`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`Intel Corporation
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ParkerVision, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________________________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01265
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`__________________________________________________
`
`DECLARATION OF TODD ZUBLER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
`ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Intel v. ParkerVision
`IPR2020-01265
`INTEL 1021
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01265
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`Petitioner’s Exhibit No. 1021
`Declaration of Todd Zubler in Support of
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`
`
`I, Todd Zubler, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am a partner at the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
`
`Dorr LLP in Washington, D.C.
`
`2.
`
`I have been practicing law for more than 20 years. My practice during
`
`that time has focused on intellectual property litigation, and particularly, patent
`
`litigation.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the District of
`
`Columbia, and am admitted to practice before the United States Courts of Appeals
`
`for the First, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Federal Circuits, and
`
`the United States District Courts for the District of Columbia, the Northern District
`
`of Indiana, the Southern District of Indiana, and the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`4. My D.C. bar membership number is 459216.
`
`5.
`
`I have represented parties in patent litigation cases in the United
`
`States District Courts for the District of Delaware, the Eastern District of Texas,
`
`the Western District of Washington, the Western District of Pennsylvania, and the
`
`District of Oregon, and in the International Trade Commission, among other
`
`jurisdictions. Those cases have involved, among other issues, issues involving
`
`Patent Office rules, regulations, and procedures, including inequitable conduct,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01265
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`Petitioner’s Exhibit No. 1021
`Declaration of Todd Zubler in Support of
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`
`
`prosecution history disclaimer, and ex parte reexaminations. See, e.g., Microlinc,
`
`LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., No. 2:07-cv-488 (E.D. Tex.) (ex parte reexamination); In
`
`the Matter of Certain NOR and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products
`
`Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-560 (inequitable conduct).
`
`6.
`
`I have represented Intel Corporation in multiple patent-related
`
`matters, including, among others, the following United States District Court cases:
`
`Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., No. 2:07-cv-488 (E.D. Tex.); X2Y Attenuators,
`
`LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., No. 1:11-cv-117 (W.D. Pa.); X2Y Attenuators, LLC v.
`
`Intel Corp. et al., No. 1:11-cv-218 (W.D. Pa.); X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Intel Corp.
`
`et al., No. 3:18-cv-1394 (D. Or.).
`
`7.
`
`I have represented parties in patent appeals to the United States Court
`
`of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in at least seven cases, including Bancorp
`
`Services, LLC v. Hartford Life Ins. Co., No. 03-1181 (Fed. Cir.); MBO
`
`Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co., No. 2008-1288 (Fed. Cir.); Organic
`
`Seed Growers and Trade v. Monsanto Co., No. 20112-1298; X2Y Attenuators, LLC
`
`v. Intel Corp., No. 2018-2248 (Fed. Cir.).
`
`8.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01265
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`Petitioner’s Exhibit No. 1021
`Declaration of Todd Zubler in Support of
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`9.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`
`
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`10.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`12.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`13.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I
`
`have reviewed the papers and exhibits filed in this proceeding. I also participated
`
`in drafting the Petition for Inter Partes Review in this proceeding and have
`
`reviewed Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response filed in this proceeding.
`
`14.
`
`I have appeared pro hac vice in the following proceedings before the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office in the last three years: IPR2018-01326
`
`(Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.), IPR2018-01327 (Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.),
`
`IPR2018-01328 (Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.), IPR2018-01329 (Intel Corp. v.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01265
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`Petitioner’s Exhibit No. 1021
`Declaration of Todd Zubler in Support of
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`
`
`Qualcomm Inc.), IPR2018-01330 (Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.), IPR2018-01340
`
`(Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.).
`
`15.
`
`I am representing the Petitioner, Intel Corporation, in the following
`
`United States District Court case: ParkerVision, Inc. v. Intel Corp., No. 6:20-cv-
`
`108-ADA (W.D. Tex.), which involves the patent at issue in this proceeding, as
`
`well as the prior art references at issue in this proceeding.
`
`16.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`/Todd C. Zubler/
`Todd C. Zubler
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DOOR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Todd.Zubler@wilmerhale.com
`Tel.: (202) 663-6636
`
`Dated: April 30, 2021
`
`
`
`5
`
`