throbber
· · · ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`· · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRAIL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`1
`
`YITA LLC,· · · · · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · · · ·Petitioner,· · · )· Case IPR2020-01142
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`VS.· · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`MACNEIL IP LLC,· · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · · · ·Patent Owner.· · )
`
`· · · · · · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION
`· · · · · · · · · · · · ·OF
`· · · · · · · · ·PAUL E. KOCH, PH.D.
`· · · · · · · · · SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 1
`
`

`

`2
`
`· ·ORAL DEPOSITION OF PAUL E. KOCH, PH.D.,
`
`produced as a witness at the instance of the
`
`Patent Owner and duly sworn, was taken in the
`
`above-styled and numbered cause on
`
`September 10, 2021, from 8:27 a.m. to
`
`2:00 p.m., before KATERI A. FLOT-DAVIS, CSR,
`
`CCR, in and for the State of Texas, reported
`
`by machine shorthand, pursuant to the Federal
`
`Rules of Civil Procedure and the provisions
`
`stated on the record herein.
`
`This hearing is being conducted remotely in
`
`accordance with the current Emergency Order
`
`regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster of
`
`the World.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`

`

`· · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`3
`
`FOR THE PETITIONER YITA LLC:
`
`JASON A. FITZSIMMONS, ESQ.
`R. WILSON "TREY" POWERS, III, ESQ.
`Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
`1100 New York Avenue Northwest
`Ste. 600
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`jfitzsimmons@sternkessler.com
`tpowers@sternkessler.com
`
`FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`
`DAVID G. WILLE, ESQ.
`CLARKE STAVINOHA, ESQ.
`CHAD D. WALTERS, ESQ.
`Baker Botts, L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Avenue
`Ste. 900
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`david.willeBakerbotts.com
`clarke.stavinoha@bakerbotts.com
`chad.walters@bakerbotts.com
`
`JEFFERSON PERKINS, ESQ.
`Perkins IP Law Group LLC
`4200 Commerce Court
`Ste. 310
`Lisle, Illinois 60532
`jperkins@perkinsip.com
`
`Also Present:
`
`Juan Torres, Document Technician
`Adilyne Garcia, Document Technician
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 3
`
`

`

`· · · · · · · · · · INDEX
`
`4
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`Appearances........................· · · ·3
`
`PAUL E. KOCH, PH.D.
`
`· ·Examination by Mr. Wille........· · · · 6
`
`Reporter's Certificate..............· · · 283
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 4
`
`

`

`· · · · · · · · · ·EXHIBITS
`
`5
`
`(All Exhibits are previously marked and
`attached)
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 5
`
`

`

`· · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S
`
`6
`
`· · · · · ·THE REPORTER:· On the record at
`
`· · · 8:27 a.m.
`
`· · · · · ·(Witness sworn.)
`
`· · · · · · ·PAUL E. KOCH, PH.D.,
`
`having been first duly sworn, testified as
`
`follows:
`
`· · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. WILLE:
`
`· · · Q.· ·Good morning, Dr. Koch.
`
`· · · A.· ·Good morning.
`
`· · · Q.· ·You've been deposed before in this
`
`case, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Do I recall, it was -- it was you?
`
`· · · Q.· ·Yes.
`
`· · · A.· ·Good to see you again.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Good to see you.
`
`· · · · · ·And that was in March; remember?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, I do.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·March of 2021?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's correct.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 6
`
`

`

`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·You understand you're still under
`
`7
`
`oath, right?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's right.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Sir, you're not a legal expert,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That is correct.· I am not a
`
`legal -- I am not a lawyer.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Thank you.
`
`· · · · · ·And you don't speak French,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·My wife taught French for, oh,
`
`probably 20 years, so I probably picked
`
`something up.· Probably not as much as she
`
`wished, but still some.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·You're -- you're not a -- you're
`
`not a qualified French interpreter, are you,
`
`sir?
`
`· · · A.· ·That is correct.· I am not a
`
`qualified French interpreter.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And so you relied upon a French
`
`translation -- or two French translations, one
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 7
`
`

`

`by Mr. Dawson and one by Dr. Popp, in your
`
`8
`
`declaration; is that correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·Are there any other translations of
`
`the Rabbe reference that you looked at?
`
`· · · A.· ·I don't recall any other ones.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· And, for the court
`
`· · · reporter, Rabbe (phonetics: Rah-bee) or
`
`· · · Rabbe (phonetics: Rob) is spelled
`
`· · · R-a-b-b-e.· That's something we'll be
`
`· · · referring to a number of times today.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· So you wouldn't --
`
`because you are not a qualified French
`
`interpreter, you wouldn't offer opinions on
`
`the correctness of one translation versus
`
`another, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·I've read both translations and I
`
`think I understand both translations.· I think
`
`I understand that there was some discussion
`
`about which one was more accurate.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And because you're not a qualified
`
`French interpreter, you're not qualified to
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 8
`
`

`

`offer an opinion on which translation is more
`
`9
`
`accurate, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Let's -- let's bring up
`
`· · · your declaration, your reply
`
`· · · declaration, Exhibit 1041.
`
`· · · · · ·(Exhibit No. 1041 Previously
`
`· · · Marked.)
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· And --
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I have a clean copy
`
`· · · in front of me here.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·That's -- so that's helpful, then.
`
`· · · Then I don't think we need to bring it
`
`· · · up if you have a clean copy in front of
`
`· · · you.
`
`· · · · · ·But let's establish two things -- a
`
`· · · few things.
`
`· · · · · ·Your declaration, Exhibit 1041, is
`
`· · · the same in both IPR-1139 and IPR-1142,
`
`· · · correct?
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's correct.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So, Mr. Fitzsimmons, why don't we
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 9
`
`

`

`10
`
`· · · deal with this up front?
`
`· · · · · ·I don't plan to offer any exhibits
`
`· · · that are different in one IPR versus the
`
`· · · other.
`
`· · · · · ·Can we stipulate that any exhibit I
`
`· · · use today, because it's going to have
`
`· · · the same number in both IPRs, the
`
`· · · testimony and that exhibit can be used
`
`· · · in both IPRs and that -- and that the
`
`· · · exhibit for both IPRs can be attached to
`
`· · · the transcript.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· That's great,
`
`· · · David.· Yeah.· Let's do that so we don't
`
`· · · have to bring up the same exhibit for
`
`· · · both cases.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.· Sounds good.
`
`· · · Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· So, Dr. Koch, in
`
`front of you, you have a hard copy of Exhibit
`
`1041, which is your reply declaration,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That is correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·So I've already deposed you on your
`
`initial declaration in both IPRs, right?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 10
`
`

`

`11
`
`· · · A.· ·That is correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So for sake of simplicity today, I
`
`am going -- when I say "your declaration,"
`
`unless I clarify that it's the earlier one,
`
`when I say "your declaration" I'm always
`
`referring to the reply declaration.
`
`· · · · · ·Can we agree to that for
`
`simplicity?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, we can.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·So are you aware of any statements
`
`in your declaration, Exhibit 1041, that
`
`require correction?
`
`· · · A.· ·No, I am not.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Who participated in creating your
`
`declaration, Exhibit 1041?
`
`· · · A.· ·Counsel, myself and my associate,
`
`Alex.· As I told you previously I'm not much
`
`of a typist, so I do hand notes and Alex types
`
`it up for me.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And which lawyers participated in
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 11
`
`

`

`12
`
`creating your declaration?
`
`· · · A.· ·Oh.· Let me think about this.
`
`There were several involved.
`
`· · · · · ·Trey comes to mind.· The fellows
`
`that were on the -- the -- the first
`
`deposition.· And Jason was here.· And, let's
`
`see, yesterday we had -- what was his name?
`
`We talked for two days.
`
`· · · · · ·I think there was a total of only
`
`four involved.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So you had Mr. Powers,
`
`Mr. Fitzsimmons, Mr. Walters?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yeah.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And who was the fourth person?
`
`· · · A.· ·Steve, yesterday.· I don't remember
`
`Steve's last name.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And you -- so did I understand you
`
`correctly:· You had two days of preparation
`
`for your deposition?
`
`· · · A.· ·I -- I broke it up, Dave, into two
`
`half days.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 12
`
`

`

`· · · · · ·So you -- you met with the
`
`attorneys for two half days in preparation for
`
`13
`
`your testimony today; is --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · A.· ·It was --
`
`· · · Q.· ·-- that correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·-- it was virtual.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·But you met with them virtually to
`
`prepare for your deposition, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·When you -- before you signed your
`
`declaration, did you carefully check each of
`
`the citations to make sure the citations were
`
`accurate?
`
`· · · A.· ·I went through it one -- twice.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And so did you check each citation
`
`to make sure the citations were accurate?
`
`· · · A.· ·To the best of my ability.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And did you check each quotation to
`
`make sure each of the quotations were
`
`accurate?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 13
`
`

`

`14
`
`· · · A.· ·Did I check to make sure the
`
`quotations were accurate?
`
`· · · · · ·Yeah.· Yes, I did.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Were you, in preparation of your
`
`declaration, shown the errata sheet for
`
`Mr. Popp's deposition?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.
`
`· · · Scope.· And objection to the extent it
`
`· · · would reveal any privileged
`
`· · · communication.
`
`· · · · · ·I would instruct the witness not to
`
`· · · answer.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· I think you can answer
`
`· · · the question unless it would reveal
`
`· · · privileged communications.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I think counsel just
`
`· · · advised me not to answer.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Well, let me ask the question a
`
`· · · different way.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Did you consider
`
`Dr. Popp's errata sheet for his deposition in
`
`reaching the opinions that you give in your
`
`declaration?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 14
`
`

`

`· · · A.· ·I considered the translation I saw,
`
`15
`
`his translation.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Yeah.
`
`· · · · · ·I'm asking about the errata for his
`
`deposition.
`
`· · · · · ·Did you consider that in reaching
`
`your opinions?
`
`· · · A.· ·I'm confused.· What is the errata?
`
`· · · Q.· ·Do you know what an errata sheet is
`
`for a deposition?
`
`· · · A.· ·I don't think I do, Dave.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Where a witness can correct
`
`mistakes in the -- in the transcription?
`
`· · · A.· ·No.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Did you see anything like that?
`
`· · · A.· ·I don't think I saw anything.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · A.· ·I have to think about that.· I have
`
`to think about that, Dave.· I'm not positive.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·What -- did you consider the errata
`
`sheet for Dr. Osswald's deposition?
`
`· · · A.· ·Did I consider?
`
`· · · · · ·I've read Tim's deposition. I
`
`don't know if there was an errata sheet.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 15
`
`

`

`16
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·How about Ray Sherman's deposition?
`
`· · · · · ·Did you consider the errata sheet
`
`for Ray Sherman's deposition?
`
`· · · A.· ·I -- I saw something where he
`
`wanted to change his opinions.
`
`· · · · · ·Is that the errata sheet?
`
`· · · Q.· ·I wouldn't characterize the errata
`
`sheet that way.
`
`· · · A.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·There is a -- there is a -- there
`
`is an errata -- errata for his deposition
`
`where he corrects certain things in the
`
`deposition.
`
`· · · · · ·Did you see that?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yeah.· I think I did see that.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And how about Mr. Granger?
`
`· · · · · ·Did you see the -- did you consider
`
`the errata sheet for Mr. Granger's deposition?
`
`· · · A.· ·Same.
`
`· · · · · ·I probably wouldn't have identified
`
`it as the errata sheet.· I'm sure I saw
`
`whatever was provided.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 16
`
`

`

`· · · · · ·Let's -- let's talk about
`
`17
`
`thermoforming.
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·So if you were doing vacuum forming
`
`or pressure forming, you're using a sheet of
`
`thermoplastic, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Thermoforming in
`
`· · · either vacuum forming or pressure
`
`· · · forming usually starts with a sheet.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And pressure forming and vacuum
`
`forming are types of thermoforming, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That is correct.
`
`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·And the -- the sheet -- the sheet
`
`that you start with, you first have to make
`
`that sheet or purchase that sheet to
`
`thermoform, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Plastic historically comes as
`
`pellets and then it's converted into a sheet
`
`stock.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And so to convert plastic pellets
`
`into a sheet stock, that can be done with
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 17
`
`

`

`18
`
`processes such as extrusion and injection
`
`molding, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·It's -- it's almost always
`
`extrusion.· I don't know of any thermoforming
`
`stock that's injection molded.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·But you can create a sheet of
`
`thermoplastic with injection molding, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·You -- it depends on the grade but,
`
`in general, yes, you can create flat shapes in
`
`injection molding.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So if -- if you're doing
`
`thermoforming there's two sets of equipment
`
`that you need, right?
`
`· · · · · ·You need something to make the
`
`sheet and then you need something to mold the
`
`sheet into a finished product, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· There are
`
`· · · opportunities where they're done at the
`
`· · · same time.· The same line will make the
`
`· · · sheet, form the sheet, fill the sheet --
`
`· · · fill the product and seal the product.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 18
`
`

`

`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· There are processes
`
`19
`
`· · · where it's all one.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· For clarity, in the
`
`answer you just described, you're -- you're
`
`basically saying there are assembly lines in
`
`certain factories where the pellets are placed
`
`at one end, some machinery converts those
`
`pellets into a sheet and then the sheet is
`
`thermoformed by other machinery and the
`
`finished product comes out the other end of
`
`the assembly line.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· They're called form,
`
`· · · fill and seal machines.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Now, with
`
`compression molding you do not need to make a
`
`sheet before you do the molding, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·There's times when what goes into a
`
`compression mold is in a sheet form.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And often it's just in a form of a
`
`blob, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 19
`
`

`

`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's too much of a
`
`· · · generalization.· "Blob" is not a
`
`20
`
`· · · technical term.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·It's called a charge?
`
`· · · A.· ·Sometimes.· Sometimes a preform.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·What's a preform?
`
`· · · A.· ·It's a shape of a charge or the
`
`shape of the thermoset material that goes into
`
`a compression mold.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.· All right.
`
`· · · · · ·So let's talk about foams.
`
`· · · · · ·So two of the types of foams that
`
`you address in your -- in your declaration are
`
`polyethylene foam and ethylvinyl acetate --
`
`ethylene vinyl acetate foam, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes.· They're both mentioned.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And polyethylene foam is often
`
`abbreviated as PE foam; is that right?
`
`· · · A.· ·Oftentimes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And ethylene vinyl acetate foam is
`
`often called EVA foam, correct?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 20
`
`

`

`21
`
`· · · A.· ·The same -- yes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And so is it okay to use the
`
`abbreviations "PE foam" and "EPA foam" today?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, it is.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So you understand that some foams
`
`are crosslinked, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·It can be done.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So, for example, there is
`
`crosslinked polyethylene foam, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·There are some.
`
`· · · Q.· ·And crosslinking generally makes
`
`the material more rigid, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's a broad
`
`· · · generalization.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Yes.
`
`· · · · · ·And it's generally a correct broad
`
`generalization, right?
`
`· · · A.· ·No --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection --
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- (inaudible) --
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 21
`
`

`

`22
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· -- form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- I -- I disagree
`
`· · · with that.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Is it true that
`
`crosslinking makes the melting point of the
`
`material higher than it would be without the
`
`crosslinking?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Melting point is a
`
`· · · function of the base polymer.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Right.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· And when you
`
`crosslink the base polymer it makes the
`
`melting point higher than it would be if you
`
`just had the base polymer, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· It depends on the
`
`· · · degree of crosslinking.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Right.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· It depends on the
`
`degree of crosslinking, but the more
`
`crosslinking there is, the higher the melting
`
`point, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Melting point is a generic term and
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 22
`
`

`

`23
`
`it's not a scientific term, so you're going to
`
`mix many properties when you try and
`
`characterize an elevation in melting point and
`
`tie it to cross-links.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Well, is it true, or not, that
`
`cross-linking generally makes the melting
`
`point higher than the material would be
`
`without the cross-linking?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Yeah -- melting point
`
`· · · is still not the correct way to think of
`
`· · · this.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Polymer chemists do
`
`typically refer to the melting point of
`
`thermoplastics, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·They talk about the glass
`
`transition temperature.· They talk about the
`
`crystalline melting point.· Seldom do polymer
`
`scientists use that term.· It's more out of
`
`their field.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So "crystalline melting point" is
`
`something you understand?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 23
`
`

`

`24
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, I do.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So the crystalline melting point is
`
`higher when something is cross-linked than
`
`when it is not, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·The crystalline melting point is
`
`indicative of the base polymer -- the base
`
`polymer.· It's not affected by the degree of
`
`crosslinking.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So one of the materials discussed
`
`in the Yung reference is EPA foam, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·All right.
`
`· · · · · ·And there, that is a material that
`
`can be cross-linked as well, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·There are several techniques for
`
`crosslinking thermoplastic foams.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Including EVA foams?
`
`· · · A.· ·Including EVA foams.
`
`· · · Q.· ·And EVA foam is a semi-crystalline
`
`polymer, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That's a broad generalization.· And
`
`the fact that it's ethylene vinyl acetate goes
`
`to the opposite of crystallization.· It makes
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 24
`
`

`

`25
`
`it less crystal- -- less able to crystallize.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·But it is a semi-crystalline
`
`polymer, right?
`
`· · · A.· ·You can't say that until you
`
`specify the degree of the vinyl acetate
`
`co-monomer in the EVA foam.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Is -- is polyethylene a crystalline
`
`polymer?
`
`· · · A.· ·Polyethylene is a semi-crystalline
`
`polymer.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And is polyethylene foam a
`
`semi-crystalline polymer?
`
`· · · A.· ·Foaming the material does not
`
`change the base properties of polyethylene.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And is that true of EVA as well?
`
`· · · A.· ·You can't tell with EVA because EVA
`
`is a copolymer so it's a mix of two different
`
`monomers.· Until you specify that ratio, you
`
`can't make a generalization about its ability
`
`to crystallize.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 25
`
`

`

`· · · · · ·Are -- are the fibers used to
`
`create polyester fabric crystalline polymers?
`
`26
`
`· · · A.· ·They can be.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So when you -- when you create the
`
`fibers for polyester fabric, you're
`
`crystallizing the polyethylene plastic,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's --
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· -- form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- that's not
`
`· · · necessarily true.· They can or cannot
`
`· · · be.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Now, you -- you're
`
`aware that one of the materials discussed in
`
`the Yung reference is EVA foam.
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Other than Yung, are there any
`
`other references that you talk about in either
`
`of your declarations that specify the use of
`
`EVA foam for a floor tray or floor mat?
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 26
`
`

`

`27
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Did you ask if any
`
`· · · other references mention EVA foam?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· No.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· I'm asking whether
`
`any of the references say to make a floor mat
`
`or floor tray out of EVA foam.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't recall any
`
`· · · other references either excluding or
`
`· · · including it.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Let's talk about -- at least as we
`
`sit here today, you don't recall any of the
`
`references that you considered for either of
`
`your declarations, besides Yung, saying to
`
`make a floor mat or a floor tray out of EVA
`
`foam -- as we sit here.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Dave, actually, I
`
`· · · can't recall.· EVA is a copolymer of
`
`· · · polyethylene and many times a small
`
`· · · amount of EVA is mixed or co-polymerized
`
`· · · in with polyethylene.
`
`· · · · · ·So there may be -- if it specifies
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 27
`
`

`

`28
`
`· · · polyethylene, it's not uncommon that
`
`· · · there would be a small component of
`
`· · · vinyl acetate in it.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·But there are certainly times
`
`where, despite there being a small amount of
`
`something in there, the polymer is either
`
`called EVA foam or it's called PE foam, right?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, I'm confused as
`
`· · · to --
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.· Let me -- Let me
`
`· · · clarify the question.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Is there any
`
`reference that you considered for your -- for
`
`your declaration which says to make a floor
`
`tray or floor mat out of EVA foam and uses the
`
`term "EVA foam" to describe the material the
`
`floor mat or floor tray is made of?
`
`· · · A.· ·I'm -- I'm trying to recall.· Some
`
`of the commercial floor mats talk about
`
`adhesives and tackifiers.
`
`· · · · · ·I -- I don't -- can't say yes or no
`
`to that.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 28
`
`

`

`· · · A.· ·The more I think about it, the more
`
`I would think about some of the -- whether
`
`some of the adhesives or --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`29
`
`· · · Q.· ·So you --
`
`· · · A.· ·I can't --
`
`· · · Q.· ·-- have your --
`
`· · · A.· ·-- I can't --
`
`· · · Q.· ·-- declaration --
`
`· · · A.· ·-- say for sure.
`
`· · · Q.· ·-- you have your declaration in
`
`front of you.
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, I do.
`
`· · · Q.· ·You -- you have not -- in your
`
`declaration, Exhibit 1041, you have not
`
`identified a floor mat or floor tray reference
`
`other than Yung which says to make a floor
`
`tray or floor mat out of EVA foam, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· I'll withdraw that.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· I have searched
`
`your declaration for all the places you used
`
`"foam" and I didn't see that.
`
`· · · A.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 29
`
`

`

`30
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I -- I don't think my
`
`· · · searching of it would do any more than
`
`· · · your searching of it.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· So, as we sit here
`
`today, certainly in Exhibit 1041 you don't
`
`recall any of the references teaching to make
`
`a floor tray or floor mat out of EVA foam
`
`other than Yung, right?
`
`· · · A.· ·Like I say, I'm trying to think
`
`about all the commercial examples that we've
`
`provided and whether they specified their tie
`
`layers or their adhesives added in the vinyl
`
`acetate content.
`
`· · · · · ·And I -- I certainly have used
`
`vinyl acetate polymers in co-extrusions and
`
`layers many times in my career.
`
`· · · · · ·So I'm going to say I can't
`
`pinpoint at this -- as I sit here with you
`
`today, pinpoint a reference that spells out
`
`something using an EVA foam.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · A.· ·Either you --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · Q.· ·Now, you are aware that EVA foam
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 30
`
`

`

`31
`
`gets compression molded, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·I've seen it on the Internet.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·You haven't -- have you seen it --
`
`when you say you've seen it on the Internet,
`
`have you seen applications where EVA foam is
`
`compression molded before this case?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes, I have.· I've seen one -- yes,
`
`I have.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And polyethylene foam also gets
`
`compression molded, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·It does.· It's a -- it's a
`
`nontraditional use.· It's more of a stamping
`
`process, a hot stamping process.
`
`· · · · · ·Compression molding is the domain
`
`of thermosets, not thermoplastic foams.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·We'll come back to that.
`
`· · · · · ·But you do agree that polyethylene
`
`foam does get compression molded into some
`
`type of plastic part, right?
`
`· · · A.· ·It gets stamped.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And --
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 31
`
`

`

`32
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · A.· ·It's not a compression molding
`
`process.
`
`· · · Q.· ·-- laminates --
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· David, I would
`
`· · · ask just that you please let Dr. Koch
`
`· · · finish his answers.· I think he wasn't
`
`· · · finished there and you asked your next
`
`· · · question.
`
`· · · · · ·I know sometimes with the -- the
`
`· · · virtual nature it's hard to hear, but I
`
`· · · think he was not finished yet there.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Laminates are also
`
`compression molded, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·"Laminates are compression molded."
`
`· · · · · ·I've seen an example of thermoset
`
`preforms that are multiple layers that are
`
`compression molded.· But, as I said,
`
`compression molding is the domain of
`
`thermosets.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·So you've seen the original -- I
`
`showed it to you at your last deposition --
`
`the original application that the inventor
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 32
`
`

`

`33
`
`filed in Taiwan for the Yung reference,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I recall that.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And that reference indicated that
`
`Yung's laminate was compression molded,
`
`correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · And objection.· Mischaracterizes the
`
`· · · reference.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I think he included
`
`· · · it as a potential embodiment.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· And Yung's --
`
`Yung's three-layer structure includes
`
`thermoplastics, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·That embodiment had thermoplastics
`
`in it.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And, in fact, it is true that
`
`compression molding is used for both
`
`thermosets and thermoplastics, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·Compression molding is historically
`
`the domain of thermosets and, as we talked
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 33
`
`

`

`34
`
`about, he omitted that reference in his later
`
`patent applications.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Sir, is it true, or not, that
`
`compression molding is used for both
`
`thermosets and thermoplastics?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Asked
`
`· · · and answered.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· And I think I've said
`
`· · · before that compression molding is
`
`· · · historically the domain of thermosets.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· But it's also used
`
`for thermoplastics, correct?
`
`· · · A.· ·There are process adaptions that
`
`don't constitute compression molding, where
`
`thermoplastics can be formed using simple
`
`presses.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Do you ever purchase two-liter
`
`bottles of soda?
`
`· · · A.· ·Occasionally.
`
`· · · Q.· ·And the cap for a two-liter bottle
`
`of soda is a compression molded item, isn't
`
`it, sir?
`
`· · · A.· ·No --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection --
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 34
`
`

`

`35
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- that's not true.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· -- relevance.
`
`· · · Objection.· Relevance.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· It's --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's -- that's not
`
`· · · true.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Isn't it true that
`
`caps for bottles are compression molded?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· No.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· -- form.
`
`· · · Objection.· Scope.· Objection relevance.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· You can answer.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· No.
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Isn't it true that caps for various
`
`containers are compression molded out of
`
`thermoplastics?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Objection.· Form.
`
`· · · Objection.· Scope.· Objection.
`
`· · · Relevance.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· The process for
`
`· · · making the caps is not compression
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 35
`
`

`

`36
`
`· · · molding.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Let's bring up Exhibit 2175,
`
`· · · please.
`
`· · · · · ·(Exhibit No. 2175 Previously
`
`· · · Marked.)
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· And that should be
`
`· · · shared.
`
`· · · · · ·Any time you bring up an exhibit,
`
`· · · please share it with everyone, as well.
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Okay?
`
`· · · Q.· ·(BY MR. WILLE)· So, Dr. Koch, you
`
`see Exhibit 2175 on the screen?
`
`· · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`· · · Q.· ·Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·And Exhibit 2175 is U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,108,823, which was issued in September
`
`of 2006, correct?
`
`· · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Can you blow it up
`
`· · · just a bit?
`
`· · · · · ·Does the document control have the
`
`· · · ability to blow that up?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Yes.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· David, this is a
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2184
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 36
`
`

`

`37
`
`· · · new exhibit; is that correct?
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· That's correct.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· Okay.
`
`· · · · · ·Object to scope and relevance of
`
`· · · this exhibit in both proceedings.
`
`· · · · · ·As we mentioned, any time I object
`
`· · · to -- to a reference like that, it will
`
`· · · have it for both proceedings, I --
`
`· · · · · ·(Simultaneous speaking.)
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Yeah.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. FITZSIMMONS:· -- presume.
`
`· · · · · ·MR. WILLE:· Yeah.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket