throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 9
`Date: December 4, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2020-01263
`Patent 8,101,659 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Request for Additional Briefing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5; 37 C.F.R. § 42.108(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01263
`Patent 8,101,659 B2
`
`
`On November 30, 2020, counsel for Biocon Pharma Limited
`(“Petitioner”) contacted the Board via e-mail to request a conference call
`seeking authorization to file a Preliminary Reply to Novartis
`Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s (“Patent Owner’s”) Preliminary Response in
`the above-identified proceeding. See Ex. 3001. Petitioner seeks
`authorization to file a Preliminary Reply addressing Patent Owner’s
`arguments under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d). Id. In its e-mail, Petitioner states that,
`although it addressed § 325(d) in its Petition, “Patent Owner has crystalized”
`its § 325(d) arguments in its Preliminary Response, and Petitioner seeks a
`“short 3 page Reply.” Id. Petitioner states further that Patent Owner
`opposes Petitioner’s request, because “Biocon has not established good
`cause, as required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.108(c), and replies are not
`automatically granted absent such a showing.” Id. According to Petitioner,
`Patent Owner also opposes because “[Petitioner] had the opportunity to and
`did address 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) in its Petition.” Id. Petitioner states that it
`“has no objection to Patent Owner receiving a 3 page Sur-Reply in
`response.” Id.
`The panel has conferred and determined that a conference call is not
`necessary. The panel determines that it would be helpful for the parties to
`provide additional briefing on the applicability of 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) to the
`particular facts of this proceeding. Thus, we authorize Petitioner to file a
`Preliminary Reply and Patent Owner to file a Preliminary Sur-Reply, if
`desired. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.20(d), 42.108(c). Specifically, Petitioner is
`authorized to file a three-page Preliminary Reply no later than 5:00 PM
`Eastern Time, one week from the date of this Order. Petitioner’s
`Preliminary Reply is limited to responding to the § 325 issues raised in
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01263
`Patent 8,101,659 B2
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response. If desired, Patent Owner is
`authorized to file a three-page Preliminary Sur-Reply, responding to
`Petitioner’s §325(d) arguments. If Patent Owner elects to file a Preliminary
`Sur-Reply, it shall be filed no later than 5:00 PM Eastern Time, one week
`from the date of Petitioner’s Preliminary Reply. No additional briefing and
`no new evidence from either party are authorized at this time. Any portion
`of the briefing that is not responsive to this Order will not be considered.
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a
`Preliminary Reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Reply is limited to
`addressing the 35 U.S.C. § 325(b) issues raised in Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Reply may be no more
`than three (3) pages in length;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file the Preliminary Reply
`by 5:00 PM Eastern Time, within one week from the date of this Order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if desired, Patent Owner is authorized to
`file a Preliminary Sur-Reply of no more than three (3) pages in length,
`addressing Petitioner’s 35 U.S.C. § 325(b) arguments;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file any such
`Preliminary Sur-Reply by 5:00 PM Eastern Time, within one week from the
`date of the Preliminary Reply;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may not submit new evidence;
`
`and
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01263
`Patent 8,101,659 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no additional briefing is permitted.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01263
`Patent 8,101,659 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Christopher Ferenc
`Brian Sodikoff
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
`christopher.ferenc@kattenlaw.com
`brian.sodikoff@kattenlaw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Nicholas N. Kallas
`Venable LLP
`nkallas@Venable.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket