throbber
8/5/2021
`
`German Court Issues Ruling in ParkerVision v. Apple Patent Case - Bloomberg
`
`Business
`
`German Court Issues Ruling in ParkerVision v.
`Apple Patent Case
`
`April 29, 2019, 1:07 PM EDT
`
`JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / April 29, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (OTCQB:
`PRKR), reported today that the District Court of Munich, Germany ruled that
`Apple does not infringe the German part of ParkerVision's '853 European
`receiver patent. The Munich district court, led by Judge Zigann, issued a no
`infringement ruling based on the court's interpretation of the asserted
`claims. This decision comes following an oral hearing last month.
`
`Jeffrey Parker, CEO of ParkerVision stated, "The court's ruling reaches
`conclusions that we believe are directly contradicted by the disclosure of the
`'853 Patent and the plain language of the claims. For example, the patent
`requires the existence of a 'delay means.' The court found that the term
`'delay means' was limited only to digital circuit implements even though the
`patent explicitly provides that the implementation of the delay means could
`also be achieved using analog circuitry. Apple's products use analog delay
`means. We are considering our options for appeal of this decision."
`
`About ParkerVision
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. has designed and developed proprietary radio-frequency (RF)
`technologies which enable advanced wireless solutions for current and next
`generation wireless communication products. ParkerVision is engaged in a
`number of patent enforcement actions in the U.S. and Germany to protect
`patented rights that it believes are broadly infringed by others. For more
`information, please visit www.parkervision.com. (PRKR-I)
`
`Safe Harbor Statement
`
`This press release contains forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned
`not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, each of
`which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certain
`risks and uncertainties which are disclosed in the Company's SEC reports,
`https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2019-04-29/german-court-issues-ruling-in-parkervision-v-apple-patent-case
`
`1/2
`
`Intel v. ParkerVision
`IPR2020-01265
`Intel 1043
`
`

`

`German Court Issues Ruling in ParkerVision v. Apple Patent Case - Bloomberg
`8/5/2021
`including the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. These risks and
`uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those
`currently anticipated or projected.
`
`Contact:
`
`Cindy Poehlman
`Chief Financial Officer
`ParkerVision, Inc.
`904-732-6100
`cpoehlman@parkervision.com
`
`Jean Marie Young
`The Piacente Group, Inc.
`212-481-2050
`parkervision@tpg-ir.com
`
`SOURCE: ParkerVision, Inc.
`
`View source version on accesswire.com:
`https://www.accesswire.com/543289/German-Court-Issues-Ru
`ling-in-ParkerVision-v-Apple-Patent-Case
`
`Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Info (California) Trademarks Privacy Policy
`©2021 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved
`Careers Made in NYC Advertise Ad Choices
` Help
`
`https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2019-04-29/german-court-issues-ruling-in-parkervision-v-apple-patent-case
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket