`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`LBT IP I LLC,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`___________
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01189
`U.S. Patent No. 8,497,774
`
`____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2020-01189
`U.S. Patent No. 8,497,774
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s March 4, 2021, Scheduling Order (Paper 10),
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on
`
`December 9, 2021. Petitioner requests oral argument for this IPR (IPR2020-01189)
`
`be combined with oral argument for IPR2020-01191 and IPR2020-01192 (for which
`
`a Request for Oral Argument is concurrently filed). Although the patents of the three
`
`IPRs are related, the grounds and arguments are varied amongst the three patents,
`
`and each IPR includes a Contingent Motion to Amend. The Parties conferred and
`
`jointly request a total argument time of 120 minutes for each Party. Petitioner also
`
`requests a single set of demonstratives be used for all IPRs. If the Board is allowing
`
`in-person hearings, Petitioner further requests the hearing take place in Alexandria,
`
`Virginia.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner specifies the following issues,
`
`without intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this
`
`proceeding:
`
`1. Whether Claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15 are obvious under § 103 over
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. JP2004-37116A to Sakamoto (“Sakamoto”);
`
`2. Whether Claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15 are obvious under § 103 over
`
`Sakamoto in view of Applicant Admitted Prior Art;
`
`3. Whether Claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15 are obvious under § 103 over
`
`Sakamoto in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,845,142 to Hayasaka (“Hayasaka”);
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2020-01189
`U.S. Patent No. 8,497,774
`
`4.
`
`Any claim constructions, unpatentability grounds, or other issues raised in
`
`the Petition or Petitioner Reply, the Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Patent Owner
`
`Response, the Patent Owner Sur-Reply, or the Board’s Institution Decision;
`
`5.
`
`Any claim constructions, unpatentability grounds, or other issues raised in
`
`the Patent Owner Motion to Amend and follow-up briefing by the Parties, including the
`
`Petitioner Objection to Motion to Amend and Patent Owner Reply;
`
`6.
`
`Any issues regarding motions to exclude or motions to strike that may be
`
`filed or pending; and
`
`7.
`
`Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`BY: /s/Jennifer C. Bailey
`
`Jennifer C. Bailey Reg. No. 52,583
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`Robin A. Snader, Reg. No 66,085
`7015 College Blvd., Suite 700
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`P: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`jennifer.bailey@eriseip.com
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`robin.snader@eriseip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2020-01189
`U.S. Patent No. 8,497,774
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on October 25,
`
`2021, the foregoing Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served via
`
`electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic Mail on the following
`
`practitioners of record for Patent Owner:
`
`
`Mitchell S. Zajac (zajac@butzel.com)
`Brian S. Seal (seal@butzel.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer C. Bailey
`
`
`Jennifer C. Bailey, Reg. No. 52,583
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`