throbber
RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Structures of Ternary Complexes
`of Rat DNA Polymerase , a DNA
`Template-Primer, and ddCTP
`Huguette Pelletier, Michael R. Sawaya, Amalendra Kumar,
`Samuel H. Wilson, Joseph Kraut
`Two ternary complexes of rat DNA polymerase p (pol ,), a DNA template-primer, and dide-
`oxycytidine triphosphate (ddCTP) have been determined at 2.9 A and 3.6 A resolution,
`respectively. ddCTP is the triphosphate of dideoxycytidine (ddC), a nucleoside analog that
`targets the reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and is at present
`used to treat AIDS. Although crystals of the two complexes belong to different space groups,
`the structures are similar, suggesting that the polymerase-DNA-ddCTP interactions are not
`affected by crystal packing forces. In the pol p active site, the attacking 3'-OH of the
`elongating primer, the ddCTP phosphates, and two Mg2+ ions are all clustered around
`Asp19g, Asp192, and Asp256. Two of these residues, Asp190 and Asp256, are present in the
`amino acid sequences of all polymerases so far studied and are also spatially similar in the
`four polymerases-the Kienow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase 1, HIV-1
`reverse transcriptase, T7 RNA polymerase, and rat DNA pol 1-whose crystal structures are
`now known. A two-metal ion mechanism is described for the nucleotidyl transfer reaction and
`may apply to all polymerases. In the ternary complex structures analyzed, pol
`binds to the
`DNA template-primer in a different manner from that recently proposed for other polymerase-
`DNA models.
`
`their cellular dNTP counterparts by the
`absence of an attacking 3'-hydroxyl group
`(3'-OH) (Fig. 2) and therefore, once a
`dideoxynucleotide is successfully incorpo-
`rated into a growing primer strand, there
`can be no further incorporation of subse-
`quent nucleotides. A well-known example
`of this kind of inhibition involves HIV-1
`reverse transcriptase (RT), which is the
`polymerase responsible for the replication of
`the HIV genome. 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxy-
`thymidine
`(AZT),
`2',3'-dideoxyinosine
`
`DNA replication (1) is a highly complex
`biological process, even for a relatively
`simple organism such as Escherichia coli.
`During replication,
`the double
`helical
`DNA molecule is unwound, and the two
`resultant single strands of DNA act as
`templates to guide the synthesis, one com-
`plementary base at a time, of antiparallel
`primer strands. Although many auxiliary
`ligases,
`proteins such as
`helicases, and
`topoisomerases are usually involved, the
`chemical reaction at the core of DNA
`replication, the nucleotidyl transfer reac-
`tion, is catalyzed by DNA polymerases and
`may be depicted as follows:
`Template-primer, + dNTP
`template-primer-dNMPn,1 + PPi
`where dNTP (2'-deoxyribonucleoside 5'-
`triphosphate) represents any one of four de-
`oxynucleotides (dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and
`dTTP), and dNMP and PPi represent 2'-
`deoxyribonucleoside 5'-monophosphate and
`pyrophosphate, respectively (Fig. 1).
`Inhibition of a polymerase that effects
`genomic replication can be fatal to an
`organism. In a common type of polymerase
`inhibition,
`2',3'-dideoxynucleotides
`(dd-
`NTPs) act as chain terminators of the
`primer strand. The ddNTPs differ from
`
`H. Pelletier, M. R. Sawaya, and J. Kraut are in the
`Department of Chemistry, University of California, San
`Diego, CA 92093-0317, USA. A. Kumar and S. H.
`Wilson are at the Sealy Center for Molecular Science,
`University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
`77555-1051, USA.
`
`(ddI), and 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC) are
`all anti-HIV drugs (2, 3) that become potent
`chain termination inhibitors of RT after
`they are converted by cellular kinases (4, 5),
`in vivo, to their corresponding nucleoside
`5'-triphosphates, AZT-TP, ddATP (6), and
`ddCTP, respectively. In that all polymerases
`probably share a common catalytic mecha-
`nism, it is not surprising that some toxic
`effects of these drugs have been attributed to
`inhibition of host-cell polymerases, perhaps
`including the pol 1B described here (7-9).
`Therefore, a detailed understanding of the
`nucleotidyl transfer reaction, as well as the
`mechanism of inhibition of viral and host
`cell polymerases by nucleoside analogs, may
`lead to the design of more potent and less
`toxic HIV-1 RT inhibitors for use in the
`treatment of AIDS.
`Despite limited sequence similarity to
`the Klenow fragment (KF) of E. coli DNA
`pol I [the only other polymerase for which a
`crystal structure (10) was known at the
`time], the crystal structure determinations
`of HIV-1 RT (11, 12) revealed a common
`polymerase fold consisting of three distinct
`subdomains (designated fingers, palm, and
`thumb because of the resemblance to a
`hand) forming an obvious DNA binding
`channel. The strongest structural overlap
`between KF and RT comprised a trio of
`carboxylic acid residues located in the palm
`subdomain (11, 12). These observations led
`to the hypothesis that perhaps all polymer-
`ases share a common nucleotidyl transfer
`mechanism centered around the highly
`conserved carboxylic acid residues
`(11).
`Strengthening this argument somewhat was
`the subsequent crystal structure determina-
`tion of an RNA polymerase (RNAP) from
`bacteriophage T7, which showed strong
`structural similarities with KF (13). How-
`
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
` on March 5, 2014
`
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`www.sciencemag.org
`
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`
`Pdimer
`
`I
`
`5
`
`Pfimer
`0U
`5'
`o--o 5
`0
`
`Base
`
`'° X
`
`'J
`
`3
`
`HO-P-O-P-OH + B-P-0-
`0
`0
`
`dNMPn
`'
`
`Base
`
`dNMPn
`
`Base
`
`dNTP
`
`Pp.
`
`dNMPn+l
`
`OH
`Fig. 1. The nucleotidyl transfer reaction. The 3'-OH group of the terminal dNMP on the primer strand
`attacks the 5'-a phosphate of an incoming dNTP, and a newly formed phosphodiester linkage
`results in elongation of the primer strand by one dNMP. After release of pyrophosphate (PP), the
`catalytic cycle is complete and the 3'-OH group of the newly incorporated dNMP is now ready to
`attack yet another incoming dNTP. Only the 3' end of a primer is extended so that DNA
`polymerization is said to proceed in a 5' to 3' direction. If the polymerase molecule does not release
`the template-primer before incorporation of a second dNMP, the mode of DNA synthesis is said to
`be "processive", but if the polymerase releases the template-primer after each successive
`incorporation of a dNMP, the mode of DNA synthesis is said to be "distributive".
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 264
`
`*
`
`24 JUNE 1994
`
`1891
`
`Illumina Ex. 1044
`IPR Petition - USP 10,435,742
`
`

`

`iM1i 0
`
`il
`
`----------------
`
`~.
`
`4JA-ddCTP sample was prepared at room
`nperature; approximately 1.2 mg of the
`-nucleotide (nt) template and 0.8 mg of
`c 6-nt primer (27) were dissolved in 240
`of a buffer solution (20 mM MgCI2, 0.1
`MES, pH 6.5) and the mixture was left
`a sealed Eppendorf tube for 1 hour to
`ow annealing of the template-primer
`(240-pl of a
`3). Two portions of pol 1
`lution containing 20 mg/ml) were then
`awed and added, and the protein-tem-
`te-primer sample was allowed to stand
`an additional hour. A 4-pgmol sample of
`CTP (in 40 ,ul of H20) (29) was the last
`mponent to be added, resulting in a
`iction mixture containing pol 1
`at ap-
`Dximately 10 mg/ml, 10 MM MgC12, and
`excess of template:primer:ddCTP in mo-
`ratios of 3:4:30, respectively, relative to
`c amount of protein. The reaction, nu-
`otidyl transfer of ddCMP to the primer
`terminus, was allowed to proceed for 2
`urs before crystallization trays were set up
`
`Two different crystal forms were ob-
`ved, depending on the concentration of
`hium sulfate in the reservoir solution.
`ie crystal form, obtained with lithium
`Lfate concentrations from 40 to 75 mM,
`IS hexagonal and grew to dimensions of
`3 by 0.8 by 0.6 mm in about 2 weeks.
`ese crystals belong to space group P61
`= b = 94.9, c = 117.6 A), with one
`mplex molecule per asymmetric unit.
`ider similar conditions, but at lithium
`Lfate concentrations from 75 to 150 mM,
`telike crystals grew to dimensions of
`
`O
`
`sN
`
`H
`
`H
`
`Fig. 2. Two normal cellular
`nucleotides, (A) 2'-deoxy-
`cytidine
`5'-triphosphate
`(dCTP) and (B) 2'-deoxy-
`thymidine 5'-triphosphate
`(dTTP), and their anti-HIV
`(C)
`(drug)
`counterparts
`0 2',3'-dideoxycytidine
`5'-
`triphosphate (ddCTP) and
`(D) 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxy-
`thymidine 5'-triphosphate
`(AZT-TP). The triphosphate
`moiety, which is linked via
`a phosphoester bond to
`the 5' carbon of the ribose,
`is designated TP.
`
`ever, because structural evidence for a com-
`mon nucleotidyl transfer mechanism has so
`far been limited to comparisons among
`polymerases from a bacterium (KF), a virus
`(RT), and a phage (RNAP), perhaps the
`most convincing evidence for this hypoth-
`esis is provided by the crystal structure
`determination of a eukaryotic polymerase,
`rat DNA pol 13(14). Sequence alignments
`show that pol 13 is so distantly related, even
`from its eukaryotic relatives, polymerases a,
`y, 8, and e, that it stands in a class of
`its own along with only one other polymer-
`ase, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase
`(TdT) (15). The crystal structure of pol P
`nevertheless revealed a polymerase fold
`consisting of palm, fingers, and thumb
`(along with an additional 8-kD domain
`attached to the fingers), and the most
`striking structural similarity with its distant
`relatives, KF, RT, and RNAP, is a portion
`of the palm that bears the highly conserved
`carboxylic acid residues (14). This suggests
`that despite the large differences in size (pol
`13, at 39 kD, is the smallest polymerase
`known), in function [although pol 13 may
`play a role in DNA replication (16, 17), its
`primary function is in DNA repair (18-
`20)], and in fidelity [pol 13 is the most error
`prone eukaryotic polymerase studied to date
`(21, 22)], pol 13 probably shares a common
`nucleotidyl transfer catalytic mechanism
`with all other polymerases.
`Taking advantage of the chain termina-
`tion method of polymerase inhibition with
`ddNTPs, we have succeeded in growing
`crystals of rat pol 13 complexed with two
`pseudo substrates, namely, (i) a DNA tem-
`plate-primer in which the 3' end of the
`primer has been "terminated" by ddCMP,
`and (ii) ddCTP. In preparation for crystal-
`lization experiments, we mixed pol 13 with
`the DNA template-primer shown below
`and a large excess of ddCTP on the assump-
`tion that, prior to crystallization, the fol-
`lowing reaction would occur:
`3'GCCGCGGGAAA5'
`3' + ddCTP --
`5'CGGCGC
`3'GCCGCGGGAAA5'
`5'CGGCGCCdd
`3' + PPi
`the newly incorporated
`where Cdd is
`ddCMP. If pol 1
`then were to try to
`incorporate another nucleotide onto the
`a second nucleotidyl
`primer terminus,
`transfer reaction could not occur because
`the recently incorporated ddCMP lacks a
`3'-OH group. This should result in a pseudo
`complex
`Michaelis-Menten
`ternary
`in
`which both "substrates" are present, name-
`ly, a nonreactive template-primer and a
`nucleoside triphosphate. Crystals were ob-
`tained, and the subsequent structure deter-
`minations revealed that this must have been
`what happened. Electron density maps
`
`showed a primer strand that was seven nu-
`cleotides long, although we started with a
`primer that was only six nucleotides in
`length, and the 3' (deoxy) terminus of the
`primer was positioned next to strong elec-
`tron density resembling a nucleoside triphos-
`phate, presumably ddCTP.
`Such a detailed view of the active site in
`the ternary complex allows us to propose a
`two-metal ion mechanism for the nucleoti-
`dyl transfer reaction that is similar, in many
`ways, to the two-metal ion mechanism
`previously proposed for another type of
`phosphoryl transfer reaction-the exonu-
`clease reaction of the 3Y'-5' exonuclease of
`E. coli DNA pol I (23, 24). Our proposed
`nucleotidyl transfer mechanism probably
`applies to all polymerases, but when we
`attempt to extend that mechanism to the
`other three polymerases-KF, RT, and
`RNAP-for which the crystal structures are
`known, a problem arises: in our structures,
`pol 13 is bound to the DNA in a manner
`that differs from the recently proposed poly-
`merase-DNA models for all three of these
`polymerases.
`Crystailizations and preliminary dif-
`fraction studies. Recombinant rat DNA
`pol 13 (25) was expressed in E. coli and
`purified as described (26). After purifica-
`tion, the protein was washed three times in
`a microconcentrator (Centricon- 10, Ami-
`con) with a buffer solution (10 mM ammo-
`nium sulfate, 0.1 M tris, pH 7.0), then
`concentrated to 20 mg/ml and stored at
`-80°C in sealed Eppendorf tubes (120-,ul
`portions). Prior to crystallization, a protein-
`
`A
`
`B
`
`dCTP
`
`dTTP
`
`C
`
`D
`
`ddCTP
`
`N3
`AZr-TP
`
`1 892
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 264
`
`*
`
`24 JUNE 1994
`
`

`

`1.0 by 0.6 by 0.2 mm in a few days. These
`(a
`crystals belong to space group P21
`= 106.3, b = 56.8, c = 86.7 A, and 1 =
`106.4°) and there are two complex mole-
`cules per asymmetric unit. Often both crys-
`tal forms grew in the same drop, and the
`crystals on which data were collected (Ta-
`ble 1) were grown at the same concentra-
`tion of lithium sulfate, 75 mM. The unusu-
`ally large excess of ddCTP (1:30 molar
`ratio) was required in order to obtain the
`P61 crystals, but the P2, crystals could be
`grown under much lower ddCTP excesses
`(1:10 molar ratio). Extreme purity of all
`components in the crystallization medium,
`particularly the DNA samples (27), seemed
`to be an absolute requirement for growing
`both types of temary complex crystals.
`Attempts were made to obtain temary
`complex crystals of rat pol ,B, a DNA tem-
`plate-primer, and AZT-TP (Fig. 2D) (31)
`under similar conditions, even though incor-
`poration of AZT-MP would result in a mis-
`matched base pair (of a G-T type) at the
`primer terminus (22). Orthorhombic crystals
`grew in space group P21212 (a = 188.4, b =
`67.7, c = 39.1 A) with one pol P molecule
`in the asymmetric unit. A 4.0 A data set was
`collected and preliminary structural studies
`(32) showed that, because of crystal pack-
`ing, it was not possible for the template-
`primer to occupy the pol 13 binding channel.
`Failure of pol 13 to form a tight complex with
`the DNA template-primer under these con-
`ditions might be attributed to steric hin-
`drance by the azido group of a newly incor-
`porated AZT-MP on the primer terminus.
`Efforts to obtain a binary complex of pol
`1 and a DNA template-primer alone (nei-
`ther ddCTP nor AZT-TP) resulted in crys-
`tals that grew under much different condi-
`
`.SR
`
`.X~s~w> f~f'S~. m
`
`tions, but were nonetheless isomorphous
`with the P21212 (AZT-TP) crystals men-
`tioned above. Failure of pol 13 to bind to the
`DNA in this case could be due to the higher
`salt concentration of the crystallization me-
`dium (about 250 mM salt compared to 75
`mM). Because one crystallization medium
`contained AZT-TP and the other did not,
`we calculated FO(AZT-TP) -FO(apo) oLC, dif-
`ference Fourier maps to see whether an
`AZT-TP binding site could be located.
`Strong electron density was observed in an
`area of the map adjacent to Arg'49, which is
`near the catalytically important residues,
`Asp'92, and Asp256. This pol
`Asp'90,
`1-AZT-TP binary complex which, as dis-
`cussed below, is probably not catalytically
`relevant, is similar to a KF-dNTP binary
`complex in which the dNTP bound to Arg
`residues near the catalytically important
`carboxylic acid residues of KF (33).
`Human pol 1, which has been cloned
`and expressed (34, 35) in a manner similar
`to that of rat pol 1, shares more than 95
`percent sequence similarity with rat pol 1,.
`so it was somewhat surprising when at-
`tempts to obtain ternary complex crystals
`of human pol 1, a DNA template-primer,
`and ddCTP under the same conditions de-
`scribed above for the rat enzyme resulted
`in crystals that grew in two previously
`unobserved orthorhombic crystal forms.
`One form has unit cell parameters a =
`158, b = 108, c = 60 A, with probably
`two complex molecules in the asymmetric
`unit, but the crystals diffract only to about 5
`A resolution. In contrast, the second crystal
`form diffracts quite well (to about 3.3 A),
`but its unit cell parameters of a = 465, b =
`168, c = 56 A are so large that special data
`collection techniques would be required.
`
`Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics. X-ray diffraction data were collected on a
`multiwire area detector (98) (San Diego Multiwire Systems) with monochromatized CuKa radiation
`(Rigaku rotating anode x-ray generator), and intensity observations for each data set were
`processed with a local UCSD Data Collection Facility software package (99). Reflections from 20 A
`to the maximum resolution were included in all least squares refinement steps. The final structures
`for both complexes include all residues, with the exception of residues 1 to 8 of the disordered
`NH2-terminus and residues 246 to 248 of a disordered surface loop. There are a few missing side
`chain atoms in both coordinate sets that are mainly in lysine and arginine residues of the 8-kD
`domain. Omit maps were used to confirm the modeling of the DNA template-primer, the ddCTP
`nucleotide, and the cis-peptide bond between Gly274 and Ser275.
`
`Data collection
`
`Refinement
`
`Space
`group
`
`dmin
`(A)
`
`a *
`
`Reflections
`
`rotal
`
`Unique
`
`rms
`deviation§
`Bond
`Angle
`(0)
`(A)
`P61
`0.193
`2.9
`0.020
`0.087
`2914
`53,583
`13,281
`99
`1.8
`2.9
`P21
`0.199
`0.018
`2.9
`5753
`0.059
`25,046
`3.6
`10,650
`96
`1.8
`tRSym = lI'obs
`*Average ratio of observed intensity to background in the highest resolution shell of reflections.
`*The number of nonhydrogen atoms includes 31 and 4 water oxygens for the P61 and the P21
`/avg.
`-
`strucures, respectively.
`§The rms bond and rms angle values are the deviations from ideal values of the bond
`IlFinal R = SIFObS - FcacI/1Fobs, including all data between 20 A
`lengths and bond angles in the final model.
`and the maximum resolution.
`
`Complete-
`ness (%)
`
`Y
`
`Final
`R11
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 264
`
`*
`
`24 JUNE 1994
`
`Structure determination and refine-
`ment. Data collection and refinement sta-
`tistics for the structure determinations of
`the two ternary complexes of rat pol 1, a
`DNA template-primer, and ddCTP are list-
`ed in Table 1. Structure solutions utilized
`the refined atomic coordinates of the high
`resolution (2.3 A) structure of the 31-kD
`domain of rat pol 1
`(14). The molecular
`replacement programs of XPLOR (36) gave
`clear rotation solutions for the 31 -kD do-
`main of both ternary complexes, but only
`after results from classical cross-rotation
`searches had been filtered through the Pat-
`terson-correlation (PC) refinement steps
`(37). PC refinement techniques were par-
`ticularly powerful for our structure determi-
`nations because independent rigid body
`movements of the fingers, palm, and thumb
`subdomains of the 31-kD domain could be
`allowed during PC refinement of the rota-
`Results from subsequent
`searches.
`tion
`translation searches gave solutions for the
`P61 complex structure that were, in gener-
`al, at higher peak height to background
`ratios than translation solutions for the P21
`complex structure, but the highest transla-
`tion peaks in both cases nevertheless were
`the correct solutions (38).
`The 31-kD partial structure solutions
`obtained by molecular replacement tech-
`niques were subjected to rigid body refine-
`ment by XPLOR (36), where the entire
`31 -kD domain was first allowed to move as
`a rigid body, then later, the fingers, palm,
`and thumb subdomains were allowed to
`move as independent rigid bodies simulta-
`neously. Typical R factors at this stage were
`about 50 percent. After subsequent posi-
`tional refinement with the least squares
`program package TNT (39) had lowered
`the R factors of the partial solutions to
`about 45 percent, we calculated Fo - FC,
`a, difference Fourier maps that revealed
`clear electron density for many of the back-
`bone phosphates of a double-stranded DNA
`molecule as well as the three phosphates of
`a ddCTP nucleotide, and even portions of
`the 8-kD domain were evident at this early
`stage. Cycles of model building and least
`squares refinement improved the electron
`density for the rest of the DNA as well as
`the 8-kD domain for both complex struc-
`tures, and once the R factors had dropped
`below 30 percent, refinement of individual
`isotropic temperature factors also improved
`the maps and facilitated refinement.
`Although we were unable to discern the
`DNA base sequences at these resolutions,
`the directionality (5' -
`3') of the DNA
`strands was evident early in our modeling
`efforts, hence we knew that the 3' terminus
`of either the template strand or the primer
`strand was positioned at the pol 13 active
`site. What ultimately distinguished the
`template from the primer was that we were
`1893
`
`

`

`loll
`
`., 1.
`
`.ll
`
`gowicamlel
`
`.ll
`
`1110011
`
`9 1 INWORM.11
`
`able to model in seven nucleotides for one
`of the DNA strands and at least 8 nt for the
`second DNA strand. Provided that no un-
`expected side reactions had occurred during
`crystallization, we knew that the primer
`could be no longer than 7 nt, and therefore
`the DNA strand containing 8 nt was desig-
`nated the template. We then concluded
`that the first three bases of the template
`(AAA) are disordered in both crystal struc-
`tures. This interpretation of the data is in
`agreement with the idea that the 3' termi-
`nus of the primer should be positioned at
`the polymerase active site. Analysis of the
`DNA in our refined structures with the
`program CURVES II (40) indicated that
`the DNA is predominantly B form. Our
`DNA may have some A-DNA characteris-
`tics, however, in that the minor groove
`width appears to increase as the DNA
`approaches the pol 13 active site; the section
`of the double-stranded DNA that is re-
`moved from the active site and protrudes
`into solution is characteristic of B-DNA
`with a minor groove width of 11 A, whereas
`nearer to the active site, the minor groove
`width is almost 15 A (typical A-DNA has a
`minor groove width of about 17 A).
`Description of the structures. When
`the pol P3 ternary complex structures are
`compared with the structure of the apo
`enzyme (Fig. 3), the most apparent differ-
`ences consist of large movements of the
`8-kD NH2-terminal domain relative to the
`fingers, palm, and thumb of 31-kD COOH-
`terminal domain. The 8-kD domain is teth-
`ered to a proteolytically sensitive hinge
`region (residues 80-90) and changes from
`an open conformation in the apo structure
`to more closed conformations in the com-
`plex structures. Because of the precarious
`position of the 8-kD domain in the pol P
`apo structure, this type of conformational
`change seemed inevitable even before the
`structures of the ternary complexes were
`determined. The only other significant con-
`formational changes on complex formation
`were noticeable rigid-body movements of
`the thumb and, to a lesser degree, the
`fingers, resulting in a somewhat more tight-
`ly closed hand in the ternary com- plexes.
`A greater degree of flexibility on the part of
`the thumb subdomain has also been ob-
`served in other polymerase-DNA structures
`(12, 23, 24, 41). A least squares superpo-
`sition of the 3 1-kD domain of the apo
`structure (14) on the 31-kD domain of one
`of the ternary complex structures
`(P61)
`resulted in a root-mean-square (rms) devi-
`ation in at carbon positions of 2.5 A,
`whereas when the fingers, palm, and thumb
`subdomains were treated separately, the rms
`deviations in a carbon positions were only
`0.71, 0.69, and 0.82 A, respectively.
`The 8-kD domain has a net charge of
`(assuming neutral
`+ 10
`histidines) and
`1894
`
`binds to single stranded DNA with an
`association constant of 2 x 105 M' (26).
`It has no obvious structural equivalent in
`any of the other polymerases for which
`
`crystal structures have been determined,
`and crosslinking studies with gapped DNA
`substrates (42) suggest that the 8-kD do-
`main is probably responsible for the highly
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`Fig. 3. Stereoview ribbon diagrams (100) of (A) rat DNA pol 13, apo structure (14) and (B and C)
`ternary complexes of rat DNA pol 1 with a DNA template-primer and ddCTP in space groups P61
`and P21, respectively. In (A) the 8-kD domain is designated 8-kD, and the fingers, palm, and thumb
`subdomains of the 31-kD domain are represented by F, P, and T, respectively. A ball-and-stick
`representation highlights the ddCTP nucleotide in (B and C). In (B) the positions of the two Mg2+
`ions are marked with black spheres. These metals ions are not shown in (C) because we were
`unable to see the Mg2+ ions in electron density maps of the lower resolution P21 ternary complex
`structure.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 264
`
`*
`
`24 JUNE 1994
`
`

`

`ow,
`
`.................... ..........
`
`.....................
`
`woman
`
`processive short-gap filling activities found
`exclusively in pol 1B
`It has been
`(43).
`proposed that the 31-kD domain binds to
`the double-stranded segment of the tem-
`plate-primer, and the 8-kD domain binds to
`single-stranded
`the
`template
`overhang
`(44)-or in the case of binding to a short
`gap in the DNA, to the 5 '-phosphate of the
`downstream oligonucleotide (42). We see
`some evidence of this in that the 3 1-kD
`domain clearly uses its palm, fingers, and
`thumb to grasp the double-stranded seg-
`ment of the template-primer while the
`8-kD domain, although positioned quite
`differently in the two complex structures, is
`nevertheless close to where an extended
`template would be. Unfortunately, our tem-
`
`plate overhang was probably a little too short
`four bases-GAAA) to
`(only
`interact
`strongly with the 8-kD domain, causing the
`first three bases of the template to be disor-
`dered in both crystal structures. It is possible
`that, because the highly flexible 8-kD do-
`main had no template on which to anchor in
`our crystallization experiments, its position
`was determined almost entirely by crystal
`packing forces, and probably neither of the
`two conformations of the 8-kD domain seen
`in Fig. 3, B and C, is correct for template
`binding in vivo. Nevertheless, kinetic stud-
`ies of the 3 1-kD fragment alone showed that
`pol ,B can still function as a polymerase
`without the 8-kD domain, albeit at only
`about 5 percent of its normal activity (44).
`
`Table 2. Hydrogen bond interactions of 3.3 A or less between pol p and the DNA template-primer.
`
`Residue
`
`Subdomain
`
`Atom
`
`Base*
`
`Atom
`
`Distance
`
`Protein to DNA phosphate H bonds
`P-6C
`N
`P-5G
`N
`P-5G
`N
`P-5G
`N
`P-7C
`NH2
`
`02P
`02P
`01 P
`02P
`02P
`
`N
`N
`N
`
`T-9C
`T-8G
`T-8G
`
`02P
`02P
`02P
`02P
`02P
`
`2.9
`2.7
`2.9
`3.1
`2.7
`
`3.0
`3.1
`2.7
`
`2.7
`2.6
`
`Gly105
`Gly107
`Ser109
`Alal10
`Arg254
`
`Lys230
`Thr233
`Lys234
`
`Fingers
`Fingers
`Fingers
`Fingers
`Fingers
`
`Palm
`Palm
`Palm
`
`Thr292
`Tyr296
`
`Thumb
`Thumb
`
`OG1
`T-5G
`OH
`T-5C
`Protein to DNA base H bonds
`Lys234
`Palm
`T-7C
`NZ
`02
`2.9
`Tyr271
`Thumb
`OH
`P-7C
`02
`2.7
`Arg283
`NH1
`T-4G
`Thumb
`N3
`3.2
`*DNA bases are designated T or P to distinguish template bases from primer bases, respectively. Starting from
`the 5' terminus of each strand, bases are numbered 1 to 11 for the template and are numbered 1 to 7 for the
`primer. C and G represent cytosine and guanine, respectively, and atom designations follow Protein Data Bank
`nomenclature.
`
`Fingerg
`
`S
`
`Thumb
`
`FingerS
`
`Thumb
`
`8 kD
`8 kD
`Fig. 4. Omit map of the DNA template-primer and ddCTP overlayed on an a carbon diagram of the
`refined P61 pol
`structure. The view is that of Fig. 3 rotated by 900 about a horizontal axis in the
`plane of the page so that the DNA binding channel is now vertical. The template-primer sits on top
`of the palm subdomain, which is not labeled. Before all omit maps were calculated, the part of the
`structure in question was deleted from the coordinate file and the remaining partial structure was
`subjected to 200 cycles of least squares positional refinement in XPLOR (36) in order to remove
`bias from the phases.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 264
`
`*
`
`24 JUNE 1994
`
`In contrast to the 8-kD domain, the rest
`of the structure (the fingers, palm, and
`thumb of 3 1-kD domain, as well as the
`template-primer and ddCTP substrate) is
`virtually identical in both crystal forms of
`the ternary complex. This provides support
`for the physiological relevance of our com-
`plex crystals, at least with respect to the
`polymerase-DNA-ddCTP interactions. Also
`strengthening the argument is that, unlike
`other reported crystals of polymerase-DNA
`complexes (12, 41), our crystals were grown
`at low, near physiological salt concentra-
`tions. Finally, the fact that that a ddCMP
`was incorporated into our template-primer
`shows that the nucleotidyl transfer reaction
`did proceed, at least for one turnover, in the
`same medium from which crystals were
`eventually obtained. In that the following
`discussions do not apply to the 8-kD do-
`main of pol ,B and will be limited mostly to
`the 3 1-kD domain's interactions with
`DNA and ddCTP, we will henceforth
`refer only to the complex structure that
`has been refined to the highest resolution,
`the P61 crystal structure.
`The DNA binding channel in pol 1, just
`as in KF, RT, and RNAP, is lined with
`positively charged lysine and arginine side
`chains, and it has always been a reasonable
`assumption that their function is to stabilize
`the negatively charged backbone phos-
`phates of the DNA (45). Therefore it was
`quite surprising that, except for Arg254,
`which is hydrogen bonded to the phosphate
`of the newly incorporated ddCMP of the
`primer strand, there are no direct lysine or
`arginine interactions with the backbone
`phosphates of the DNA in our complex
`(Table 2). Instead, nearly all of the inter-
`actions of protein with DNA involve two
`different clusters of protein backbone nitro-
`gens located at the entrance to the DNA
`binding channel (Table 2). One cluster,
`consisting of four of the backbone nitrogens
`between Gly'05 and Aa1P1, is located at the
`NH2-terminal end of helix G in the fingers
`subdomain of pol 1 and interacts with the
`phosphates of the primer strand. The sec-
`ond cluster, comprising three of the five
`backbone nitrogens between Lys230 and
`Lys234, is located in a beta turn, which
`connects beta strands 3 and 4 of the palm
`subdomain and interacts with backbone
`phosphates of the template strand. The
`only other hydrogen bonded interactions
`(3.3 A or less) between pol 13 and DNA
`phosphates are between the side chains of
`Thr292 and Tyr296, located on a loop be-
`tween beta strands 6 and 7 of the thumb
`subdomain, and the backbone phosphates
`of the template strand (Table 2).
`In addition to our observations that
`there seemed to be fewer hydrogen bond
`interactions between pol 1P and DNA than
`expected (Table 2), we were also initially
`1895
`
`

`

`surprised to see that the DNA sits in the
`binding channel at a slight angle and ap-
`pears to "run into" alpha helices M and N
`of the thumb subdomain (Fig. 4). It
`is
`possible that the angle between the DNA
`axis and the apparent axis of the pol 1
`binding channel would change considerably
`if a longer template were used and, as
`proposed above, the 8-kD domain partici-
`pated in the positioning of the template-
`primer. However, the aesthetically pleasing
`observation that the base pairs of the DNA
`are parallel to the beta strands of the palm
`subdomain (Fig. 5) encourages us to believe
`that interactions of pol 13 with the double-
`stranded segment of any DNA template-
`primer will not vary much from what is seen
`in the present ternary complex structures.
`Perhaps one of the most unvarying char-
`acteristics of B-DNA is that it has a spine of
`well-ordered water molecules which inter-
`acts with the 02 of pyrimidines and the
`N3's of purines in the minor groove, and it
`has been proposed that the disruption of
`this particular water structure is the first
`step in the B-DNA to A-DNA transition
`(46, 47). In our complex structure, only
`three protein side chains come within 3.3
`A of the DNA bases, and they are all
`located in the shallow minor groove of the
`template-primer (Table 2). Two of these
`(Lys234 and Tyr27t) are hydrogen bonded to
`the 02 of a template cytidine and the 02 of
`a primer cytidine, respectively, while an-
`other (Arg283) is hydrogen bonded to the
`N3 of a template guanine. This leads us to
`propose that perhaps Lys234, Tyr271, and
`Arg283 all function to break up the water
`structure in the minor groove of the tem-
`plate-primer upon complex formation, re-
`sulting in a larger minor groove width,
`characteristic of A-DNA, at the pol 1
`active site.
`Unlike transcription factors and other
`gene regulatory DNA-binding proteins,
`polymerases must bind to DNA with little
`regard for sequence specificity. This is evi-
`dent from Table 2 where, as discussed
`above, most of the protein to DNA inter-
`actions are nonsequence-specific hydrogen
`bonds between pol 13 backbone nitrogens
`and DNA phosphate oxygens. Even what
`appear to be sequence-specific interactions
`between protein side chains and DNA

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket