throbber
Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 1 of 16
`
`Hypertension
`Volume 30, Issue 3, September 1997, Pages 535-541
`https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535
`
`ARTICLE
`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Carlos M. Ferrario, Mark C. Chappell, E. Ann Tallant, K. Bridget Brosnihan, and Debra I. Diz
`
`ABSTRACT: Abstract Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) is a bioactive component of the renin-
`angiotensin system that is formed endogenously from either Ang I or Ang II. The first
`actions described for Ang-(1-7) indicated that the peptide mimicked some of the effects of
`Ang II, including the release of prostanoids and vasopressin. However, Ang-(1-7) is devoid
`of vasoconstrictor, central pressor, or thirst-stimulating actions. In fact, new findings reveal
`depressor, vasodilator, and antihypertensive actions that may be more apparent in
`hypertensive animals or humans. Thus, the accumulating evidence suggests that Ang-(1-7)
`may oppose the actions of Ang II either directly or by stimulation of prostaglandins and
`nitric oxide. These observations are significant because they may explain the effective
`antihypertensive action of converting enzyme inhibitors in a variety of non–renin-dependent
`models of experimental and genetic hypertension as well as most forms of human
`hypertension. In this context, studies in humans and animals showed that the
`antihypertensive action of converting enzyme inhibitors correlated with increases in plasma
`levels of Ang-(1-7). In this review, we summarize our knowledge of the mechanisms
`accounting for the counterregulatory actions of Ang-(1-7) and elaborate on the emerging
`concept that Ang-(1-7) functions as an antihypertensive peptide within the cascade of the
`renin-angiotensin system.
`Key Words: angiotensin II ◼ angiotensin receptors ◼ blood pressure ◼ hypertension,
`essential ◼ rats, inbred SHR
`t is well recognized that the renin-angiotensin system has an important role in
`cardiovascular physiology, fluid homeostasis, and cell function. Angiotensin (Ang) II has
`long been considered the main biologically active product of an endocrine system that
`contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension, renal dysfunction, and
`congestive heart failure. Attesting to the importance of this function is the impressive clinical
`therapeutic benefits achieved by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and a new
`class of Ang II receptor antagonists. However, newer studies have revived the possibility
`1
`that other peptide fragments of Ang I may either contribute to or actually oppose the pressor
`and proliferative actions of Ang II, endowing this hormonal system with greater capability for
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 001
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 2 of 16
`
`the regulation of tissue perfusion. Earlier studies demonstrated selective actions of the
`heptapeptide Ang III [Ang-(2-8)] in the secretion of aldosterone; more recent studies by
`2
`Harding (Swanson et al ) suggest that a smaller carboxyl product of Ang II, Ang IV
`3
`[Ang-(3-8)], is biologically active by virtue of recognizing a binding site that is not competed
`for by selective AT or AT Ang II receptor antagonists.
`1
`2
`The characterization of Ang-(1-7)
` as the first amino-terminal angiotensin peptide
`4 5 6 7
`product possessing biological actions provided a foundation for the pursuit of a new concept
`regarding the regulation of cardiovascular function by the renin-angiotensin system. While
`prostacyclin, bradykinin, and nitric oxide (NO) act as vasodilator hormones limiting the
`pressor and proliferative actions of Ang II, it had not been considered that products of Ang I
`could also function to counterbalance the actions of Ang II. This review updates the
`progress that has been made in the development of this concept since its introduction in
`1993
` and also outlines the areas where further work will be necessary to attain a
`7 8
`mechanistic understanding of how the opposing activities of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) contribute
`to the long-term regulation of blood pressure.
`
`PRINCIPLES OF ANG-(1-7) FORMATION AND FUNCTION
`Synthesis of Ang-(1-7)
`Ang I is the ultimate precursor of both Ang II and Ang-(1-7). This readily indicates a
`common source for the generation of the two active and functionally opposing peptides.
`While ACE cleaves Ang II from Ang I, processing of Ang I into Ang-(1-7) requires the
`participation of tissue-specific endopeptidases found in the plasma membranes of
`neuroepithelial (prolyl-endopeptidase [EC 3.4.24.26]), epithelial (neprilysin [EC 3.4.24.11]),
`vascular endothelial (prolyl-endopeptidase and neprilysin), and smooth muscle cells
`(metalloendopeptidase [EC 3.4.24.15]).
` The processing pathways in these various
`9 10 11
`tissues have been reviewed recently.
` The diversity of the enzymatic pathways by
`10 11 12 13
`which Ang-(1-7) is cleaved from Ang I suggests that the production of the heptapeptide may
`be regulated at the tissue level, an interpretation which favors the possibility that Ang-(1-7)
`functions as a true paracrine hormone.
`Little is known yet about the factors that determine the rate of conversion of Ang I into
`Ang II and Ang-(1-7). We know that any condition that augments plasma or tissue levels of
`Ang I is associated with increased formation of Ang-(1-7). In several experimental
`conditions, Ang-(1-7) is the primary peptide produced from Ang I.
` These findings
`9 14 15 16
`suggest that production of Ang-(1-7) may limit the amount of substrate that is available for
`the generation of Ang II. This theoretical possibility provides a glimpse into the mechanisms
`that may determine the balance of the opposing actions of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) in the
`control of cardiovascular and body fluid functions (see below). In keeping with this
`interpretation, studies in humans and animals
` showed that increased
`17 18 19 20 21 22
`concentrations of Ang I after inhibition of ACE are associated with increases in the
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 002
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 3 of 16
`
`concentration of Ang-(1-7). While Ang I is a primary substrate for the formation of Ang-(1-7),
`the heptapeptide may be formed from Ang II by the cleavage of the Pro -Phe bond by
`7
`8
`prolyl-endopeptidase
` and a postproline carboxypeptidase.
` The physiological
`14
`23
`24
`significance of this alternate pathway has not been characterized yet; conceivably, it
`provides an additional route for the inactivation of Ang II.
`Fig 1 provides a schematic diagram of the active pathways involved in the production of
`Ang-(1-7) from both Ang I and Ang II. With a more complete understanding of the
`biochemical routes for the processing of Ang I, it becomes apparent that the potential
`involvement of the endopeptidase pathways in the pathogenesis of hypertension may be a
`fruitful area of inquiry. One of the Ang-(1-7)–forming enzymes, neprilysin, converts the atrial
`natriuretic peptide and bradykinin into inactive fragments.
` Potential interactions of these
`25
`enzymes with the various substrates have not been investigated yet, nor have studies been
`undertaken to assess whether polymorphisms in the genes encoding these enzymes might
`be linked to disorders of cardiovascular function.
`
`Physiological Actions of Ang-(1-7)
`The first studies of Ang-(1-7) revealed that the peptide stimulates the activity of
`hypothalamic-neurohypophysial neurons regulating vasopressin release with a potency
`equal to Ang II. Subsequently, we found that Ang-(1-7) releases prostaglandins from
`4
`astrocytes, VSMCs, and endothelial cells in culture.
` Prostaglandin release in
`26 27 28 29
`human astrocytes and porcine smooth muscle cells was mediated by AT receptors,
`2
`whereas a non-AT , non-AT receptor accounted for these actions in rat C6 glioma and
`1
`2
`porcine endothelial cells. Furthermore, Ang-(1-7) elicits prostaglandin production through
`calcium-independent mechanisms in cells in culture and in the vasculature.
` Ang-(1-7) also
`30
`causes a depressor effect when injected into the circulation of the pithed rat, and this action
`is blocked completely by indomethacin but only partially by an AT receptor blocker.
` The
`31
`1
`peptide induces relaxation of porcine and canine coronary artery,
` piglet arterioles,
` and
`32 33
`34
`the feline mesenteric bed, possibly via release of NO through a non-AT , non-AT
`1
`2
`angiotensin receptor.
