throbber
Q J Med 1999; 92:1–4
`
`Editorial
`
`Peptides as drugs
`
`We are on the brink of a therapeutic revolution. There
`has been a rapid expansion in the use of peptides as
`drugs over the last decade, and this is likely to con-
`tinue. Peptides regulate most physiological processes,
`acting at some sites as endocrine or paracrine signals
`and at others as neurotransmitters or growth factors.
`They are already being used therapeutically in
`such diverse areas as neurology, endocrinology and
`haematology.
`Most peptides cannot be administered orally as
`they are rapidly inactivated by gastrointestinal
`enzymes, so that subcutaneous or intravenous admin-
`istration is required. Therefore, research is focussing
`on alternative routes of delivery, including inhaled,
`buccal, intranasal and transdermal routes, as well as
`novel delivery systems such as the use of protective
`liposomes. Neuropeptide systems in the brain are
`being examined as potential targets for therapeutics,
`providing an exciting future development area. The
`dual problems of
`local
`targeted delivery and the
`blood-brain barrier, prevent administered peptides
`from readily gaining access to the required site of
`action, although as we will discuss, solutions are on
`the horizon.
`Peptides act by binding to specific cell surface
`receptors. The perfect therapeutic agent would be a
`small-molecular-mass chemical mimic of the recep-
`tor ligand, which would be cheap to manufacture
`and could get to the site of action after oral adminis-
`tration. However, receptors are large with many bind-
`ing sites, and peptides have a complex tertiary
`structure, both of which improve specificity as well
`as affording protection from simple invading molec-
`ules, like bacterial toxins. Consequently, production
`of successful peptide mimics using chemical libraries
`is largely unsuccessful and we still rely on the native
`peptide for therapeutics.
`The list of peptides as potential drugs is huge;
`space does not permit discussion of them all. It is
`beyond the scope of this article to focus on older
`peptide therapies
`such as
`luteinizing-hormone-
`releasing hormone, growth hormone, arginine vaso-
`pressin or the very interesting peptide, cyclosporin.
`We will instead highlight some exciting new areas of
`
`© Association of Physicians 1999
`
`QJM
`
`research as well as recent developments in the use of
`more established peptide therapies.
`Insulin was the first peptide to be isolated and
`administered therapeutically, and is still
`the most
`commonly prescribed peptide, having been used for
`over half a century. We have yet to find a chemical
`mimic; however, there is still ongoing research into
`novel analogues and methods of administration.
`Manipulation of the insulin molecule has allowed the
`development of shorter-acting insulins, such as Lispro
`insulin. This is rapidly absorbed, readily dissociates
`into insulin monomers, and produces plasma levels
`that more closely mimic the normal postprandial
`insulin profile. Thus, Lispro can be injected immedi-
`ately prior to a meal, unlike conventional short-acting
`insulins that should be injected half an hour earlier.1
`A recent development is the use of non-injectable
`forms of insulin. Daily injections up to four times per
`day,
`is a major source of distress in the diabetic
`population, for example children or the elderly. It
`comes as no surprise that inhaled, intranasal, buccal,
`rectal and sub-lingual preparations of insulin have all
`been investigated. Precise insulin dosage is critical
`for ‘brittle’ type 1 diabetics. However, for some, e.g.
`people with type 2 diabetes who have significant
`residual endogenous insulin secretion, less accurate
`forms of administration may be adequate. Results pre-
`sented at the 1998 American Diabetes Association
`meeting, showed that inhaled insulin provided glyca-
`emic control equivalent to the subcutaneous route,
`whilst allowing insulin to be taken immediately
`before a meal. Thus, the future seems to be more
`hopeful for the ‘multiply-punctured diabetic’.
`A number of other peptides have been investigated
`for the treatment of diabetes. For example, peptides
`that delay gastric emptying may be valuable in the
`treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.2 If
`patients with glucose intolerance or early diabetes,
`ate small amounts of food frequently, decreasing the
`flux in intestinal glucose absorption,
`this would
`diminish beta-cell work, and may therefore slow the
`progression of the disease. Islet amyloid was origin-
`ally noted to be present in the islets of patients with
`type 2 diabetes, and its precursor amylin is secreted
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1055, p. 1 of 4
`
`

`

`2 w
`
`ith insulin. A proposed action of amylin to improve
`insulin sensitivity was not confirmed3 but
`it was
`found to be a potent inhibitor of gastric emptying.2
`Recent studies of pramlintide, a stable amylin ana-
`logue which does not form amyloid, indicate poten-
`tial for the approach of delaying gastric emptying,4
`and it is undergoing phase 3 clinical trials.
`Another peptide in which there is currently much
`interest is the endogenous hormone, glucagon-like
`peptide–1 (GLP–1).5 This not only has
`insulin-
`releasing properties, but also suppresses glucagon
`levels, and delays gastric emptying. The insu-
`linotropic action of GLP–1 is glucose-dependent,
`thus, it acts more potently after a meal than in the
`fasting state, protecting against hypoglycaemia.
`GLP–1 has been reported to increase peripheral glu-
`cose disposal, another desirable effect in diabetes,
`and a target for non-peptide treatments such as the
`thiazolidinediones. GLP–1 has been shown to
`decrease appetite in the rat,6 and more recently in
`man,7 particularly relevant for the 85% of patients
`with NIDDM who are overweight. The results of a
`recent small double-blind placebo-controlled cross-
`over study using subcutaneous injections of GLP–1
`for three weeks, has demonstrated therapeutic prom-
`ise in early type 2 diabetes.8 Indeed, development of
`a novel buccal tablet,9 with good bioavailability has
`ensured at least two pharmaceutical companies are
`exploring the possible use of GLP–1 as therapy.
`Longer-acting peptide agonists of the GLP–1 receptor
`are also under clinical trial.
`In 1980, 8% of the population in Britain were
`clinically obese (body mass index >30); by 1994
`this had increased to 15%. Obesity is a major risk
`factor
`for
`ischaemic heart disease, diabetes and
`stroke. As all those who see obese patients know,
`exercise and dieting does not work for the majority.
`The recent withdrawal from the market of phenterm-
`ine and fenfluramine, indicates the difficulty in find-
`ing a safe and effective therapy. The number of new
`obesity treatments recently licensed demonstrates the
`magnitude of the need and the desperate desire for
`an effective medical treatment.
`The discovery of the adipose tissue peptide hor-
`mone, leptin,10 has opened a new chapter in the
`search for an anti-obesity agent. Leptin, a signal of
`the degree of body adipose tissue mass, decreases
`appetite and increase metabolic rate in animal
`models. Exogenous administration of
`this peptide
`could treat obesity. Conversely an antagonist could
`treat anorexia. In obese humans, leptin levels are
`high, yet they keep eating. This may reflect the fact
`that
`the transport system into the central nervous
`system is saturable, producing functional leptin resist-
`ance.11 However, it is still believed by many that
`exogenous administration of leptin will cause weight
`loss. The first clinical evaluation of daily injection of
`
`Editorial
`
`recombinant methionyl leptin in obese volunteers,
`treated for 6 months, demonstrated an 8 kg loss in
`weight. This occurred with minimal side-effects. We
`await with interest to see whether this weight loss
`continues on further treatment. Certainly patients
`with the rare condition of obesity due to genetically
`absent leptin,12 respond well.
`The discovery of one adipose tissue hormone that
`regulates body weight may lead to the identification
`of others. These may hold greater therapeutic hope.
`With over 100 million obese people globally, and the
`incidence of obesity climbing, this is an area which
`will continue to be a major focus for research.
`The long acting stable analogue of somatostatin,
`octreotide, has a number of therapeutic indications.
`Octreotide is very effective at treating acromegaly as
`well as the symptoms from gastro-enteropancreatic
`endocrine tumours, particularly from carcinoid syn-
`drome, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and VIPomas.
`Octreotide has also been used as a therapy for a
`variety of other disorders including upper gastrointes-
`tinal bleeding, acute pancreatitis, dumping syn-
`drome,
`gastrointestinal
`fistulae
`and
`secretory
`diarrhoea. Recently, two new analogues and delivery
`systems making octreotide more stable and thus
`longer-acting have been licensed, such that subcuta-
`neous injections are only necessary every 2 weeks
`(Lanreotide) or 4 weeks (Sandostatin LAR), providing
`an improvement in the quality of life of these patients.
`Interestingly, an oral preparation of somatostatin
`demonstrated good bioactivity,13 however, it has not
`yet been developed commercially.
`Interest has focussed on the use of radiolabelled
`octreotide for imaging, and its potential therapeutic
`use. Expression of particular somatostatin receptors
`on certain tumours allows imaging of these tissues,
`and specific binding and internalization of higher
`dose 111In-pentetreotide, produces cell death and
`tumour regression.14 111In-pentetreotide therapy is in
`its infancy and has only been used in a few patients,
`but has resulted in good objective evidence of tumour
`response. Longer-term studies are required to assess
`the exact usefulness of
`this novel weapon in our
`therapeutic armament. Hopefully it will lead the way
`for other such peptides to allow specific targeting of
`a cytotoxic dose of radioactivity.
`When the interferons were discovered they were
`hailed as a panacea for many conditions, but this has
`not proven to be the case. Recombinant interferon
`beta–1b has been licensed for use in relapsing-
`remitting multiple sclerosis following the results of a
`large multicentre randomized, placebo-controlled
`trial in 1993.15 This showed a 34% decrease in the
`annual rate of exacerbations as well as a decrease in
`their severity after 2 years therapy with interferon
`beta–1b (8 MIU subcutaneously every second day).
`Unfortunately, there was no evidence for any effect
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1055, p. 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Editorial
`
`3
`
`on the level of disability. Interferon beta–1a, being
`glycosylated, is closer to natural interferon. This has
`also been shown to reduce relapse rate but, in addi-
`tion, demonstrated a delay in progression of disabil-
`ity.16 Since the introduction of these drugs, a highly
`charged argument has waged on the cost-benefit ratio
`for such expensive treatments with relatively little
`evidence of long-term benefit.
`Copolymer 1 (Cop–1) is a mixture of synthetic
`peptides composed of the amino acids alanine, glu-
`tamic acid,
`lysine and tyrosine.
`It was originally
`designed to mimic myelin basic protein, one of the
`components of myelin, which is now thought to have
`only a minor role in the pathogenesis of multiple
`sclerosis. Despite this, Cop–1 injections have been
`shown to reduce relapse rate by a similar degree to
`beta-interferon and may be better tolerated.17 Cop–1
`appears to work via a different mechanism to inter-
`feron, making dual
`therapy a likely future devel-
`opment.
`Peptide neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth
`factor (NGF), have been suggested to be valuable in
`the therapy of neurodegenerative disorders such as
`Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. NGF is
`hypothesized to rescue dying neurons and stimulate
`nerve terminal outgrowth. Direct infusion of NGF
`into the putamen has produced some benefit when
`used as a support to autografts of adrenal medulla in
`Parkinson’s disease. Infusion of NGF into the third
`cerebral ventricle of patients with Alzheimer’s disease
`for 3 months resulted in cognitive improvement as
`well as increased cerebral blood flow and EEG
`changes.18 Obviously these methods of drug delivery
`are only appropriate for a very select patient group.
`However, the studies do point to another potential
`use for peptides as drugs in the future, and linking a
`neurotrophin to a carrier molecule to facilitate trans-
`port across the blood-brain barrier may allow intra-
`venous usage.
`Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) was first
`licensed as a therapeutic agent in 1988, remarkably
`within 5 years of cloning of the human gene.19 It was
`an immediate success in treating the anaemia of
`chronic renal
`failure. At present,
`subcutaneous
`administration is the route of choice in Europe.
`Erythropoietin is one of a number of drugs, including
`insulin and interferon, for which encapsulation in
`liposomes to allow oral delivery has been investi-
`gated.20 Pharmacological availability is extremely
`variable (0.74–31%), dependent on liposome com-
`position and particle size, however, such studies indi-
`cate potential for this delivery system. Therapy with
`EPO has also been considered for the anaemia associ-
`ated with many disorders including cancer, multiple
`myeloma, myelodysplasia, HIV infection and chemo-
`therapy. It seems to be relatively free of side-effects,
`aside from a significant increase in blood pressure in
`
`about one third of patients in one study of renal
`patients, all but one being controlled with further
`anti-hypertensive treatment.21 Indeed, it has become
`a drug of abuse amongst athletes who derive benefit
`from the increased oxygen carrying capacity of the
`resultant polycythaemia—time will tell as to the real
`prevalence of this problem.
`Recombinant human growth factors such as gran-
`ulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and gran-
`ulocyte macrophage-colony
`stimulating
`factor
`(GM-CSF) stimulate the production of neutrophils or
`granulocytes and monocytes. They reduce the sever-
`ity of chemotherapy induced neutropenia and accel-
`erate haematopoietic recovery,22 and have also been
`used for neutropenia associated with other disorders.
`A number of studies have demonstrated a significant
`reduction in infections with these treatments given in
`the form of subcutaneous injections. They are now
`frequently used as part of the therapeutic protocol for
`a number of haematological malignancies. In particu-
`lar, combination with EPO seems to improve its effi-
`cacy, at least in myelodysplastic syndromes.23 After
`development of peptides to increase red-cell and
`white-cell numbers,
`it comes as no surprise that
`thrombopoietin is the latest
`replacement peptide
`being investigated as a treatment
`for thrombocy-
`topenia.
`Peptide antibiotics have been under investigation
`for a number of years. In this country there are cur-
`rently two antibiotic peptides licensed,
`the poly-
`myxins, polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E).
`Colistin is occasionally given by injection to treat
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fib-
`rosis, though more frequently aerosol preparations
`have been used.24 It is also used orally in bowel
`sterilization regimens for neutropenic patients, as it is
`not absorbed. Polymyxin B is just used as a topical
`preparation for local eye and ear infections. Both
`antibiotics are prescribable for local skin infections.
`Several classes of other antibiotic peptides including
`defensins, protegrins, magainins, tachyplesins, cecro-
`pins, mutacins and clavanins are under investigation.
`They are isolated from animal or bacterial sources as
`diverse as Xenopus skin, mudfish and streptococci.
`The inability of present non-peptide antibiotics to kill
`certain bacteria, make it likely that antibiotic peptides
`will form an important part of our fight to defeat
`multi-resistance in the twenty-first century.
`We have described some of the present diversity of
`uses for peptide therapies and future potential devel-
`opment. Manipulation of the structure of some of
`these peptides has allowed development of receptor
`ligands with longer action. Peptides active via non-
`injected routes are beginning to appear. Gene
`therapy is likely to provide the basis for novel delivery
`systems in the future. Production of orally active pre-
`parations is more likely with the encapsulation of
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1055, p. 3 of 4
`
`

`

`4
`
`Editorial
`
`peptides in liposomes or polymers allowing protec-
`tion from digestion. This is an active area of research
`with much therapeutic potential; the ‘holy grail’ of
`orally active peptides will soon be realized, and with
`it a rapid expansion of peptide therapy will ensue.
`C.M.B. Edwards
`M.A. Cohen
`S.R. Bloom
`ICSM Endocrine Unit
`Hammersmith Hospital
`London
`
`References
`1. Puttagunta AL, Toth EL. Insulin lispro (Humalog), the first
`marketed insulin analogue: indications, contraindications
`and need for further study. CMAJ 1998; 158:506–11.
`2. Young AA, Gedulin BR, Rink TJ. Dose-responses for the
`slowing of gastric emptying in a rodent model by glucagon-
`like peptide (7–36) NH2, amylin, cholecystokinin, and
`other possible regulators of nutrient uptake. Metabolism
`1996; 45:1–3.
`3. Wilding JP, Khandan-Nia N, Bennet WM, Gilbey SG,
`Beacham J, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Lack of acute effect of
`amylin (islet associated polypeptide) on insulin sensitivity
`during hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp in humans.
`Diabetologia 1994; 37:166–9.
`4. Thompson RG, Peterson J, Gottlieb A, Mullane J. Effects of
`pramlintide, an analog of human amylin, on plasma glucose
`profiles in patients with IDDM: results of a multicenter trial.
`Diabetes 1997; 46:632–6.
`5. Byrne MM, Goke B. Human studies with glucagon-like-
`peptide–1: potential of the gut hormone for clinical use.
`Diabet Med 1996; 13:854–60.
`6. Turton MD, O’Shea D, Gunn I, Beak S, Edwards CMB,
`Meeran K, Choi SJ, Taylor GM, Heath MM, Lambert PD,
`Wilding JPH, Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Herbert J, Bloom SR. A
`role for glucagon-like peptide–1 in the central regulation of
`feeding. Nature 1996; 379:69–72.
`7. Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like
`peptide-1 promotes satiety and suppresses energy intake in
`humans. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:515–520.
`8. Todd JF, Edwards CMB, Ghatei MA, Mather HM, Bloom SR.
`Subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide–1 improves
`postprandial glycaemic control over a three-week period in
`patients with early NIDDM. Clin Sci 1998; 95:325–9.
`9. Gutniak MK, Larsson H, Heiber SJ, Juneskans OT, Holst JJ,
`Ahren B. Potential therapeutic levels of glucagon-like
`peptide I achieved in humans by a buccal tablet. Diabetes
`Care 1996; 19:843–8.
`10. Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L,
`Friedman JM. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene
`and its human homologue. Nature 1994; 372:425–32.
`11. Caro JF, Kolaczynski JW, Nyce MR, Ohannesian JP,
`Opentanova I, Goldman WH, Lynn RB, Zhang PL, Sinha
`MK, Considine RV. Decreased cerebrospinal-fluid/serum
`leptin ratio in obesity: a possible mechanism for leptin
`resistance. Lancet 1996; 348:159–61.
`12. Montague CT, Farooqi IS, Whitehead JP, Soos MA, Rau H,
`Wareham NJ, Sewter CP, Digby JE, Mohammed SN, Hurst
`
`17.
`
`16.
`
`JA, Cheetham CH, Earley AR, Barnett AH, Prins JB,
`O’Rahilly S. Congenital leptin deficiency is associated with
`severe early-onset obesity in humans. Nature 1997;
`387:903–8.
`13. Nelson-Piercy C, Hammond PJ, Gwilliam ME, Khandan-Nia
`N, Myers MJ, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Effect of a new oral
`somatostatin analog (SDZ CO 611) on gastric emptying,
`mouth to cecum transit time, and pancreatic and gut
`hormone release in normal male subjects. J Clin Endocrinol
`Metab; 1994; 78:329–36
`14. Wiseman GA, Kvols LK. Therapy of neuroendocrine tumors
`with radiolabeled MIBG and somatostatin analogues. Semin
`Nucl Med. 1995; 25:272–8.
`15. The IFNB multiple sclerosis study group. Interferon beta–1b
`is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. 1.
`Clinical results of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind,
`placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1993; 43:655–61.
`Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, Herndon RM, Richert
`JR, Salazar AM. Intramuscular interferon beta–1a for disease
`progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neur 1996;
`43:655–61.
`Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, Ford CC, Goldstein J,
`Lisak RP, Myers LW, Panitch HS, Rose JW, Schiffer RB.
`Copolymer-1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III
`multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The
`Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology
`1995; 45:1268–76.
`18. Olson L, Nordberg A, von Holst H, Backman L, Ebendal T,
`Alafuzoff I, Amberla K, Hartvig P, Herlitz A, Lilja A,
`Lundgvist H, Langstrom B, Meyerson B, Persson A, Viitanen
`M, Winblad B, Seiger A. Nerve growth factor affects 11C-
`nicotine binding, blood flow, EEG, and verbal episodic
`memory in an Alzheimer patient. J Neural Transm 1992;
`4:79–95.
`19. Erslev AJ. Erythropoietin: from physiology to clinical trials
`via molecular biology. In: Erslev A, Adamson J, Eschbach J,
`Winearls C, eds. Erythropoietin: molecular, cellular and
`clinical biology. Baltimore and London, The John Hopkins
`University Press, 1991:3–18.
`20. Maitini Y, Hazama M, Tojo Y, Shimodo N, Nagai T. Oral
`administration of recombinant human erythropoietin in
`liposomes in rats: Influence of lipid composition and size of
`liposomes on bioavailability. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85:440–5
`21. Sundal E, Kaeser U. Correction of anaemia of chronic renal
`failure with recombinant human erythropoietin: safety and
`efficacy of one year’s treatment in a European multicentre
`study of 150 haemodialysis-dependent patients. Nephrol
`Dial Transplant. 1989; 4:979–87
`22. Nemunaitis J. A comparative review of colony-stimulating
`factors. Drugs 1997; 54:709–29
`23. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Ahlgren T, Beguin Y, Carlsson M,
`Carneskog J, Dahl IM, Dybedal I, Grimfors G, Kanter-
`Lewensohn L, Linder O, Luthman M, Lofvenberg E, Nilsson-
`Ehle H, Samuelsson J, Tangen JM, Winqvist I, Oberg G,
`Osterborg A, Ost A. Treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic
`syndromes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus
`erythropoietin: results from a randomized phase II study and
`long-term follow-up of 71 patients. Blood 1998; 92:68–75
`24. Diot P, Gagnadoux F, Martin C, Ellataoui H, Furet Y,
`Breteau M, Boissinot E, Lemarie E. Nebulization and anti-
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa activity of colistin. Eur Respir J
`1997; 10:1995–8
`
` PFIZER, INC. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S - IPR2020-01252, Ex. 1055, p. 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket