throbber
'
`
`,,,·
`
`·,
`
`. IBJ~])j]J&,~ .. IM_o~\~
`-....;.,,...._ ___ .....;.._;,..__;...;, ________________ _.... ________ _ . , , ; . _ , _
`-.. · ·~ · · · . ; )
`-
`·· .• rapid:results
`....
`, topical.· ..
`in bacterial skin·
`infections··
`. Genticin,HC '•:.,
`' Cream andOintmen~ 15g
`
`'
`
`,,
`
`·'"
`
`.
`
`,·.,, .,, ',•',
`'
`.
`,,
`•'
`"
`',FORMERLY ,THE "PUBLIC PHARMACIS,T''.,
`
`' ' ,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`OFFit:::1AL 'ORGAN, OF THE GUILD OF., PUBLIC PiAR~AblSTS
`
`"PUBLISHED MONTHLY
`
`;,''
`'
`
`.
`' '
`
`.
`'.
`l.
`i•Genticin
`, Cream and Ointme~t 15g . •·· · · ·
`,,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`'
`
`ll)'lpetigo
`
`Burns
`
`'' :
`
`, Decubitus ulcers
`
`, Varicose ulcers
`
`~
`::--:--;__ _ _ _;_-.::,..-~~-+-
`,. Decubitus ulcers
`
`,
`
`'< Otit.is externa
`
`Eczematous
`periphery of ulcers
`
`Further in.formation '.i
`available on request from
`British Schering Limited·
`~i~~t~~s Laborato!i~s '1
`, Slough Buckinghamshire
`
`, · Genticin brand of 'i
`Gentamicin Sulphate
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 1 of 8
`
`

`

`Factors Influencing Drug Stability in Intravenous
`Infusions
`
`JOHN JACOBS, M.Pharm., F.P.S.
`
`Deputy Director of Pharmacy Services, Meyer de Rothschild
`Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In order to preserve the activity of drugs given by infusion, many factors
`must be considered. The infusion fluid must be chosen with care so that the
`presence of any electrolyte or sugar or the pH of the solution does not
`provide an unsuitable medium for the added drugs.
`Where drugs are inherently unstable small infusion flasks may be used
`or the drug may be added to the last few hundred millilitres of the infusion.
`Additional drugs should be added only when no incompatibility occurs. With
`very unstable drugs, injection into the infusion tubing may be undertaken.
`Where a chemical incompatibility occurs between two drugs, !hey should
`be given in separate infusion bottles.
`
`THE traditional role of the pharmacist
`
`is
`the hospital environment
`in
`undergoing rapid change. He has recently
`taken on clinical responsibility by leaving
`the pharmacy and
`in conjunction with
`physicians and nurses has attempted to
`bring safer and more effective procedures
`into practice in the everyday work of drug
`distribution and medication administration.
`A short time ago it was acceptable to think
`that the pharmacist's responsibility ended
`the
`when a drug was dispensed from
`pharmacy. This is no longer true and the
`pharmacist is often present in the ward to
`advise on drug administration. Advice is
`frequently sought on the preparation and
`administration of
`intravenous solutions.
`This is a complex field in which the careful
`consideration of drug properties and
`infusion stability is required to ensure that
`patients receive a drug mixture which will
`bring about the required therapeutic effect.
`in compounding
`II care
`is not
`taken
`infusions a patient may receive an infusion
`which may not be beneficial and may even
`be harmful.
`There is an important area of investiga(cid:173)
`tional work to be covered in the determina(cid:173)
`tion of stability of intravenous solutions
`
`and the results and conclusions of the
`survey described here are the first stage in
`this work.
