` PATENT 10,257,319
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________________
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB; AND
`OXYSALES, UAB,
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LUMINATI NETWORKS LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2020-01266
`Patent 10,257,319
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF THOMAS M. DUNHAM
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Luminati Exhibit 2015
`Code200 et al. v. Luminati Networks LTD.
`IPR2020-01266 Page 001
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01266
`Patent 10,257,319
`
`
`
`
`I, Thomas M. Dunham, declare as follows under penalty of perjury.
`
`1. I am lead counsel for Patent Owner.
`
`2. Concurrently filed with Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response are the following
`
`exhibits.
`
`3. Exhibit 2001 is a true and correct copy of Oxylabs’ Motion To Stay Pending
`
`Inter Partes Reviews (public-redacted) in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D.
`
`Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG ECF No. 131.
`
`4. Exhibit 2002 is a true and correct copy of a portion of the Joint Claim
`
`Construction and Prehearing Statement in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D.
`
`Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG ECF No. 105-1
`
`5. Exhibit 2003 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s Markman opening brief in
`
`Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG ECF
`
`No. 126,
`
`6. Exhibit 2004 is a true and correct copy of the Defendants’ Markman response
`
`brief in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-
`
`JRG ECF No. 138,
`
`7. Exhibit 2005 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s Markman reply brief in
`
`Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG ECF
`
`No. 145
`
`
`
`2
`
`Luminati Exhibit 2015
`Code200 et al. v. Luminati Networks LTD.
`IPR2020-01266 Page 002
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01266
`Patent 10,257,319
`
`
`8. Exhibit 2006 is a true and correct copy of SEALED Excerpts of Defendants’
`
`Amended Invalidity Contentions served August 31, 2020 in Luminati v. Teso Lt
`
`UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG.
`
`9. Exhibit 2007 is a true and correct copy of Oxysales’ Answer (public-redacted)
`
`in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG,
`
`ECF. No. 95
`
`10. Exhibit 2008 is a true and correct copy of the October 18, 2018 response
`
`during the ‘319 patent prosecution history at LUM-00149133-34.
`
`11. Exhibit 2009 is a true and correct copy of Dr. Rhyne’s Markman Declaration
`
`in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG,
`
`ECF No. 126
`
`12. Exhibit 2010 is a true and correct copy of the Sur-Reply in the Motion to
`
`Dismiss in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-
`
`00395-JRG ECF No. 47
`
`13. Exhibit 2011 is a true and correct copy of the Order on the Motion to Dismiss
`
`in Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG
`
`ECF No. 85
`
`14. Exhibit 2012 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of V. Thomas
`
`Rhyne.
`
`
`
`3
`
`Luminati Exhibit 2015
`Code200 et al. v. Luminati Networks LTD.
`IPR2020-01266 Page 003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01266
`Patent 10,257,319
`
`15. Exhibit 2013 is a true and correct copy of an Amended Rule 7.1 disclosure
`
`statement from Luminati v. Teso Lt UAB et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-
`
`cv-00395-JRG ECF No. 55
`
`16. Exhibit 2014 is a true and correct copy of Code200’s Rule 7.1 Disclosure
`
`statement in Luminati v. Code200 et al., E.D. Texas, Case No. 2:19-cv-
`
`00396-JRG ECF No. 28.
`
`
`
`I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on October 26, 2020.
`
`/s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham,
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Luminati Exhibit 2015
`Code200 et al. v. Luminati Networks LTD.
`IPR2020-01266 Page 004
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
