throbber
Short Technical Reports
`
`SHORT TECHNICAL
`REPORTS
`Manuscripts published in the Short
`Technical Reports section are shorter
`and less comprehensive in scope than
`full Research Reports.
`
`Elimination of Residual
`Natural Nucleotides from
`3¢¢ -O-Modified-dNTP
`Syntheses by Enzymatic
`Mop-Up
`
`BioTechniques 25:814-817 (November 1998)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Here, we describe a novel strategy
`called enzymatic “Mop-Up” that efficiently
`removes contaminating dNTPs from re-
`verse-phase, high-performance liquid chro-
`matography (RP-HPLC) purified 3¢-O-
`modified dNTP
`syntheses. Enzymatic
`mop-up takes advantage of the high selec-
`tivity of DNA polymerases for the former
`nucleoside triphosphates over the latter nu-
`cleotide analogs. We demonstrate the selec-
`tive removal of contaminating dATP and
`
`814 BioTechniques
`
`dTTP from RP-HPLC purified 3¢-O-methyl-
`dATP and 3¢-O-(2-nitrobenzyl)-dTTP syn-
`theses, respectively. These data highlight
`the importance of natural nucleotide conta-
`mination when interpreting enzymatic in-
`corporation data and provide an alternative
`hypothesis for the observed property of cat-
`alytic editing of DNA polymerases. More-
`over, the effective removal of natural nu-
`from 3¢-O-modified analogs
`cleotides
`addresses the important issue of nucleotide
`read-through for stop-start DNA sequenc-
`ing strategies, such as the base addition se-
`quencing scheme (BASS).
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Characterization of the behavior
`of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate
`(dNTP) analogs as terminators of DNA
`syntheses has greatly increased our un-
`derstanding of DNA polymerases. In
`general, DNA polymerases show re-
`stricted selectivity and specificity for
`dNTP analogs that have been particu-
`larly useful for the development of an-
`tiviral compounds. While these analogs
`potentially have broad use for molecu-
`lar biology applications, in practice
`however, large screening assays must
`be used to identify specific DNA poly-
`merases that show the desired activity.
`Moreover, the study of 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTPs has been particularly challeng-
`ing because the starting material for the
`chemical syntheses of these com-
`pounds is the natural 2¢ -deoxyribonu-
`cleoside, which can be carried-over
`into the chemical phosphorylation step.
`The subsequent use of chromatography
`is typically inadequate for the complete
`removal of the contaminating dNTPs
`from 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP synthesis.
`Previously, we demonstrated the
`feasibility of a stepwise DNA sequenc-
`ing strategy, called the base addition se-
`quencing scheme (BASS), by the syn-
`thesis and enzymatic incorporation of 7
`different 3¢ -O-modified-dATPs and 3¢ -
`O-methyl-dTTP (3). However, a major
`obstacle in BASS has been the presence
`of contaminating natural dNTPs carried
`over in the chemical synthesis of 3¢ -O-
`modified-dNTPs (2,3). Although re-
`verse-phase, high-performance liquid
`chromatography (RP-HPLC) can puri-
`fy 3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs ‡ 99.5%, the
`level of contamination remains suffi-
`
`ciently high that the DNA polymerase
`selectively incorporates the preferred
`natural dNTP over the 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTP analog. Incorporation of the nat-
`ural dNTP at the desired termination
`base, referred to here as natural-nu-
`cleotide read-through, can significantly
`result in decreased signal intensities
`and higher background signals in sub-
`sequent base addition steps, thus mak-
`ing the interpretation of enzymatic in-
`corporation data more difficult. To
`overcome this problem, we have devel-
`oped an enzymatic “Mop-Up” strategy
`that specifically removes dNTP conta-
`mination from RP-HPLC-purified 3¢ -
`O-modified-dNTPs.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Reagents
`
`Nucleotides, Klenow fragment of
`DNA polymerase I and avian myelo-
`blastosis virus reverse transcriptase
`(AMV-RT) were purchased
`from
`Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscat-
`away, NJ, USA). Bst DNA Polymerase
`was purchased from Bio-Rad (Her-
`cules, CA, USA). Streptavidin-coated
`magnetic Dynabeads(cid:210) M-280 were
`purchased from Dynal AS (Oslo, Nor-
`way). DNA synthesis reagents were
`purchased from PE Applied Biosys-
`tems (Foster City, CA, USA), except
`for the biotin phosphoramidite, which
`was purchased from Glen Research
`(Sterling, VA, USA). All oligonucleo-
`tides were synthesized trityl-on using a
`Model 394 DNA Synthesizer (PE Ap-
`plied Biosystems) and purified using
`Nensorb(cid:212)
`20 columns, according to
`the manufacturer’s protocol (NEN Life
`Science Products, Boston, MA, USA).
`
`Mop-Up Assay
`Biotinylated primer (500 pmol) (5¢ -
`CAGAGCCAAGGCTCTACCTAGCA-
`GTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3¢ ) in
`100 m L of reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-
`HCl, pH 8.5, 10 mM MgCl2) was added
`to 100 m L of prewashed streptavidin-
`coated magnetic Dynabeads, incubated
`for 1 h in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 10
`mM MgCl2, 1 M NaCl at ambient tem-
`perature and washed twice with reaction
`buffer by magnetic separation. Five
`
`Columbia Ex. 2002
`Illumina, Inc. v. The Trustees
`of Columbia University
`in the City of New York
`IPR2020-01177
`Vol. 25, No. 5 (1998)
`
`

`

`Short Technical Reports
`
`SHORT TECHNICAL
`REPORTS
`Manuscripts published in the Short
`Technical Reports section are shorter
`and less comprehensive in scope than
`full Research Reports.
`
`Elimination of Residual
`Natural Nucleotides from
`3¢¢ -O-Modified-dNTP
`Syntheses by Enzymatic
`Mop-Up
`
`BioTechniques 25:814-817 (November 1998)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Here, we describe a novel strategy
`called enzymatic “Mop-Up” that efficiently
`removes contaminating dNTPs from re-
`verse-phase, high-performance liquid chro-
`matography (RP-HPLC) purified 3¢-O-
`modified dNTP
`syntheses. Enzymatic
`mop-up takes advantage of the high selec-
`tivity of DNA polymerases for the former
`nucleoside triphosphates over the latter nu-
`cleotide analogs. We demonstrate the selec-
`tive removal of contaminating dATP and
`
`814 BioTechniques
`
`dTTP from RP-HPLC purified 3¢-O-methyl-
`dATP and 3¢-O-(2-nitrobenzyl)-dTTP syn-
`theses, respectively. These data highlight
`the importance of natural nucleotide conta-
`mination when interpreting enzymatic in-
`corporation data and provide an alternative
`hypothesis for the observed property of cat-
`alytic editing of DNA polymerases. More-
`over, the effective removal of natural nu-
`from 3¢-O-modified analogs
`cleotides
`addresses the important issue of nucleotide
`read-through for stop-start DNA sequenc-
`ing strategies, such as the base addition se-
`quencing scheme (BASS).
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Characterization of the behavior
`of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate
`(dNTP) analogs as terminators of DNA
`syntheses has greatly increased our un-
`derstanding of DNA polymerases. In
`general, DNA polymerases show re-
`stricted selectivity and specificity for
`dNTP analogs that have been particu-
`larly useful for the development of an-
`tiviral compounds. While these analogs
`potentially have broad use for molecu-
`lar biology applications, in practice
`however, large screening assays must
`be used to identify specific DNA poly-
`merases that show the desired activity.
`Moreover, the study of 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTPs has been particularly challeng-
`ing because the starting material for the
`chemical syntheses of these com-
`pounds is the natural 2¢ -deoxyribonu-
`cleoside, which can be carried-over
`into the chemical phosphorylation step.
`The subsequent use of chromatography
`is typically inadequate for the complete
`removal of the contaminating dNTPs
`from 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP synthesis.
`Previously, we demonstrated the
`feasibility of a stepwise DNA sequenc-
`ing strategy, called the base addition se-
`quencing scheme (BASS), by the syn-
`thesis and enzymatic incorporation of 7
`different 3¢ -O-modified-dATPs and 3¢ -
`O-methyl-dTTP (3). However, a major
`obstacle in BASS has been the presence
`of contaminating natural dNTPs carried
`over in the chemical synthesis of 3¢ -O-
`modified-dNTPs (2,3). Although re-
`verse-phase, high-performance liquid
`chromatography (RP-HPLC) can puri-
`fy 3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs ‡ 99.5%, the
`level of contamination remains suffi-
`
`ciently high that the DNA polymerase
`selectively incorporates the preferred
`natural dNTP over the 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTP analog. Incorporation of the nat-
`ural dNTP at the desired termination
`base, referred to here as natural-nu-
`cleotide read-through, can significantly
`result in decreased signal intensities
`and higher background signals in sub-
`sequent base addition steps, thus mak-
`ing the interpretation of enzymatic in-
`corporation data more difficult. To
`overcome this problem, we have devel-
`oped an enzymatic “Mop-Up” strategy
`that specifically removes dNTP conta-
`mination from RP-HPLC-purified 3¢ -
`O-modified-dNTPs.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Reagents
`
`Nucleotides, Klenow fragment of
`DNA polymerase I and avian myelo-
`blastosis virus reverse transcriptase
`(AMV-RT) were purchased
`from
`Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscat-
`away, NJ, USA). Bst DNA Polymerase
`was purchased from Bio-Rad (Her-
`cules, CA, USA). Streptavidin-coated
`magnetic Dynabeads(cid:210) M-280 were
`purchased from Dynal AS (Oslo, Nor-
`way). DNA synthesis reagents were
`purchased from PE Applied Biosys-
`tems (Foster City, CA, USA), except
`for the biotin phosphoramidite, which
`was purchased from Glen Research
`(Sterling, VA, USA). All oligonucleo-
`tides were synthesized trityl-on using a
`Model 394 DNA Synthesizer (PE Ap-
`plied Biosystems) and purified using
`Nensorb(cid:212)
`20 columns, according to
`the manufacturer’s protocol (NEN Life
`Science Products, Boston, MA, USA).
`
`Mop-Up Assay
`Biotinylated primer (500 pmol) (5¢ -
`CAGAGCCAAGGCTCTACCTAGCA-
`GTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3¢ ) in
`100 m L of reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-
`HCl, pH 8.5, 10 mM MgCl2) was added
`to 100 m L of prewashed streptavidin-
`coated magnetic Dynabeads, incubated
`for 1 h in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 10
`mM MgCl2, 1 M NaCl at ambient tem-
`perature and washed twice with reaction
`buffer by magnetic separation. Five
`
`Vol. 25, No. 5 (1998)
`
`

`

`hundred picomoles of the mop-up tem-
`[5¢ -(T)26ACTGGCCGTCG-
`plate
`TTTTACA-3¢ ) in 100 m L of reaction
`buffer were added to the primer-cap-
`tured beads and annealed by heating to
`80(cid:176) C for 5 min. The reaction was slow-
`ly cooled to ambient temperature and
`washed twice with reaction buffer. In-
`corporation of the natural nucleotide
`was performed according to the enzy-
`matic conditions described for Bst DNA
`polymerase (4 U) or Klenow fragment
`(10 U) (3) at 65(cid:176) or 37(cid:176) C for 1 h, respec-
`tively. The mop-up solution containing
`
`the 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP was isolated
`by magnetic separation and directly
`used in the incorporation assay. For en-
`zymatic mop-up of dTTP analogs, the
`template was used: [5¢ -
`following
`(A)26CTGGCCGTCGTTTTACA-3¢ ].
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Here, the mop-up assay is described
`by which the contaminating natural nu-
`cleotide is enzymatically removed from
`a 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP solution by
`
`Common biotlnyfale<'I ptlmer
`
`'-O-modified-dNTP
`
`dATI'
`
`dA'fP
`
`dA'l"P
`
`dATP
`
`•
`l' Bind to trep1avidin-ooaced mugae~ beads
`~c ................ + A~~eal "Jl~ifk Jl01Y(N) le.rnpl;i,1e
`
`~C•-..,m ......... _...,_,,...._J'l'l"i'l"l''l'l'I'I'l"l'l,TlLT'l'l'T'l'r"l'l'TI
`+ Add DNA pofym.er·
`<§ @f
`~~
`@sdATI'
`
`SeJ~tive inoorporlil.io
`.fdNTPooly
`
`.dlATP
`
`OCH3
`
`'l"I'I'TI'Tl'
`
`Di card
`
`Mo Up purified
`'-0-modil'iei:l-d)','TP solutiqn
`
`+
`
`Figure 1. Enzymatic mop-up assay to remove contaminating dNTPs from a 3¢¢ -O-modified-dNTP
`solution. A common biotinylated primer is attached to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, washed and
`annealed to a specific poly(dN) template. The mop-up polymerase, buffer and 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP are
`incubated to allow the mop-up enzyme selectively to remove the contaminating dNTP by DNA synthesis
`of the solid-phase bound primer-template complex. Once completed, the mop-up purified 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTP is isolated from the primer-template complex by magnetic separation and directly used in the in-
`corporation assay.
`
`Vol. 25, No. 5 (1998)
`
`

`

`Short Technical Reports
`
`c -'"4---- Readtltrough
`o
`(presence of dA 'fP)
`G
`A
`G
`G
`T
`G
`
`Pseudo-termination
`(ab ence of dA TP)
`
`0 0.2S 0.S0 125 2.50
`µ M
`
`fL25
`1-1M
`dATP
`
`dATP after
`Mop-Up
`
`Figure 2. Capacity of the mop-up assay. Enzymatic mop-up was performed on a range of dATP con-
`centrations (0, 5, 10, 25 and 50 m M) using Bst DNA polymerase and assayed (final concentrations: 0,
`0.25, 0.50, 1.25 and 2.5 m M, respectively) using AMV-RT. Conditions for the AMV-RT incorporation as-
`say have been described previously (3) and are 32P-labeled universal primer-annealed to the oligo-tem-
`plate in AMV-RT buffer. All reactions contained dCTP, dTTP, ddGTP and the compound listed below
`each lane.
`
`s ~
`
`Readthrough
`presence o dA TP)
`
`ddATPor
`3' ~ O~methy 1~dA TP
`termination
`
`G
`A
`G
`G
`T ~
`G
`G
`
`I) 1 1ABAIIAlfl
`dd .TI' y y y
`
`'
`d . f f>
`
`-~
`
`2!i
`fJl},,t}
`
`5j
`
`1¥)
`
`3" -0-rru:thyl-dA TP
`A: o Mop-Up
`B; &JMop-- p
`
`Figure 3. Complete termination of 3¢¢ -O-methyl-dATP by AMV-RT. As shown, various concentrations
`of 3¢ -O-methyl-dATP are assayed in the absence (lanes A) or after enzymatic mop-up (lanes B). All re-
`actions contained 32P-labeled universal primer-annealed to the oligo-template and AMV-RT in reaction
`buffer (lane 1). In addition, lane 2 contained dCTP and ddGTP. All other reactions contained dCTP,
`dTTP, ddGTP and compounds listed below each lane.
`
`816 BioTechniques
`
`DNA synthesis and the extension of a
`solid-phase bound primer-template
`complex containing a complement oli-
`go(dN) 5¢ -end overhang (Figure 1). The
`mop-up strategy takes advantage of
`DNA polymerases that show high affin-
`ity for natural nucleotides and minimal
`specificity for 3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs
`by standard-template incorporation as-
`says. Once enzymatic removal of the
`natural nucleotide is complete, the puri-
`fied 3¢ -O-modified-dNTP solution is
`isolated by magnetic separation and
`can be directly used for the incorpora-
`tion assay. Heat inactivation or chemi-
`cal extraction of the mop-up poly-
`merase can be performed before the
`template assays, although experiments
`omitting this step have resulted in simi-
`lar incorporation data.
`To test the capacity of enzymatic
`mop-up, a range of dATP concentra-
`tions (0, 5, 10, 25 and 50 m M) were
`tested using Bst DNA polymerase as
`the mop-up enzyme and assayed (final
`concentrations: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.25 and
`2.5 m M, respectively) using AMV-RT
`for the presence of nucleotide read-
`through (Figure 2). Under these condi-
`tions, Bst DNA polymerase efficiently
`mopped-up dATP concentrations be-
`tween 25 and 50 m M. Similar results
`have been obtained for the enzymatic
`mop-up of dTTP (data not shown).
`Typically, 3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs have
`been evaluated at a final concentration
`range of 12.5–50 m M in incorporation
`assays (References 2 and 3; data not
`shown), corresponding to a capacity to
`efficiently mop-up a 2.5%–20% level
`of natural-nucleotide contamination.
`Previously, the incorporation of RP-
`HPLC purified 3¢ -O-methyl-dATP by
`AMV-RT was shown to cause both ter-
`mination and natural nucleotide read-
`through by the oligo-template assay (3)
`(Figure 3, lanes A). Bst DNA poly-
`merase that was previously shown not to
`incorporate 3¢ -O-methyl-dATP (3) was
`used to selectively remove dATP conta-
`mination from an RP-HPLC purified 3¢ -
`O-methyl-dATP solution. Following en-
`zymatic mop-up, the incorporation of
`3¢ -O-methyl-dATP by AMV-RT shows
`complete termination without natural
`nucleotide read-through (Figure 3, lanes
`B). Klenow fragment has also been used
`to efficiently mop-up both contaminat-
`ing dATP from a 3¢ -O-methyl-dATP so-
`
`Vol. 25, No. 5 (1998)
`
`

`

`incorporation data.
`Here, we have demonstrated that en-
`zymatic mop-up is a viable strategy that
`uses conventional reagents for the pu-
`rification of novel RP-HPLC-purified
`3¢ -O-modified-dNTP analogs. The de-
`velopment of enzymatic mop-up also
`addresses the important issue of nu-
`cleotide read-through in stop-start DNA
`sequencing strategies such as BASS.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1.Canard, B., B. Cardona and R.S. Sarfati.
`1995. Catalytic editing properties of DNA
`polymerases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`92:10859-10863.
`2.Canard, B. and R.S. Sarfati. 1994. DNA
`polymerase fluorescent substrates with re-
`versible 3¢ -tags. Gene 148:1-6.
`3.Metzker, M.L., R. Raghavachari, S.
`Richards, S.E. Jacutin, A. Civitello, K.
`Burgess and R.A. Gibbs. 1994. Termination
`of DNA synthesis by novel 3¢ -modified-de-
`oxyribonucleoside 5¢ -triphosphates. Nucleic
`Acid Res. 22:4259-4267.
`
`This work was supported in part by
`Grants 1 R01 HG01459 and 1 R01 AI33334
`and grants to K.B. from the Texas Advanced
`Technology Program and National Insti-
`tutes of health HG/GM01745. Address cor-
`respondence to Dr. Michael Metzker, De-
`partment of Human Genetics, Merck
`Research Laboratories, West Point, PA
`19486, USA. Internet: michael_metzker
`@merck.com
`
`Received 23 March 1998; accepted 15
`July 1998.
`
`Michael L. Metzker, Ramesh
`Raghavachari1, Kevin
`Burgess2 and Richard A.
`Gibbs
`Baylor College of Medicine
`Houston, TX
`1LI-COR
`Lincoln, NE
`2Texas A&M University
`College Station, TX, USA
`
`lution before incorporation by human
`immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-
`1)-RT (data not shown) and contaminat-
`ing dTTP from a 3¢ -O-(2-nitrobenzyl)-
`dTTP solution before incorporation by
`Bst DNA polymerase (data not shown).
`Thus, these data show that dNTP conta-
`mination of RP-HPLC 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTPs can be effectively removed by
`the enzymatic mop-up assay.
`Canard et al. (1) have provided evi-
`dence for the hydrolysis of 3¢ -O-ester
`linkages by a mechanism of catalytic
`editing of DNA polymerases. Both 3¢ -
`O-methyl and 3¢ -O-(2-nitrobenzyl) pro-
`tecting groups described in the current
`study are attached to the sugar ring by
`ether linkages. The oligo-template as-
`say used here and elsewhere (3) has
`been designed to differentiate between
`the incorporation of the natural dNTP
`(read-through) and the 3¢ -O-modified-
`dNTP (true termination) (Figures 2 and
`3). Using this assay, we have observed
`that the majority of RP-HPLC purified
`3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs contains mini-
`mal, but significant levels of dNTP
`contamination. Previously, we evaluat-
`ed 7 different 3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs, 3
`of which contained ester linkages that
`were not incorporated by 8 different
`DNA polymerases (3). One of these 3¢ -
`linked analogs, 3¢ -O-acyl-
`O-ester
`dATP, can terminate terminal deoxynu-
`cleotidyl transferase (TdT) synthesis in
`a template-independent manner (data
`not shown). The dATP contamination
`for 3¢ -O-acyl-dATP was estimated at
`0.4% by TdT nucleotide-extension as-
`says. Following chain termination of
`3¢ -O-acyl-dATP by TdT, DNA synthe-
`sis could not be reinitiated after a dATP
`chase suggesting that the presence of
`contaminating natural nucleotides, not
`catalytic editing of DNA polymerases,
`is a major cause for nucleotide read-
`through past the desired termination
`base. Moreover, the levels of natural
`nucleotide contamination can vary sig-
`nificantly for different base substituents
`containing the same 3¢ -O-protecting
`group resulting in no read-through [3¢ -
`O-(2-nitrobenzyl)-dATP] (3) or read-
`through [3¢ -O-(2-nitrobenzyl)-dTTP]
`(data not shown). Taken together, our
`data highlight the importance of natur-
`al nucleotide contamination of the
`3¢ -O-modified-dNTPs in the characteri-
`zation and interpretation of enzymatic-
`
`Vol. 25, No. 5 (1998)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket