throbber
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 813-826
`
`813
`
`HYCRON, an Allylic Anchor for High-Efficiency Solid Phase
`Synthesis of Protected Peptides and Glycopeptides
`
`Oliver Seitz and Horst Kunz*
`Institut fu¨ r Organische Chemie der Universita¨t Mainz, J.-J. Becher-Weg 18-20, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
`
`Received April 23, 1996X
`
`The recently developed allylic HYCRON anchor1 exhibits excellent properties for the solid phase
`synthesis of protected peptides and glycopeptides. Model reactions with analogous low molecular
`weight compounds assessed the acid- and base-stability of the polar and flexible HYCRON linkage.
`The new anchor is available in a two-step synthesis and allows the use of both the Boc- and the
`Fmoc-strategy, which can even be combined within one synthesis. Protected glycopeptides are
`released under almost neutral conditions, taking advantage of the Pd(0)-catalyzed allyl transfer to
`a weakly basic nucleophile such as N-methylaniline. The highly efficient synthesis of O-RGalNAc-
`(TN)-peptides of the MUC-1 repeating unit is described. Acid- and base-stability of the allyl ester
`linkage enabled the synthesis of an O-glucosylated peptide by first removing a threonine tert-butyl
`group on the solid phase and subsequently glycosylating the liberated resin-bound hydroxyl
`component.
`
`Introduction
`
`Proteins and peptides exist in a variety of conjugated
`forms, the most important being glycoconjugates.2 N-
`and O-Glycosidically bound carbohydrates affect the
`conformation of proteins and regulate their activity and
`biological half-lives.3 Glycoproteins participate in bio-
`logical recognition processes such as cell adhesion, regu-
`lation of cell growth, and cell differentiation. During
`tumor-transformation, the glycosylation pattern of gly-
`coproteins, such as mucins, changes markedly.4 Mucins
`are excessively O-glycosylated proteins with a carbohy-
`drate portion reaching 50-80%.5 Mucins expressed from
`various epithelial cell types in soluble and membrane-
`associated forms typically consist of several serine- and
`threonine-rich repeating units which serve as carbohy-
`drate scaffolds. During tumor progression the balance
`between the mucin-mediated adhesion6 and antiadhesion
`processes is no longer under control. Simultaneously,
`alterations of the glycosylation pattern occur, because
`certain glycosyltransferases are expressed in lower con-
`centrations.7 These two phenomena seem to be causally
`related. For instance, TN-antigen structures (Ser/Thr-
`(RGalNAc)) were demonstrated to be tumor-associated
`
`X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, January 1, 1997.
`(1) Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; Ac, acetyl; Acm, acetamido-
`methyl; Bn, benzyl; Boc, tert-butyloxycarbonyl; DCC, N,N ¢-dicyclo-
`hexylcarbodiimide; DIC, N,N ¢-diisopropylcarbodiimide; DIPEA, diiso-
`propylethylamine; DKP, diketopiperazine; EtSMe, ethyl methyl sulfide;
`Fmoc, 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl; Gal, D-galactopyranose; GalNAc,
`2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-galactopyranose; Glc, D-Glucopyranose; GPC,
`gel permeation chromatography; HOBt, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole; HON-
`Su, N-hydroxysuccinimide; HYCRAM, hydroxycrotonoyl (aminometh-
`yl)polystyrene; HYCRON, hydroxycrotyl-oligoethylene glycol-n-al-
`kanoyl; MPLC, medium performance liquid chromatography; Mtr,
`4-methoxy-2,3,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonyl; Muc, mucine; NMM, N-
`methylmorpholine; Pac, phenacyl; PS, polystyrene; tBu, tert-butyl; Trt,
`trityl; TBTU, 2-O-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
`tetrafluoroborate; Z, Benzyloxycarbonyl.
`(2) (a) Montreuil, J. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1980, 37, 157
`(b) Lis, H.; Sharon, N. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 218, 1.
`(3) Rudd, P. M.; Woods, R. J.; Wormald, M. R.; Opdenakker, G.;
`Downing, A. K.; Campbell, I. D.; Derek, R. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
`1995, 1248, 1.
`(4) Brockhausen, I.; Yang, J.-M.; Burchell, J.; Whitehouse, C.;
`Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 233, 607.
`(5) Hilkens, J.; Ligtenberg, M. J. L.;Vos, H. L.; Litvinov, S. L. Trends
`Biochem. Sci. 1992, 17, 359.
`(6) Berg, E. L.; McEvoy, L. M.; Berlin, C.; Bargatze, R. F.; Butcher,
`E. C. Nature 1993, 366, 695.
`
`and T-antigen structures (Ser/Thr(R-3-((cid:226)Gal)-GalNAc))
`even tumor-specific in breast tissue.8
`Oligonucleotides9 and oligopeptides10 are readily avail-
`able via solid phase synthesis. The properties of the
`anchor group positioned between the oligomer to be
`synthesized and the polymeric support are crucial for the
`success of a solid phase synthesis. There is an increasing
`demand for linkage groups which provide an additional
`orthogonal stability and can, thus, accommodate a wider
`range of reaction conditions. This particularly holds true
`for the synthesis of glycopeptides and for the growing
`field of combinatorial chemistry.11 The synthesis of
`glycopeptides and phosphopeptides as well as peptides
`with acid- and base-labile protecting groups, which are
`to be employed in fragment condensations,12 requires
`anchor groups which allow the release of the target
`molecule under conditions that leave the labile structures
`unaffected.
`Most of the commonly used anchors for the solid phase
`synthesis of protected peptides and glycopeptides are
`either acid-labile13 or base-labile. Nearly all of the acid-
`labile anchor groups belong to the benzyl ester type14 and
`produce long-lived, stable carbocations during their
`cleavage. These may cause undesired alkylations of
`nucleophilic moieties.15 Furthermore, acid-labile protect-
`ing groups such as the tert-butyloxycarbonyl(Boc)-group
`
`(7) Vavasseur, F.; Dole, K.; Yang, J.; Matta, K. L.; Myerscough, N.;
`Corfield, A.; Paraskeva, C.; Brockhausen, I. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994,
`222, 415.
`(8) Karsten, U.; Papsdorf, G.; Pauly, A.; Vojtesek, B.; Moll, R.; Lane,
`E. B.; Clausen, H.; Stosiek, P.; Kasper, M. Differentiation 1993, 54,
`55.
`(9) (a) Narang, S. A. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3. (b) Bannwarth, W.
`Chimia 1987, 41, 302.
`(10) (a) Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149. (b) Fields,
`G. B.; Noble, R. L. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1990, 35, 161. (c) Williams,
`P. L.; Albericio, F.; Giralt, E. Tetrahedron 1993, 347, 11065.
`(11) a) Jung, G.; Beck-Sickinger, A. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
`1992, 31, 375. (b) Gallop, M. A.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor,
`S. P. A.; Gordon, E. M. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1233. (c) Gallop, M.
`A.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gordon, E. M. J. Med.
`Chem. 1994, 37, 1385.
`(12) Benz, H. Synthesis 1993, 337.
`(13) (a) Paulsen, H.; Merz, G.; Weichert, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
`Engl. 1988, 27, 1365. (b) Lu¨ ning, B.; Norberg, T.; Tejbrant, J.
`Glycoconjugate J. 1989, 6, 5. (c) Laczko, I.; Hollosi, M.; Urge, L. E.;
`Ugen, K.; Weiner, D. B.; Mautsch, H. H.; Thurin, J.; Otvos, L.
`Biochemistry 1990, 4282. (d) Mucin-type glycopeptides: Meldal, M.;
`Mouritsen, S.; Bock, K. Am Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 1993, 519, 19.
`
`S0022-3263(96)00743-8 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society
`
`Illumina Ex. 1104
`IPR Petition - USP 10,435,742
`
`

`

`814 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997
`
`Seitz and Kunz
`
`Scheme 1
`
`Scheme 2
`
`cannot be removed on solid phase without detaching the
`peptide. Base-labile linkages such as in Kaiser’s oxime
`resin are not compatible with the widely used fluorenyl-
`methoxycarbonyl(Fmoc)-strategy. Most of the existing
`photolabile linkers can only be cleaved in low yields if
`longer peptide sequences are synthesized. Photolabile
`anchors with high cleavability are usually base-sensi-
`tive16 and not fully compatible with Fmoc chemistry.
`Linkers of the general allyl-type17 are of particular
`value, because they are removable under almost neutral
`conditions and are orthogonally stable to the commonly
`used acid- and base-labile protecting groups.18 Allylic
`anchoring offers the possibility of applying both the Boc-
`and the Fmoc-group for temporary N-terminal protection
`in solid phase peptide synthesis. The strategies may
`even be combined in one synthesis. The cleavage of the
`allylic linkage is achieved by a palladium(0)-catalyzed
`transfer reaction19 of the allyl group to a nucleophile,
`which acts as an allyl scavenger. Nucleophiles such as
`morpholine,20 the less basic N-methylaniline,21 or dime-
`done22 irreversibly trap the allylic moiety.
`Solid phase peptide synthesis with allylic anchoring
`was introduced using hydroxycrotonic acid linkers ((cid:226)-
`HYCRAM 1, Scheme 1). A range of complex glycopep-
`tides have been successfully synthesized on the (cid:226)-HY-
`CRAM-support.23 While Boc-strategy provided glyco-
`peptides in high yield, the application of the Fmoc-
`strategy showed losses of some peptide during the
`synthesis.24 Moreover, complete release of the peptide
`was sometimes difficult to achieve.
`
`(14) (a) Wang, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 1328. (b) Mitchell,
`A. R.; Erickson, B. W.; Ryabster, M. N.; Hodges, R. S.; Merrifield, R.
`B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7357. (c) Flo¨rsheimer, A.; Riniker, B.
`Peptides 1990. Proceedings of the 21st European Peptides Symposium;
`Giralt, E., Andreu, D., Eds.; ESCOM: Leiden, 1991; p 131. (d) Mergler,
`M.; Tanner, R.; Gosteli, J.; Grogg, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4005.
`(e) Mergler, M.; Nyfeller, R.; Tanner, R.; Gosteli, J.; Grogg, P.
`Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4009. (f) Albericio, F.; Barany, G. Tetra-
`hedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1015.
`(15) (a) Atherton, E.; Cameron, L. R.; Sheppard, R. C. Tetrahedron
`1988, 44, 843. (b) Albericio, F.; Kneib-Cordonier, N.; Biancalana, S.;
`Geva, L.; Masada, R. I.; Hudsen, D.; Barany, G. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
`55, 3730.
`(16) Tjoeng, F. S.; Tam, J. P.; Merrifield, R. B. Int. J. Pept. Protein
`Res. 1979, 14, 262.
`(17) Kunz, H.; Dombo, B. (ORPEGEN GmbH), DE-A P 3720269.3,
`1987; USA. 4 929 671, 1990.
`(18) (a) Kunz, H.; Dombo, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988,
`27, 711. (b) Kunz, H.; Dombo, B.; Kosch, W. In Peptides 1988; (Jung,
`G., Bayer, E., Eds.; W. de Gruyter: Berlin, 1989, 154. (c) Blankemeyer-
`Menge, B.; Frank, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5871. (d) Guibe´, F.;
`Dangles, O.; Balavoine, G.; Loffet, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2641.
`(e) Zhang, X.; Jones, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 22, 3789.?
`(19) (a) Trost, B. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 385. (b) Trost, B. M.
`Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 53, 2357.
`(20) (a) Kunz, H.; Waldmann, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1984,
`23, 71. (b) Friedrich-Bochnitschek, S.; Waldmann, H.; Kunz, H. J. Org.
`Chem. 1989, 54, 751.
`(21) Ciommer, M.; Kunz, H. Synlett 1991, 593.
`(22) Kunz, H.; Unverzagt, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984,
`23, 436.
`(23) Kosch, W.; Ma¨rz, J.; Kunz, H. React. Polym. 1994, 22, 181 and
`references therein.
`(24) Kosch, W. Dissertation, Universita¨t Mainz, 1992.
`
`In the design of a new allylic anchoring group, a more
`flexible spacer was inserted between the anchor and the
`polymer in order to facilitate an efficient access of the
`Pd(0) complex during the detachment reaction. The
`success achieved with craft copolymers25 of polyethylene
`glycol and polystyrene inspired the incorporation of a
`polar spacer of the ethylene glycol type. In addition, in
`this HYCRON anchor26 2 (Scheme 1), the R,(cid:226)-unsatur-
`ated carbonyl structure was avoided, since it could be
`responsible for the occasionally low yields in Fmoc
`chemistry with (cid:226)-HYCRAM 1. As in (cid:226)-HYCRAM, (cid:226)-ala-
`nine is used as a standard amino acid, since it simplifies
`the determination of the peptide loading.27
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Synthesis of a Low Molecular Weight Model. The
`first step in synthesis of an anchor derivative 4, which
`allows the coupling of the starting amino acid via
`nucleophilic esterification consists in the sodium glycolate
`catalyzed 1,4-addition of triethylene glycol to tert-butyl
`acrylate (Scheme 2). The subsequent reaction of the
`adduct 3 with 1,4-dibromo-2-butene is carried out under
`phase transfer conditions, which avoids the retro-Michael
`reaction leading to unseparable mixtures. This elimina-
`tion is initiated by abstraction of an R-proton, which is
`unlikely to occur in the resin-bound molecule, because
`proton abstraction would take place at the amide function
`disabling further deprotonation. Treatment of 4a with
`TFA removes the tert-butyl group.
`The carboxylic acid 5 is activated with DCC28 and
`N-hydroxysuccinimide29 (HONSu) and reacted with (cid:226)-Ala-
`NH-Bn to give 6 (Scheme 3). A slight excess of the acid
`compound must be used in order to prevent the concomi-
`tant allylation of HONSu. Compound 6 can be consid-
`ered a low molecular weight model of an (aminomethyl)-
`polystyrene (H2N-PS) resin functionalized with the
`standard amino acid (cid:226)-alanine and the anchor-bromide.
`The reaction of the cesium salt of Z-protected alanine
`
`(25) (a) Rapp, W.; Zhang, L.; Ha¨bich, R.; Bayer, E. In Peptides 1988,
`Jung, G.; Bayer, E., Eds.; de Gruyter: Berlin 1989, 199. (b) Bayer, E.
`Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 113.
`(26) Seitz, O.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 807.
`(27) (a) Atherton, E.; Clive, D. I.; Sheppard, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`1975, 97, 6584. (b) Albericio, F.; Barany, G. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
`1985, 26, 92.
`(28) Sheehan, J. C.; Hess, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1067.
`(29) Weygand, F.; Hoffmann, D.; Wu¨ nsch, E. Z. Naturforsch. 1966,
`21b, 426.
`
`

`

`A Novel Allylic Anchor in Solid Phase Synthesis
`
`J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997 815
`
`Table 1. Nucleophilic Esterification of Fmoc-Amino Acids with Anchor-Bromides 4a,b and Removal of the C-Terminal
`Protecting Group (see also Scheme 4)
`Pro
`Gly
`(R ) tBu),
`(R ) tBu),
`% yield
`% yield
`9a, 65
`10a, 81
`9b, 88
`10b, 85
`
`Val
`(R ) tBu),
`% yield
`11a, 67
`11b, 57
`
`Thr(tBu)
`(R ) Pac),
`% yield
`12a, 83
`12b, 97
`
`ester formation
`R removal
`
`Ala
`(R ) tBu),
`% yield
`8a, 72
`8b, 84
`
`Scheme 3
`
`Scheme 4
`
`with bromide 6 provides the model compound 7. This
`nucleophilic esterification is known to proceed without
`any detectable racemization.30 Unfortunately, the chro-
`matographic behavior of 6 and 7 is nearly identical
`resulting in a small contamination with 6 even after two-
`fold MPLC and preparative HPLC. However, the mate-
`rial is useful for stability tests, since the reactions of both
`6 and 7 can be monitored by analytical HPLC. In order
`to assess the stability of the HYCRON system toward
`the conditions of N-Boc- and N-Fmoc removal, compound
`7 is treated with dichloromethane/TFA (1:1) and mor-
`pholine, respectively. Several reaction cycles are simu-
`lated by an exposure of two days. HPLC analysis shows
`that formation of new substances occurs in an amount
`of less then 4%. This is a promising result for the
`application of HYCRON-anchoring in solid phase peptide
`synthesis.
`Synthesis of Anchor Conjugates and Resin Load-
`ing. The starting amino acids should be loaded onto the
`polymer via their anchor conjugates, since attempts to
`couple amino acid cesium salts to a PS-resin functional-
`ized with (cid:226)-alanine and the bromo-anchor 5 resulted in
`low loading yields. Using the linkage agent 4a, anchor
`conjugates of Fmoc-amino acids can be synthesized. For
`conjugate synthesis of amino acids with acid-labile side
`chain protecting groups, the tert-butyl group of 4a is
`exchanged (Scheme 2). The phenacyl (Pac) ester 4b
`provides orthogonally stable protection to most side chain
`protecting groups in SPPS.
`Usually Fmoc-amino acids are alkylated via the cesium
`salt method. This reaction is less favorable for the
`HYCRON-system, because the rate of the alkylation
`reaction is slow and Fmoc-cleavage competes in the basic
`environment. In contrast, this nucleophilic esterification
`with the anchor bromides 4a and 4b proceeds mildly
`under phase transfer conditions using the base NaHCO3
`(Scheme 4). Reactants need not to be applied in excess.
`Conjugates 8a-12a are easily accessible (Table 1) using
`this method. TFA liberates the carboxylic function in the
`case of tert-butyl protection to give 8b-11b, and zinc
`powder in acetic acid reductively cleaves the Pac-group
`from 12a to form 12b.
`Conjugates consisting of starting amino acid, anchoring
`group, and standard amino acid are synthesized via two
`possible routes, which differ in the sequence of condensa-
`
`Scheme 5
`
`tions. For synthesis of conjugate 16b containing Boc-
`Ala, the anchor-bromide 5 is condensed with (cid:226)-Ala-OPac.
`Amide 14 is employed in an alkylation of the Boc-Ala
`cesium salt followed by reductive removal of the Pac-
`group (Scheme 5). Conjugate 16a is synthesized by
`coupling 8b to (cid:226)-Ala-OPac and subsequent reductive
`cleavage of the Pac-ester 13.
`In order to attach the amino acid-anchor-conjugates
`to the polymer, Boc-(cid:226)-Ala loaded (aminomethyl)polysty-
`rene (H2N-PS) is treated with TFA and neutralized with
`diisopropylethylamine (DIEA). The conjugates 8b-12b
`are coupled to this resin by the DIC/HOBt31 method
`(Scheme 6). The same reaction conditions are applied
`for binding the conjugates 16a and 16b to unmodified
`H2N-PS resin. Any amino groups that have not been
`acylated are capped with acetic anhydride/pyridine.
`Table 2 shows the loadings and yields achieved by these
`reactions.
`In the previously described synthesis of anchor conju-
`gates the allylic ester is formed by allylation of the
`carboxylic acid. However, nucleophilic esterifications can
`be accompanied by alkylations of other nucleophilic
`structures. For instance, the esterification of Fmoc-Cys-
`(Acm) under the above mentioned conditions proceeds
`
`(30) Wang, S.-S.; Gisin, B. F.; Winter, D. P.; Makofske, R.; Kulesha,
`I. D.; Tsougraki, C.; Meienhofer, J. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1286.
`
`(31) (a) Sarantakis, D.; Teichmann, J.; Lien, E. L.; Fenichel, R. L.
`Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun. 1976, 73, 336. (b) Ko¨nig, W.; Geiger,
`R. Chem. Ber. 1970, 103, 788.
`
`

`

`816 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997
`
`Seitz and Kunz
`
`AA
`
`Ala
`
`Table 2. Attachment of Amino Acid-Anchor-Conjugates
`to the Polystyrene Resin (see also Scheme 6)
`loading/
`PG
`anchor-conjugate
`(mmol of AA/g), yielda
`8b
`17a, 0.52, 89%
`Fmoc
`16a
`17b, 0.71, 89%
`Fmoc
`16b
`17c, 0.67, 75%
`Boc
`9b
`18, 0.50b, 80%
`Gly
`Fmoc
`10b
`19, 0.52, 61%
`Pro
`Fmoc
`11b
`20, 0.41, 75%
`Val
`Fmoc
`12b
`21, 0.40c, 66%
`Thr(tBu)
`Fmoc
`(cid:2)
`a Yield ) lAA/l(cid:226)-Ala (cid:2) 100 for resins 17a and 18-21, lAA/lNH2
`100 17b,c (l ) loading, determined by amino acid analysis).
`b Content of Fmoc group (photometrically). c Original loadings and
`yields are higher, and determination by amino acid analysis gives
`values that are too low.
`
`Scheme 6
`
`with a concomitant allylation of the thiol function. The
`side reactions are avoided if the carboxylic group is
`reacted with the anchor-alcohol. In contrast to the amino
`acid loadings with HYCRON-bromides as substrates, this
`procedure can also be performed on the solid support.
`Acetoxylation of the anchor-bromide 4a and removal of
`the tBu-group produces the protected form 23 of the
`allylic anchor-alcohol (Scheme 7). Using DIC/HOBt,
`compound 23 is coupled to (cid:226)-Ala-NH-PS, and 24 is
`deacetylated by means of aqueous NaOH/dioxane. The
`attachment of the starting amino acid Fmoc-Cys(Acm)
`is achieved by activating the C-terminus with 2,6-
`dichlorobenzoyl chloride32 in situ and then coupling to
`the resin-bound allylic alcohol in the presence of pyridine.
`This reaction takes place without affecting the thiol
`function as was demonstrated by the esterification of
`compound 26 in solution. It should be taken into account
`that the application of this more convenient method
`results in a higher propensity of racemization.
`Synthesis of Tri- and Tetrapeptides. In order to
`investigate the properties of the HYCRON-anchor re-
`garding stability and cleavability, protected tri- and
`tetrapeptides 28-31 have been synthesized (Scheme 8).
`The coupling reactions were accomplished with a three-
`to four-fold excess of the N-protected amino acids acti-
`vated by DIC and HOBt. Temporary N-Boc-groups
`(Scheme 8, PG ) Boc) were removed by treating the
`peptide-resin with dichloromethane/TFA (1:1). Reactions
`with DMF/morpholine (4:3) for 2 h deprotected the amino
`groups if the Fmoc-strategy was applied (Scheme 8, PG
`) Fmoc). Removal of the N-Fmoc-groups is usually
`complete in less than 45 min. However, in these syn-
`theses, the cleavage times were extended in order to
`
`(32) Sieber, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6147.
`
`Scheme 7
`
`Scheme 8
`
`facilitate the detection of undesired anchor cleavage
`(Table 3). The final release of the peptides was achieved
`by treating the peptide-resin with a catalytic amount of
`the palladium(0)-catalyst and a ten- to fifteen-fold excess
`of the scavenger nucleophile under exclusion of oxygen.
`Morpholine was used for the release of N-Boc-protected
`peptides and N-methylaniline for the liberation of N-
`Fmoc protected peptides, since this base does not to
`cleave the Fmoc-group. Detachment yields were dem-
`onstrated to be in the range of 90% on average. Table 3
`shows peptide losses, which occur at the stage of the
`dipeptide-resin due to the formation of diketopiperazines
`(DKP) and the total peptide losses caused by any other
`undesired cleavage of the HYCRON-linkage. It is clear
`that the application of the Boc-strategy (peptide 28) does
`not result in any premature losses at all. Fmoc-cleavage
`with DMF/morpholine (4:3) for 2 h leads to a considerable
`amount of DKP formation (see peptides 29-31). The
`
`

`

`A Novel Allylic Anchor in Solid Phase Synthesis
`
`J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997 817
`
`Table 3. Synthesis of Protected Tri- and Tetrapeptides (see also Scheme 9)
`
`scavenger
`peptide-DKP,a
`losses,
`detachment,
`R2NH
`peptide
`PG removal
`% yield
`% totalb
`% yieldc
`28
`CH2Cl2/TFA, 1:1, 45 min
`0
`0
`morpholine
`89
`29
`DMF/morpholine, 4:3, 2 h
`20
`22
`N-methylaniline
`81
`30
`DMF/morpholine, 4:3, 2 h
`38
`33
`N-methylaniline
`93
`31
`DMF/morpholine, 4:3, 2 h
`33
`34
`N-methylaniline
`96
`a Diketopiperazine formation ) [(lAla/l(cid:226)-Ala)tripep-resin/(lAla/l(cid:226)-Ala)dipep-resin - 1] (cid:2) 100. b ((lAla/l(cid:226)-Ala)pep-resin/(lAla/l(cid:226)-Ala)AA-resin - 1) (cid:2) 100.
`c (1 - [(lstart-AA/l(cid:226)-Ala)a/(lstart-AA/l(cid:226)-Ala)b] (cid:2) 100, (l ) loading, determined by amino acid analysis, a ) after cleavage, AA ) amino acid, b
`) before cleavage).
`
`peptide (n-mer)
`32 (4-mer)
`33 (9-mer)
`
`34 (9-mer)
`
`35 (20-mer)
`
`1.-4.: DIC/HOBt
`5.-6.: TBTU/HOBt/NMM
`7.-8.: DIC/HOBt
`1.-19.: TBTU/HOBt/NMM
`
`93
`
`95d
`
`Table 4. Solid Phase Synthesis of Peptide 33 and O-Glycopeptides 32, 34, and 35
`PG removal (PG, conditions)
`couplings
`detachment, % yielda
`1.-3.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50 min
`1.-3.: DIC/HOBt
`96
`1.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 5 min
`1.-8.: DIC/HOBt
`87
`2.: Boc, CH2Cl2/TFA 1:1, 50 min
`3.-9.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50 min
`1.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50 min
`2.: Boc, CH2Cl2/TFA 1:1, 50 min
`3.-9.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50min
`1.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50 min
`2.: Boc, CH2Cl2/TFA 1:1, 50 min
`3.-19.: Fmoc, DMF/morpholine 1:1, 50min
`a (1 - [(lstart-AA/l(cid:226)-Ala)a/(lstart-AA/l(cid:226)-Ala)b] (cid:2) 100. b npeptide/(mstart-AA-resin/lstart-AA) (cid:2) 100. c Based on loading with (cid:226)-Alafminimum yield.
`d Loadings determined photometrically by Fmoc-cleavage (l ) load, a ) after cleavage, b) before cleavage, n ) amount, m ) mass).
`
`total, % yieldb
`77c
`83
`
`95
`
`45d
`
`Scheme 9
`
`total losses are solely caused by DKP formation since they
`are identical the DKP losses within the experimental
`error. No additional losses occur, and it can be concluded
`that the HYCRON-anchor is orthogonally stable to both
`the Boc- and the Fmoc-group. The amount of intramo-
`lecular aminolysis of the resin-bound dipeptides can be
`decreased by reducing the Fmoc-cleavage times.
`Synthesis of O-Glycopeptides. The efficiency of
`HYCRON-anchoring in solid phase glycopeptide synthe-
`sis was demonstrated by the synthesis of the protected
`O-glycotetrapeptide 32 (Scheme 9). Peptide 32 is a
`glycosylated variant of the N-terminal part of peptide T,
`a segment of the HIV-envelope glycoprotein gp120.33
`Starting from resin 21, treatment with DMF/morpholine
`
`(33) (a) Kowalski, M.; Potz, J.; Basiripour, L.; Dorfman, T.; Goh,
`W. C.; Terwilliger, E.; Dayton, A.; Rosen, G.; Haseltine, W.; Sodroski,
`J. Science 1987, 237, 1351. (b) Pert, C. B.; Hill, J. M.; Ruff, M. R.;
`Berman, R. M.; Robey, W. G.; Arthur, L. O.; Ruscetti, F. W.; Farrar,
`W. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83, 9254.
`
`(1:1) for 50 min removed the Fmoc-group (Table 4). The
`carbohydrate portion was introduced by coupling the
`preformed glycosyl amino acid (Fmoc-Thr(RAc3GalNAc)-
`OH.34 This, as well as the other coupling reactions, was
`performed using DIC/HOBt. In the presence of O-acetyl
`groups long coupling times, which may be necessary due
`to the bulkiness of the glycoside, may result in an acetyl
`shift to the amino group that is to be acylated. In order
`to accelerate the elongation reaction of the resin-bound
`glycodipeptide, the reagents were employed in a larger
`excess. Release of the O-glycosylated tetrapeptide 32 was
`accomplished in a yield of 96% by palladium(0)-catalyzed
`transfer of the allyl moiety to N-methylaniline. An exact
`overall yield can not be given. Calculations based on the
`initial amino acid load is not reasonable because the
`amino acid analysis of hydroxyamino acids generally
`gives low values resulting in overestimated yields. As-
`
`(34) Kunz, H.; Birnbach, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25,
`360.
`
`

`

`818 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997
`
`suming a threonine/(cid:226)-alanine-ratio of 1, which requires
`a quantitative coupling of 12b to (cid:226)-Ala-NH-PS, a mini-
`mum overall yield of 77% can be calculated.
`Taking advantage of the HYCRON-system, glycopep-
`tide structures of the MUC-1 mucine were synthesized.
`Synthesis of the protected forms of the nonapeptide 33,
`its TN-variant 34 and of the TN-eicosapeptide 3535 (Scheme
`9), which spans the entire 20-mer MUC-1 repeating unit,
`starts from resins 18 and 19, respectively. The 20-mer
`is continuously repeated up to 90 times in the MUC-1
`mucin. It is obvious that it would be convenient to couple
`two 20-mers in order to obtain a dimer of the repeating
`unit. If possible, a Pro-Gly bond should be formed in
`fragment condensations, since proline is the amino acid
`least prone to racemization, and the fastest couplings are
`achieved when the C-terminal fragment contains N-
`terminal glycine. For that reason the frame of the
`repeating unit in peptide 35 is slightly moved to C-
`terminal proline. Removal of the Fmoc-groups was again
`accomplished by treatment with DMF/morpholine (1:1)
`for 50 min. N-Boc-amino acids were used for elongation
`of the amino acid-resins (Table 4). The subsequent
`acidolysis of the Boc-group reduces the formation of
`diketopiperazines during cleavage. The strategy was
`then returned to Fmoc-protection. All acylations were
`carried out in DMF. For the synthesis of 33 and 34 DIC/
`HOBt-activation was used except for the couplings of the
`O-glycosyl-threonine and the following aspartic acid
`building block. These acylations were anticipated to be
`slow, and therefore the amino acids were activated with
`TBTU,36 HOBt, and N-methylmorpholine (NMM). Cou-
`plings of the N-terminal amino acids proline and alanine
`were each repeated once. The N-terminal alanine was
`acetylated after Fmoc-removal. TBTU-activation was
`applied for all coupling reactions in the synthesis of TN-
`eicosapeptide 35. Treating the peptide-resins with cata-
`lytic amounts of the palladium(0)-complex in the presence
`of morpholine or N-methylaniline in DMSO/DMF de-
`tached the peptides in yields between 87 and 95%.
`Compounds 33, 34, and 35 were obtained in overall yields
`of 83%, 95% and 45% respectively. The overall yields are
`based on the initial amino acid load determined by amino
`acid analysis or photometrically after Fmoc-cleavage. In
`the case of 34 the overall yield is higher than the
`detachment yield. Of course, this is impossible, but the
`deviation is within the experimental error of the amino
`acid analysis.
`The O-glycononapeptide 34 was deprotected with TFA
`in the presence of ethyl methyl sulfide and anisole as
`scavengers37 (Scheme 10). A sodium methylate-catalyzed
`transesterification38 removed the O-acetyl groups of the
`sugar moiety yielding 37, which was purified by gel
`permeation chromatography and isolated in an overall
`yield of 74% relative to the loaded starting amino acid
`(22 steps).
`Removal of Permanent Protecting Groups and
`O-Glycosylation on Solid Phase. Solid phase synthe-
`sis of O-glycopeptides is possible following two routes.
`The carbohydrate can be introduced by preformed gly-
`
`(35) Dupradeau, F.-Y.; Stroud, M. R.; Boivin, D.; Li, L.; Hakomori,
`S.-E.; Singhal, A. K.; Toyokoni, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4,
`1813.
`(36) Knorr, R.; Trzeciak, A.; Bannwarth, W.; Gillessen, D. Tetrahe-
`dron Lett. 1989, 30, 1927.
`(37) Atherton, E.; Sheppard, R. C.; Wade, J. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
`Commun. 1983, 1060.
`(38) Peters, S.; Bielefeldt, T.; Meldal, M.; Bock, K.; Paulsen, H. J.
`Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 1163.
`
`Seitz and Kunz
`
`Scheme 10
`
`cosyl amino acids or by glycosylation of an unprotected
`hydroxyl group on the solid phase. Due to the difficulties
`involved in the latter method, only very little data have
`been published so far. Solid phase glycosylation using
`sugar oxazolines was reported, but unfortunately no
`yields were given.39 A yield of 5% was achieved in a silver
`triflate promoted mannosylation of a serine employing
`the corresponding glycosyl bromide.40
`We had developed a method in which soft electrophiles
`transform carbohydrates carrying an allylic carbamate
`at the anomeric position into potent glycosyl donors.41 In
`order to examine the efficiency of this glycosylation, a
`resin-linked peptide with an deblocked hydroxyl group
`was prepared starting from 20 (Scheme 11). Fmoc-
`removal was achieved with DMF/piperidine (4:3) in 10
`min, and couplings were performed using DIC/HOBt.
`TFA cleaved the tert-butyl ether of the fully protected
`resin-bound tripeptide. The tripeptide-resin was divided
`and one part subjected to the palladium(0)-catalyzed allyl
`transfer to N-methylaniline. Tripeptide 38, a partial
`structure of MUC-1, was obtained in a total yield of 96%.
`Before glycosylation, the remaining resin-linked peptide
`was dried for several days under high vacuum and
`repeatedly washed with dry dichloromethane. The resin-
`bound tripeptide with an unprotected hydroxyl group was
`reacted with 7 equiv of the glucose donor 1-O-(N-
`allylcarbamoyl)-2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetylglucose and 2.5 equiv
`of the promotor S-methylbis(methylthio)sulfonium hexa-
`chloroantimonate.41 The large excess of the donor rela-
`tive to the promotor was used in order to prevent an
`electrophilic attack of the promotor at the double bond
`of the anchor system. The glycosylation reaction was
`repeated twice. After palladium(0)-catalyzed cleavage,
`the glycosylated Fmoc-tripeptide 39 was isolated in an
`overall yield of 4%, the unchanged Fmoc-tripeptide 38
`in 64%. In the solid phase O-glucosylation of a sterically
`hindered threonine-peptide a yield comparable to the
`O-mannosidation of the serine-peptide described previ-
`ously was achieved.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The allylic HYCRON-anchoring allows the efficient
`solid phase synthesis of peptides and glycopeptides in
`high yields and high purity. The acid- and base-stability
`
`(39) Hollo´si, M.; Kolla´t, E.; Laczko´, I.; Medzihradszky, K. F.; Thurin,
`J.; Otvo¨s, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1531.
`(40) Andrews, D. M.; Seale, P. W. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1993,
`42, 165.
`(41) Kunz, H.; Zimmer; J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2907.
`
`

`

`A Novel Allylic Anchor in Solid Phase Synthesis
`
`J. Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997 819
`
`Scheme 11
`
`of the HYCRON-anchor makes the application of both
`the Fmoc- and the Boc-strategy possible. They may even
`be combined in one synthesis. Peptides and glycopep-
`tides are liberated under almost neutral conditions via
`the palladium(0)-catalyzed allyl transfer to scavenger
`nucleophiles such as morpholine or the less basic N-
`methylaniline. The Fmoc-group, the Boc-group, tert-
`butyl-esters, tert-butyl ethers, the O-acetyl groups in
`carbohydrates, and particularly O-glycosidic bonds are
`left intact. Therefore, the HYCRON-anchor will be a
`versatile tool in solid phase synthesis of compounds which
`demand high standards of orthogonality and also shows
`properties promising for combinatorial chemistry.
`
`Experimental Section
`
`General.42 Fmoc-amino acids, (aminomethyl)polystyrene,
`and Boc-(cid:226)-Ala-loaded polystyrene were kindly donated by
`ORPEGEN GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. THF was freshly
`distilled from potassium/benzophenone before use. Dichlo-
`romethane used in the glycosylation reaction was dried over
`P4O10 and freshly distilled. Reactions were carried out at room
`temperature if no specifications are given. Solid phase syn-
`thesis was performed manually using a reaction vessel similiar
`to the Merrifield-reactor.
`Amino acid-analysis (AAA) was carried out by ORPEGEN
`GmbH. Photometric determination of the Fmoc-loadings was
`performed by treating 1 aliquot of the resin with 2.00

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket