throbber
British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 140, 123–132
`
`& 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0007 – 1188/03 $25.00
`www.nature.com/bjp
`
`GLP-1 derivative liraglutide in rats with b-cell deficiencies:
`influence of metabolic state on b-cell mass dynamics
`
`*,1Jeppe Sturis, 1Carsten F. Gotfredsen, 1John Rømer, 1Bidda Rolin, 1Ulla Ribel, 1Christian L.
`Brand, 1Michael Wilken, 1Karsten Wassermann, 2Carolyn F. Deacon, 1Richard D. Carr & 1Lotte
`Bjerre Knudsen
`
`1Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Alle´ , DK-2880 Bagsværd, Denmark and 2The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen,
`Copenhagen, Denmark
`
`1 Liraglutide is a long-acting GLP-1 derivative, designed for once daily administration in type II
`diabetic patients. To investigate the effects of liraglutide on glycemic control and b-cell mass in rat
`models of b-cell deficiencies, studies were performed in male Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats and in
`60% pancreatectomized rats.
`2 When liraglutide was dosed s.c. at 150 mg kg1 b.i.d. for 6 weeks in ZDF rats 6 – 8 weeks of age at
`study start, diabetes development was markedly attenuated. Blood glucose was approximately 12 mm
`lower compared to vehicle (Po0.0002), and plasma insulin was 2 – 3-fold higher during a normal 24-h
`feeding period (Po0.001). Judged by pair feeding, approximately 53% of the antihyperglycemic effect
`observed on 24-h glucose profiles was mediated by a reduction in food intake, which persisted
`throughout the study and averaged 16% (Po0.02).
`3 Histological analyses revealed that b-cell mass and proliferation were significantly lower in
`prediabetic animals still normoglycemic after 2 weeks treatment compared to vehicle-treated animals
`that had begun to develop diabetes. When the treatment period was 6 weeks, the liraglutide-treated
`animals were no longer completely normoglycemic and the b-cell mass was significantly increased
`compared to overtly diabetic vehicle-treated animals, while b-cell proliferation was unaffected.
`In the experiments with 60% pancreatectomized rats, 8 days treatment with liraglutide resulted in a
`4
`significantly lower glucose excursion in response to oral glucose compared to vehicle treatment. Again,
`part of the antihyperglycemic effect was due to reduced food intake. No effect of liraglutide on b-cell
`mass was observed in these virtually normoglycemic animals.
`In conclusion, treatment with liraglutide has marked antihyperglycemic effects in rodent models of
`5
`b-cell deficiencies, and the in vivo effect of liraglutide on b-cell mass may in part depend on the
`metabolic state of the animals.
`British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 140, 123–132. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705397
`Keywords: Glucagon-like peptide-1; type II diabetes; Zucker diabetic fatty; 60% pancreatectomy
`
`Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; b.i.d., twice a day; BrdU, bromodeoxyuridine; DPPIV, dipeptidyl-peptidase IV;
`GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; ZDF, Zucker diabetic fatty
`
`Introduction
`
`Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is secreted from the intestinal
`L-cells
`in response
`to ingested carbohydrates and fat
`(Kreymann et al., 1987; Ørskov, 1992; Holst, 1997). The
`molecule has a spectrum of physiological effects, including
`glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibi-
`tion of glucagon secretion (Gromada et al., 1998), inhibition of
`small bowel motility (Tolessa et al., 1998) and gastric emptying
`(Nauck et al., 1997), and reduction of appetite (Flint et al.,
`1998; Toft-Nielsen et al., 1999). Moreover, recent evidence
`suggests that GLP-1 and analogs act as trophic agents in the
`pancreas, causing b-cell proliferation and neogenesis (Buteau
`et al., 1999; Edvell & Lindstro¨ m, 1999; Xu et al., 1999; Perfetti
`et al., 2000; Moldrup et al., 2001; Farilla et al., 2002; Rolin
`et al., 2002), and some studies indicate that it also inhibits
`
`*Author for correspondence; E-mail: jstu@novonordisk.com
`Advance online publication: 29 July 2003
`
`b-cell apoptosis (Bregenholt et al., 2001; Farilla et al., 2002; Li
`et al., 2003). Thus, GLP-1 may be an important physiological
`regulator of b-cell mass. Taken as a whole, these properties
`make GLP-1 ideally suited to be developed as an antidiabetic
`agent, particularly since many of its effects are glucose-
`dependent and therefore treatment would likely be associated
`with a very low risk of hypoglycemia. Consequently, many
`studies have been undertaken and shown GLP-1 to be highly
`effective in reducing blood glucose levels in patients with type
`II diabetes (Nauck et al., 1993; Gutniak et al., 1994; Rachman
`et al., 1997; Larsen et al., 2001a). Native GLP-1 is, however,
`rapidly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV; Mentlein
`et al., 1993; Deacon et al., 1995) and cleared by the kidneys
`(Deacon et al., 1996), giving the biologically active peptide a
`half-life of less than 2 min after i.v. administration (Deacon
`et al., 1996) and 1 – 2 h after s.c. administration (Knudsen et al.,
`2000). Since the presence of an elevated GLP-1 concentration
`is necessary in type II diabetic patients in order to obtain a
`continuous effect, the pharmacokinetic properties of the native
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 1 of 10
`
`

`

`124
`
`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`peptide make it less than ideal for therapeutic use. Liraglutide
`(Arg34Lys26-(N-e-(g-Glu(N-a-hexadecanoyl)))-GLP-1(7-37)),
`also known as NN2211,
`is a novel
`long-acting analog,
`obtained by derivatizing GLP-1 with a fatty acid side chain,
`which promotes albumin binding and prevents degradation by
`DPPIV (unpublished observations). Liraglutide and GLP-1
`are equipotent in vitro (Knudsen et al., 2000). When injected
`s.c., these features, combined with a slow release from the
`injection site, result in a compound with a prolonged plasma
`half-life of 14 h in pigs (Knudsen et al., 2000) and 10 – 12 h in
`man (Agers et al., 2002; Juhl et al., 2002), which makes it
`suitable for once daily administration (Knudsen et al., 2000).
`The present study was undertaken to investigate the effects
`of liraglutide on glycemia and b-cell mass in two b-cell-
`deficient rat models: male Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats, a
`model of type II diabetes in which insulin resistance and b-cell
`defects are prominent features (Clark et al., 1983; Etgen &
`Oldham, 2000), and 60% pancreatectomized Sprague – Dawley
`rats, a model of b-cell deficiency (Liu et al., 2000).
`
`Methods
`
`Animals
`
`All studies were carried out with permits from the Animal
`Experiments Inspectorate, Ministry of Justice, Denmark. Male
`ZDF (fa/fa) rats (ZDF) and lean male ZDF (fa/ þ or þ / þ )
`rats
`(lean) were purchased from Genetic Models
`Inc.
`(Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.) and housed two per cage (study
`1a and 1c) or individually (study 1b). Male Sprague – Dawley
`rats were obtained from M&B, Lille Skensved, Denmark, and
`were housed individually. Unless otherwise stated, animals had
`free access to food (Purina 5008) and drinking water.
`
`Experimental procedures
`
`Dosing
`In all studies, the animals were dosed with sub-
`cutaneous injections (1 ml kg1) of vehicle or liraglutide at the
`various doses indicated at approximately 0715 – 0800 and
`1400 – 1415 h. Twice daily dosing was used because the
`pharmacokinetic half-life of liraglutide is only approximately
`4 h in rats (Novo Nordisk, data on file).
`
`Blood sampling Blood for the determination of whole-
`blood glucose concentration and HbA1c was collected into
`heparinized 10 and 5 ml glass tubes, respectively, by puncture
`of the capillary vessels in the tail tip, and diluted in analysis
`buffer. Samples for insulin measurements were also collected
`from the tail into 100-ml heparin-coated glass tubes and were
`centrifuged at 41C for 10 min and plasma was separated and
`stored at 201C until assayed.
`
`Oral glucose tolerance test Oral glucose tolerance tests
`(OGTTs) were performed in fasted animals. For ZDF rats,
`1 g kg1 glucose solution and for 60% pancreatectomized rats,
`2 g kg1 glucose solution was administered by gavage. Com-
`pound or vehicle was administered at the regular time points.
`Samples for the measurement of blood glucose and, in some
`cases, plasma insulin were drawn immediately prior to glucose
`administration and at intervals thereafter.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
`Studies in ZDF rats
`
`These studies were performed to investigate the ability of
`liraglutide to influence diabetes development and b-cell
`proliferation and mass in the ZDF rat model.
`Study 1a Three groups of animals (n¼ 6; age 7 – 8 weeks at
`the start of the study) were housed two per cage and treated
`b.i.d. with either vehicle or liraglutide (low dose, 30 mg kg1;
`high dose, 150 mg kg1) for 6 weeks. Initial random glucose
`concentrations were not significantly different between the
`three groups (vehicle: 6.5570.33; low dose: 6.4070.22; high
`dose: 6.4270.20 mm). Blood samples for 24-h profiles of
`glucose were taken approximately every 4 h on day 9, OGTTs
`were performed on days 21 and 36, and a final 24-h profile of
`glucose and insulin was carried out on day 41. Food and water
`intake were monitored daily (at approx. 0800 h), and body
`weight was measured regularly.
`
`Study 1b Pair feeding was employed in order to investigate
`to what extent the blood glucose-lowering effect observed with
`150 mg kg1 liraglutide in study 1a could be ascribed to the
`reduction in food intake. Four groups of animals (age 6 weeks
`at the start of the study) were individually housed and treated
`b.i.d. with either vehicle (lean, n¼ 9; ZDF vehicle, n¼ 7; ZDF
`pair-fed, n ¼ 8) or liraglutide (150 mg kg1, n¼ 8) for 6 weeks.
`Pair-matching was based on the animals’ initial body weights.
`Daily food consumption was measured for each liraglutide-
`treated animal and this amount of food was then made
`available to the pair-matched vehicle-treated animal on the
`following day. Glucose and insulin profiles (24 h) were assessed
`on day 38. Food and water intake were measured daily and
`body weight was recorded twice weekly.
`Study 1c Two groups of animals (n¼ 9 – 10; age 8 weeks at
`the start of the study) received either vehicle or liraglutide
`(200 mg kg1) b.i.d. for 2 weeks. OGTTs were performed after
`the first dose and again after 13 days. Food and water
`consumption were recorded throughout the study period.
`Body weight and fructosamine were measured before and at
`the end of the study.
`
`Studies in 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`These studies were performed to test the effect of short-term
`liraglutide treatment on glucose tolerance and b-cell mass in
`60% pancreatectomized rats, a nongenetic model of b-cell
`deficiency.
`
`Study 2a
`In all, 12 male Sprague – Dawley rats of 80 – 100 g
`(100 g1)
`(50 ml
`received presurgical streptocillin treatment
`i.m.) prior to isofluoran anesthesia and were subjected to
`60% pancreatectomy using the method previously described
`(Liu et al., 2000). Briefly, the portion of the pancreas bordered
`by the spleen and ventriculus extending to the duodenum was
`carefully removed by gentle abrasion with cotton applicators,
`leaving the ligament with arteries and veins intact. The
`remnant pancreatic tissue was anatomically defined as the
`duodenal segment. All animals received postsurgical pain relief
`Finadyne (20 ml (100 g1) i.m.) and were allowed to recuperate
`for 4 days postoperatively. Animals were allocated into two
`groups (n¼ 6), based on an OGTT on day 4, after which they
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 2 of 10
`
`

`

`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`125
`
`received either vehicle or liraglutide (100 mg kg1) b.i.d. for 4
`days. A second OGTT was carried out on day 8.
`
`Study 2b
`In all, 24 male Sprague – Dawley rats were
`subjected to 60% pancreatectomy and allocated into three
`groups (n ¼ 8) after an OGTT on day 4. One group was
`thereafter treated with vehicle, a second vehicle-treated group
`was pair-fed relative to the liraglutide-treated group, and the
`third group received liraglutide (150 mg kg1) b.i.d., all for 4
`days. A second OGTT was carried out on day 8.
`
`Histology
`In all studies, 4 h prior to killing, animals were
`injected with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, 100 mg kg1 i.p.).
`The animals were anesthetized with CO2, decapitated, and
`approximately 5 ml whole blood for determination of fructo-
`samine (study 1a) and liraglutide concentrations (study 1b)
`was collected from the trunk into 10 ml tubes containing
`0.12 ml 15% K3 ETDA. The pancreata were immediately
`isolated for histological analysis, weighed,
`fixed in 4%
`paraformaldehyde overnight, cut in small pieces, fractionated
`according to the smooth fractionator principle (Bock et al.,
`1999), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections
`(3 mm) were cut, deparaffinized, rehydrated, the endogenous
`peroxidase blocked by H2O2 in 96% ethanol, and blocked with
`avidin and then biotin, before use for immunohistochemical
`staining of islet cell markers, which was carried out with slides
`from all pancreata in parallel. For antigen retrieval, the
`sections in 0.01 m citrate buffer pH 6.0, preheated to 901C,
`were heated 3 5 min in a microwave oven, before blocking
`with avidin and biotin blocking solutions (DAKO) and 10%
`normal goat serum. BrdU was stained by monoclonal mouse
`anti-BrdU (M0744, DAKO) 1 : 50 in 7% goat serum 3% rat
`serum in TBS, biotinylated goat anti-mouse Ig (E0433,
`DAKO) 1 : 300, and streptavidin peroxidase (Vectastain,
`Vector). The peroxidase activity was developed 5 min with
`(DAB) þ 0.01% H2O2þ 2.5%
`0.066% diaminobenzidine
`NiSO4 to render BrdU containing nuclei black. Insulin was
`stained with guinea-pig antiinsulin (#651041, ICN) 1 : 400 in
`7% rabbit serum 3% rat serum in TBS-T, peroxidase-coupled
`rabbit anti-guinea-pig Ig (P141, DAKO) 1 : 100, and developed
`with DAB for brown cytoplasm or with Vector Nova Red
`(Vector) according to the manufacturer, to stain the b-cell
`cytoplasm reddish brown. Finally, the slides were lightly
`counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Neighboring sec-
`tions were stained for non-b-cells with a mixture of mono-
`clonal mouse antiglucagon (GLU-001, Novo Nordisk)
`1 : 800þ rabbit antisomatostatin (A566, DAKO) 1 : 600þ
`rabbit antipancreatic polypeptide (A619, DAKO) 1 : 1000 in
`4% swine serumþ 4% goat serum þ 3% rat serum in TBS-T,
`detected using biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (E0433,
`1 : 400 þ biotinylated
`DAKO)
`swine
`anti-rabbit
`(E353,
`DAKO) 1 : 400, streptavidin peroxidase, and developed with
`DAB and NiSO4, as above. In ZDF studies 1a and 1b, b-cells
`were subsequently stained for insulin as described above.
`Reagents were obtained from DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark,
`if not otherwise stated. BrdU staining of cell nuclei was
`examined in 1000 – 1500 b-cells per section in an Olympus BX-
`50 microscope with a video camera and monitor (Olympus,
`Copenhagen, Denmark), at a total on-screen magnification of
` 1920. The sections were systematically scanned using a PC-
`controlled motorized stage and CAST-GRID software (Olym-
`pus). The volume fractions of b- and non-b-cells were
`
`estimated by point-counting stereological techniques, at a
`total on-screen magnification of  960, a grid of 6 64 points,
`and step lengths of 1200  1000 mm2. The sections were
`examined with their origin blinded to the observer. Two
`sections cut 250 mm apart were stained and analyzed for each
`set of estimations.
`
`Assays Glucose concentrations were measured by the
`immobilized glucose oxidase method using an EBIO Plus
`autoanalyser (Eppendorf, Germany). Plasma insulin concen-
`tration was measured with an in-house ELISA method
`(Johansen et al., 1999) using 15 ml samples. Rat insulin was
`used as standard. Per cent HbA1c (Roche A/S) was measured
`by the enzymatic calorimetric method (COBAS MIRA Plus
`Autoanalyser, Roche Diagnostic Systems, Basel, Switzerland).
`The concentration of liraglutide was measured by sandwich
`ELISA (Wilken et al., 2000).
`
`Statistics Paired and unpaired t-tests and one-way analysis
`of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s and Tukey’s post hoc
`tests for pairwise group comparisons were employed. Area
`under the curve (AUC) was calculated with the trapezoidal
`rule. Data are expressed as mean7s.e.m. Differences with
`Po0.05 were considered significant.
`
`Results
`
`ZDF studies: metabolic parameters
`
`Glucose tolerance tests Study 1a: Both the low and high
`doses of liraglutide significantly lowered glucose excursions
`(AUC) compared to vehicle treatment. Differences were seen
`both during the first OGTT (Figure 1; day 21; Po0.0005,
`ANOVA), and during the second OGTT (Figure 1; day 36;
`2250790 mm min
`AUCs:
`vehicle
`vs
`low
`dose
`14507180 mm min vs high dose 760740 mm min, Po0.0002,
`ANOVA, all groups different by post hoc testing), demonstrat-
`ing a continuing antihyperglycemic effect at both dose levels.
`Plasma insulin concentrations were also increased in a dose-
`dependent manner (AUCs: vehicle 3375 nm min and low dose
`59712 nm min vs high dose 11778 nm min, Po0.0002, ANO-
`VA, high dose different from low dose and vehicle) and the
`effect of the drug increased with time. Thus, in the high-dose
`group, the AUC of insulin was increased between the first and
`second OGTT (Po0.005, paired t-test), the increase averaging
`66%. In contrast, in the vehicle group, the AUC of insulin was
`decreased between the first and second OGTT (Po0.0005,
`paired t-test), the decrease averaging 40%. In the second
`OGTT, the effect on the second phase of insulin secretion
`appeared particularly pronounced in the high-dose group.
`Study 1c: In the shorter-term study, no effect of the first dose
`was observed on glucose or insulin excursion during the
`OGTT, while significant effects on both parameters were
`observed on day 13 (data not shown).
`
`Profiles (24 h), fructosamine and HbA1c Study 1a: After
`41 days treatment, the final 24-h glucose profile (Figure 2) was
`significantly lower in the high-dose liraglutide group, the
`difference to the vehicle-treated group averaged B12 mm
`(glucose AUCs: vehicle 3171 m min and low dose 2673 m min
`vs high dose 1472 m min, Po0.0002, ANOVA, high dose
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 3 of 10
`
`

`

`Vehicle
`30 µg kg-1 bid
`150 µg kg-1 bid
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Blood glucose (mM)
`
`Vehicle
`30 µg kg-1 bid
`150 µg kg-1 bid
`
`0
`
`80
`40
`Time (min)
`
`120
`
`0
`
`80
`40
`Time (min)
`
`120
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`Plasma insulin (pM)
`
`126
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Blood glucose (mM)
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`Plasma insulin (pM)
`
`0
`
`80
`40
`Time (min)
`
`120
`
`0
`
`80
`40
`Time (min)
`
`120
`
`Figure 1 ZDF study 1a. OGTT after 21 days (left) and 36 days
`liraglutide treatment (right). Glucose (1 g kg1) was administered by
`gavage at time 0 to overnight fasted animals and BG and plasma
`insulin were measured basally and after the glucose challenge. All
`the three groups differed significantly with respect to total AUC
`after the glucose challenge (Po0.0005 by ANOVA, day 21,
`Po0.0002 by ANOVA, day 36).
`
`different from low dose and vehicle). In contrast, the 24-h
`insulin profile demonstrated increased insulin levels in the
`high-dose group (insulin AUCs: vehicle 0.7470.12 mm min and
`low dose 0.9270.30 mm min vs high dose 2.35 þ 0.34 mm min,
`Po0.002, ANOVA, high dose different from low dose and
`vehicle). Fructosamine was significantly reduced in the high-
`dose group (vehicle 22977 mm and low dose 219711 mm vs
`high dose 17478 mm, Po0.002, ANOVA).
`Study 1b: After treatment for 38 days, the AUCs of the 24-h
`glucose profiles were significantly different between all four
`groups (Figure 3). Lean animals had the lowest and ZDF
`vehicle animals the highest glucose AUC. Both liraglutide and
`pair feeding reduced the glucose AUC compared to the ZDF
`vehicle group. The reduction achieved by pair feeding alone
`was 7.5 m min, that is, approximately 53% of the 14.2 m min
`reduction observed with liraglutide treatment
`(Table 1).
`Similarly, HbA1c was significantly reduced in both ZDF
`liraglutide and ZDF pair-fed animals compared to vehicle,
`but was not normal compared with lean vehicle (Table 1).
`AUC for plasma insulin did not differ between ZDF liraglutide
`and ZDF pair-fed, but both were higher than lean vehicle and
`ZDF vehicle, which were similar to each other (Table 1). The
`reproducibility of the glucose and insulin results compared
`with study 1a strongly suggests that any stress caused to the
`animals by the individual housing did not
`influence the
`development of diabetes.
`Study 1c: Fructosamine levels were decreased in the
`liraglutide group compared to vehicle.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`Vehicle
`30 µg kg-1 bid
`150µg kg-1 bid
`
`0900 1300 1700
`
`0100 0500
`2100
`Clock time
`
`0900
`
`Vehicle
`30 µg kg-1 bid
`150µg kg-1 bid
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Blood glucose (mM)
`
`3000
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`0
`
`Plasma insulin (pM)
`
`0900 1300 1700 2100 0100 0500 0900
`Clock time
`
`Figure 2 ZDF study 1a. Glucose and insulin profiles (24 h) after 41
`days
`liraglutide treatment. Animals had free access
`to food
`throughout. Judged by 24-h AUCs, BG was significantly decreased
`(Po0.0002 by ANOVA) and plasma insulin was significantly
`increased (Po0.002 by ANOVA) in the group receiving high-dose
`liraglutide compared to low dose and vehicle.
