`
`From:
`on behalf of
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Clifton Kagawa [clifkagawa@hawaii.mcom]
`Clifton Kagawa <clifkagawa@hawaii.mcom> [clifkagawa@hawaii.mcom]
`5/21/2004 6:05:26 PM
`tim@adss.tv; 'Glenn Yamashita [gyamashita@bbitv.com]; 'Milton Diaz' [mdiaz@bbitv.com]
`Re: Galileo Engagement Proposal
`
`Allen & Co, Bain, Veronis Suhler and Warburg Pincus are the bluest of blue chip investors. While it
`would be great to meet with them, I wonder whether we are too small a deal.
`
`Constellation, Granite, Megunticook and Sandler are on our list and have been preliminarily vetted. They
`would be worth meeting.
`
`Milestone, Quadrangle and Spire are outside our sphere.
`
`Tr -Artisan, Waller Sutton and Wicks seem to be good prospects.
`
`That's seven good prospects plus the three strategic VCs.
`
`Am working on a contact at Quetzal/JP Morgan, another seemingly good target...media/minority focus.
`
`Plus, TWI, Intel, Draper, and Skyway.
`
`We have a data base of another 80-90 VCs we have developed which we can share with Galileo, but suggest
`we have them work on their contacts first for meetings the week of June 6.
`
`Clif
` Original Message
`From: Tim Evard
`To: 'Cliff Kagawa' ; 'Glenn Yamashita' ; 'Milton Diaz'
`Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:11 PM
`Subject: FW: Galileo Engagement Proposal
`
`Glenn -
`
`You might want to check out some of these companies and see if they are the kind of firms we expected.
`
`Tim
`
`Tim Evard
`CCS, Inc
`4380 PGA Boulevard
`Suite 101
`Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
`561-775-1208
`561-775-7877 fax
`561-512-5100 mobile
`tim@adss.tv
` Original Message
`From: thomas f. burchill [mailto:tburchill@msn.com]
`Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:24 PM
`To: tim evard
`Cc: peter_frame
`Subject: Re: Galileo Engagement Proposal
`
`Tim, Peter has filled me in on our understanding and we look forward to receiving the revised engagement
`letter from you. Enclosed is a list of places where, subject to your approval, we would solicit
`i nvestment funding.
`Talk to you soon.
`Tom
`
`Thomas F. Burchill
`Galileo Management LLC
`41 Madison Avenue Suite 3810
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: 646 442-0808
`Fax: 646 442-0801
`Cell: 917 757-9647
`
`RESTRICTED -ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`BBITV184350
`
`BBiTV EX2094
`DISH v. BBiTV
`IPR2020-01267
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`
`
`tburchill@msn.com
` Original Message
`From: tim evard
`To: 'thomas f. burchill'
`Cc: 'peter_frame'
`Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 7:58 AM
`Subject: RE: Galileo Engagement Proposal
`
`Sorry for the delay in responding.
`
`We remain interested in working with you
`
`I am in Hawaii next week, and we will be discussing our strategy for going forward.
`
`I will call you while I am there.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Tim
`
`Tim Evard
`CCS, Inc
`4380 PGA Boulevard
`Suite 101
`Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
`561-775-1208
`561-775-7877 fax
`561-512-5100 mobile
`tim@adss.tv
` Original Message
`From: thomas f. burchill [mailto:tburchill@msn.com]
`Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 3:09 PM
`To: tevard@BBiTV.com
`Cc: peter_frame
`Subject: Galileo Engagement Proposal
`
`Dear Tim,
`It was a pleasure seeing you the other day and it was nice to meet your associate, Cliff, as well Peter
`and I are high on the concept and we are anxious to get started. As promised, I am forwarding our
`engagement proposal and look forward to your comments in connection with it. Thank you for having the
`business plan sent to us. It is professional and thorough but not nearly as effective as an in person
`presentation. Most investors want to gauge the management behind the business and you will be well
`received in that regard.
`All the best,
`Tom
`
`Thomas F. Burchill
`Galileo Management LLC
`41 Madison Avenue Suite 3810
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: 646 442-0808
`Fax: 646 442-0801
`Cell: 917 757-9647
`tburchill@msn.com
`
`RESTRICTED -ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`BBITV184351
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