`During a two-month survey, the use of
`intravenous drugs was observed
`in 17
`departments of the Hadassah University
`Hospital. In the majority of the depart(cid:173)
`ments surveyed, drugs were added to the
`infusion fluid. A single drug was most
`frequently added, with occasional mixtures
`of
`two
`to
`four drugs concurrently
`administered in one infusion bottle. Five or
`even six drug combinations were not
`unknown. This
`reflects
`the physician's
`dilemma in attempting
`to administer a
`large number of drugs
`in an efficient
`manner when the oral route cannot be
`used. Some patients suffering from weight
`loss and emaciation cannot tolerate intra(cid:173)
`muscular injections and the unnecessary
`pain of multiple injections each day can be
`intravenous route of
`avoided when the
`administration is employed.
`The survey showed that 56 drugs and 8
`infusion
`fluids were commonly given.
`Among the drugs used there were 13 anti(cid:173)
`biotics, 11 sympathomimetic and cardio(cid:173)
`vascular agents, 2 antihistamines, 6 vita(cid:173)
`mins and 5 hormones.
`
`Cecember 1969
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`341
`
`This material wast:apied
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 2 of 8
`
`

`

`New Product Announcement
`
`Dalacin C
`
`Upjohn introduces Dalacin C
`a new antibiotic
`effective in a wide range of
`Gram-positive infections.
`"~JftN■
`Pifilimwunl
`ffl@ff 1ifU:I
`mn111
`
`. - - • Availability:
`[ ~.·: ::,).J 150 mg. Capsule (clindamycin) (maroon/lavender)
`I(, :-nj 75 mg. Paediatric Capsule (clindamycin) (lavender/
`_
`_
`lavender)
`
`•
`
`1 6s
`PRICE TO CHEMIST: 150 mg. Capsules:
`28/-
`75 mg. Paediatric Capsules: 15/-
`
`1 00s
`168/-
`90/-
`
`500s
`830/-
`444/6
`
`Your usual wholesaler will have supplies, but in case of difficulty
`please contact us direct.
`
`Full product information available on request
`
`Wfflttl
`
`,."'ll,.1~"..tf,,,o,rn,11~
`
`0,,1,ic~•
`
`IHi'I
`
`!i-01 Uk
`
`UPJOHN LIMITED• FLEMING WAY. CRAWLEY• SUSSEX
`
`342
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`December 1969
`
`This material wast:apied
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Only in a few of the world's largest
`hospitals does the pharmacy department
`provide an
`intravenous additive service
`which prepares and dispenses individual
`infusion bottles containing the necessary
`drugs prescribed by the physician. One
`such unique and comprehensive intraven(cid:173)
`ous solution service is provided by the
`Ohio State University Hospitals, and intra(cid:173)
`venous infusions containing added drugs
`are prepared under direct pharmaceutical
`supervision and are available on demand
`day and night. 1
`
`Whether the pharmacy provides such a
`service or not, pharmacists should have
`knowledge of the stability factors involved
`when a drug is added to an infusion fluid.
`They can then advise the nursing staff how
`the infusion can be prepared and safely
`given to the patient without decomposition
`and loss of activity, or the formation of
`toxic products.
`
`The factors influencing drug stability in
`intravenous infusion include:
`
`Time of preparation: The interval between
`the preparation and the administration of
`the infusion should be minimal. In the event
`of contamination
`this does not allow
`excessive multiplication
`of
`bacteria,
`reduces drug decomposition and, perhaps
`even more important, the possibility that
`the wrong patient may receive the infusion
`due to a change in nursing shift. This
`interval should never be longer than one
`hour. Infusions of drugs not used soon
`after preparation should be rejected. They
`must not be refrigerated and used at a
`later stage.
`
`Duration of infusion: The survey showed
`that the duration of infusion was commonly
`from ½ hour to 12 hours, and occasionally
`24 hours. Bacterial contamination would
`be more likely in infusions administered
`long periods and many drugs
`over
`decompose within a
`few hours.
`It
`is
`suggested that infusion time should not
`
`exceed 12 hours per flask and preferably
`8 hours per flask.
`
`pH of the solution: Many drugs decompose
`rapidly when added
`to a solution of
`unsuitable pH.
`(See
`table 1) Dextrose
`infusions are the common cause of stability
`problems since they are almost always
`acid
`in
`reaction. The
`lower pharma(cid:173)
`copoeia! limit is pH 3.5. In solutions of
`very low pH, methicillin sodium may be
`free methicillin acid
`decomposed and
`precipitated
`in
`the
`infusion
`flask. With
`other drugs, e.g. ampicillin, heparin, etc.,
`no precipitate may be formed, but much of
`the drugs' activity is rapidly lost.
`
`Electrolytes: The presence of electrolytes
`in
`the
`infusion, especially
`in high
`concentration,
`may
`cause
`drug
`decomposition or precipitation.
`( See
`table 2)
`
`Sugars and polysaccharides: The presence
`of apparently
`innocuous sugars may
`cause
`instability. Sulphadiazine sodium
`injection has a pH of about 10.5. When this
`is added to dextrose solutions of pH 4.4,
`the pH of the solution is raised to 8.5 and
`a deep yellow colour develops over some
`hours.
`
`infusion: Not all
`Physical state of the
`infusions are simple solutions. Blood is
`a coarse suspension, mannitol in the high
`concentration usually employed for forced
`diuresis is a supersaturated solution and
`emulsions of
`fats are also used, e.g.
`lntralipid.®
`In
`some
`cases
`room
`temperature
`can
`influence
`solubility.
`Infusion fluids may have to be warmed to
`to ensure
`that
`the solids are
`37'C
`completely dissolved and that the solution
`is homogenous, e.g. 25% mannitol. Super(cid:173)
`saturated
`solutions
`can
`be
`readily
`crystallised out and it is recommended
`that no additions be made to mannitol,
`inulin, etc., in these concentrations. Fat
`emulsions may be "cracked" and separa(cid:173)
`tion of the pharns or enlargement of the
`globule size may occur if drugs are added
`
`December 1969
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`343
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Table 1
`
`Drug
`
`DRUG STABILITY
`
`IN SOLUTION ACCORDING TO pH
`
`Stability characteristics
`
`Aminophylline
`
`Ampicillin sodium
`
`Unstable in neutral or acid solution.
`
`Loses 10% activity in 4 hours in dextrose or dextrose-saline.
`Preferable to administer in saline or Ringers solution.
`
`Amylobarbitone sodium
`
`Should not be added to solutions with a pH below 8.0.
`May be given in saline.
`
`Benzylpenicillin sodium
`
`Unstable in highly acid solutions.
`
`Carbenicillin sodium
`
`Unstable in alkaline solutions. Given in saline,
`dextrose or dextrose-saline during 6 hours or less.
`
`Heparin
`
`Methicillin sodium
`
`Rapidly inactivated in solutions with a pH below 6.0
`Should not be infused in dextrose or dextrose-saline
`over a long period.
`
`Acid solutions may cause cloudiness or precipitation.
`Check dextrose solutions frequently for clarity during infusion.
`Adminisler during 6-8 hours.
`
`Novobiocin sodium
`
`Must not be added to dextrose infusions.
`Administer in saline or Ringers solution.
`
`Sulphadiazine sodium
`
`Incompatible with laevulose and very acid dextrose infusions
`may cause precipitation. May be administered in normal saline.
`
`pH of common infusion fluids (B.P.* or U.S.P. •• limits)
`
`Ammonium chloride
`Dextran 40 in 5% dextrose (Rheomacrodex in dextrose)
`Dextran 40 in Normal saline (Rheomacrodex in saline)
`Dextrose 5%
`Hartmann 's so:ution
`
`Mannitol 10%
`Protein hydrolysate
`Sodium chloride
`Sodium chloride 0.18% with Dextrose 4.3%
`Sodium lactate 1/6 molar
`
`4.o - 6.o··
`3.5 - 6.5·
`4.o
`7.o•
`3.5 - 6.5'
`5.o - 7.o·
`6.0 - 7.5 ..
`4.5
`7.o·
`5.0 - 7.0 ..
`4.5 - 7.0 ..
`3.5 - 6.5'
`5.0 - 7.0'
`
`indiscriminately. The makers recommend
`that apart from the cautious addition of
`heparin no other drug be added to infusion
`bottles of fat emulsions. These emulsions
`may however be given concurrently with
`saline or dextrose solutions provided that
`they are administered through a Y-tube
`placed just before the needle.
`Drug reaction with containers, closures or
`the
`Infusion set: A few drugs may be
`
`absorbed by rubber stoppers, e.g. those
`containing phenolic groupings, and glass
`itself has been reported to adsorb insulin
`from solution.2 Mercaptomerin must be
`injected
`through
`rustless needles and
`must not come into contact with aluminium
`fittings." The use of non-neutral glass
`containers,
`or
`surface-treated
`glass
`containers in which the film has become
`worn or scratched, may liberate alkali into
`
`344
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`December 1969
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 5 of 8
`
`

`

`Table 2
`
`EFFECT OF ELECTROLYTES ON DRUG STABILITY
`
`Drug
`
`Amphotericin-8
`
`Electrolyte
`
`Sodium chloride
`
`Mannitol 20% (or
`higher concentra(cid:173)
`tions)
`
`Sodium bicarbonate
`
`Tetracycline or
`oxytetracycl ine
`
`Potassium chloride or
`sodium chloride
`
`Calcium ions
`
`Calcium (in neutral or
`alkaline solution) in
`alkaline Ringers or
`Ringer-Lactate solution
`
`Result
`
`Colloidal suspension
`broken, and coarse
`precipitate produced
`
`Crystallisation of mannito\
`due to "salting out"
`process
`
`Insoluble calcium salt
`precipitated
`
`Insoluble calcium complex
`precipitated
`
`the solution. Citrates and phosphates
`readily produce glass spicules in these
`bottles and the problem of preparing and
`storing sodium bicarbonate solutions in
`has been suspected of dissolving small
`quantities of electrolytes from solution.
`Reaction with oxygen or carbon dioxide:
`The bubbling of air through an infusion
`over a long period may cause a reaction
`with carbon dioxide or oxygen. Phenytoin
`sodium reacts with carbon dioxide libera(cid:173)
`ting the free base and producing a cloudy
`solution, and ascorbic acid, sodium
`p-amino hippurate and
`riboflavine are
`glass bottles without the deposition of a
`is still
`largely
`fine white precipitate
`unsolved. Doubts have also been raised
`about the inertness of plastic containers
`which may liberate plasticiser into solu(cid:173)
`tions stored in them and polypropylene
`sensitive to oxidation. Such solutions must
`be checked during the infusion for clarity
`and possible colour change.
`Light sensitivity: A few drugs are unstable
`to light and infusion bottles should not be
`exposed for prolonged periods to direct
`sunlight or strong artificial light. (See table
`3)
`It
`is
`recommended
`that bottles of
`amphotericin-B infusion be covered with
`black paper to prevent decomposition
`during administration.
`
`Microbiological contamination: Growth of
`micro-organisms within the infusion fluid
`may occur, particularly in warm climates
`and where the infusion is continued for a
`long period. This may produce either a
`febrile pyrogen reaction or infection. It
`may be preferable to use two half-litre
`flasks in place of a sin'gle litre bottle.
`Care should be exercised when adding
`infusion bottle. Although
`drugs to
`the
`completely aseptic conditions are unlikely
`to be attainable
`in
`the normal ward
`atmosphere, nursing personnel preparing
`infusions must wash their hands, work
`with a no-touch technique, preferably use
`a mask, and swab all rubber caps, etc_,
`with disinfectant before puncturing them
`with a needle.
`
`Table 3
`
`DRUGS SENSITIVE TO LIGHT
`
`Amphotericin-8
`
`N itrofurantoin-Sodium
`
`Su\phadiazine sodium
`
`Ribof\avine
`
`Tetracyclines
`
`Oestrogenic substances
`(f'remarin ®)
`
`December 1969
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`345
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 6 of 8
`
`

`

`is a special risk with
`Contamination
`blood and deaths have been reported when
`in gross
`faulty technique has resulted
`contamination of these infusions. It seems
`advisable that no drugs whatsoever be
`added to blood prior to transfusion. Anti(cid:173)
`histamines
`and
`steroids
`are
`best
`administered separately to the patient and
`not added to the transfusion as is common
`practice in many hospitals.
`
`Dissociation constants of the drug: If the
`time taken for a certain percentage of a
`drug to react or break down under certain
`conditions
`is known, estimates can be
`made of the optimal and maximum time
`infusion can
`take place.
`during which
`Carlin and Perkins4 have published the Tm
`per cent values
`for several penicillins
`using the reaction data from chemical
`stability studies. The Tm per cent repre(cid:173)
`sents the time it takes for ten per cent of
`the drug to react, and has been taken as
`a reasonable standard for the
`time to
`measure the 10 per cent loss
`in drug
`potency which is acceptable during an
`infusion. At pH 5.0 the Tiu per cent of
`potassium penicillin-G is about 12 hours
`at 25°C. If ascorbic acid and vitamin B
`complex are added to a 5% dextrose
`solution of the antibiotic and this infusion
`has a pH of 3.65, the resulting T111 per cent
`is only 1.2 hours. The importance of these
`values is obvious since in the latter case
`the concentration of the penicillin in the
`vitamins-dextrose
`infusion during
`the
`last hour of an 8-hour infusion period
`would be about half that of the
`initial
`concentration, and after 12 hours only
`about one third of the original percentage
`would be left in the solution.
`
`Drug additives: The addition of a second,
`third or any additional drug to an infusion
`may seriously reduce the stability of the
`mixture and sometimes results in gross
`incompatibility. A great many charts
`reporting such drug incompatibilities have
`• 9• 111· and even a
`been pub I ished :,, G,
`7
`8
`•
`computerised compatibility-incompatibility
`
`print-out of mixtures of two drugs has been
`described.ll
`Many of these schemes utilise informa(cid:173)
`tion obtained from other charts since little
`basic data of the actual mechanism of
`drug instability and interaction has ~e~~
`published. Obvious visible incompat1bI1l(cid:173)
`ties have been noted where evolution of
`gas, change of colour or pH or preci~!ta(cid:173)
`tion occur, but many decomposItIon
`mechanisms result
`in no such obvious
`phenomena. The mixture is then reported
`as 'not incompatible' or 'not known', neither
`of which statement helps either the com(cid:173)
`pounder or the patient. These charts may
`be useful but suspect. More charts
`documenting substantiated drug com(cid:173)
`patibilities are urgently needed.
`
`Manufacturers' Information: It should be
`axiomatic that every drug firm should be
`able to provide full information on its own
`products, yet when letters were despatch(cid:173)
`ed
`to 26
`international and
`local
`firms
`asking for details on the stability of their
`products under varying conditions, only
`four manufacturers were able to provide
`comprehensive replies and of these only
`two producers gave actual percentage
`assay figures. Some firms did not reply.
`Some replies were ambiguous or unhelp(cid:173)
`ful. One firm stated that their product, a
`corticosteroid, should not be mixed with
`other drugs in the infusion flask, and that
`the pH of the infusion should be greater
`than 7.4, despite the fact that almost every
`common infusion fluid has a pH below 7.0.
`Another firm stated that to determine the
`stability of their anticoagulant would be a
`matter of trial and error, and that they
`could be of no further service!
`
`Previous surveys of commercial drug
`literature 1~- 1" have shown deficiencies in
`in manu(cid:173)
`the
`information published
`reference booklets
`facturers' standard
`and package leaflets. It is obvious that a
`very unsatisfactory situation exists if data
`are not available in reference books, have
`not been the subject of pharmaceutical
`
`346
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOS!'ITAL PHARMACY
`
`December 1969
`
`This material wast:apied
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 7 of 8
`
`

`

`research, and cannot be supplied by the
`manufacturers of the drug itself.
`As almost every large hospital routinely
`I. V.
`infusions containing added
`uses
`drugs, it would seem essential that this
`neglected field of drug research should be
`explored with vi'gour and in depth.
`Successful therapy is dependent upon
`a consideration of the causes of drug
`instabability and the correct application
`of knowledge to preserve the full activity
`of the drug and the vehicle during the
`period of the infusion.
`
`Acknowledgement
`Thanks are due to Dr. E. Superstine. Director of
`Pharmacy Services. and Dr. T. Sacks. Director of
`Clinical Microbiology, of
`the Hadassah Medical
`Organisation.
`for help and advice during
`the
`preparation of this work.
`
`References
`1. Developing a Parenteral Admixture Program-
`
`Laboratories
`
`Latiolais. C. J. and Godwin. H.N., Ohio State
`University Hospitals (1968)
`2. Hill, J. B .. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 102.
`75-78 (1959)
`3. Myers. J. A., Pharm. J. 186, 245-247 (1961)
`4. Carlin, H. S. and Perkins, A. J., Am. J. Hosp.
`Pharm. 25, 271-279, (1968)
`5. Compatibility Guide - Cutter
`(1965)
`6. Patel, J. A. and Phillips, G. L., Am. J. Hosp.
`Pharm. 23, 409-411 (1966)
`7. Fowler, T. J., Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 24, 450-457
`(1967)
`8. A Study on Parenteral
`Baxter Laboratories (1967)
`9. Physical Compatibilityof Parenteral Mixtures(cid:173)
`Abbott Laboratories (1968)
`10. A Guide for Combining Drugs in Intravenous
`lnfusions-Ben-Zeev, Z., Beilinson Hospital,
`Petach-Tiqvah, Israel (1969)
`11. Hodges, T. H. and Allen Scott, I., Hospitals,
`42, 103-105 (1968)
`12. Jacobs, J., Practitioner, 201, 483-490 (1968)
`13. Jacobs, J., Pharm. J. (In the press.)
`
`Incompatibilities(cid:173)
`
`Patients and their Hospitals
`KING Edward's Hospital Fund
`for
`Many complaints could be cured by
`London has recently published a
`imaginative
`organisation
`and
`good
`report on a survey intended to discover to
`management. At a press conference held
`to launch the report it was stated that there
`what extent the customers ( i.e. hospital
`appeared
`to be a close correlation
`patients) were
`satisfied with
`their
`between staff contentment and patient
`experiences
`in hospital. Questionnaires
`contentment and the report will surely
`were distributed to be answered in some
`underline to hospital authorities the need
`leaving hospital
`in
`cases just prior to
`for enlightened policies in the field of staff
`others at home immediately afterwards. A
`recruitment and training. The report gives
`response rate of 62% was achieved. No
`no support to those who would restrict the
`attempt was made to evaluate medical
`numbers of "visitors" to patients on wards
`treatment. The questions related to the
`(such as the various technicians and the
`experiences of patients with regard to the
`ward
`and
`its
`equipment,
`sanitary
`ward pharmacist) since 111 out of 131
`accommodation and
`facilities, meals,
`patients commenting on one question
`activities, care of patients and overall
`complained of boredom! I wonder if those
`who have visited the wards in this capacity
`contentment.
`The answers reflected grateful satis(cid:173)
`would support the contention that most
`faction
`in nearly all aspects but some
`patients welcome a friendly word with the
`criticisms stood out painfully-inadequate
`ward pharmacist as he or she examines
`sanitary facilities, early waking,
`lack of
`the prescription at the foot of the bed.
`information and so on. The overall picture
`pointed to the fact that patient satisfaction
`depends primarily on human or organisa(cid:173)
`tional factors rather than physical factors.
`
`(Patients and their Hospitals- A King's
`Fund Report. 12/6d. King Edward's
`Hospital Fund for London.)
`
`December 1969
`
`THE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
`
`347
`
`This material was copied
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1011, p. 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket