throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WACO DIVISION
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`


`
`§ §
`
`IN RE:
`WACO DIVISION
`TRIALS
`
`DIVISIONAL STANDING ORDER REGARDING TRIALS IN WACO
`
`in accordance with the Western District of Texas’s Seventh
`The Waco Division,
`Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by the
`COVID—l9 Pandemic, enters the following order finding this Division may safely conduct trials:
`
`1. The Waco Division serves Bel], Bosque, Coryell, Falls, Freestone, Hamilton, Hill, Leon,
`Limestone, McLennan, Milam, Robertson, and Somervell counties.
`
`Since the beginning of July 2020, the county in which the Waco Division sits and those
`from which it pulls jurors have seen a meaningful decline in new reported COVID-l9
`cases. For example, McLennan County—none of the densest and most populated in the
`Division—has seen a 70% drop in rolling 7-day average of daily positives. See
`https://covidwaco.com/countyl.
`According to the Center for Disease Control as of the date of this order, the Waco
`Division’s counties have approximately just 2.3% of all cases
`in Texas. See
`https://www.cdcgov/coronavirus/ZOl9-ncov/cases-updateslcounty-map.html. Indeed, the
`Waco Division counties collectively have fewer cases than do a single county in Austin
`(Travis County), San Antonio (Bexar County), and El Paso (El Paso County). Id.
`
`The Division has undertaken great efforts to ensure trials can be conducted safely. Among
`other things, the Court is prepared to mandate appropriate distancing in the courtroom and
`around the courthouse, limit the number of individuals in the courtroom, provide masks to
`jurors, supply hand sanitizer, and install plexiglass shields where beneficial and
`appropriate.
`The Division has also sought feedback from otherjudges and lawyers who have conducted
`in—person trials since the outbreak of the pandemic. That feedback has informed the
`Division’s procedures for trials.
`
`Therefore, the Division is confident that, as things stand today, it can conduct fair trials in
`a safe manner. Accordingly, bench and jury trials in the Waco Division will resume as
`early as September 1, 2020.
`
`The Chief Judge was notified of this Order on August 18, 2020.
`
`It is further ORDERED, effective August 19, 2020, at 12:01 a.m., for the protection of
`court staff, litigants, attorneys, and observers, the following persons shall not enter the Waco
`Division Courthouse absent a specific order from the Court:
`
`1
`
`ANCORA EX. 2004, Page 1
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2004, Page 1
`
`

`

`1. Any person who has traveled to any of the following countries within the preceding 14 ‘
`days: People’s Republic of China, South Korea, Japan, Iran, Brazil, or Western Europe;
`
`2. Any person who has resided with, or has had close contact with, someone who has traveled
`to one of the countries listed above within the preceding 14 days;
`
`3. Any person who is currently under the direction of a iicensed healthcare professional or
`public health agency to self—quarantine;
`‘
`
`4. Any person who has been diagnosed by a iicensed healthcare provider as having COVID-
`19 or has tested positive for COVID-19 by a source authorized by any State, and who has
`not obtained written verification from a licensed medical doctor, doctor of osteopathy,
`hospital, or public health agency professional that he or she is currently not contagious;
`
`5. Any personwho lives with, or cares for, a person described in category 3 or 4 above; or
`6. Any person who presents currentiy having a fever, chills, persistent cough, shortness of
`breath, persistent pain or pressure in the chest, nausea, or loss of the sense of taste or smell.
`
`It is further ORDERED that any person seeking entry to the Waco Division Courthouse at
`any time may be asked by a Court Security Officer (CSO) or a member of the court staffto confirm
`that none of the exciusions listed above applies to that person.
`
`It is further ORDERED that each person, except a witness while testifying, and an attorney
`while examining a witness or making a statement to a jury, must wear an appropriate face mask or
`covering while inside the Waco Division Courthouse, uniess excused from this requirement by a
`judge, CSO, or a member of the court staff. Witnesses shall testify unmasked, and attorneys may
`speak unmasked, while maintaining social distance. Persons other than jurors must supply their
`own mask or face covering. Each person in the courthouse must foliow the instructions of the court
`staff and CSOs to aid in maintaining distance in the courthouse.
`'
`
`It is further ORDERED that all CSOs, following substantive guidance provided by this
`Order and administrative guidance from the United States Marshai for the Western District of
`Texas, shaii deny entry to anyone attempting to enter, or remain in, the Waco Division Courthouse
`in violation of these protocols. In the event of any uncertainty as to whether a person shouid he
`' denied entrance to the courthouse, the 0805 shall immediately contact the US. Marshal or the
`designated Deputy Marshal for a determination, which shall control.
`
`It is finally ORDERED that, unless extended by subsequent order, these restrictions shall
`remain in place untii September 30, 2020, at 11:59 p.m., when they shall automaticaliy expire.
`
`SIGNED this 18th day of August, 2020.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`ANCORA EX. 2004, Page 2
`
`ANCORA Ex. 2004, Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket