digital Device”
`prior to Gonder's May 2004 filing
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`
`
`No Reduction to Practice of
`“Internet-Connected Digital Device”
`In July 2004
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`
`
`Cons tructi ve Reduc ti on to Prac ti ce Requi res Pos s ession
`
`“For an earlier-filed application to serve as constructive reduction to practice
`of the subject matter of [a claim], the applicant must describe the subject
`matter of the [claim] in terms that establish that he was in possession of the
`later-claimed invention, including all of the elements and limitations
`presented in the [claim], at the time of the earlier filing.”
`
`Hyatt v. Boone, 146 F.3d 1348, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1998); see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 2
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`
`
`J u l y 2 0 0 4 A p p l i c a t i o n : N o RT P o f “ I n t e r n e t - c o n n e c t e d D i g i t a l D e v i c e ”
`
`INTERNET
`
`CABLE
`
`EX2062 (’192 App.) Fig. 2A (annotated); see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 5
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`
`
`J u l y 2 0 0 4 A p p l i c a t i o n : N o RT P o f “ I n t e r n e t - c o n n e c t e d D i g i t a l D e v i c e ”
`
`* * * *
`
`EX2062 (’192 App.) ¶¶ [0022], [0031] (annotated), See also Paper 45 (Reply) at 4
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`
`
`Marc h 2007 CIP A d d e d Internet Dev ic es to the Spec i fic ati on
`
`First Disclosed in the 2007 CIP:
`
`EX1013 (’336 Patent) at 20:22-33 (annotated); see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 2-3
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`
`
`J u l y 2 0 0 4 A p p l i c a t i o n : N o RT P o f “ I n t e r n e t - c o n n e c t e d D i g i t a l D e v i c e ”
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`BBiTV Attempts To Incorporate Information About the Navic N-Band Platform --
`But the Passages BBiTV Relies on Are Not About the N-Band
`
`The Passages That BBiTV Relies on Are About Potential Future Devices
`
`The ’192 App Does Not Show Possession Of Using Navic For the Claimed ICDD
`
`No Support for the “Internet-Connected Digital Device” Genus
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`
`
`I n c o r p o r a t i o n b y R e f e r e n c e R e q u i r e s I d e n t i f y i n g S p e c i f i c M a t e r i a l
`
`“[T]he host document must identify with detailed particularity what
`specific material it incorporates and clearly indicate where that
`material is found in the various documents”
`
`Cook Biotech, Inc. v. Acell, Inc., 460 F.3d 1365, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citations omitted)
`See also Paper 45 (Reply) at 6-7
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`
`
`BBi TV Inc orporates Informati on About The N-Band Pl atform
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
`
`EX2062 (’192 App.), ¶ [0021] (annotated)
`
`EX2062 (’192 App.), ¶ [0004] (annotated)
`
`Paper 45 (Reply) at 7
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`
`
`T h e P a s s a g e s B B i T V P o i n t s To A r e N o t A b o u t t h e N - B a n d P l a t f o r m
`
`* * * *
`
`EX2069 (Navic App.), ¶¶ [0005]-[0006] See also Paper 45 (Reply) at 7
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`
`
`D S L i s a C a b l e Te c h n o l o g y : N a v i c D o e s
`N o t D i s c l o s e I t s U s e F o r I n t e r n e t
`
`EX2069 (Navic App.) ¶ [0022], see also Paper 48 (Sur-reply) at 7
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`
`
`BBi TV Cannot Rel y On An Amalgamation of Di s c los ures
`
`“[P]ointing to an amalgam of disclosures from which an artisan could have created the
`claimed invention does not satisfy [the written description] requirement. Instead, the
`specification must present each claim as an integrated whole.”
`
`FlashControl, LLC v. Intel Corp., No. 2020-2141, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20790, at *7-8 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2021)
`
`“[I]ncorporation by reference does not convert the invention of the incorporated patent
`into the invention of the host patent.”
`
`Modine Mfg. Co. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm’n, 75 F.3d 1545, 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
`
`Paper 45 (Reply) at 7-8
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`
`
`“Internet-connected Di gi tal Dev ic e” i s a Genus
`
`Internet-connected
`digital device
`
`“a device configured to send and receive information
`via the Internet” (Agreed)
`
`EX1051 (Joint Claim Construction Statement) at 1, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 2
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`
`
`“Internet-connected Di gi tal Dev ic e” i s a Genus
`
`EX1001 (’336 Patent) at Claim 1; see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 8
`
`EX1001 (’336 Patent) at Claims 11, 12, 13, 1; see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 8
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`
`
`M u s t D i s c l o s e R e p r e s e n t a t i v e N u m b e r o f S p e c i e s o r C o m m o n S t r u c t u r e
`
`“[T]o claim a genus, a patentee must disclose [1] a representative number of species
`falling within the scope of the genus or [2] structural features common to the
`members of the genus so that a PHOSITA can visualize or recognize the members
`of the genus."
`
`D Three Enters., LLC v. SunModo Corp., 890 F.3d 1042, 1047 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
`(quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 8-9.
`
`Paper 45 (Reply) at 7-8
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`
`
`BBi TV Admi ts Di s c losure Of At Mos t One Spec i es
`
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply at 9
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`
`
`The ' 192 App Does Not Di s c lose “Struc tural Features” of ICDD
`
`EX1052 (Shamos Depo), 29:13-30:19, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 9
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`
`
`No Conception of “Internet-Connected Digital
`Device” Prior To Gonder’s May 2004 Filing
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`
`
`Conc eption Requi res Pos s es sion of Ev ery Li mi tation In Contex t
`
`“It is settled that in establishing conception a party must show possession of every
`feature recited in the [claim], and that every limitation of the [claim] must have been
`known to the inventor at the time of the alleged conception.”
`
`Coleman v. Dines, 754 F.2d 353, 359 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
`
`“Conception is the formation 'in the mind of the inventor of a definite and
`permanent idea of the complete and operative invention, as it is therefore to be
`applied in practice.”
`
`Singh v. Brake, 317 F.3d 1334, 1340, 48 F. App'x 766, 771 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (citations omitted)
`
`Paper 45 (Reply) at 9-10
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s Al l eged Conc eption Doc uments
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`February Presentation (EX2072)
`
`March Draft (EX2061)
`
`April Dev Doc (EX2070)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`
`
`February Pres entati on Does Not Show The Underl yi ng Dev i c e
`
`EX2072 (Feb. Presentation), see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 10
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`
`
`Marc h Draft Only Mak es Reference to N-Band
`
`EX2061 at 2; see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 11
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`
`
`Apri l Dev Doc ument Does Not Show An Internet-connec ted STB
`
`EX2070
`(April Dev. Doc.)
`(annotated)
`See also Paper 45
`(Reply) at 11-14
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`
`
`A p r i l D e v e l o p m e n t D o c u m e n t U s e s “ i T V ” To R e f e r To “ I n t e r a c t i v e T V ”
`
`EX2070 (April Dev Doc) at 3; see also EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 55
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`
`
`J a v a S e r v l e t D o e s N o t S h o w C o n c e p t i o n o f I n t e r n e t C o n n e c t e d S T B
`
`EX1052 (Shamos Depo), 79:13-23, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 13
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`
`
`J a v a S e r v l e t P u l l e d I n f o r m a t i o n F r o m D a t a b a s e @ C a b l e H e a d E n d
`
`EX1054 (Diaz Depo), 78:3-6 (annotated)
`
`EX2070 (April Dev. Doc.) (annotated)
`
`Paper 45 (Reply) at 12-13
`
`EX1054 (Diaz Depo), 79:9-24 (annotated)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`
`
`Conc eption Is J udged By Pos s essi on: Not Obv i ousness
`
`Paper 48 (PO Sur-Reply) at 12-13
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`
`
`CableLabs' ADI Format is Incorporated Into
`Gonder by Reference
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`
`
`Gonder Inc orporates Cabl eLabs ' ADI Format
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 5:15-25, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 22
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`
`
`T h e Tr a n s c r i p t i o n E r r o r F r o m “ I 0 1 ” t o “ 1 0 1 ” Wa s M a d e b y t h e P TO
`
`EX1059 (Gonder Application), 8-9; see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 15
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`
`
`Onl y Three Vers i ons of Cabl eLabs & One Obv i ous Choic e
`
`“VOD MD-SP-VOD-Content Specification 101-020327”
`
`Gonder
`
`Cablelabs Version No.
`
`Specification Serial Number
`
`I01
`
`I02
`
`I03
`
`0203927
`
`0230327415
`
`024032107
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 22; Paper 45 (Reply) at 15-16
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`EX1011 (CableLabs I01) at 2, EX1056 (I02) at 2, EX1057 (I03) at 2
`
`
`
`POSITAs Are Fami l i ar With Cabl eLabs & ADI
`
`EX1052 (Shamos Dep.), 83:9-14
`
`EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 83, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 16.
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`
`
`Cl ai m Mapping Di s putes
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Three Layer Template in Claim 1[b] (Grounds 1 and 2)
`
`Multi-provider Category Terms Claim 6 (Grounds 1 and 2)
`
`Phones & PDAs in Claims 11 and 12 (Ground 2)
`
`VOD Bookmarks in Claim 15 (Ground 2)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`
`
`Claim Mapping Disputes: Claim 1[b]
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`
`
`Gonder Fi gures 4-5 and 7 Al l Hav e Bac k grounds
`
`Claim 1[b](a)
`
`Gonder
`
`(a) a first layer comprising a background screen to
`provide at least one of a basic color, logo, or
`graphical theme to display;
`
`(b) a second layer comprising a particular display
`template from the plurality of different display
`templates layered on the background screen,
`wherein
`the
`particular
`display
`template
`comprises one or more reserved areas that are
`reserved for displaying content provided by a
`different layer of the plurality of layers; and
`
`(c) a third layer comprising reserved area content
`generated using the received video content, the
`associated metadata,
`and
`the
`associated
`plurality of images to be displayed in the one
`or more reserved areas in the particular display
`template as at least one of text, an image, a
`navigation link, and a button,
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Figures 4, 5a, 5b, and 7 (annotated), see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 43-45
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`
`
`No Di s pute That Gonder Has Templ ates Wi th Res erv ed Areas
`
`Claim 1[b](b)
`
`Gonder
`
`(a) a first layer comprising a background screen to
`provide at least one of a basic color, logo, or
`graphical theme to display;
`
`(b) a second layer comprising a particular display
`template from the plurality of different display
`templates layered on the background screen,
`wherein
`the particular display
`template
`comprises one or more reserved areas that are
`reserved for displaying content provided by a
`different layer of the plurality of layers; and
`
`(c) a third layer comprising reserved area content
`generated using the received video content, the
`associated metadata,
`and
`the
`associated
`plurality of images to be displayed in the one
`or more reserved areas in the particular display
`template as at least one of text, an image, a
`navigation link, and a button,
`
`EX1005 (Gonder),
`Figures 4, 7
`See also Paper 1
`(Petition) at 46-48
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`
`
`B B i T V D i s p u t e s W h e t h e r G o n d e r ' s T h i r d L a y e r G e n e r a t e d U s i n g
`P l u r a l i t y o f I m a g e s
`
`Claim 1[b](c)
`
`(a) a first layer comprising a background screen to
`provide at least one of a basic color, logo, or
`graphical theme to display;
`
`(b) a second layer comprising a particular display
`template from the plurality of different display
`templates layered on the background screen,
`wherein
`the
`particular
`display
`template
`comprises one or more reserved areas that are
`reserved for displaying content provided by a
`different layer of the plurality of layers; and
`
`(c) a third layer comprising reserved area content
`generated using the received video content, the
`associated metadata, and
`the associated
`plurality of images to be displayed in the one
`or more reserved areas in the particular display
`template as at least one of text, an image, a
`navigation link, and a button,
`
`“There is no logical reason why the nesting of a
`product-by-process limitation within a method
`of treatment claim should change how novelty
`of that limitation is evaluated.”
`
`Biogen MA Inc. v. EMD Serono, Inc., 976 F.3d 1326, 1334
`(Fed. Cir. 2020), see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 17-18
`(citing Paper 15 (Decision to Institute) at 53-54
`
`EX1001 (026 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`
`
`BBi TV Had Full Opportunity To Res pond
`
`“Here, in contrast, Hamilton Beach received adequate
`notice in f'real's post-institution response regarding
`the nozzle terms, as shown by the fact that Hamilton
`Beach argued against f'real's proposed constructions
`in its reply brief and during the oral hearing”
`
`“Patent Owner had notice of Petitioner’s claim
`construction arguments in Petitioner's Reply and
`had opportunities to respond by submitting arguments
`in a sur-reply and at the oral hearing.”
`
`Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. f'real Foods, LLC,
`908 F.3d 1328, 1338-39 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
`
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Pure Data Systems, LLC,
`No. IPR2019-00484, 2020 WL 4210599, at *3
`(P.T.A.B. July 22, 2020)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`
`
`Gonder Di s c l oses Content Generated From the Requi red Types
`
`Claim 1[b](c)
`
`Gonder
`
`(a) a first layer comprising a background screen to
`provide at least one of a basic color, logo, or
`graphical theme to display;
`
`(b) a second layer comprising a particular display
`template from the plurality of different display
`templates layered on the background screen,
`wherein
`the
`particular
`display
`template
`comprises one or more reserved areas that are
`reserved for displaying content provided by a
`different layer of the plurality of layers; and
`
`(c) a third layer comprising reserved area content
`generated using the received video content, the
`associated metadata,
`and
`the associated
`plurality of images to be displayed in the one
`or more reserved areas in the particular display
`template as at least one of text, an image, a
`navigation link, and a button,
`
`EX1005 (Gonder),
`Figures 4, 7
`See also Paper 1
`(Petition) at 52-54
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`
`
`Gonder Di s c l oses Logos as Thi rd Layer Images
`
`Claim 1[b](c)
`
`Gonder
`
`(a) a first layer comprising a background screen to
`provide at least one of a basic color, logo, or
`graphical theme to display;
`
`(b) a second layer comprising a particular display
`template from the plurality of different display
`templates layered on the background screen,
`wherein
`the
`particular
`display
`template
`comprises one or more reserved areas that are
`reserved for displaying content provided by a
`different layer of the plurality of layers; and
`
`(c) a third layer comprising reserved area content
`generated using the received video content, the
`associated metadata,
`and
`the associated
`plurality of images to be displayed in the one
`or more reserved areas in the particular display
`template as at least one of text, an image, a
`navigation link, and a button,
`
`EX1005, Fig. 5b, 8:33-39,
`see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 49, Paper 45 (Reply) at 22-25
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`
`
`Dr. Shamos Admits that Logos Are Often Images
`
`EX1052 (Shamos Dep.) 40:3-12; see also EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 93
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s “Si ngl e As s et” Argument
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 9:1-3, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 19-20
`
`EX1005 (Gonder),
`Fig. 9 (annotated)
`See also Paper 45 (Reply) at 27
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s “Si ngl e As s et” Argument i s Bas ed On One Embodi ment
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 8:16-19, 10:34-38, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 20-21
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s “Si ngl e As s et” Argument i s Bas ed On One Embodi ment
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Figure 7 (annotated), see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 25-29
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`51
`
`
`
`Gonder Renders Thi rd Layer Images Obv i ous
`
`EX1011 (CableLabs) at 16, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 53-54, Paper 45 (Reply) at 19-21
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Gonder Renders Thi rd Layer Images Obv i ous
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 203
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 207
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 52-54
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`53
`
`
`
`BBi TV Ignores The IP Gateway Embodi ment
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 1:34-37; 6:25-29, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 21-22
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`54
`
`
`
`Claim Mapping Disputes: Claim 6
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`
`
`Gonder Teac hes Menus That Sati s fy Cl aim 6
`
`Claim 6
`
`Gonder
`
`The Internet-connected digital
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`one or more category terms
`associated with the first video-
`on-demand
`program content
`correspond to one or more topics
`that pertain to video-on-demand
`program content from more than
`one content provider.
`
`EX1005 (Gonder) Fig. 1 (annotated)
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Fig. 8 (annotated)
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 60-62; Paper 45 (Reply) at 33-34
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`
`
`Cl ai m 6: BBi TV’s “Ov erl appi ng Category Names ” Argument
`
`Claim 6
`
`The Internet-connected digital
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`one or more category terms
`associated with the first video-
`on-demand
`program content
`correspond to one or more topics
`that pertain to video-on-demand
`program content from more than
`one content provider.
`
`Paper 35 (POR) at 80-81
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`
`
`D r. R u s s : O b v i o u s To H a v e C a t e g o r i e s U s e d B y M u l t i p l e P r o v i d e r s
`
`Claim 6
`
`The Internet-connected digital
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`one or more category terms
`associated with the first video-
`on-demand
`program content
`correspond to one or more topics
`that pertain to video-on-demand
`program content from more than
`one content provider.
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 239, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 61
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`58
`
`
`
`Kel ts Shows Categori es That Pertai n To Multiple Prov i ders
`
`Claim 6
`
`The Internet-connected digital
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`one or more category terms
`associated with the first video-
`on-demand
`program content
`correspond to one or more topics
`that pertain to video-on-demand
`program content from more than
`one content provider.
`
`Kelts
`
`HBO
`
`HBO
`
`DRAMA
`
`AMC
`
`ENCORE
`
`MYSTERY
`
`BRAVO
`
`EX1007 (Kelts), Fig. 3 (annotated); see also Paper 1 (petition) at 61
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`
`
`Claim Mapping Disputes: Claims 11 and 12
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`60
`
`
`
`Kel ts Teac hes Phones and PDAs as Pres entation Dev i c es
`
`Claim 11
`
`Kelts
`
`digital
`Internet-connected
`The
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`Internet-connected digital device
`is a digital phone.
`
`Claim 12
`
`digital
`Internet-connected
`The
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`Internet-connected digital device
`is a personal digital assistant
`(PDA).
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 65
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`61
`
`EX1007 (Kelts), ¶ [0101], see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 65
`
`
`
`Kel ts Teac hes Us ing Internet-connected Handhel d Computers
`
`Claim 11
`
`Kelts
`
`digital
`Internet-connected
`The
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`Internet-connected digital device
`is a digital phone.
`
`Claim 12
`
`digital
`Internet-connected
`The
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`Internet-connected digital device
`is a personal digital assistant
`(PDA).
`
`EX1007 (Kelts), ¶ [0138], see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 65
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`62
`
`
`
`The Clai m & Spec i fi cation Di s c us s Us i ng The EPG On The ICDD
`
`Claim 1[a]
`
`the Internet-connected digital device being
`configured to obtain and present
`to the
`subscriber an electronic program guide as a
`templatized video-on-demand display, which
`uses at least one of a plurality of different
`display templates to which the Internet-
`connected digital device has access,
`to
`enable a subscriber using
`the Internet-
`connected digital device to navigate in a
`drill-down manner through titles by category
`information in order to locate a particular
`one of the titles whose associated video
`content
`is desired for viewing on
`the
`Internet-connected digital device using the
`same category information as was designated
`by a video content provider in metadata
`associated with the video content
`
`’026 Patent
`
`EX1001 (’026 patent) at 21:16-27, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 34
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`63
`
`
`
`Kel ts Teac hes Pl aying the Vi deo Through the Web Appl i c ation
`
`Kelts
`
`EX1007 (Kelts), ¶ [0144], see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 34-35
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Handheld Vi deo Phones Were Known i n 2007
`
`EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 124, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 35
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`65
`
`
`
`’ 0 2 6 A c k n o w l e d g e s H a n d h e l d Vi d e o P h o n e s We r e K n o w n i n 2 0 0 7
`
`’026 Patent
`
`EX1001 at 16:54-57, EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 124, Paper 45 (Reply) at 35
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`66
`
`
`
`Claim Mapping Disputes: Claim 15
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`
`
`Kel ts Teac hes Book marki ng i n Contex t of Webpages & Radi o
`
`Claim 15
`
`Kelts
`
`digital
`Internet-connected
`The
`device of claim 1, wherein the
`Internet-connected digital device
`is further configured to receive a
`selection from the subscriber to
`bookmark a selected title and to
`store an electronic guide location
`address for the video-on-demand
`program associated with
`the
`selected title as an electronic
`bookmark for later viewing.
`
`EX1007 (Kelts), ¶ [0062], see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 67; Paper 45 (Reply) at 36
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`68
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Book mark ing VOD i s Obv i ous In View of Kel ts
`
`EX1053 (Russ Reply Decl.) ¶ 127, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 36
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`69
`
`
`
`Motivation to Combine
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`70
`
`
`
`Obv i ous To Add Son' s Upl oad To Gonder' s Teac hi ngs
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Fig. 1, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 56
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`71
`
`
`
`Son Enables Inc reas ing Content Vol umes
`
`Son
`
`EX1006 (Son), 2:6-11
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`72
`
`
`
`Gonder Seek s to Sol v e Inc reasing Content Vol umes
`
`Gonder
`
`EX1005 (Gonder) at 1:14-22, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 69
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`73
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Gonder Addres ses Probl ems From Inc reas ed Volume
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.), ¶ 285
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.), ¶ 287
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.), ¶ 284
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Son & Gonder Hav e Synergies
`
`* * * *
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 293
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 291
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`
`
`Dr. Rus s : Gonder and Son are Compati ble
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶ 294
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`76
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Moti v ati on to add Kel ts
`
`* * * *
`
`EX1002 (Russ. Decl.) ¶¶ 297-298
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`77
`
`
`
`Secondary Considerations of
`Non-Obviousness
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`78
`
`
`
`BBi TV Argues That Comc as t’s Non-Web Depl oyment
`Shows Long-Felt Need
`
`Paper 35 (POR) at 87-88
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`79
`
`
`
`BBi TV Admi ts No Nex us
`
`PO Sur Reply at 30
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`80
`
`
`
`BBi TV’s Sec ondary Indi c a Ev i dence Is Irrel ev ant
`
`“Evidence of objective indicia is only relevant to the obviousness inquiry if
`there is a nexus between the claimed invention and the objective indicia.”
`
`Bosch Auto. Serv. Sols., LLC v. Matal, 878 F.3d 1027, 1036
`(Fed. Cir. 2017) (emphasis added) (modification markers and citations omitted)
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`81
`
`
`
`BULLPEN
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`82
`
`
`
`No Conception of “Reserved Area Content
`Generated Using The Received Video
`Content” In March or April 2004
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`83
`
`
`
`N o C o r r o b o r a t i o n o f “ G e n e r a t e d U s i n g t h e R e c e i v e d Vi d e o C o n t e n t : ”
`F e b r u a r y P r e s e n t a t i o n
`
`EX2036, Diaz Decl. ¶ 29 (citing February Presentation), see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 14
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`84
`
`
`
`N o C o r r o b o r a t i o n o f “ G e n e r a t e d U s i n g t h e R e c e i v e d Vi d e o C o n t e n t : ”
`M a r c h D r a f t
`
`EX2036 (Diaz Decl.) ¶ 30 (emphasis in original), see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 14
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`85
`
`
`
`N o C o r r o b o r a t i o n o f “ G e n e r a t e d U s i n g t h e R e c e i v e d Vi d e o C o n t e n t ”
`
`EX2061 (March Draft), ¶ [0023], see also Paper 48 (Sur-Reply) at 15
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`86
`
`
`
`N o C o r r o b o r a t i o n o f “ G e n e r a t e d U s i n g t h e R e c e i v e d Vi d e o C o n t e n t ”
`( A p r i l D e v. D o c . )
`
`EX2070
`(April Dev. Doc.) at 7
`See also Paper 45 (Reply) at 15
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`87
`
`
`
`N o C o r r o b o r a t i o n o f “ G e n e r a t e d U s i n g t h e R e c e i v e d Vi d e o C o n t e n t ”
`( A p r i l D e v. D o c . )
`
`EX1054, 84:23-85:13, see also Paper 45 (Reply) at 15
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`88
`
`
`
`Undisputed Claim Mapping Slides
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`89
`
`
`
`Ground 1 (Gonder & Son): Cl aim 1 Preamble
`
`Claim 1
`
`Gonder
`
`An Internet-connected digital
`device for receiving, via the
`Internet, video content to be viewed
`by a subscriber of a video-on-
`demand system using a
`hierarchically arranged electronic
`program guide
`
`• BBiTV argued and persuaded the
`District Court that only the
`underlined portion is limiting.
`
`EX2152 (Claim Construction Order) at 3
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 6:25-29
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 6:47-50
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 36-38
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`90
`
`
`
`Ground 1 (Gonder & Son): Cl aim 1 Preamble
`
`Claim 1
`
`Son
`
`An Internet-connected digital
`device for receiving, via the
`Internet, video content to be viewed
`by a subscriber of a video-on-
`demand system using a
`hierarchically arranged electronic
`program guide
`
`• BBiTV argued and persuaded the
`District Court that only the
`underlined portion is limiting.
`
`EX2152 (Claim Construction Order) at 3
`
`EX1006 (Son), Fig. 1.
`See also 6:5-26
`(discussing streaming of
`video over the Internet)
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 36-38
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`91
`
`
`
`Ground 1 (Gonder & Son): Cl aim 1[a]
`
`Claim 1[a]
`
`Gonder
`
`the Internet-connected digital device being
`configured to obtain and present
`to
`the
`subscriber an electronic program guide as a
`templatized video-on-demand display, which
`uses at least one of a plurality of different
`display
`templates
`to which
`the Internet-
`connected digital device has access, to enable
`a subscriber using
`the Internet-connected
`digital device to navigate in a drill-down
`manner through titles by category information
`in order to locate a particular one of the titles
`whose associated video content is desired for
`viewing on
`the Internet-connected digital
`device using the same category information as
`was designated by a video content provider in
`metadata associated with the video content
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), 8:1-5
`
`Paper 1 (Petition) at 38-40
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`92
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Figs. 4, 6, 7
`
`
`
`Ground 1 (Gonder & Son): Cl aim 1[a] ( C o n t . )
`
`Claim 1[a]
`
`Gonder
`
`the Internet-connected digital device being
`configured to obtain and present
`to
`the
`subscriber an electronic program guide as a
`templatized video-on-demand display, which
`uses at least one of a plurality of different
`display
`templates
`to which
`the Internet-
`connected digital device has access, to enable
`a subscriber using
`the Internet-connected
`digital device to navigate in a drill-down
`manner through titles by category information
`in order to locate a particular one of the titles
`whose associated video content is desired for
`viewing on
`the Internet-connected digital
`device using the same category information as
`was designated by a video content provider in
`metadata associated with the video content
`
`EX1005 (Gonder), Fig. 8, see also Paper 1 (Petition) at 41-42
`
`IPR2020-01267 | DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`93
`
`
`
`Ground 1 (Gonder & Son): Cl aim 1[a] ( C o n t . )
`
`Claim 1[a]
`
`Gonder
`
`the Internet-connected digital device being
`configured to obtain and present
`to
`the
`subscriber an electronic program guide as a
`templatize
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