` Unlike Ang II, Ang-(1-7) does not elicit vasoconstriction, aldosterone
`35
`release, or stimulation of thirst and salt appetite, nor does it produce a pressor response
`after intraventricular administration in normotensive rats. Indeed, Ang-(1-7) facilitates the
`baroreflex and displays depressor effects in sites within the dorsal medulla.
` These
`5 36
`effects in the dorsal medulla are blocked by a selective antagonist to Ang-(1-7), [d-Ala ]
`7
`-Ang-(1-7).
` Thus, increasing evidence supports the concept that Ang-(1-7) opposes the
`37
`actions of Ang II and may do so through a novel receptor.
`
`Actions That Oppose the Effects of Ang II Are Enhanced in Models of
`Hypertension
`Ang-(1-7), similar to losartan and ACE inhibitors, counteracts the actions of Ang II.
`7
`Ang-(1-7) may contribute to the antihypertensive effects produced by ACE inhibitors, since
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 003
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 4 of 16
`
`circulating levels of Ang-(1-7) increase 25-fold to 50-fold during ACE inhibition
` and
`19 21 22
`Ang-(1-7) alone can produce antihypertensive effects in hypertensive animals.
` In the
`38
`spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), chronic infusion of Ang-(1-7) produces significant
`increases
`in urinary excretion of prostaglandin E and 6-keto-prostaglandin F
`2
`1α
`accompanied by diuresis, natriuresis, and a decrease in blood pressure.
` Systemic
`38
`administration of Ang-(1-7) attenuates the vasoconstrictor actions of phenylephrine and Ang
`II in hypertensive but not normotensive rats,
` in contrast with the potentiation of
`39
`α-adrenoceptor-mediated pressor responses by Ang II. Moreover, intravenous infusions of
`Ang-(1-7) reverse the inhibitory effects of Ang II on the reflex control of heart rate in both
`SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats and improve the impaired slope of the reflex control of heart
`39
`rate in SHR after either peripheral or central administration.
`36 39
`A recent study in a genetic model of hypertension that is associated with heightened
`activity of the brain angiotensin system clearly demonstrated the opposing actions of
`Ang-(1-7).
` In this important research, we evaluated the hemodynamic effects of delivering
`40
`either a specific, affinity-purified Ang-(1-7) antibody or an Ang II monoclonal antibody
`(KAA8) into the brain of conscious homozygous mRen2(27) renin transgenic [Tg(+)] rats
`(Fig 2). Cerebroventricular administration of the affinity-purified Ang-(1-7) antibody in
`conscious Tg(+) hypertensive rats caused significant dose-related elevations in blood
`pressure and heart rate.
` The hypertensive response was augmented in transgenic rats
`40
`studied 7 to 10 days after cessation of lisinopril therapy. In contrast, all doses of the Ang II
`antibody produced hypotension and bradycardia. The magnitude of the depressor response
`was significantly augmented in transgenic rats weaned off lisinopril therapy. Central
`administration of either the Ang-(1-7) or Ang II antibodies had no effect on normotensive
`Sprague-Dawley rats. These data demonstrate that Ang-(1-7) opposes the action of Ang II
`on the central mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance of this model of hypertension.
`In addition, these studies showed an important contribution of the brain renin-angiotensin
`system to the maintenance of this form of monogenetic hypertension.
`There is also evidence that Ang-(1-7) can act as an antagonist to the actions of Ang II in
`the vasculature.
` Therefore, mechanisms other than activation of prostaglandins and NO
`41
`may play a role in mediating the depressor effects of Ang-(1-7). It is not currently possible to
`determine the exact contribution of prostaglandins versus other mechanisms to the effects
`produced by Ang-(1-7) in the SHR or Tg(+) hypertensive rats from these initial studies. In
`addition, the mediators stimulated by Ang-(1-7) may differ, depending on the vascular bed
`and species studied. In recent studies we showed that the Ang-(1-7)–induced prostacyclin
`release from aortic VSMCs of Tg(+) rats was greater than that from VSMCs isolated from
`Sprague-Dawley control rats.