`
`Food and water consumption, body weight
`
`In all the three ZDF studies, liraglutide treatment had an
`immediate strong effect on lowering both food and water
`intake immediately after dosing was initiated. With continued
`dosing, a less pronounced, but significant effect on food and
`water consumption was observed. At the end of the study, the
`overtly hyperglycemic vehicle-treated ZDF rats consumed
`significantly more water than the remaining groups. The data
`from study 1b are representative and are summarized in
`Table 2. Hematocrit measured at the end of study 1a was not
`reduced by liraglutide treatment (data not shown), indicating
`that the reduced water consumption was not associated with
`dehydration. Within each of the three ZDF studies, initial
`body weight did not differ between ZDF groups and in the
`early treatment period, the reduced food intake in liraglutide-
`treated animals
`resulted in an attenuated weight gain.
`However, as the treatment duration increased, the difference
`in weight disappeared, reflecting a treatment-related reduced
`loss of calories due to glucosuria. Data on body weight from
`study 1b are representative and are illustrated in Figure 4.
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 4 of 10
`
`

`

`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`127
`
`Table 2 ZDF, study 1b: food and water intake
`
`Lean vehicle
`ZDF vehicle
`
`ZDF pair-fed
`ZDF 150 µg kg-1 bid
`
`0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800
`Clock time
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`Blood glucose (mM)
`
`3000
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`0
`
`Plasma insulin (pM)
`
`0800 1200 1600 2000 2400 0400 0800
`Clock time
`
`Figure 3 ZDF study 1b. Glucose and insulin profiles (24 h) after 38
`days
`liraglutide treatment. Animals had free access
`to food
`throughout. Judged by 24-h AUCs, BG was significantly decreased
`(Po0.0001 by ANOVA) and plasma insulin was significantly
`increased (Po0.0001 by ANOVA) in animals receiving liraglutide
`compared to vehicle (see Table 1 for detailed analysis).
`
`Table 1 ZDF, study 1b: AUC of glucose and insulin
`during 24-h profile and HbA1c after 38 days treatment
`
`AUC glucose
`(m min)
`
`AUC insulin
`(mm min)
`
`HbA1c
`(%)
`
`Lean vehicle
`ZDF vehicle
`ZDF pair-fed
`ZDF
`liraglutide
`ANOVA
`
`0.670.02
`8.370.1
`0.870.1
`30.470.6*
`2.070.3*w
`22.970.2*w
`2.570.4*z
`16.270.2z}8
`Po0.0001
`Po0.0001
`*Po0.001 vs lean vehicle; wPo0.01 vs ZDF vehicle;
`zPo0.001 vs ZDF vehicle; }Po0.01 vs lean vehicle; 8Po0.05
`vs ZDF pair-fed, Tukey’s post hoc test. Data are mean7s.e.m.
`
`3.970.04
`8.670.2*
`6.370.4*z
`5.570.4z}
`Po0.0001
`
`Average
`daily food
`intake (g)
`
`20.270.4
`30.470.7*
`23.270.3*#
`23.870.4*#
`
`Average daily
`food intake,
`final week (g)
`
`Average daily
`water intake,
`final week (g)
`
`20.070.6
`30.870.9*
`23.570.5}#
`25.170.6*#
`
`2971#
`94711
`5674}#
`3873#
`
`Lean vehicle
`ZDF vehicle
`ZDF pair-fed
`ZDF
`liraglutide
`ANOVA
`
`Po0.0001
`Po0.0001
`Po0.0001
`*Po0.001 vs lean vehicle; #Po0.001 vs ZDF vehicle;
`}Po0.01 vs lean vehicle. Data are mean7s.e.m.
`
`Initial body weight
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`200
`
`100
`
`Body weight(g)
`
`0
`
`Lean vehicle
`
`ZD F vehicle
`
`ZDF pair-fed
`
`Z D F liraglutide
`
`Day 10-Day 0
`
`*
`
`**
`*
`
`**
`*
`
`Lean vehicle
`
`ZDF vehicle
`
`ZD F pair-fed
`
`ZD Fliraglutide
`
`Day 42- Day 0
`
`*
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`(g)
`
`Body weight increase
`
`200
`
`100
`
`(g)
`
`Body weight increase
`
`Plasma concentration liraglutide
`
`In study 1b,
`the total plasma concentration (albumin
`bound þ free) of liraglutide was 160712 nm (approximately
`5 – 7 h after the final dose). The high total concentration
`reflects the albumin-binding properties of liraglutide.
`
`0
`
`Lean vehicle
`
`ZD F vehicle
`
`ZD F pair-fed
`
`ZD F liraglutide
`
`Figure 4 ZDF study 1b. Initial body weight and body weight
`increase after 10 and 42 days liraglutide treatment. *Po0.01 vs lean
`vehicle; **Po0.001 vs ZDF vehicle.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 5 of 10
`
`

`

`128
`
`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`Beta-cell
`proliferation
`study 1a
`
`Beta-cell
`mass
`study 1a
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`% beta cellvolume
`
`ZDF Vehicle
`
`ZDF 30 µg kg-1 bid
`
`ZDF 150 µg kg-1 bid
`
`study 1b
`
`study 1b
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`% beta cell volume
`
`Lean vehicle
`
`ZDF pair-fed
`
`0
`ZDF vehicle
`ZDF 150 µg kg-1 bid
`
`study 1c
`
`study 1c
`
`1.00
`
`0.75
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.00
`
`% beta cellvolume
`
`1.00
`
`0.75
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.00
`
`beta cells
`
`%BrdU positive
`
`0.75
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.00
`
`0.5
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`0.0
`
`beta cells
`
`%BrdU positive
`
`beta cells
`
`% BrdUpositive
`
`ZDF vehicle
`
`ZDF 200 µg kg-1 bid
`
`Figure 6 Quantitation of b-cell proliferation and mass (volume
`fraction) in ZDF experiments. Study 1a: after 6 weeks treatment, b-
`cell volume fraction was increased in both the low- and high-dose
`liraglutide groups, though only statistically significant for the low-
`dose group (Po0.05) There was a weak trend towards increased b-
`cell proliferation as estimated by the BrdU indices. Study 1b: b-cell
`volume fraction in liraglutide-treated and pair-fed groups were
`higher than in the lean control group, but not significantly higher
`than in the vehicle-treated ZDF rats. There was no difference
`between the b-cell proliferation rates of the three groups of ZDF
`rats. Study 1c: b-cell volume fraction was significantly lower in the
`animals treated with liraglutide (Po0.002), and this relative decrease
`occurred concomitantly with a markedly reduced b-cell proliferation
`(Po0.006).
`
`groups of ZDF rats and the vehicle- (study 1a and 1b) or
`vehicle plus pair feeding (study 1b)-treated groups (not
`shown).
`
`Studies in 60% pancreatectomized rats: metabolic
`parameters
`
`In study 2a, liraglutide (100 mg kg1 b.i.d.) treatment resulted
`in a tendency towards lower blood glucose during the OGTT
`compared to vehicle at day 8, but the difference in AUC for
`glucose was not statistically significant
`(Figure 8,
`top).
`However,
`in study 2b,
`the higher dose of
`liraglutide
`(150 mg kg1 b.i.d.) resulted in significantly lower AUC for
`blood glucose at day 8 compared with both the vehicle and
`
`Figure 5 BrdU incorporation in b- and non-b-cells of the pancreas
`of a 13-week-old vehicle-treated diabetic ZDF rat from ZDF study
`1a. Black nuclei ¼ BrdU incorporation, brown cytoplasm ¼ insulin
`in b-cells. Filled arrows show BrdU-positive b-cells, empty arrow
`shows a BrdU-positive non-b-cell (exocrine or centro-acinar duct
`cell?). Horizontal bar indicates 50 mm.
`
`ZDF studies: histology
`
`Proliferation of b-cells was demonstrated by the incorporation
`of BrdU into b-cell nuclei (Figure 5). It should be noted that
`the number of non-b-cells in islets, duct cells, and exocrine cells
`that incorporated BrdU exceeded that of b-cells. The b-cell
`mass was estimated by point-counting morphometry. In study
`1a, after 6 weeks treatment in the study, b-cell mass (volume
`fraction) was increased in both the low- and high-dose
`liraglutide groups, although only statistically significant for
`the low-dose group (Figure 6a), and there was a weak trend
`towards increased b-cell proliferation as estimated by the
`BrdU indices. In general, the islet morphology in all groups of
`ZDF rats was quite irregular and the b-cell insulin-staining
`intensity variable with no treatment-related differences in
`staining intensity (not shown). In study 1b, b-cell volume
`fractions in liraglutide-treated and pair-fed groups were higher
`than in the lean control group, but not higher than in the
`vehicle-treated ZDF rats (Figure 6b). When expressed in terms
`of total b-cell mass, the liraglutide-treated group of ZDF rats
`had a higher b-cell mass than the ZDF vehicle animals
`(20.972.6 vs 12.471.8 mg, Po0.03). There was no difference
`between the b-cell proliferation rates of the three groups of
`ZDF rats and no obvious differences between insulin-staining
`intensities.
