throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 92, pp. 6339-6343, July 1995
`Biochemistry
`
`A single residue in DNA polymerases of the Escherichia coli DNA
`polymerase I family is critical for distinguishing between deoxy-
`and dideoxyribonucleotides
`(DNA sequencing/dideoxynucleotides/T7 DNA polymerase/Taq DNA polymerase/fidelity)
`STANLEY TABOR AND CHARLES C. RICHARDSON
`Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
`
`Contributed by Charles C. Richardson, March 28, 1995
`
`Bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase effi-
`ABSTRACT
`ciently incorporates a chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide
`into DNA, in contrast to the DNA polymerases from Esche-
`richia coli and Thermus aquaticus. The molecular basis for this
`difference has been determined by constructing active site
`hybrids of these polymerases. A single hydroxyl group on the
`polypeptide chain is critical for selectivity. Replacing tyrosine-
`526 of T7 DNA polymerase with phenylalanine increases dis-
`crimination against the four dideoxynucleotides by >2000-
`fold, while replacing the phenylalanine at the homologous
`position in E. coli DNA polymerase I (position 762) or T.
`aquaticus DNA polymerase (position 667) with tyrosine de-
`creases discrimination against the four dideoxynucleotides
`250- to 8000-fold. These mutations allow the engineering of
`new DNA polymerases with enhanced properties for use in
`DNA sequence analysis.
`
`All known DNA polymerases can be placed in one of four
`families based on sequence homologies (1, 2). Although Esch-
`erichia coli DNA polymerase I, Thermus aquaticus DNA
`polymerase (Taq DNA polymerase), and bacteriophage T7
`DNA polymerase are members of the DNA polymerase I (Pol
`I) family, a number of their properties differ significantly (3).
`First, T7 DNA polymerase is responsible for the replication of
`a genome and, as such, interacts with other replication pro-
`teins, whereas E. coli DNA polymerase I and Taq DNA
`polymerase are mainly responsible for repair and recombina-
`tion. Second, the three polymerases have different exonuclease
`activities: T7 has only a 3' --
`5' activity, Taq has only a 5' --
`3' activity, and E. coli DNA polymerase I has both 3' --
`5' and
`5' --
`3' activities. The exonuclease activities reside in separate
`domains at the amino termini and can be inactivated selectively
`by genetic modification. Third, the thermostability of Taq
`DNA polymerase distinguishes it from the other two.
`A fourth difference is their relative abilities to distinguish
`between a deoxy- and a dideoxyribose in the nucleoside
`triphosphate. E. coli DNA polymerase I (4-6) and Taq DNA
`polymerase (7) incorporate deoxyiucleotides at a rate that is
`several hundred to several thousand times that of di-
`deoxynucleotides, while T7 DNA polymerase incorporates
`dideoxynucleotides much more efficiently, preferring de-
`oxynucleotides by only a factor of three (5, 6). To determine
`the molecular basis for this difference we constructed active
`site hybrids of the DNA polymerases and examined their
`ability to use ddNTPs relative to dNTPs. Inasmuch as chain
`termination by dideoxynucleotides is the basis of all commonly
`used enzymatic methods of DNA sequencing (5, 8), an un-
`derstanding of this difference has utility for improving the
`DNA polymerases used for this purpose.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`6339
`
`METHODS
`Construction ofHybrid Genes. Hybrid genes were constructed
`by using synthetic oligonucleotides and the polymerase chain
`reaction. Hybrids of the T7 DNA polymerase gene were ex-
`pressed under the control of the lac promoter in the vector
`pUC18; the parent vector (pGP5-12) contains the gene for T7
`DNA polymerase with a deletion that encodes amino acid
`residues 118-145, inactivating the exonuclease (9). Hybrids of the
`E. coli DNA polymerase I gene were constructed in pKLEN-1,
`which encodes the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I
`(beginning at residue 324) under the control of a T7 RNA
`polymerase promoter. Hybrids of Taq DNA polymerase were
`constructed in pTQA-1, which encodes a truncated fragment of
`Taq DNA polymerase (beginning at residue 289) under the
`control of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. For characterization
`of the purified Taq hybrid polymerase C-Q5 (see Table 1), a
`fragment containing the mutation in pTQA-1 was transferred into
`the full-length Taq DNA polymerase gene.