` Similarly, in the renovascular hypertensive dog, the
`42
`depressor component of the response to systemic Ang-(1-7) is exaggerated.
` Thus, the
`43
`degree of activation of these depressor systems is influenced by the state of activation of
`the renin-angiotensin system.
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 004
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 5 of 16
`
`Evidence for Ang-(1-7) Vasodilator Actions in Canine Coronary Vessels
`and Interactions With Kinins
` as well as isolated feline
`Ang-(1-7) relaxes canine or porcine coronary artery rings,
`32 33
`mesenteric beds.
` This effect is blocked in both canine and porcine rings by removal of the
`35
`endothelium or pretreatment with an NO synthase inhibitor. Moreover, the vasorelaxant
`activity of Ang-(1-7) is markedly attenuated by the bradykinin B receptor antagonist Hoe
`2
`140 and does not appear
`to be associated with
`the synthesis and release of
`prostaglandins.
` Assessment of
`the angiotensin receptor subtypes mediating
`the
`33
`responses to Ang-(1-7) revealed that these effects are not inhibited by subtype-selective
`AT or AT receptor antagonists but are markedly attenuated by prior exposure to the
`1
`2
`competitive nonselective Ang II peptide receptor antagonist [Sar , Thr ]-Ang II. These
`1
`8
`results suggest that Ang-(1-7) has a direct effect on the endothelium, through the release of
`NO and kinins, mediated by an angiotensin receptor pharmacologically distinct from AT
`1
`and AT receptor subtypes. Furthermore, Ang II and Ang-(1-7) at equivalent concentration
`2
`ranges produced diametrically opposite changes in the contractile state of coronary artery
`rings (Fig 3).
`Additionally, Ang-(1-7) potentiated synergistically bradykinin-induced vasodilation. These
`actions of Ang-(1-7) may contribute to the cardioprotective effects of chronic ACE inhibition.
`Ang-(1-7)’s potentiating effect on the response to bradykinin was first described by Paula et
`al,
` who showed that low concentrations of Ang-(1-7) given intravenously augmented by
`44
`2-fold to 10-fold the vasodepressor response elicited by bradykinin. In isolated canine
`coronary arteries, Ang-(1-7) has a synergistic, concentration-dependent action on
`bradykinin-induced vasodilation that is dependent on the release of NO but not
`prostaglandins.
` The response is specific for Ang-(1-7), since neither acetylcholine, sodium
`45
`nitroprusside, nor prostaglandins were able to augment the bradykinin-induced relaxation.
`45
`This synergistic effect of Ang-(1-7) is not mediated by a known angiotensin receptor, since
`the effect persists in the presence of AT , AT , and [Sar , Thr ]-Ang II receptor antagonists.
`1
`8
`1
`2
`In fact, in contrast to a receptor-mediated effect of Ang-(1-7),
` the peptide may augment
`33
`vasodilation in coronary arteries by acting as a local modulator of ACE activity. Li et al
`45
`found that Ang-(1-7) significantly inhibits the degradation of
`I-[Tyr ]-bradykinin and the
`125
`0
`appearance of the bradykinin-(1-7) and bradykinin-(1-5) metabolites in coronary vascular
`rings while it also inhibits purified canine ACE activity with an IC of 0.65 μmol/L. These
`50
`findings indicate that Ang-(1-7) may inhibit ACE activity to elevate bradykinin levels as one
`mechanism of promoting vasodepressor actions.
`
`Antiproliferative Actions of Ang-(1-7) in VSMCs
`In previous studies in porcine and rat VSMCs, Ang II activates phospholipase C and D and
`releases prostaglandins, whereas Ang-(1-7) releases only prostaglandins.
` The
`29 30 46 47
`activation of phospholipase C by Ang II in VSMCs is known to stimulate growth. Because
`prostaglandins inhibit vascular growth, we speculated that Ang-(1-7) might also prevent the
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 005
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 6 of 16
`
`growth of VSMCs. The effect of Ang-(1-7) on cell growth was determined by measuring [ H]
`3
`thymidine incorporation into rat aortic VSMCs in the presence and absence of various
`mitogens.
` The amount of [ H]thymidine incorporation was increased by treatment with
`48
`3
`fetal bovine serum, platelet-derived growth factor, or Ang II. In the presence of Ang-(1-7),
`the incorporation of [ H]thymidine in response to fetal bovine serum, platelet-derived growth
`3
`factor, and Ang II was significantly attenuated in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 4). Thus,
`Ang II and Ang-(1-7) have opposite effects on VSMC growth.
`Attenuation of serum-stimulated thymidine incorporation by Ang-(1-7) is unaffected by
`antagonists selective for AT or AT receptors. However, the sarcosine derivatives of Ang II
`1
`2
`are effective antagonists, indicating that growth inhibition by Ang-(1-7) is a result of
`angiotensin receptor activation. In contrast, Ang II stimulation of [ H]thymidine incorporation
`3
`is attenuated by the AT -selective antagonists. Thus Ang-(1-7) inhibits VSMC growth
`1
`through activation of a non-AT , non-AT receptor.
`48
`1
`2
`Novel Receptor Identified in Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cells
`The inhibition of vascular growth by Ang-(1-7) through a non-AT , non-AT receptor
`1
`2
`suggests that the heptapeptide activates a unique angiotensin peptide receptor. Since
`previous studies strongly suggested that the endothelium also responds to Ang-(1-7)
`through activation of a non-AT , non-AT angiotensin peptide receptor,
` we isolated
`28 33
`1
`2
`endothelial cells from bovine thoracic aorta to determine whether they contain a high-affinity
`I-Ang-(1-7) binding site. Scatchard analysis of saturation isotherms of endothelial cells
`125
`showed that
`I-Ang-(1-7) binds to bovine aortic endothelial cells with an affinity of 19
`125
`nmol/L and a density of 1351 fmol/mg protein.
` In competition studies, the specific binding
`49
`of
`I-Ang-(1-7) is blocked by [Sar , Ile ]-Ang II and by [d-Ala ]-Ang-(1-7), a selective
`125
`1
`8
`7
`blocker of responses to Ang-(1-7).
` In contrast, neither the AT -selective nor the
`49
`1
`AT -selective antagonists significantly competes for
`I-Ang-(1-7) binding. Further proof
`125
`2
`that Ang-(1-7) does not bind to a typical AT or AT receptor is derived from studies showing
`1
`2
`that bovine aortic endothelial cells do not contain the mRNA encoding an AT or AT
`1
`2
`receptor. In preliminary experiments, we also showed that
`I-Ang-(1-7) binds specifically
`125
`and with high affinity to the endothelial layer of canine coronary arteries, using the technique
`of in vitro emulsion autoradiography, as previously described (Fig 5). Binding to canine
`50
`coronary endothelium was effectively competed for by either unlabeled Ang-(1-7) or [d-Ala ]
`7
`-Ang-(1-7). These results are in agreement with endothelial cell binding data as well as
`49
`previous studies in which we showed that Ang-(1-7) causes vasodilation of canine coronary
`arteries by a non-AT , non-AT receptor.
`33
`1
`2
`ANG-(1-7) AND THE KIDNEY
`A critically important target organ for Ang II is the kidney. Ang II causes renal
`vasoconstriction, release of aldosterone, reduced glomerular filtration rate, stimulation of
`sodium and bicarbonate transport in the proximal tubules, and mesangial cell hypertrophy.
`51
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 006
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 7 of 16
`
`In contrast, Ang-(1-7) exhibits diuretic and natriuretic properties in hypertensive animals, as
`evidenced by our studies in SHR.
` Similar natriuretic and diuretic actions occur in the in
`38
`vivo isolated and in vivo perfused kidney.
` The natriuretic and diuretic responses to
`52 53 54
`Ang-(1-7) are associated with increases in prostaglandin release,
` and the majority of the
`53
`renal effect of Ang-(1-7) is attenuated with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. In
`isolated proximal tubules, very low doses (10
` to 10 mol/L) of Ang-(1-7) inhibit transport-
`−13
`−9
`dependent oxygen consumption and bicarbonate transport.
` These actions of Ang-(1-7)
`54
`55
`are at least partially blocked by antagonists selective for the AT receptor. In marked
`1
`contrast to the effects of Ang II on the kidney, Ang-(1-7) does not alter renal blood flow or
`stimulate aldosterone release.
`53 54 56
`The renal excretory response to low doses of Ang-(1-7) is markedly different from the
`antinatriuresis and antidiuresis reported
`for
`low doses of Ang
`II. Subthreshold
`vasoconstrictor doses of Ang II activate AT receptors on the proximal tubule, leading to a
`1
`decrease in urinary sodium and water excretion. The natriuretic effect of Ang-(1-7) may be
`due to decreased AT receptor activation resulting from receptor competition with
`1
`endogenous Ang II. However, the renal vascular constrictor response to Ang II (AT
`1
`receptor mediated) is unaltered when coinjected with nonvasoconstrictor doses of
`Ang-(1-7), suggesting that Ang-(1-7) does not functionally antagonize the AT -mediated
`1
`actions of Ang II in the kidney.
` Alternatively, the natriuretic effects of high doses of Ang II
`54
`may be due to conversion of Ang II to Ang-(1-7).
`infusions of Ang-(1-7) in
`In
`the above studies, differences were observed to
`normotensive and hypertensive rats. While transient depressor and diuretic/natriuretic
`effects and suppression of plasma vasopressin levels were seen in the SHR, minimal
`changes occurred
`in
`the Wistar-Kyoto
`rats.
`
`Interestingly, Ang-(1-7) stimulates
`38
`antinatriuresis and a nonsignificant rise in plasma vasopressin in water-loaded Wistar rats.
`57
`Santos et al
` recently reported antidiuretic effects in an isolated collecting duct preparation,
`58
`which were blocked by the [d-Ala ]-Ang-(1-7) antagonist. These antidiuretic effects are in
`7
`direct contrast to the effects observed in the isolated and in situ perfused kidney. One
`obvious difference in the studies with intact animals was that the experiments were
`performed after water loading. Burnier et al
` reported conflicting results concerning AT
`59
`1
`treatment of patients after an acute water load. In addition, in isolated tubules, the route for
`administration of the Ang-(1-7) and the segment of the nephron accessed was different than
`in isolated kidneys or whole-animal experiments. These findings suggest that the overall
`state of sodium and water balance (and perhaps the overall activity of the renin-angiotensin
`system) may influence the effects of Ang-(1-7) in the kidney, as discussed below. In
`addition, these results emphasize that the route of administration and the site of the
`nephron exposed to Ang-(1-7) may determine the direction of observed actions.
`Ang-(1-7) was reported to inhibit transcellular sodium flux in cultured renal tubular
`epithelial cells, an action that may be mediated through the activation of phospholipase
`A .
` Interestingly, the phospholipase A activation in response to Ang I is markedly
`60
`2
`2
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 007
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 8 of 16
`
`potentiated by captopril. These data indicate that Ang-(1-7) plays an important role in
`modulating sodium handling, most likely at the level of the tubule, and reinforce the concept
`that Ang-(1-7) is a biologically active member of the renin-angiotensin system. The data
`also suggest that the tubular epithelium can convert Ang I to Ang-(1-7) with only minor
`amounts of Ang II formed. Inhibition of neprilysin blocked the majority of Ang-(1-7)
`formation.
` In contrast, Ang II was metabolized preferentially to Ang-(1-4) by neprilysin and
`61
`shorter N-terminal fragments such as Ang-(2-8) and Ang-(3-8) by peptidyl and dipeptidyl
`aminopeptidases. Thus, the kidney contains the necessary substrates and enzymes for the
`intrarenal generation of Ang-(1-7).
`
`Presence of Angiotensin-(1-7) in Urine: A Marker of Renal Function?
`A further insight into the role of Ang-(1-7) in renal function was gained by demonstration of
`large quantities of the heptapeptide in rat urine. Urinary excretion of Ang-(1-7) averages
`4.8±0.4 pmol/24 h compared with 0.73±0.04 pmol/24 h for Ang II.
` Urinary Ang-(1-7) levels
`62
`are increased by 88% after a 5-day exposure of the rats to lisinopril (20 mg/kg, PO).
`Combined treatment with lisinopril and a neprilysin inhibitor returned the concentration and
`excretion of Ang-(1-7) to control levels and augmented Ang II concentration. These data
`suggest that the kidneys are an important source for the production of Ang-(1-7) and
`reinforce the concept that neprilysin participates in the renal processing of Ang I into
`Ang-(1-7).
`The demonstration of high concentrations of Ang-(1-7) in rat urine is an important finding
`that could lead to greater knowledge of the mechanisms that account for the progressive
`decline in renal function associated with hypertension and end-stage renal disease. A
`significant step into this problem has been gained with the characterization of Ang-(1-7) in
`the urine of 31 healthy volunteers and 18 untreated essential hypertensive subjects.
` In
`63
`these studies, the concentration of Ang-(1-7) in the urine of normal subjects averaged
`62.6±22.6 (SD) pmol/L, corresponding to a urinary excretion rate of 98.9±44.7 pmol/24 h.
`Concurrent measurements of plasma Ang-(1-7) showed that the content of Ang-(1-7) in
`urine was 2.5-fold higher than that measured in the plasma. In contrast, untreated essential
`hypertensive subjects had lower concentrations and 24-hour urinary excretion rates of
`Ang-(1-7) averaging 39.4±18.0 pmol/L and 60.2±14.6 pmol/24 h, respectively (P<.001).
`Differences in the excretory rate of Ang-(1-7) between normal volunteers and essential
`hypertensive subjects were not modified by normalization of the data by urinary creatinine
`excretion rates. In addition, urinary concentrations of Ang-(1-7) correlated inversely with
`arterial pressures (r=−.48, P<.001), whereas both urinary Ang-(1-7) (odds ratio of 0.92 [95%
`confidence interval: 0.88-0.97]) and age were independent predictors of systolic blood
`pressure.
`These studies demonstrate the presence of Ang-(1-7) in urine and the existence of
`reduced levels of the heptapeptide in individuals with untreated essential hypertension. The
`relatively higher concentrations of Ang-(1-7) in urine compared with plasma are in
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 008
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 9 of 16
`
`agreement with data showing that Ang-(1-7) may contribute to the regulation of blood
`pressure. The inverse association between Ang-(1-7) and arterial pressure provides a
`potential marker for the characterization of forms of essential hypertension associated with
`reduced production or activity of vasodilator hormones.
`
`CONCLUDING REMARKS
`Studies of the role of Ang-(1-7) in the control of blood pressure suggest that the renin-
`angiotensin system possesses the ability to limit the pressor and proliferative actions of Ang
`II through a mechanism that relies on the alternative generation of Ang-(1-7). In this context,
`Ang-(1-7) may act as the signal peptide for the activation of the negative feedback limb that
`limits the pressor and proliferative actions of Ang II through stimulation of vasodilator
`prostacyclin, NO, or both. Increased Ang II production is a critical component of the short-
`term cardiovascular response to acute changes in blood pressure and blood volume.
`Therefore, regulatory mechanisms must exist to ensure that increased production of
`Ang-(1-7) will not negate the important compensatory actions of Ang II in both the short- and
`long-term regulation of blood pressure. The specific feedback mechanisms that regulate the
`formation of Ang-(1-7) independently from Ang II have yet to be determined. Our working
`hypothesis is that one aspect of the regulatory feedback mechanism may entail modulation
`of Ang II production by ACE, since Ang-(1-7) is metabolized by ACE and exhibits an affinity
`comparable to that for bradykinin (approximately 0.7 mol/L).
` Our studies also suggest that
`45
`the actions of Ang-(1-7) are most evident in situations associated with long-term rather than
`short-term increases in Ang II production or activity. Likewise, augmented Ang-(1-7)
`formation follows chronic rather than acute inhibition of ACE.
` While further studies are
`20
`required to assess the mechanisms that determine the factors that control production of
`Ang-(1-7) over Ang II formation from their common Ang I substrate, the data gathered to
`date suggest that the net actions of the renin-angiotensin system in the long-term regulation
`of blood pressure may depend on a balance between the tissue concentrations of Ang II
`and Ang-(1-7; Fig 6).
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 009
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 10 of 16
`
`Figure 1. Diagram showing the active pathways involved in the production of Ang-(1-7). Ang I is processed
`to biologically active peptides by distinct enzymes. Ang I is hydrolyzed at Phe -His by angiotensin-
`8
`9
`converting enzyme (ACE) or chymase (CHYM) to yield Ang II. Ang-(1-7) is produced by the hydrolysis of
`Ang I at Pro -Phe by neutral endopeptidases 24.11 and 24.15 (NEP) and prolyl endopeptidase (PE). PE
`7
`8
`and prolyl carboxypeptidase (PCP) hydrolyze Ang II to Ang-(1-7).
`
`Figure 2. Contrasting effects of cerebroventricular injection of either a specific polyclonal Ang-(1-7) (▪, solid
`line) or monoclonal angiotensin II (▴, dashed line) antibody on the mean arterial pressure of homozygous
`mRen2(27) transgenic hypertensive rats. Data were redrawn from Reference 40. Values are mean±SE.
`
`https://www.ahajournals.org/reader/content/10.1161/01.HYP.30.3.535/format/epub/EPUB/...
`
`7/31/2020
`
`BIOCON PHARMA LTD (IPR2020-01263) Ex. 1016, p. 010
`
`

`

`Counterregulatory Actions of Angiotensin-(1-7)
`
`Page 11 of 16
`
`Figure 3. Average cumulative dose response to angiotensin (Ang) II (left) and Ang-(1-7) (right) in canine left
`anterior descending coronary vessels precontracted with 10 nmol/L U46 619, a thromboxane A analogue.
`2
`All concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) are given as negative logs. The ordinate shows the percent
`contraction or relaxation of the precontracted coronary vessels. Data were redrawn from Reference 33.
`
`Figure 4. Vascular smooth muscle cells made quiescent by 48 hours in serum-free media and then treated
`for an additional 48 hours with either Ang-(1-7) in the presence of 1% fetal bovine serum (serum stimulated)
`or Ang II. Left axis, Inhibition of serum-stimulated [ H]thymidine incorporation by increasing concentrations
`3
`of Ang-(1-7) is presented as the percentage of serum-stimulated activity (29 442±3253 cpm per well). Right
`axis, Stimulation of [ H]thymidine incorporation by increasing concentrations of Ang II is presented as the
`3
`percentage of basal activity (13 217±228 cpm per well). Data were redrawn from Reference 48.
`
`Figure 5. In vitro emulsion autoradiography showing specific binding of
`I-Ang-(1-7) to endothelial cells on
`125
`a canine coronary artery frozen-sectioned at 14 μm and incubated with 0.75 nmol/L
`I-Ang-(1-7) in the
`125
`presence or absence of either 1 μmol/L Ang-(1-7) or d-Ala -Ang-(1-7). Sections were processed for
`7
`emulsion autoradiography as previously described.
` The arrows indicate the endothelium lining the lumen.
`50
`Abundant silver grains, i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket