throbber
Org.
`
`1903
`
`The Ally1 Ether as a Protecting Group in Carbohydrate Chemistry.
`Part I1 la
`By Roy Gigg and C. D. Warren, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London N.W.7
`Mercuric chloride in the presence of mercuric oxide was used to hydrolyse prop-1 -enyl ethers of carbohydrates.
`Under these non-acidic conditions, 4.6-U-benzylidene-D-galactose and 2,3-di-U-benzyl-4,6-U-benzylidene-D-
`galactose were prepared from the corresponding prop-1 -enyl glycosides and a mixture of the anomers of methyl
`2,3,6-tri-U-benzyl-D-glucofuranoside was prepared from the corresponding 5-U-prop-1 '-enyl ether. Acid-
`catalysed cyclisation of prop-1 '-enyl 4.6-U-benzylidene-a-D-galactopyranoside gave 4.6-U-benzylidene-l.2-U-
`propylidene-D-galactose which was converted into 1.2-U-propylidene-D-galactose. Preferential rearrangement
`of the 2-U-ally1 group in methyl 2.3-di-U-allyl-4.6-U-benzylidene- a-D-glucopyranoside gave methyl 3-O-allyl-
`4,6-0-benzylidene-2-U-prop-l'-enyl-cr-D-glucopyranoside which was converted into 4.6-U-benzylidene-2-0-
`methyl-a-D-glucopyranoside. The rearrangement of an allyl group to a prop-1 -enyl group in a carbohydrate
`derivative containing a benzamido-group occurred without hydrolysis of the amide linkage. The elimination of
`butadiene from 3-methylallyl (crotyl) ethers by the action of potassium t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide suggests
`that the crotyl ether may provide a useful protecting group in carbohydrate chemistry. The action of potassium
`t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide on an oxazoline derived from D-glucosamine produced a rearrangement to give
`an oxazole. The monoprop-I '-enyl ethers of 1.2-diols give 2'-chloromercuripropylidene acetals when treated with
`mercuric chloride in the presence of mercuric oxide. Reduction of these acetals with sodium borohydride re-
`generates monoprop-1 '-enyl ethers of the glycol.
`
`WE have previously described the application of the
`allyl ether as a protecting group in carbohydrate chem-
`istry and other workers have also used the method.
`We now report procedures for extending the use of this
`protecting group.
`The allyl group is conveniently removed by isomeris-
`ation 3 to the cis-prop-l-enyl group and subsequent acid
`hydrolysis, but in the case of carbohydrate derivatives
`containing other acid-labile groupings we have used la
`( a ) Part I , J. Gigg and R. Gigg, J . Chem. SOC. ( C ) , 1966, 82;
`(b) J. Cunningham, R. Gigg, and C. D. Warren, Tetrahedron
`Letters, 1964, 1191; (c) R. Gigg and C. D. Warren, J . Chem.
`SOC., 1965, 2205; ( d ) R. Gigg and C. D. Warren, Tetrahedron
`Letters, 1966, 2415.
`2 A. L. Bullock, V. 0. Cirino, and S. P. Rowland, Canad. J .
`Chem., 1967, 45, 255; S. J. Angyal and T. S. Stewart, Austral.
`J . Chem., 1966, 19, 1683; D. E. Hoiness, C. P. Wade, and S. P.
`Rowland, Abst. ,151st Meeting Amer. Clzem. SOC., 1966, ~ 2 1 .
`( a ) T. J. Prosser, J . Anzer. Chem. SOC., 1961, 83, 1701; (b)
`C. C. Price and W. H. Snyder, J . Amer. Chem. SOC., 1961, 83,
`1773.
`
`ozonolysis followed by alkaline hydrolysis or oxidation
`with alkaline permanganate for the selective removal
`of the prop-l-enyl group. As both of these methods
`suffer from disadvantages, a convenient non-acidicmethod
`was required and the reaction of mercuric chloride with
`the prop- 1 -en yl group was therefore investigated.
`The reaction of ionised mercuric salts (e.g., mercuric.
`acetate) with isolated ethylenic bonds is well docu-
`mented4 and they are also known to react with the
`double bonds of enol ether^.^,^ However, mercuric
`4 J. Chatt, Chem. Rev., 1951, 48, 7; A. Pol& and J. L.
`Jungnickel, Org. Analysis, 1956, 3, 301.
`A. N. Nesmeyanov, I. F. Lutsenko, and N. I. Vereshchagina,
`Bull. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S., Classe sci. chim., 1947, 63 (Chem. Abs.,
`1948, 42, 4148); A. N. Nesmeyanov, I. F. Lutsenko, and
`R. M. Khomutov, Izvest. A kad. N a u k S.S.S.R., Otdel. khim. N a u k ,
`1957, 942 (Chem. Abs., 1958, 52, 4476).
`6 ( a ) J. B. Johnson and J. P. Fletcher, Analyt. Chem., 1959,
`31, 1563; (b) G. R. Inglis, J. C. P. Schwarz, and L. McLaren,
`J . Chem. SOC., 1962, 1014; (c) P. T. Manolopoulos, M. Mednick,
`and N. N. Lichtin, J . Amer. Chem. SOC., 1962, 84, 2203.
`
`Published on 01 January 1968. Purchased by adrienne.stephens@knobbe.com on 31 July 2017.
`
`View Article Online
`
` / Journal Homepage
`
` / Table of Contents for this issue
`
`Illumina Ex. 1108
`IPR Petition - USP 10,435,742
`
`

`

`1904
`
`to be unreactive towards isolated
`chloride is reported
`double bonds. A very slow reaction of allyl ethers
`with mercuric chloride in the presence of mercuric
`oxide was observed in the present work. The very
`rapid reaction between mercuric chloride and vinyl
`ethers was probably first observed by Feulgen and his
`co-workers during histochemical studies on the plasma-
`logens. Although at that time Feulgen was unaware of
`the nature of the reaction, subsequent work has shown
`that the plasmalogens contain a vinyl ether linkage
`and the reaction has been rationalised as the hydrolysis
`(1) of a vinyl ether by mercuric chloride to give a chloro-
`mercurialdehyde.8
`R1-O-CH=CH-R2 + HgCl, + H,O -+
`RlOH + OHC-CH(HgC1)R2 + HC1
`(1)
`The very rapid rate of reaction of mercuric chloride
`with vinyl ethers and the very slow rate of reaction with
`isolated double bonds suggested that it would be a
`more useful reagent than mercuric acetate for our
`purposes and we reported9 the application of
`this
`method for the removal of the prop-l-enyl group from
`carbohydrate derivatives containing other acid-labile
`groupings. The hydrogen chloride liberated in the
`reaction was conveniently removed by yellow mercuric
`oxide. Excess of mercuric chloride was removed at the
`end of the reaction by washing a solution of the product
`in an organic solvent with aqueous potassium iodide.
`The chloromercuripropionaldehyde formed was degraded
`by this treatment producing some metallic mercury and
`a volatile unsaturated product which was not further
`investigated. 2-Chloromercuripropionaldehyde was iso-
`lated as an oil from the reaction between l-O-prop-
`1 '-enyl-2,3-O-isopropylideneglycerol10 and mercuric
`chloride. The product slowly crystallised and the solid
`had a similar m.p. to that reported l1 for this compound.
`Chloromercuriacetaldehyde was prepared from mercuric
`chloride and ethyl vinyl ether in the presence of mercuric
`oxide and this compound was also degraded by potas-
`sium iodide solution to metallic mercury. When a
`water-soluble product was obtained after the removal
`of the prop-l-enyl group the excess of mercuric chloride
`was removed by passage of hydrogen sulphide (with
`sodium hydrogen carbonate present to retain a neutral
`medium). The 2-chloromercuripropionaldehyde and
`chloromercuriacetaldehyde were also decomposed by this
`procedure.
`Initial experiments on the removal of the prop-l-enyl
`group were carried out on compounds containing other
`easily hydrolysable groupings and it was found that the
`labile isopropylidene groups in 1,2-O-isopropylidene-
`3-O-prop- 1 '-en ylglycerol lo and 1,2: 5,6-di-O-isopropyl-
`idene-3-0-prop-~'-enyl-~-g~ucofuranose
`la were stable to
`the conditions required for the removal of the prop-
`
`7 R. Feulgen and K. Voit, Pflugev's Arch. ges. Physiol., 1924,
`206, 389.
`8 W. T. Norton, Nature, 1959, 184, 1144.
`R. Gigg and C. D. Warren, Tetrahedron Lettevs, 1967, 1683.
`lo J. Cunningham and R. Gigg, J . Chem. SOC., 1965, 2968.
`
`J. Chem. SOC. (C), 1968
`1 -enyl groups by the mercuric chloride procedure.
`Of greater interest was the mercuric chloride hydrolysis
`of prop-l-enyl glycosides containing other acid-labile
`groupings since in this case neither acid hydrolysis nor
`oxidation with permanganate was applicable.
`Prop-1'-enyl 4,6-0-benzylidene-a-~-galactopyranoside
`(11) was prepared by the isomerisation of
`the ally1
`
`CH2.OH
`I
`
`(1-11) R = CH2Ph
`
`R2 = CH2-CH=CH2
`(I) R' = H ;
`R2 = CHyCH-CH,
`(11) R' = H ;
`(111) R' = R2 = H
`(IV) R' = CH2Ph;
`R2 = CH2--CH=CH2
`(I-) R1 = CH,Ph;
`R2 = CH=CH-CH,
`R2 = H
`(VI) R' = CH,Ph;
`
`CH2.OH
`
`;:fH
`
`(VIII) R = H
`(IX) R = AC
`
`O-CHEt
`(X) R = H
`(XI) R = CH2Ph
`
`CH2.OR
`(XII) R = CH2Ph
`
`CH~.OR'
`
`(XIII) R1 = CPh,;
`R2 = H
`(XI\') RL = CPh,;
`R2 = CH2-CH=CH2
`
`(Sly) R' = H ;
`R2 = CH2-CH=CH,
`(XVI) R' = CH2Ph;
`R2 = CH,CH=CI-T.,
`(SVII) R' = CH2Ph;
`R2 = CH=CH-CH,
`(XVIII) R' = CH,Ph; R2 = H
`(XIX) R2 = CH,Ph; R2 = Me
`glycoside (I) which was prepared from allyl ceD-galaCtO-
`pyranoside12 by the action of benzaldehyde in the
`presence of zinc chloride. Compound (11) was rapidly
`into 4,6-0-benzylidine-~-galactose (111) l3
`converted
`by the mercuric chloride procedure and a by-product
`which was considered to be the 2-chloromercuripropy1-
`idene acetal was also formed at the same time (see below).
`Similarly the dibenzyl ether (V) was converted into the
`free sugar (VI) by these conditions without loss of the
`
`11 D. Y. CurtinandM. J. Hurwitz, J . Amer. Ghem. SOC., 1952,
`74, 5381.
`12 E. A. Talley, M. D. Vale, and E. E'anovsky, J . Amev. Chew.
`SOC., 1945, 67, 2037.
`l3 ( a ) J. Pacbk and M. tern?, Coll. Czech. Chew?. Comm., 1961,
`26, 2212; 1963, 28, 541; (b) E. G. Gros and V. Deulofeu, Cheni.
`and Ind., 1962, 1502.
`
`Published on 01 January 1968. Purchased by adrienne.stephens@knobbe.com on 31 July 2017.
`
`View Article Online
`
`

`

`' OR2
`
`R, = H
`(XX) R' =
`R2 = CH,CH=CH,
`(XXI) R' =
`R2 = CH=CH-CH,,
`(XXII) R' =
`CH2-CH=CH2; R2 = CH=CH-CH,
`(XXIII) R' =
`CH2CH=CH2; R2 = H
`(XXIV) R1 =
`CHXH-CH,; R2 = H
`(XXV) R' =
`
`(XXVI) R' = CH=CH-CH,; R2 = Me
`(XXVII) R' =
`H; R 2 = M e
`
`(XXVIII) R' = CH=CH-CH,; R2 = CH2-CH=CH,
`(XXIX) R'=
`H ; R2 = CH2-CH=CH,
`(XXX) R' =
`H; R2 = CH=CH-CH,
`Me; R2 = CH=CH-CH,
`(XXXI) R1 =
`(XXXII) R' = Me; R2 = I-I
`
`
`1905
`ment to a monoallyl monopropenyl derivative occurred
`fairly rapidly and the product was isolated at this stage.
`The subsequent discussion will show that the product
`was compound (XXIII). The prop-l-enyl group was
`removed from this compound by mercuric chloride with-
`out affecting the allyl group to give compound (XXIV)
`which was isomerised to compound (XXV) and methyl-
`ated to give compound (XXVI). Hydrolysis of the
`prop-l-enyl group in compound (XXVI) with mercuric
`
`Org .
`benzylidene group. The free sugar (VI) was reduced
`by sodium borohydride to give 2,3-di-O-benzyl-4,6-0-
`benzylidene-D-galactitol (VII) which was required as an
`intermediate for synthetic studies in connection with the
`sphingolipids. Acid hydrolysis and subsequent catalytic
`hydrogenation of compound (VII) gave galactitol.
`Monovinyl ethers of 1,2-diols are rapidly cyclised to
`acetals in the presence of acidic catalysts l4 and it was
`considered that the prop-l-enyl ethers of carbohydrates
`might be cyclised similarly in appropriate cases to give
`useful synthetic intermediates.
`In compound (11)
`the C(2) hydroxyl group is in a suitable position for
`acetal formation and this compound was cyclised to
`the acetal (VIII) by heating in ethyl acetate with an
`acid catalyst. Catalytic hydrogenation of compound
`(VIII) gave crystalline 1 ,2-0-propylidene-D-galactose
`(X) which was characterised by conversion into the tri-
`O-benzyl ether (XI) followed by acid hydrolysis and
`sodium borohydride reduction
`to give 3,4,6-tri-O-
`benzyl-D-galactitol (XII) which was identical with
`the material which has been prepared and characterised
`previous1y.l"
`the anomers of methyl 2,3,6-tri-0-
`A mixture of
`benzyl-D-glucofuranoside (XVIII) was required as an
`intermediate for synthetic studies in connection with the
`sphingolipids and a route to this compound by use of the
`allyl ether was investigated. The triphenylmethyl ether
`(XIII) was converted into the allyl ether (XIV) and
`the product was hydrolysed with methanolic hydrogen
`chloride to give a mixture of the anomers of methyl
`N-- Ph
`5-0-allyl-3-O-benzyl-~-glucofuranoside (XV) . After
`NH-COPh
`benzylation and removal of the allyl group by isomeris-
`(XXXVI) R = CH,CH=CH,
`(XXXIII) R = H
`(XXXVII) R = CH=CH-CH,
`(XXXIV) R = CH,Ph
`ation and mercuric chloride hydrolysis the required
`(XXXV) R = CH2CH=CH2 (XXXVIII) R = H
`compound (XVIII) was obtained in good yield as a
`syrup. This compound was characterised by methyl-
`chloride gave methyl 4,6-0-benzylidene-2-O-methyl-a-~-
`ation, followed by catalytic hydrogenation and acid
`glucopyranoside (XXVII) with the same m.p. as re-
`hydrolysis to give the known 5-O-methyl-~-glucofuran-
`ported previously 18 for this compound. Allylation of the
`ose which was converted into the crystalline 3,6-di-0-
`prop-l-enyl ether (XXV) gave the isomeric allyl prop-
`acetyld-O-methyl-lJ2 J-O-isopropylidene-~-glucofuran-
`l-enyl ether (XXVIII) which was hydrolysed with
`ose.I6
`mercuric chloride to give the 2-0-ally1 ether (XXIX).
`Brimacombe and his co-workers recently described l7
`Isomerisation of compound (XXIX) followed by methyl-
`the rearrangement of methyl 2,3-di-O-ally1-4,6-O-benzyl-
`ation and removal of the prop-l-enyl group gave 4,6-0-
`idene-a-D-glucopyranoside (XXI) to the di-O-prop-
`benzylidene-3-0-methyl-a-~-glucopyranoside (XXXII)
`l-enyl ether (XXII). The yield of compound (XXII)
`with the same properties as those reported18b,l9 for
`reported was very low (ca. 4%) and we have therefore
`this material. Since the isomeric allyl ethers (XXIV)
`reinvestigated the rearrangement of compound (XXI) .
`and (XXIX) were resolved by t.1.c. and only compound
`At 100" the rearrangement to the di-0-prop-l-enyl
`(XXIV) was observed after the hydrolysis of the initial
`derivative (XXII) was complete within 40 min. as ob-
`product, this indicates that the initial product was not a
`served by t.1.c. and the product was readily hydrolysed
`mixture of compounds (XXIII) and (XXVIII).
`to methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-a-~-glucopyranoside (XX)
`In order to use the allyl ether as a protecting group in
`by mercuric chloride. When compound (XXI) was
`the amino-sugar series it was necessary to show that the
`rearranged at 40°, t.1.c. showed that a partial rearrange-
`amido-group was stable to the strongly basic conditions
`of the isomerisation. For this purpose the allyl ether
`18 (a) E. J. Bourne, A. J. Huggard, and J. C. Tatlow, J . Chem.
`SOL, 1953, 735; (b) E. J. Bourne, M. Stacey, C. E. M. Tatlow,
`and J. C. Tatlow, J . Chem. Soc., 1951, 826.
`l9 (a) I<. S. Ennor and J. Honeyman, J . Chem. Soc., 1958,
`2586; (b) A. F. Krasso, E. Weiss, and T. Reichstein, Helv. Chim.
`A d a , 1963, 46, 2538; (c) H. R. Bollinger and D. A. Prins, Helv.
`Chirn. Acta, 1945, 28, 465.
`
`Me2C\' 'yHz
`
`0-
`
`l4 H. S. Hill and L. M. Pidgeon, J . Amer. Chem. SOC., 1928, 50,
`27 18.
`l5 R. E. Gramera, R. M. Bruce, S. Hirase, and R. L. Whistler,
`J . Org. Chem., 1963, 28, 1401.
`l6 (a) L. v. Vargha, Ber., 1936, 69, 2098; (b) 0. T. Schmidt,
`G. Zinke-Allmang, and U. Holzach, Chem. Bey., 1957, 90, 1331.
`l7 J. S. Brimacombe, B. D. Jones, M. Stacey, and J. J. Willard,
`Carbohydrate Res., 1966, 2, 167.
`
`Published on 01 January 1968. Purchased by adrienne.stephens@knobbe.com on 31 July 2017.
`
`View Article Online
`
`

`

`1906
`(XXXV) was hydrolysed by methanolic hydrogen
`chloride, under the very mild conditions described pre-
`viously,20a to give the methyl glycoside (XXXVI)
`and this compound was isomerised to the prop-l-enyl
`ether (XXXVII) without evidence of decomposition of
`the amide linkage. Hydrolysis of
`the prop-l-enyl
`group in compound (XXXVII) by mercuric chloride gave
`compound (XXXVIII) which was identical with the
`material obtained by the direct methanolysis of the
`oxazoline (XXXIII)
`Compound (XXXV) was
`treated with potassium t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide
`
`. 2 0 a j b
`
`HO
`
`R1o$ORz
`
`(XXXIX) R1 = CH,-CH=CH2; RZ = H
`(XL) R' = CH=CH-CH,; R2 = H
`(XLI) R1 = CH=CH-CH3 ; R2 = AC
`(XLII) R1 = H ; R2 = AC
`(XLIII) R1 = R2 = H
`
`H
`OH C
`
`(XLV)
`
`, OCH2
`
`I Me2c'ob?
`
`J. Chem. SOC. (C), 1968
`material (XXXV) ; thus under the normal conditions
`of the rearrangement (100"/15 min.) it appeared that no
`reaction had occurred. The rearrangement of compound
`(XXXV) presumably occurs by removal of the proton
`at C(4) of the oxazoline ring, under the strongly basic
`conditions, with concomitant rupture of the 0-C bond
`of the furanose ring to give the oxazole (XXXIX).
`This reaction is followed by a normal rearrangement of
`the allyl ether to give the prop-l-enyl ether (XL). The
`structure of
`the crystalline compound
`(XL) was
`established by conversion to a crystalline acetate
`(XLI) followed by hydrolysis of the prop-l-enyl group
`with mercuric chloride and basic hydrolysis of the acetate
`group to give the crystalline diol (XLIII). Oxidation
`of this diol with sodium metaperiodate gave crystalline
`4-formyl-2-phenyloxazole (XLV) with the properties
`reported previously.21 Basic hydrolysis of compound
`(XLV) gave benzamidomalondialdehyde as reported.21
`Hydrolysis of the diol (XLIII) or of the prop-l-enyl
`ether (XL) with acid gave the oxazole (XLIV) derived
`from 2-benzamido-2-deoxy-~-glucose. The lability of
`the proton in the 4-position of 2-phenyloxazolines in the
`presence of potassium t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide
`suggests that isomerisations might occur in other
`carbohydrate derivatives containing this grouping under
`these conditions and this subject is being investigated
`further.
`Isomerisations at the 4-position of 2-phenyl-
`oxazolines under milder basic conditions have been
`observed with derivatives of 4-ethoxycarbonyl-2-phenyl-
`oxazoline. 22
`When compound (XL) was treated with mercuric
`chloride in an attempt to remove the prop-l-enyl group,
`the major product was the chloromercuripropylidene
`derivative (XLVI) and only a small amount of the diol
`(XLIII) was formed. Compound (XLVI) was converted
`into the crystalline iodomercuri-derivative (XLVII)
`after washing a solution of the product with potassium
`iodide solution, In an attempt to prepgre the propyl-
`idene acetal (XLVIII) , compound (XLVII) was reduced
`with sodium borohydride as described previously 6b923
`for the replacement of
`the chloromercuri-group by
`hydrogen. The product was mainly a monoprop-l-enyl
`ether of the diol (XLIII) which cochromatographed with
`compound (XL). However, only a small amount of
`the crystalline compound (XL) was obtained from
`the product and it is assumed that a mixture of the
`cis- and trans-isomers of compound (XL) was produced
`whereas in the isomerisation which produced com-
`pound (XL) from the allyl ether only the cis-isomer is
`produced.3 The mechanism of the action of sodium
`borohydride with the 2-iodomercuripropylidene deriv-
`ative is presumably similar to the action14*24 of alkali
`23 H. B. Henbest and B. Nicholls, J . Chem. SOC., 1959, 227;
`H. B. Henbest and R. S. McElhinney, J . Chem. SOC., 1959, 1834.
`24 (a) J. Wislicenus, Annalen, 1878, 192, 106; H. S. Hill, J .
`Amer. Chem. SOC., 1928, 50, 2725; J. F. Arens and D. A. van
`Dorp, Rec. Trav. chim., 1946, 65, 729; C. Piantadosi, A. F.
`Hirsch, C. L. Yarbro, and C. E. Anderson, J . Org. C h m . , 1963,
`28, 2425; (b) J. C. Craig and D. P. G. Hamon, ibid., 1965, 30,
`4168; (c) J. C. Craig, D. P. G. Hamon, H. W. Brewer, and H.
`Harle, ibid., 1965, 30, 907.
`
`.f OlCMe,
`
`CH2.0
`(XLVI) R = CH(HgC1)CH3
`(XLVII) R = CH(HgI)CH3
`(XLVIII) R = CH2CH3
`
`CH2.0.CH2-CH: CHMe
`I
`
`
`CHO \ CMe2
`
`CH2-O'
`(LIII)
`
`0 - C Me2
`(XLIX) R = CH2-C(Me)=CH2
`(L) R = CH=CMe2
`(LI) R = CH2-CH=CH2
`(LII) R = CH2-CH=CH-CH3
`to investigate the stability of the oxazoline ring in carbo-
`hydrate derivatives to the isomerisation conditions.
`At 20" a reaction to a more slowly moving compound
`(XXXIX) was observed by t.1.c. At 50" compound
`(XXXIX) was slowly converted into compound (XL)
`which had the same mobility on t.1.c. as the starting
`2o (a) S. Konstas, I. Photaki, and L. Zervas, Chem. Ber., 1959,
`92, 1288; (b) R. Gigg and C. D. Warren, J . Chem. SOC., 1965,
`1351; (c) B. Lindberg and H. Agback, Acta Chem. Scand., 1964,
`18, 185.
`21 J. W. Cornforth, E. Fawaz, L. J. Goldsworthy, and R.
`Robinson, J . Chem. SOC., 1949, 1549.
`22 D. F. Elliott, J . Chem. SOC., 1949, 589; 1950, 62; E. E.
`Hamel and E. P. Painter, J . Amer. Chem. SOC., 1953, 75, 1362;
`H. E. Carter, J. B. Harrison, and D. Shapiro, J . Amer. Chem.
`SOC., 1953, 75, 4705.
`
`Published on 01 January 1968. Purchased by adrienne.stephens@knobbe.com on 31 July 2017.
`
`View Article Online
`
`

`

`Org .
`In the
`metals on 2-halogenoalkylidene acetals of diols.
`latter reaction a mixture of cis- and trans-isomers of the
`two possible vinyl ethers is produced.rn3C The simple
`addition products of mercuric salts with olefins in alcohols
`can also be reduced with hydrazine or with sodium in
`ethanol to give some of the original olefin.%
`The 2-methylallyl ether (XLIX) of 1,2:5,6-di-O-iso-
`propyhdene-D-glucofuranose was prepared and the rates
`of isomerisation of this compound and of the allyl ether
`(LI) were compared. The allyl ether was isomerised
`about twenty times more quickly than compound
`(XLIX) which was converted into the crystalline ether
`(L) *
`We have shownlo that y-substituted allyl ethers are
`eliminated to give dienes by treatment with potassium
`t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide and this has been
`confirmed by others.25 The action of these basic con-
`ditions on the 3-methylallyl (crotyl) ether (LII) 26 of
`1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-~-glucofuranose was investi-
`gated. At 50" elimination was complete in 1 hr. whilst
`at 20" elimination was complete in 30 hr. The same
`behaviour was observed with the crotyl ether (LIII)
`although a previous report 24b indicated that this com-
`pound was stable to these conditions. The ease of
`elimination of butadiene from the ether (LII) indicates
`that the crotyl ether should provide a further useful
`protecting group in the carbohydrate series and this
`subject is being investigated.
`
`C
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`T.1.c. was as described previously.1° Light petroleum
`had b.p. 40-60" unless otherwise stated. Specific rotations
`were measured a t 22-24" on a Bendix Automatic Polari-
`meter. Solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure.
`Action of Mercuric Chloride-Mercuric Oxide on 3-0-Prop-
`
`1 ',enyl- 1,2: 5,6-di-O-isopro~ylidene-~-glucofuranose and 3-0-
`A llyl- 1,2: 5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-~-glucofuranose (General
`Procedure for the Hydrolysis of Prop-l-enyl Ethers by Mer-
`solution of mercuric chloride (900 mg.,
`curic Clzloride) .-A
`3.3 mmoles) in acetone-water (10: 1, 10 ml.) was added
`dropwise with stirring to a mixture of 3-O-prop-l'-enyl-
`1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-~-glucofuranose
`la (1 g., 3.3
`mmoles), yellow mercuric oxide (900 mg.), and acetone-
`water (10 : 1, 30 ml.) during 3 min. When the addition was
`complete, t.1.c. (ether-light petroleum, 3 : 1) showed com-
`plete conversion of the starting material (Rf 0.9) into the
`product (Rf 0.58) and 2-chloromercuripropionaldehyde
`(R, 0.1) (detected with the potassium permanganate
`spray lo). The mercuric oxide was removed by filtration
`through Celite, the acetone was evaporated, and ether was
`added to the residue. The ether layer was washed with a
`semisaturated aqueous solution of potassium iodide (10
`ml.), dried (K,CO,), and the solvent evaporated. Recrystall-
`isation of the residue from cyclohexane gave 1,2: 5,6-di-0-
`isopropylidene-D-glucofuranose (800 mg.), m.p. and mixed
`m.p. 108-110".
`In smaller scale reactions the mercuric
`oxide was not removed but the acetone was evaporated
`25 G. Kesslin and C. M. Orlando, J . Org. Chem., 1966, 31, 2682;
`G. M. Mkryan, N. A. Papazyan, and A. A. Pogosyan, Z h w . ovg.
`Khim., 1967, 3, 1160 (Chem. Abs., 1967, 67, 90,349).
`26 W. M. Corbett and J. E. McKay, J . Chem. SOC., 1961, 2930.
`
`1907
`
`and a mixture of the residue with ether was washed directly
`with potassium iodide solution which dissolved all of the
`mercury derivatives.
`When 3-O-allyl- 1,2: 5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-~-glucofuran-
`ose was subjected to the same treatment, t.1.c. (ether-
`light petroleum, 1 : 1) showed no reaction of the starting
`material (Rf 0.7) until 30 min. after the addition of the
`mercuric chloride whereupon a trace of product (Rf 0.1)
`was detected. After 60 hr. the starting material was
`completely converted into the product (Rf 0.1) which was
`not further investigated.
`Ally1 4,6-O-Benzylidene-a-~-galactopyranoside (I) (with
`J. GIGG) .-A mixture of allyl a-D-galactopyranoside l2
`(50 g.), anhydrous zinc chloride (50 g.), and benzaldehyde
`(100 ml.) was stirred a t room temperature for 3 hr. and then
`poured with stirring into a mixture of ice-water and light
`petroleum. The solid product was filtered off, washed with
`light petroleum, and dissolved in chloroform. The solution
`was dried (K,CO,), the solvent evaporated, and the crude
`product (70 g.) triturated with light petroleum to remove
`benzaldehyde. Recrystallisation from ethyl acetate-
`light petroleum gave the product, m.p. 115-117",
`[a],
`+121"
`(c 1.9 in CHC1,) [Found: C, 60.45; H, 6.5.
`(C,,H,,O,),,H,O
`requires C, 60.5; H, 6 ~ 7 x 1 (Found, after
`drying at 100" under high vacuum for 3 hr. : C, 62.1 ; H,
`6.6. C16H200, requires C, 62.3; H, 6.5%).
`Prop- 1 '-enyl 4,6-O-Benzylidene-a-~-galactopyranoside (11)
`(with J. GIGG).-The allyl galactoside (I) (20 g.) was isomer-
`ised with potassium t-butoxide (20 g.) in dry dimethyl
`sulphoxide (100 ml.) a t 100" for 2 hr. whereupon t.1.c.
`(ethyl acetate) showed complete conversion of the starting
`material (Rf 0.7) into the product (Rf 0.8). After addition
`of water and extraction with ether, the product (19 g.)
`was recrystallised from ethyl acetate-light petroleum,
`and had m.p. 114-115", [a], +58" (G 1 in CHCl,) (Found:
`C, 58.9; H, 6.8. C16H200,,H20 requires C, 58-9; H, 6.8%).
`The diacetate was prepared by the action of acetic anhydride
`in pyridine and when recrystallised from ethyl acetate-
`light petroleum had m.p. 165", [a], +207" (c 1 in CHC1,)
`(Found: C, 61.0; H, 6.1. C,OH2408 requires C, 61-2;
`H, 6.2%).
`prop- 1 -
`1,2-O-~ro~y~idene-~-ga~acto~yranose
`(X) .-The
`enyl galactoside (11) (7.5 g.) was fused under high vacuum
`and dried for 5 hr. a t 120", then dissolved in dry ethyl
`acetate (50 ml.) and anhydrous toluene-9-sulphonic acid
`(50 mg.) was added. After heating under reflux for 3 hr.,
`t.1.c. (ether) showed conversion of the starting material
`(Rf 0.4) into a product (Rf 0.8). After neutralisation of the
`acid (K,CO,) and evaporation of the solvent the crude
`product was chromatographed on alumina and elution
`with ethyl acetate gave 4,6-O-benzylidene- 1,2-O-propyl-
`idene-D-galactopyranose (VIII) (4.3 g.) as a syrup which
`gave a non-crystalline acetate (IX), [a], -54"
`(c 0.4 in
`CHCl,) (Found: C, 61.4; H, 6-2. C18H220, requires C,
`61-7; H, 6.3%). Compound (VIII) (2 g.) was hydrogenated
`in glacial acetic acid a t atmospheric pressure in the presence
`of palladium-charcoal until uptake was complete. After
`evaporation of the solvent the residue was recrystallised
`from ethyl acetate to give 1,2-0-propylidene-~-galacto-
`pyranose (X) (0.8 g.) as needles, m.p. 115-116",
`[a],
`+93*2" (c 0.75 in MeOH) (Found: C, 49.0; H, 7.2.
`requires C, 49.1; H, 7.3%). Acetylation with
`C,H,,O,
`acetic anhydride and pyridine gave the triacetate as a
`syrup [a], +96.8" (c 0.6 in CHC1,) (Found: C, 52-1 ; H,
`6.4. C,,H,,O,
`requires C, 52.0; H, 6.4%).
`
`Published on 01 January 1968. Purchased by adrienne.stephens@knobbe.com on 31 July 2017.
`
`View Article Online
`
`

`

`J. Chem. SOC. (C), 1968
`
`3,4,6-Trz-O-benzyl-~-gaZactdol (XII) .-
`(chloroform-ethyl acetate, 1 : 2) showed complete conversion
`1,2-O-Propyl-
`idene-D-galactopyranose (X) (150 mg.) was benzylated with
`the starting material (RR~ 0.7) into 2,3-di-O-benzyl-
`of
`sodium hydride and benzyl chloride in refluxing benzene
`D-galactitol (Rf 0.2) which was obtained as a syrup after
`until t.1.c. (ether-light petroleum, 1 : I) showed complete
`neutralisation (BaCO,) and evaporation of the solution.
`conversion into the tri-O-benzyl ether (XI) (Rp 0.85).
`The syrup was dissolved in glacial acetic acid and hydrogen-
`The excess of sodium hydride was decomposed by the ad-
`ated at atmospheric pressure over palladium-charcoal
`dition of methanol and the benzene solution was washed
`until uptake was complete. The catalyst was filtered off
`with water and dried (MgSO,). Evaporation of the solvents
`and washed with water. Evaporation of the filtrate gave a
`gave compound (XI) as a syrup which was hydrolysed in
`solid residue which was recrystallised from glacial acetic
`dioxan-N-sulphuric acid (5 : 1) until t.1.c. showed that
`acid to give galactitol, m.p. and mixed m.p. 186-188"
`hydrolysis to the free sugar was complete (Rp 0.4 in ether).
`(lit.,27 m.p. 185-186").
`Methyl 4,6-O-BenzyZzdene-2,3-d~-O-pvop-l'-enyl-a-~-gluco-
`The acid was neutralised (BaCO,), the solvent evaporated,
`pyranoside (XXII).-The di-O-ally1 ether (XXI) 17 (2 g.)
`and the crude product was chromatographed on neutral
`alumina. After removal of impurities by elution with
`was treated with potassium t-butoxide (2 g.) in dimethyl
`(10 : 1) the 3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-~-galacto-
`ether-methanol
`sulphoxide (50 ml.) a t 100" for 40 rnin. whereupon t.1.c.
`pyranose la (200 mg.) was obtained as a syrup by elution
`(ether-light petroleum, 1 : 2) showed conversion of
`the
`starting material (Rf 0.4) into the di-O-prop-l-enyl ether
`with methanol. This was reduced with sodium borohydride
`in ethanol at room temperature for 8 hr. Glacial acetic
`(Rf 0.6). After dilution with water and extraction with
`acid was added and the solvent was evaporated. Several
`ether the product was recrystallised from light petroleum
`portions of methanol were evaporated from the residue to
`to give needles (1.35 g.), m.p. 99-loo",
`[a], +90" (e 1 in
`remove boric acid and water was added to the residue and
`CHC1,) (Found: C, 66-0; H, 6.95. Calc. for C2,H2,06
`the product filtered off. Recrystallisation from ethyl
`C, 66.3; H, 7.2%) [lit.,17 m.p. 94-95, [a],23 +41° f 5"
`acetate-light petroleum gave 3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-~-galactitol
`(e 0.024 in CHCl,)]. The prop-l-enyl groups were removed
`(120 ing.), m.p. and mixed m.p. with material prepared
`with mercuric chloride and the product isolated as described
`(Found: C, 71.5; H, 7.0. Calc. for
`above to give methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-a-~-glucopyrano-
`previously la 98-100"
`C27H3206 C, 71-6; H, 7-17;).
`side (80%), m.p. and mixed m.p. 158-159".
`Ally1 2,3-Di-O-benzy1-4,6-0-beiazylidene-u-~-gaEactopyrano-
`Met?iyl 3-0-Allyl-4,6-O-beu2zylzdine-a-~-glucopy~anoside
`side (IV).-Compound
`(I) (3 g.) was benzylated with
`(XXIV).-The di-O-ally1 ether (XXI) (1 g.) in dimethyl
`powdered sodium hydroxide and benzyl chloride until
`sulphoxide (10 ml.) with potassium t-butoxide (0.5 g.) was
`t.1.c. (ether-light petroleum, 1 : 1) showed complete con-
`kept a t 40" and the reaction followed by t.1.c. (ether-
`version into the di-O-benzyl ether (Rf 0.6). After washing
`light petroleum, 1 : 1). After 30 min. there was a major
`with water and drying and evaporation of the solvent,
`product ( R f 0.55) together with traces of starting material
`the residue was recrystallised from light petroleum (b.p.
`( R f 0.4) and di-O-prop-l-enyl ether (Rf 0.6). Water was
`to give the product (IV) (3-8 8.) as plates, 1n.p.
`80-100°)
`added and the product (0.95 g.) was extracted with ether
`[a], 3-82-4" (c 1 in CHCl,) (Found: C, 73.9;
`123-125",
`and treated with mercuric chloride as described above.
`H, 6-6. C,,,H,,06
`requires C, 73-75; H, 6.6%).
`T.1.c. (ether) showed complete removal of the prop- l-enyl
`Prop-1'-enyl 2,3-Di-O-benzy1-4,6-O-benzylidene-a-~-galac-
`groups to give a major product (I?, 0.7) and traces (Rf
`topyranoside (V) .-Compound
`(IV) (3 g.) was isomerised
`0.2 and 0.95). Chromatography on alumina and elution
`with potassium t-butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide as de-
`with ether removed the material Iif 0.95 (compound XXI)
`scribed previously la until t.1.c. (ether-light petroleum, 1 : 1)
`and further elution with ether-methanol (50 : 1) gave the
`major product (Rf 0-7) (0.54 g.). This compound was
`showed complete conversion of the starting material (Rf
`0.6) into the product (Rf 0.7). After dilution with water
`recrystallised from methanol to give cowpound (XXIV),
`and extraction with ether the product (2.5 g.) was recrystall-
`[u], +104O (c 0.7 in CHC1,) (Found: C,
`m.p. 154-155",
`ised from light petroleum (b.p. 60-80°) and had m.p.
`63-3; H, 6.7. C1,H2,06 requires C, 63.3; H, 6.9%).
`[u], +81" (c 1 in CHC1,) (Found: C, 73.7; H,
`122-124",
`Compound (XXIV) (1.5 g.) was isomerised as described
`6-4. C3,H3,06 requires C, 73.75; H, 6.6%).
`previously
`and the product was recrystallised from
`(VI) .
`2,3-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket