`
`Re: Deposition of Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D.
`Date: 8/5/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`Page
`
`Line
`
`Correction/Change and Reason
`
`33
`
`34
`
`36
`
`37
`
`37
`
`37
`
`43
`
`46
`
`48
`
`48
`
`5
`
`7
`
`3
`
`1
`
`4
`
`7
`
`9
`
`17
`
`7
`
`11
`
`49
`
`18
`
`“Sherman” instead of “Shearman”
`
`“Sherman” instead of “Shearman”
`
`Misspelling
`
`Misspelling
`
`“3D” instead of “suite”
`
`Transcription Error (TE)
`
`“processing” instead of “process”
`
`“transport” instead of “transfer”
`
`“3-D” instead of “three”
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`“No, I have not written an entire book, but I have
`written about thermoforming in my books.”
`
`Clarification
`
`instead of
`
`“No, I have not.”
`“or
`injection molding”
`injectionable”
`
`“EVOH” instead of “EDOH”
`
`instead of
`
`“of
`
`TE
`
`Add to answer: “I should make clear that the
`multiple layers in these plastics had similar
`melting points and viscosities, just like the multi-
`layer plastic discussed in the MacNeil Patents.”
`
`Add to answer: “I should make clear that the
`multiple layers in those laminates had similar
`melting points and viscosities, just like the multi-
`layer plastic discussed in the MacNeil Patents.”
`
`TE
`
`Clarification
`
`Clarification
`
`56
`
`68
`
`10
`
`“thermoformed” instead of “thermoform”
`
`TE
`
`12-14 Replace text between “much spinning and “axial
`stretching” with “much thinning, especially if
`you thermoform a trough, but if you thermoform
`
`TE (multiple)
`
`1
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2191
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 1
`
`
`
`No. 389431
`
`Re: Deposition of Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D.
`Date: 8/5/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`73
`
`74
`
`74
`
`74
`
`74
`
`74
`
`75
`
`75
`
`76
`
`78
`
`78
`
`83
`
`89
`
`91
`
`a cube, especially if you are doing biaxial
`stretching”
`
`“It is a thermoset” instead of “It was a
`thermoset”
`
`TE
`
`Replace answer with, “No in the context of these
`patents. In the abstract, I am aware that cross-
`linked
`polyethylene
`foams, which
`are
`thermosets,
`have
`been
`used with
`a
`thermoforming process.”
`
`Clarification—I
`interpreted the question in
`the
`context of
`these
`patents.
`
`“foam” instead of “form”
`
`conductivity”
`“thermal
`“thermoconductivity”
`
`TE
`
`instead
`
`of
`
`TE
`
`14
`
`4
`
`11
`
`13
`
`8-14 Add to end of answer, “Again, my answer is in
`the context of these patents. In the abstract, I am
`aware that cross-linked polyethylene foams,
`which are thermosets, have been used with a
`thermoforming process.”
`
`Clarification—I
`interpreted the question in
`the
`context of
`these
`patents.
`
`21
`
`“glass transition” instead of “glass condition”
`
`1
`
`3
`
`6
`
`4
`
`15
`
`22
`
`14
`
`9
`
`“glass transition” instead of “glass condition”
`
`“glass transition” instead of “glass condition”
`
`“glass transition” instead of “glass condition”
`
`“shear” instead of “sheered” (twice)
`
`“shear” instead of “sheer”
`
`“thermoset” instead of “thermostat”
`
`“a” instead of “the”
`
`“grooves” instead of “groups”
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`2
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2191
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`
`
`No. 389431
`
`Re: Deposition of Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D.
`Date: 8/5/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`92
`
`92
`
`115
`
`135
`
`2
`
`22
`
`4
`
`5-6
`
`“with” instead of “but”
`
`“umbos” instead of “emboss”
`
`“there” instead of “therefore”
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`“120 thousandths” instead of “120,000th” and
`“0.125” instead of “1.125”
`
`TE and/or I misspoke
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`TE and/or I misspoke
`
`TE
`
`TE
`
`Clarification—I made a
`mistake
`in
`trying
`to
`explain this and the answer
`also ended up confusing.
`
`143
`
`2
`
`“compression molding” instead of “pressure
`molding”
`
`143
`
`143
`
`146
`
`195
`
`196
`
`202
`
`202
`
`13-14 “thermoset” instead of “thermosense” (twice)
`
`22
`
`3
`
`22
`
`1
`
`7
`
`15
`
`“I don’t think” instead of “I think”
`
`“thickness” instead of “thicknesses”
`
`“flush” instead of “sliced”
`
`“line” instead of “lines”
`
`“high” instead of “tight”
`
`Replace answer with, “As I indicated earlier in
`my testimony, pressure forming is a form of
`thermoforming. You are using air pressure to
`hold the sheet of plastic against the mold.
`Sometimes a vacuum pulls the plastic against the
`mold at the same time the air pressure is pushing
`the plastic against the mold. This process uses a
`single mold, not multiple matched molds like
`compression molding does. Now, there is a form
`of compression molding that uses a bladder filled
`with air and thus relies upon air pressure, but that
`is a different process. An example of that is a
`project that I did for Trek Bicycles. A hollow
`bike frame was elliptical shaped in cross section
`with two halves. It was compression molded
`with a rubber bladder in the center to help hollow
`out the middle and press the composite material
`against the walls of the mold. I do not consider
`
`3
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2191
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 3
`
`
`
`No. 389431
`
`Re: Deposition of Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D.
`Date: 8/5/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`this to be pressure forming although it does use
`air pressure.”
`
`4
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2191
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 4
`
`
`
`No. 389431
`
`Re: Deposition of Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D.
`Date: 8/5/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`DECLARATION OF DEPONENT
`
`I, Tim A. Osswald, Ph.D., do hereby acknowledge that I have read and examined the
`
`foregoing testimony, and the same is a true, correct and complete transcription of the testimony
`
`given by me and any corrections appear on the above Errata sheet which is a part of this declaration.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the date
`
`indicated below.
`
`August 18, 2021
`_________________________
`(Date)
`
`___________________________
`(Signature)
`
`5
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2191
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 5
`
`