`After only 2 weeks treatment in study 1c, b-cell mass
`(volume fraction) was significantly lower in the animals treated
`with liraglutide (0.6670.04 vs 0.9070.06%, Po0.002), and
`this relative decrease occurred concomitantly with a markedly
`reduced b-cell proliferation (0.1370.04 vs 0.4670.07%,
`Po0.006, Figure 6c). In contrast, the insulin-staining intensity
`of b-cells in the liraglutide-treated rats was markedly higher
`than in the vehicle group (Figure 7).
`Non-b-cells were demonstrated by a cocktail of antibodies
`against glucagon, somatostatin, and pancreatic polypeptide.
`Stereological measurements of the volume fractions of non-b-
`cells in the pancreata from these experiments showed no
`treatment-related differences between the liraglutide-treated
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1046, p. 6 of 10
`
`

`

`J. Sturis et al
`
`Liraglutide in ZDF and 60% pancreatectomized rats
`
`129
`
`Figure 7 Increased insulin staining intensity after 2 weeks liraglutide treatment. Representative sections from pancreata of ZDF
`rats show higher and more regular insulin-staining intensity in the liraglutide-treated rat than in the vehicle-treated rat. Note the
`better staining pattern and intensity of this 10-week-old newly diabetic vehicle-treated rat than that of the 13-week-old diabetic rat
`from the experiment shown in Figure 5.
`
`-30
`
`0
`
`60
`30
`Time (min)
`
`Vehicle
`Liraglutide
`
`90
`
`120
`
`P<0.05
`P<0.001
`
`P<0.05
`
`Vehicle Liraglutide Pair-fed
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`∆AUC0-120 (mM×min)
`
`-30
`
`0
`
`30
`
`60
`Time (min)
`
`Vehicle
`Vehicle (pair-fed)
`Liraglutide
`
`90
`
`120
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`02468
`
`Glucose (mM)
`
`Glucose (mM)
`
`Figure 8 OGTTs in experiments performed in 60% pancreatecto-
`fast glucose (2 g kg1) was
`mized rats. After an overnight,
`administered by gavage at time 0 to overnight fasted animals and
`BG was measured basally and after the glucose challenge. Top:
`study 2a. After dosing vehicle or 100 mg kg1 liraglutide b.i.d. for 4
`days, a nonsignificant trend towards improved glucose tolerance was
`observed in the treated animals. Bottom: study 2b. After dosing
`vehicle or 150 mg kg1 liraglutide b.i.d. for 4 days, significantly lower
`AUC for BG was observed in both the vehicle and pair-fed groups.
`Furthermore, pair feeding itself resulted in slightly, but significantly,
`reduced delta AUC during the OGTT.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 140 (1)
`
`pair-fed groups. Furthermore, pair feeding itself resulted in
`slightly, but significantly, reduced delta AUC during the
`OGTT (Figure 8, bottom).
`
`Studies in 60% pancreatectomized rats: histology
`
`In both studies 2a and 2b, the distribution of islet sizes showed
`a trend towards an increase in the liraglutide-treated animals.
`However, point-counting morphometry at sections through
`the remnant pancreas from study 2b revealed no significant
`differences in the total b-cell volume fractions (1.2770.16% in
`the liraglutide group, 1.1570.15% in the vehicle group, and
`0.9570.14% in the pair-fed group).
`There was no visible difference between the vehicle- and
`liraglutide-treated groups in the size or number of islets
`located in the regenerated area. Immunostaining for BrdU
`revealed a marked proliferation mainly in exocrine cells
`located at the border of the regeneration zones in both vehicle-
`and liraglutide-treated animals. At this time point, there was
`no effect of liraglutide treatment on the proliferative index in
`islets or in any other areas of remnant or regenerating
`pancreas.
`
`Discussion and conclusions
`
`We have demonstrated in two different rat models of b-cell
`deficiency that
`liraglutide has marked antihyperglycemic
`effects. In male ZDF rats, treatment with liraglutide strongly
`attenuated diabetes development in prediabetic animals, while
`treatment in 60% pancreatectomized rats reduced glucose
`excursions after an OGTT. In both models, the effects were
`partly

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket