`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 388474
`
`Re: Deposition of Ray Sherman
`Date: 7/28/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`
`Page|Line Correction/Change and Reason
`
`25
`12
`Answershould be “Yes.”
`I
`forgot
`that
`I had
`reviewed
`both
`versions.
`I reviewed
`both the blacked out
`and version and the
`version
`with
`the
`blackout removed.
`
`
`
`51 Add to end of answer—‘Specifically, it is|Clarification5
`the floor portion of the footwell.”
`
`
`
`
`63 Add to end of answer—‘“Muchofthe top|Clarification8
`edge touched the footwell walls. So the
`top edge conformed but the side panels
`did not”
`
`
`
`
`83 13-|Add to end of answer after removing the|Clarification
`14
`period at the end ofthe second sentence—
`”, specifically a properly designed mold,
`you would get a substantially uniformly
`thick product
`if you started with a
`substantially uniformly thick sheet.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 1
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2190
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2190
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 1
`
`
`
`No. 388474
`
`Re: Deposition of Ray Sherman
`Date: 7/28/2021
`Case: Yita L.L.C. -v- MacNeil IP L.L.C. (PTAB)
`Return to: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`
`DECLARATION OF DEPONENT
`
`I, Ray Sherman,
`
`do hereby acknowledge that
`
`I have
`
`read and examined the foregoing testimony, and the same
`
`is a
`
`true, correct and complete transcription of
`
`
`the
`
`testimony given by me and any corrections appear on the
`
`above Errata sheet which is a part of this declaration.
`
` declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct. Executed on the date indicated below.
`
`
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2190
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2190
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`