`SDS-DNA Activity Gel Analysis. SDS-DNA activity gel
`analysis was carried out as described (10, 11). Ten milliliters of
`induced cells was pelleted and resuspended in 0.3 ml of 50 mM
`Tris HCl (pH 6.8). Two to 20 ,ul of cells was added to 60 ,ul of
`50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8/15% glycerol/100 mM mercapto-
`ethanol/0.02% bromphenol blue/0.5% SDS. Samples were
`heated at 37°C for 5 min prior to loading 20-,ul samples on
`duplicate gels. After electrophoresis (5 V/cm for 13 hr at
`13°C), SDS was removed from the gels by soaking four times
`in 800 ml of renaturation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5/15%
`glycerol/6 mM magnesium acetate/40 mM KCl/400 ,ug of
`bovine serum albumin per ml/1 mM dithiothreitol) at 4°C over
`16 hr. DNA polymerase activity in each gel was assayed in a
`6-ml mixture of renaturation buffer containing all four dNTPs
`(each at 1.5 ,uM), 30 ,uCi of [a-32P]dATP (1 Ci = 37 GBq), 30
`,uM ddTTP (where present), and 1 ,LM E. coli thioredoxin.
`Reactions were carried out for 2 hr at either room temperature
`(E. coli and T7) or 70°C (Taq). Unincorporated [a-32P]dATP
`was removed from the gels by soaking four times in 300 ml of
`5% trichloroacetic acid/1% PP; over 2 hr. The gels were
`transferred to filter paper, dried, and autoradiographed.
`Purification of Wild-Type (WT) and Hybrid Proteins.
`"WT" DNA polymerase refers to the enzyme that contains the
`WT residue (tyrosine in T7 and phenylalanine in E. coli and
`Taq) at the ribose selectivity site, while the mutant or hybrid
`enzyme has the opposite residue. "WT T7 DNA polymerase"
`has a deletion of 28 amino acid residues (118-145) in the
`exonuclease domain (9) and is a one-to-one complex of the T7
`gene 5 protein and E. coli thioredoxin. "WT E. coli DNA
`polymerase I" is the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase
`I, or Klenow fragment, missing the 5' -* 3' exonuclease
`activity. "WT Taq DNA polymerase" is full-length Taq DNA
`polymerase. WT Taq DNA polymerase was purchased from
`
`Abbreviations: Pol I, DNA polymerase I; WT, wild-type.
`
`Columbia Ex. 2059
`Illumina, Inc. v. The Trustees
`of Columbia University in the
`City of New York
`IPR2020-00988, -01065,
`-01177, -01125, -01323
`
`

`

`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 92, pp. 6339-6343, July 1995
`Biochemistry
`
`A single residue in DNA polymerases of the Escherichia coli DNA
`polymerase I family is critical for distinguishing between deoxy-
`and dideoxyribonucleotides
`(DNA sequencing/dideoxynucleotides/T7 DNA polymerase/Taq DNA polymerase/fidelity)
`STANLEY TABOR AND CHARLES C. RICHARDSON
`Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
`
`Contributed by Charles C. Richardson, March 28, 1995
`
`Bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase effi-
`ABSTRACT
`ciently incorporates a chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide
`into DNA, in contrast to the DNA polymerases from Esche-
`richia coli and Thermus aquaticus. The molecular basis for this
`difference has been determined by constructing active site
`hybrids of these polymerases. A single hydroxyl group on the
`polypeptide chain is critical for selectivity. Replacing tyrosine-
`526 of T7 DNA polymerase with phenylalanine increases dis-
`crimination against the four dideoxynucleotides by >2000-
`fold, while replacing the phenylalanine at the homologous
`position in E. coli DNA polymerase I (position 762) or T.
`aquaticus DNA polymerase (position 667) with tyrosine de-
`creases discrimination against the four dideoxynucleotides
`250- to 8000-fold. These mutations allow the engineering of
`new DNA polymerases with enhanced properties for use in
`DNA sequence analysis.
`
`All known DNA polymerases can be placed in one of four
`families based on sequence homologies (1, 2). Although Esch-
`erichia coli DNA polymerase I, Thermus aquaticus DNA
`polymerase (Taq DNA polymerase), and bacteriophage T7
`DNA polymerase are members of the DNA polymerase I (Pol
`I) family, a number of their properties differ significantly (3).
`First, T7 DNA polymerase is responsible for the replication of
`a genome and, as such, interacts with other replication pro-
`teins, whereas E. coli DNA polymerase I and Taq DNA
`polymerase are mainly responsible for repair and recombina-
`tion. Second, the three polymerases have different exonuclease
`activities: T7 has only a 3' --
`5' activity, Taq has only a 5' --
`3' activity, and E. coli DNA polymerase I has both 3' --
`5' and
`5' --
`3' activities. The exonuclease activities reside in separate
`domains at the amino termini and can be inactivated selectively
`by genetic modification. Third, the thermostability of Taq
`DNA polymerase distinguishes it from the other two.
`A fourth difference is their relative abilities to distinguish
`between a deoxy- and a dideoxyribose in the nucleoside
`triphosphate. E. coli DNA polymerase I (4-6) and Taq DNA
`polymerase (7) incorporate deoxyiucleotides at a rate that is
`several hundred to several thousand times that of di-
`deoxynucleotides, while T7 DNA polymerase incorporates
`dideoxynucleotides much more efficiently, preferring de-
`oxynucleotides by only a factor of three (5, 6). To determine
`the molecular basis for this difference we constructed active
`site hybrids of the DNA polymerases and examined their
`ability to use ddNTPs relative to dNTPs. Inasmuch as chain
`termination by dideoxynucleotides is the basis of all commonly
`used enzymatic methods of DNA sequencing (5, 8), an un-
`derstanding of this difference has utility for improving the
`DNA polymerases used for this purpose.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`6339
`
`METHODS
`Construction ofHybrid Genes. Hybrid genes were constructed
`by using synthetic oligonucleotides and the polymerase chain
`reaction. Hybrids of the T7 DNA polymerase gene were ex-
`pressed under the control of the lac promoter in the vector
`pUC18; the parent vector (pGP5-12) contains the gene for T7
`DNA polymerase with a deletion that encodes amino acid
`residues 118-145, inactivating the exonuclease (9). Hybrids of the
`E. coli DNA polymerase I gene were constructed in pKLEN-1,
`which encodes the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I
`(beginning at residue 324) under the control of a T7 RNA
`polymerase promoter. Hybrids of Taq DNA polymerase were
`constructed in pTQA-1, which encodes a truncated fragment of
`Taq DNA polymerase (beginning at residue 289) under the
`control of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. For characterization
`of the purified Taq hybrid polymerase C-Q5 (see Table 1), a
`fragment containing the mutation in pTQA-1 was transferred into
`the full-length Taq DNA polymerase gene.
`SDS-DNA Activity Gel Analysis. SDS-DNA activity gel
`analysis was carried out as described (10, 11). Ten milliliters of
`induced cells was pelleted and resuspended in 0.3 ml of 50 mM
`Tris HCl (pH 6.8). Two to 20 ,ul of cells was added to 60 ,ul of
`50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8/15% glycerol/100 mM mercapto-
`ethanol/0.02% bromphenol blue/0.5% SDS. Samples were
`heated at 37°C for 5 min prior to loading 20-,ul samples on
`duplicate gels. After electrophoresis (5 V/cm for 13 hr at
`13°C), SDS was removed from the gels by soaking four times
`in 800 ml of renaturation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5/15%
`glycerol/6 mM magnesium acetate/40 mM KCl/400 ,ug of
`bovine serum albumin per ml/1 mM dithiothreitol) at 4°C over
`16 hr. DNA polymerase activity in each gel was assayed in a
`6-ml mixture of renaturation buffer containing all four dNTPs
`(each at 1.5 ,uM), 30 ,uCi of [a-32P]dATP (1 Ci = 37 GBq), 30
`,uM ddTTP (where present), and 1 ,LM E. coli thioredoxin.
`Reactions were carried out for 2 hr at either room temperature
`(E. coli and T7) or 70°C (Taq). Unincorporated [a-32P]dATP
`was removed from the gels by soaking four times in 300 ml of
`5% trichloroacetic acid/1% PP; over 2 hr. The gels were
`transferred to filter paper, dried, and autoradiographed.
`Purification of Wild-Type (WT) and Hybrid Proteins.
`"WT" DNA polymerase refers to the enzyme that contains the
`WT residue (tyrosine in T7 and phenylalanine in E. coli and
`Taq) at the ribose selectivity site, while the mutant or hybrid
`enzyme has the opposite residue. "WT T7 DNA polymerase"
`has a deletion of 28 amino acid residues (118-145) in the
`exonuclease domain (9) and is a one-to-one complex of the T7
`gene 5 protein and E. coli thioredoxin. "WT E. coli DNA
`polymerase I" is the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase
`I, or Klenow fragment, missing the 5' -* 3' exonuclease
`activity. "WT Taq DNA polymerase" is full-length Taq DNA
`polymerase. WT Taq DNA polymerase was purchased from
`
`Abbreviations: Pol I, DNA polymerase I; WT, wild-type.
`
`

`

`6340
`
`Biochemistry: Tabor and Richardson
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`Perkin-Elmer (AmpliTaq) and the other five enzymes were
`purified using standard procedures. Polymerase activities in
`extracts and with purified proteins were determined by mea-
`suring the incorporation of [3H]dTMP into a primed M13
`template (9).
`Incorporation Rate Ratios of dNMPs to ddNMPs. Relative
`incorporation rates were determined by gel analysis of a
`32P-end-labeled primer annealed to single-stranded M13 DNA
`extended using a fixed ratio of dNTPs to each ddNTP. React-
`ion mixtures (20 ,ul) contained 0.5 pmol of [5'-32P]GTTTTC-
`CCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGCCA
`(500,000 cpm/pmol) annealed to single-stranded M13 mGP1-2
`DNA (5)/25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0/5 mM MgCl2/5 mM di-
`thiothreitol/all four dNTPs (each at 120 ,uM)/one of the four
`ddNTPs at 20 ,uM/10 ng of yeast inorganic pyrophosphatase
`(12)/10 ng of the indicated DNA polymerase. Reactions were
`carried out for 15 min at 37°C (E. coli and T7) or 70°C (Taq).
`The reactions were terminated by the addition of 20 ,ul of 80%
`formamide/10 mM EDTA/0.02% bromphenol blue, and the
`samples were heated at 90°C for 2 min immediately prior to
`loading onto an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
`The relative rate of incorporation of dNMPs to each ddNMP
`for the three DNA polymerases containing tyrosine at the
`ribose selectivity site was determined by quantitative analysis
`of the gel shown in Fig. 3. The radioactive bands in each lane
`were analyzed with a PhosphorImager, and the data were fit to
`an exponential decay curve to obtain the apparent ratio of
`dNTPs to ddNTPs. The incorporation rate ratio is the ratio of
`the apparent to the actual ratio of each dNTP to ddNTP. For
`each of the three DNA polymerases with phenylalanine, the
`relative rate of incorporation was determined by comparing
`the average length of fragments generated using varying dNTP
`to ddNTP ratios to those generated using the homologous
`polymerase with tyrosine; the increase in discrimination
`against ddNTPs with phenylalanine is the ratio of the dNTP/
`ddNTP ratios required to produce fragments of the same
`average length for the two polymerases.
`
`RESULTS
`Analysis of T7 DNA Polymerase/E. coli DNA Polymerase I
`Hybrid Genes. The three-dimensional structure ofE. coli DNA
`polymerase I is known (13-15). The strongest homology with
`T7 DNA polymerase is in the crevice responsible for binding
`DNA and dNTPs (16). For the five most conserved regions,
`ranging in size from 14 to 29 amino acid residues, we con-
`structed hybrid genes in which the DNA encoding each seg-
`ment in E. coli DNA polymerase I was substituted for the
`homologous segment in the gene for T7 DNA polymerase (Fig.
`1). Activities of extracts ranged from <1% that of WT T7 DNA
`polymerase for hybrids containing regions A, D, and E, 2% for
`region C, and 80% for region B.
`To screen all the hybrids and avoid interference by the host
`DNA polymerases, we used an SDS-DNA activity gel assay for
`initial characterization (10, 11). SDS was added to cells
`containing the overproduced hybrid polymerases and the
`proteins were separated by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide
`gel containing single-stranded DNA. After electrophoresis,
`the SDS was removed, allowing the proteins to renature, and
`polymerase activity was determined directly in the gel by
`incubation with [a-32P]dNTPs. By comparing reactions carried
`out on duplicate gels in the presence and absence of ddTTP,
`we determined the ability of ddTTP to inhibit DNA synthesis
`by each of the hybrid polymerases (Fig. 2).
`In the absence of ddTTP, DNA synthesis was relatively
`efficient with the hybrid polymerases containing regions A, B,
`and C of E. coli polymerase when compared to WT T7 DNA
`polymerase, while those containing regions D and E of E. coli
`polymerase exhibited <1% activity. As shown in the lower
`panel of Fig. 2A, whereas WT T7 DNA polymerase was in-
`
`Structure of the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase
`FIG. 1.
`I showing the regions substituted into T7 DNA polymerase. The
`regions A-E (shown in different colors) were removed from E. coli
`DNA polymerase I and placed into T7 DNA polymerase. The specific
`residues substituted were as follows: A, 666-682 (E. coli) -- 427-444
`(T7); B, 710-734 (E. coli) -* 480-506 (T7); C, 754-767 (E. coli) --
`518-531 (T7): D, 843-867 (E. coli) -- 609-633 (T7); E, 914-928 (E.
`coli) -- 690-704 (T7). The structure shown was derived from the
`coordinates determined by Beese et at (15). The letters within
`parentheses define specific helices (13, 15). The residue shown in helix
`0 (region C) is phenylalanine-762.
`
`hibited several 100-fold by a 20-fold excess of ddTTP over
`dTTP, DNA synthesis by the hybrid containing region C was
`resistant to this level of ddTTP. To define more precisely the
`residues responsible for this difference, we analyzed additional
`
`A T7DNAPol
`(-) W rA B C
`
`.....
`
`B Pol I
`
`D
`
`E
`
`K K6
`
`-ddTTP
`
`+ddTTP
`
`::. ...
`.....-. ......
`
`...
`
`.....
`
`:...w"
`
`FIG. 2. SDS-DNA activity gel analysis of hybrid DNA poly-
`merases. Cell aliquots were loaded on duplicate gels, and after
`electrophoresis, the SDS was removed and the polymerases were
`assayed for their ability to incorporate [a-32P]dAMP into single-
`stranded calf thymus DNA in the absence (-) or presence (+) of
`ddTTP. (A) Analysis of WT T7 DNA polymerase I (WT) and hybrids
`in which regions A-E of T7 DNA polymerase were replaced with the
`homologous regions from E. coli DNA polymerase I (Fig. 1). C-T8
`corresponds to cells containing the T7 DNA polymerase hybrid with
`the single Y526F mutation (Table 1). In the leftmost lane (-), the cells
`contain the control vector pUC18. The leftmost lane and those
`containing hybrids A, C, D, and E contain 10 times the amount of
`induced cells as in the other lanes to compensate for the low activity of
`these polymerases; the band visible at the top of each of these lanes is the
`result of DNA synthesis by the host E. coli DNA polymerase I (arrow-
`head). (B) Analysis of WT E. coli DNA polymerase I (WT) and E. coli
`DNA polymerase I hybrids C-K1 (substitution of 14 residues from T7
`DNA polymerase) and C-K6 (single F762Y mutation) (Table 1).
`
`

`

`..=_,...
`._ _wr_._ _
`........:..::
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`6341
`
`effect of substituting region C of T7 DNA polymerase for the
`homologous region in Taq DNA polymerase (Table 1). Substi-
`tutions that include tyrosine for phenylalanine at residue 667 of
`Taq DNA polymerase increased dramatically the ability of
`ddTTP to inhibit DNA synthesis.
`Analysis of Purified Proteins with Tyrosine Versus Phenyl-
`alanine at Ribose Selectivity Position. To analyze quantita-
`tively the effect of tyrosine versus phenylalanine at the ribose
`selectivity site, we purified the three hybrid polymerases, T7
`Y526F, E. coli F762Y, and Taq F667Y, and compared their
`properties to the WT DNA polymerases. The specific poly-
`merase activities of each of the three hybrid proteins were
`within 25% of the respective WT enzymes. The autoradio-
`graph in Fig. 3 shows the relative ability of the three WT and
`hybrid polymerases to incorporate each of the four ddNMPs.
`A 5'-32P-labeled primer annealed to a single-stranded M13
`template was extended by each of the DNA polymerases in the
`presence of a fixed (6:1) ratio of dNTP to each of the four
`ddNTPs. For all three DNA polymerases, the presence of
`phenylalanine resulted in strong discrimination against each of
`the four ddNTPs, while the presence of tyrosine resulted in
`efficient incorporation of all four ddNMPs.
`We determined quantitatively the relative rate of incorpo-
`ration of each ddNMP compared with the corresponding
`dNMP for each of the DNA polymerases shown in Fig. 3
`(Table 2). Whereas with WT T7 DNA polymerase the average
`rate of incorporation of deoxynucleotides is three times that of
`dideoxynucleotides, with the hybrid T7 DNA polymerase
`Y526F the average rate of incorporation of deoxynucleotides
`is 8000 times that of dideoxynucleotides. On the other hand,
`whereas with WT E. coli DNA polymerase I and Taq DNA
`polymerase the average rate of incorporation of deoxynucle-
`otides is 600 and 3000 times that of dideoxynucleotides, respec-
`
`T7 DNA
`Polymerase
`
`526Y Y526F
`(MUT)
`(WT)
`
`E. coli DNA
`Polymerase I
`
`Taq DNA
`Polymerase
`
`762F
`(WT)
`
`F762Y
`(MUT)
`
`667F F667Y
`(MUT)
`(WT)
`
`- m
`
`--U'
`
`--B 4.
`
`.0io.........
`if-F.7.740
`
`PHE
`
`PHE
`
`TYR
`
`L
`PHE
`
`W
`
`W
`TYR
`
`444r 4*|jb
`uSo w}w
`.::::,
`.: ::¢a '-u:. :u:*
`
`Stl}f
`
`'.., .;
`
`:.:::. ot .: ._: __
`*: t0f:>
`
`.:_rittsSj _
`....."n_
`
`*- :
`_ :::: :::_
`_-_
`:: .::.:
`
`_........
`
`*,: 4_
`.* .
`_.]_jk3w. __
`
`_.
`
`_
`
`J
`
`TYR
`
`Effect of phenylalanine versus tyrosine on discrimination
`FIG. 3.
`against dideoxynucleotides. Purified T7 DNA polymerase, E. coli
`DNA polymerase I, and Taq DNA polymerase with either phenylal-
`anine (F) or tyrosine (Y) at the ribose selectivity site were compared
`for their ability to extend a radioactive primer in the presence of a 6:1
`ratio of dNTPs to each of the four ddNTPs. Each set of reactions were
`carried out in the presence of ddGTP, ddATP, ddTTP, or ddCTP
`(from left to right). Unextended primer is shown on the left.
`
`Biochemistry: Tabor and Richardson
`
`hybrids containing smaller segments of region C (Table 1 and Fig.
`2A). All of the hybrids that contained the replacement of
`tyrosine-526 in T7 DNA polymerase with phenylalanine, the
`residue at the homologous position in E. coli DNA polymerase I
`(position 762), were resistant to ddTTP. Thus modification of this
`single site is critical for increasing the ability of T7 DNA poly-
`merase to distinguish between deoxy- and dideoxynucleotides.
`A reciprocal series of hybrids in E. coli DNA polymerase I
`were constructed to determine whether substitution of region
`C from T7 DNA polymerase would decrease their ability to
`distinguish between deoxy- and dideoxynucleotides (Table 1
`and Fig. 2B). SDS-DNA activity gel analysis of these hybrids
`defined the same single position as the sole determinant: when
`phenylalanine-762 in E. coli DNA polymerase I was replaced
`by tyrosine, DNA synthesis was strongly inhibited by ddTTP,
`reflecting a diminished ability of the hybrid polymerase to
`distinguish between deoxy- and dideoxynucleotides.
`Analysis of Taq DNA Polymerase/T7 DNA Polymerase
`Hybrid Genes. Of the 16 known members of the Pol I family
`(1, 2, 17), one other besides E. coli DNA polymerase I, Taq
`DNA polymerase, is known to strongly prefer deoxy- over di-
`deoxynucleotides (7). Taq DNA polymerase has a phenylalanine
`at residue 667, the site that corresponds to phenylalanine-762 in
`E. coli DNA polymerase I. We have therefore determined the
`
`Table 1.
`Localization of the domain responsible for distinguishing
`between dNTPs and ddNTPs
`
`*.
`
`Inhibition of
`DNA synthesis
`by ddTTP
`-
`-
`+
`
`Polymerase
`Sequence
`Poll
`754 RRSAKAINFGLIYG
`Taq
`659 RRAAKTINFGVLYG
`518 RDNAKTFIYGFLYG
`T7
`Consensus
`R
`AK
`G
`YG
`T7 WT
`RDNAKTFIYGFLYG
`T7 C-T2
`RBRAKAINFGLIYG
`RfIaAKTFIYGFLYG
`T7 C-T3
`T7 C-T4
`RDNAKAINFGFLYG
`T7 C-T5
`RDNAKAI IYGFLYG
`RDNAKTFUEGFLYG
`T7 C-T6
`T7 C-T7
`RDNAKTFNYGFLYG
`T7 C-T8
`RDNAKTFIEGFLYG
`PolI WT
`RRSAKAINFGLIYG
`Pol I C-K1
`RDNAKTFIYGFYG
`Pol I C-K2
`RRSAKTFIYGLIYG
`RRSAKTFNFGLIYG
`Pol I C-K3
`Pol I C-K4
`RRSAKAIIYGLIYG
`Pol I C-K5
`RRSAKAIIFGLIYG
`RRSAKAINYGLIYG
`Pol I C-K6
`Taq WT
`RRAAKTINFGVLYG
`RINAKTINFGVLYG
`Taq C-Q1
`Taq C-Q2
`RRAAKTFIYGFLYG
`Taq C-Q3
`RRAAKTIIYGVLYG
`Taq C-Q4
`RRAAKTIIFGVLYG
`Taq C-Q5
`RRAAKTINYGVLYG
`Specificity residue
`1
`The three aligned sequences at the top correspond to region C in
`Fig. 1; the number of the first residue shown for each polymerase is
`indicated at the left. Three sets of hybrids are presented, correspond-
`ing to substitutions of E. coli DNA polymerase I sequences into T7
`DNA polymerase (T7), T7 DNA polymerase sequences in E. coli DNA
`polymerase I (Pol I), and T7 DNA polymerase sequences into Taq
`DNA polymerase (Taq). Substituted residues are underlined. Each
`hybrid protein was tested qualitatively for inhibition of DNA synthesis
`by ddTTP using the SDS-DNA activity gel assay described in the
`legend to Fig. 2; inhibition was categorized as >20-fold (+), reflecting
`efficient incorporation of a chain-terminating ddTMP, or <2-fold (-),
`reflecting strong discrimination against ddTTP. Hybrids T7 C-T8, Pol
`I C-K6, and Taq C-QS were purified for quantitative comparison to the
`WT proteins (Table 2).
`
`+
`-
`+
`-
`+
`-
`+
`-
`-
`+
`+
`-
`+
`-
`+
`-
`-
`+
`+
`-
`+
`
`

`

`6342
`
`Biochemistry: Tabor and Richardson
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`Effect of phenylalanine versus tyrosine at the ribose selectivity site on discrimination
`Table 2.
`against ddNTPs
`
`Incorporation rate ratio
`Average
`dC/ddC
`dG/ddG
`dA/ddA
`dT/ddT
`dNMP/ddNMP
`Polymerase
`WT T7 DNA polymerase (526Y)
`3.0
`3.7
`2.8
`3.3
`3.2
`8000
`11,000
`7300
`8400
`6400
`T7 DNA polymerase Y526F
`WT E. coli DNA polymerase I (762F)
`600
`250
`720
`1100
`140
`0.6
`0.75
`0.54
`E. coli DNA polymerase I F762Y
`0.72
`0.56
`WT Taq DNA polymerase (667F)
`3000
`2,600
`4700
`4500
`1400
`0.5
`Taq DNA polymerase F667Y
`0.32
`0.56
`0.59
`0.45
`T7 DNA polymerase, E. coli DNA polymerase I, and Taq DNA polymerase were compared with either
`phenylalanine (F) or tyrosine (Y) at the ribose selectivity site. In each case the unmodified or WT DNA
`polymerase (WT) is presented first. The relative rate of incorporation of each dNMP to ddNMP was
`determined by gel analysis of the average extension lengths at different ratios of dNTP to ddNTP (see text).
`
`tively, the hybrid DNA polymerases E. coli F762Y and Taq
`F667Y actually prefer ddNTPs over dNTPs -2-fold.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Mechanism of Discrimination. The critical phenylalanine/
`tyrosine residue defining the ability of Pol I-type DNA poly-
`merases to distinguish between deoxy- and dideoxyribose is
`located on the "O" helix facing into the crevice responsible for
`binding dNTPs and DNA (Figs. 1 and 4). In a crystal structure of
`the binary complex of E. coli DNA polymerase I with dCTP, the
`closest residue to the 3'-hydroxyl group of the dCIP is this
`Ehenylalanine (residue 762), separated by a distance of about 4.5
`A (14). While this binary complex must be viewed with caution
`since a primer-template is required for specific binding of the
`correct dNTP, genetic and structural data support the juxtapo-
`sition of these two moieties in the catalytically competent com-
`plex (17-20).
`What is the mechanism that accounts for efficient incorpora-
`tion of a nucleotide when there is a hydroxyl moiety on either the
`3' position of the ribose or on the aromatic residue of the poly-
`merase but inefficient catalysis when both hydroxyls are absent?
`ddTTP binds to E. coli DNA polymerase I in a binary complex
`with the same affinity as dTTP, suggesting that discrimination
`
`0 helix
`
`dTTP
`
`FIG. 4. Model showing possible relationship between ribose selec-
`tivity residue and a dNTP in Pol l-type DNA polymerases. On the left
`is helix 0 of E. coli DNA polymerase 1 (13); the four residues shown
`all face into the crevice responsible for binding DNA and dNTPs (Fig.
`1). On the right is dTTP; the position of the ribose moiety is ap-
`proximately that observed in a binary complex of dCTP with E. coli
`DNA polymerase 1 (14). The two critical hydroxyl moieties on residue
`762 (tyrosine) and the 3' position of the dNTP are shaded. A hypothetical
`interaction of these hydroxyl ions with the Mg2+ responsible for stabi-
`lizing the pentavalent intermediate on the a-phosphate on the dNTP
`during catalysis is indicated.
`
`between a deoxy- and dideoxyribose occurs in a step subsequent
`to the initial binding (21). One model is that a hydroxyl moiety is
`required to restrict the space occupied by the nucleotide and thus
`stabilize a catalytically productive orientation. However, it is hard
`to reconcile this model with the fact that two hydroxyls in the
`same space, one on the enzyme and the other on the nucleotide,
`does not affect polymerization. Another model is that at least one
`of the hydroxyl moieties is necessary for binding an essential
`ligand. While this could be a water molecule, a more attractive
`possibility is a divalent cation. The number and location of metal
`ions required for polymerization in Pol I-type DNA polymerases
`are not known, although several conserved acidic residues have
`been implicated genetically as important in binding the divalent
`cation(s) (17-20). It is thought that one divalent cation acts as a
`Lewis acid to promote deprotonation of the 3' hydroxyl of the
`primer while a second promotes the formation of the pentaco-
`valent transition state at the a-phosphate of the dNTP (18).
`Perhaps the hydroxyl ion either on the nucleotide or on the
`enzyme is required to stabilize the binding of the metal ion that
`interacts with the a-phosphate of the dNTP (Fig. 4).
`What is the effect of residues other than phenylalanine and
`tyrosine at the ribose selectivity site? The substitution of the
`polar uncharged residues cysteine, serine, and asparagine at
`residue 526 of T7 DNA polymerase reduces its activity by 10-
`to 50-fold, as measured by SDS-DNA activity gel analysis; the
`residual activity of these mutant enzymes is unable to distin-
`guish between deoxynucleotides and dideoxynucleotides (data
`not shown). The substitution of the nonpolar residue leucine
`reduces T7 DNA polymerase activity 1000-fold; the residual
`activity incorporates deoxynucleotides preferentially over
`dideoxynucleotides. The only substitution that retains the high
`level of polymerase activity observed with phenylalanine and
`tyrosine is tryptophan, which results in a strong preference for
`deoxynucleotides over dideoxynucleotides. While these results
`show that a polar group at this site reduces the ability of a
`polymerase to distinguish between deoxy- and dideoxynucle-
`otides, they also suggest a critical role of an aromatic moiety
`for efficient incorporation of all nucleotides. Consistent with
`these results, Astatke et at (17) have shown that replacement
`of phenylalanine-762 ofE. coli DNA polymerase I with alanine
`increases the Km for dTTP by >100-fold, without affecting
`significantly the kcat.
`Relationship to Other DNA Polymerases. Mutations that
`increase the ability of a DNA polymerase to incorporate
`dideoxynucleotides into DNA have not, to our knowledge,
`been previously described. On the other hand, mutations that
`decrease the ability of DNA polymerases to incorporate
`dideoxynucleotides relative to deoxynucleotides have been
`described in T7 DNA polymerase (22), herpes DNA poly-
`merase (23), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA
`polymerase (24, 25). The nature of the changes observed in
`these examples suggests that the decreased rate of incorpora-
`tion of dideoxynucleotides is mediated by an indirect mecha-
`nism. For example, in the T7 DNA polymerase mutants E480D
`
`

`

`Biochemistry: Tabor and Richardson
`and Y530F, the rate of incorporation of ddTMP relative to
`dTMP is reduced 45- and 100-fold, respectively, but these
`mutations also reduce the binding constant for dTTP by
`10-fold (22). Similarly, the hybrid polymerases described here
`containing regions A, D, and E that exhibit significantly lower
`overall activity reduce the rate of incorporation of ddTMP to
`a much greater extent than that of dTMP. In the case of HIV
`reverse transcriptase, the location of some of the mutations
`that decrease the rate of incorporation of dideoxynucleotides
`suggests that they affect the interaction of polymerase with a
`primer-template (25). In contrast, the presence or absence of
`a hydroxyl group at the site identified here appears to affect
`specifically analogs missing the 3'-hydroxyl moiety. Interest-
`ingly, this residue lies within a highly conserved motif shared
`by Pol II-type DNA polymerases and T7 RNA polymerase (2),
`suggesting that this motif

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket