throbber

`
`PE-HD
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`$(
`
`Linear molecule
`ca. 4 to 10 short side chains
`per 1000 C - atoms
`
`PE-LD
`
`Long chain branching
`
`PE-LLD
`
`Linear molecule
`ca. 10 to 35 short side chains
`per 1000 C - atoms
`
`Figure 3.14 Schematic of the molecular structure of polyethylene with different densities
`
` (cid:132) 3.5 Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`As mentioned in Chapter 1, polymeric materials can be divided into two general
`categories: thermoplastics and thermosets. Thermoplastics are materials that have
`the ability to remelt a!er they have solidified, and thermosets are those that solid-
`ify via a chemical reaction that causes polymer molecules to cross-link. These
`cross-linked materials cannot be remelted a!er solidification.
`As thermoplastic polymers solidify, they take on two different types of structure:
`amorphous or semi-crystalline. Amorphous polymers are those where the mole-
`cules solidify in a random arrangement, whereas some of the molecules in semi-
`crystalline polymers align with their neighbors, forming regions with a three-
`dimensional order. In semi-crystalline polymers, the molecules that do not align
`into crystals remain amorphous structures.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 77
`
`

`

`%)
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`3.5.1 Thermoplastic Polymers
`
`The formation of macromolecules from monomers occurs if there are unsaturated
`carbon atoms (carbon atoms connected with double bonds), or if there are mono-
`mers with reactive end-groups. The double bond, say in an ethylene monomer, is
`split, which frees two valences per monomer and leads to the formation of a macro-
`molecule such as polyethylene. This process is o!en referred to as polymerization.
`Similarly, monomers (R) that possess two reactive end-groups (bifunctional) can
`react with other monomers (R’) that also have two other reactive end-groups that
`can react with each other, also leading to the formation of a polymer chain. A list of
`typical reactive end-groups is given in Table 3.2.
`
`Table 3.2 List of Selected Reactive End-Groups
`
`Hydrogen in aromatic monomers
`Hydroxyl group in alcohols
`Aldehyde group as in formaldehyde
`
`Carboxyl group in organic acids
`
`Isocyanate group in isocyanates
`Epoxy group in polyepoxys
`
`Amido groups in amides and polyamides
`Amino groups in amines
`
`– H
`– OH
`
`– N (cid:308) C (cid:308) O
`
`– CO – NH2
`– NH2
`
`3.5.2 Amorphous Thermoplastics
`
`Amorphous thermoplastics, with their randomly arranged molecular structure,
`are analogous to a bowl of spaghetti. Due to their random structure, the character-
`istic size of the largest ordered region is on the order of a carbon-carbon bond. This
`dimension is much smaller than the wavelength of visible light and so generally
`amorphous thermoplastics are transparent.
`Figure 3.15 [4] shows the shear modulus5, G’, versus temperature for polystyrene,
`one of the most common amorphous thermoplastics. The figure shows two general
`
`5  The dynamic shear modulus, G’, is obtained using the dynamic mechanical properties test described in
`Chapter 9.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 78
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`%!
`
`Energy elastic region
`
`Ts
`
`Tg
`
`104
`
`MPa
`
`103
`
`102
`
`101
`
`Shear modulus, G
`
`100
`
`Entropy elastic region
`
`Viscoelastic region
`
`10-1
`-160 -120 -80 -40 0
`40 80
`Temperature, T
`Figure 3.15 Shear modulus of polystyrene as a function of temperature
`
`°C 160
`
`200
`
`regions: one where the modulus appears fairly constant6, and one where the modu-
`lus drops significantly with increasing temperature. With decreasing tempera-
`tures, the material enters the glassy region where the slope of the modulus
`approaches zero. At high temperatures the modulus is negligible and the material
`is so! enough to flow. Although there is not a clear transition between “solid” and
`“liquid”, the temperature that divides the two states in an amorphous thermo-
`plastic is referred to as the glass transition temperature, Tg. For the polystyrene in
`Fig. 3.15 the glass transition temperature is approximately 110 °C. At tempera-
`tures below the glass transition temperature the material behaves like a visco-
`elastic solid, the area in the curve denoted as energy elastic region. Once the
`material is above the glass transition temperature, it enters the so-called entropy
`elastic region. At this point the material can be more easily deformed, such as is
`done during the thermoforming process. However, in order for the material to flow,
`its temperature must be above a so!ening temperature, Ts, at which point it behaves
`like a viscoelastic fluid. The so!ening temperature defines the point where the
`viscous forces during deformation (loss) exceed the elastic forces during deforma-
`tion (storage), and for amorphous thermoplastics it typically ranges about 50 K
`
`6 When plotting G’ versus temperature on a linear scale, a steady decrease of the modulus is observed.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 79
`
`

`

`%*
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`above the glass transition temperature. Storage and loss moduli are discussed in
`more detail in Chapter 10.
`It should be mentioned here that the curve shown in Fig. 3.15 was measured at a
`constant frequency. If the frequency of the test is increased – reducing the time
`scale – the curve is shi! ed to the right, because higher temperatures are required
`to achieve movement of the molecules at the new frequency. Figure 3.16 [5] dem-
`onstrates this concept by displaying the elastic modulus as a function of tempe r-
`ature for polyvinyl chloride at various test frequencies. The relation between time
`scale and temperature, also known as the time-temperature superposition principle,
`is discussed in detail Chapter 9. A similar eff ect as observed with time scale and
`temperature can be seen when the molecular weight of the material is increased.
`The longer molecules have more diffi culty sliding past each other, thus requiring
`higher temperatures to achieve “fl ow.”
`
`MPa
`
`1000
`
`E
`
`100
`
`10
`
`0
`
`5 Hz
`50 Hz
`500 Hz
`5000 Hz
`
`80
`40
`Temperature, T
`
`°C
`
`160
`
` 
`
` Figure 3.16 Modulus of polyvinyl chloride
`as a function of temperature at various test
`frequencies
`
`3.5.3 Semi-Crystalline Thermoplastics
`
`Semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymers show more order than amorphous ther-
`moplastics. The molecules arrange in an ordered crystalline form as shown for
`polypropylene in Fig. 3.17. The crystalline structure shown in the photograph is
`composed of spherulites, which are formed by lamellar crystals. The formation of
`spherulites during solidifi cation of semi-crystalline thermoplastics is covered in
`Chapter 8. The schematic in Fig. 3.18 shows the general structure and hierarchical
`arrangement in semi-crystalline materials, using polyethylene as an example. The
`spherulitic structure is the largest domain with a specifi c order and has a cha-
`racteristic size of 50 to 500 μm. Some of the polypropylene spherulites in the
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 80
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`%+
`
`micrograph presented in Fig. 3.17 are about 150 μm in diameter. The size of spher-
`ulites is much larger than the wavelength of visible light, making semi-crystalline
`materials translucent and not transparent.
`However, the crystalline regions are very small with molecular chains comprised
`of both crystalline and amorphous regions. The degree of crystallinity in a typical
`thermoplastic will vary from grade to grade. For example, in polyethylene the
`degree of crystallinity depends on the branching and the cooling rate. A low den-
`sity polyethylene (LDPE) with its long branches (Fig. 3.14) can only crystallize to
`approximate 40 – 50 %, whereas a high density polyethylene (HDPE) crystallizes to
`up to 80 %. The density and strength of semi-crystalline thermoplastics increase
`with the degree of crystallinity, as demonstrated in Table 3.3 [6], which compares
`low and high density polyethylene. Figure 3.19 shows the different properties and
`molecular structure that may arise in polyethylene plotted as a function of degree
`of crystallinity and molecular weight.
`
`Table 3.3 Influence of Crystallinity on Properties for Low and High Density Polyethylene
`Property
`Low density
`High density
`0.91 – 0.925
`0.941 – 0.965
`Density (g/cm3)
`% crystallinity
`42 – 53
`64 – 80
`Melting temperature (°C)
`110 – 120
`130 – 136
`Tensile modulus (MPa)
`17 – 26
`41 – 124
`Tensile strength (MPa)
`4.1 – 16
`21 – 38
`
` Spherulites
`
` 
`
` Figure 3.17 Micrograph of
`the spherulitic crystal line
`structure in a poly proylene
`poly mer (Courtesy of the
`Institute of Plas tics Technology,
`LKT, Uni versity of Erlangen-
`Nurem berg)
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 81
`
`

`

`%#
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`Optical microscope
`
`W
`
` Spherulite
` 1-500µm
`
`Polymer
`component
`
`Crystal
`lamella
`
`Scanning electron microscope
`
`0.492 nm
`
`0.736 nm
`
`Atom probe microscope
`
`0.252 nm
`
` Lamella
`20 to 60 nm
`
`t
`
`Figure 3.18  Schematic representation of the general molecular structure and arrangement of
`typical semi-crystalline materials
`
`Brittle gray
` wax
`
`Hard
`
`PE-LD
`
`PE-HD
`
`Similar to
`bees wax
`
`Jelly
`
`0 500 2,500
`
`10,000
`
`20,000
`
`40,000 Molecular weight
`
`100
`
`%
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`
`Crystallinity
`
`Figure 3.19  Infl uence of degree of crystallinity and molecular weight on diff erent properties
`of polyethylene
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 82
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`%$
`
`Figure 3.20 [4] shows the dynamic shear modulus versus temperature for a high
`density polyethylene, the most common semi-crystalline thermoplastic. Again,
`this curve presents data measured at one test frequency. The fi gure clearly shows
`two distinct transitions: one at about –110 °C, the glass transition temperature, and
`another near 140 °C, the melting temperature. Above the melting temperature, the
`shear modulus is negligible and the material will fl ow. Crystalline arrangement
`begins to develop as the temperature decreases below the melting point. Between
`the melting and glass transition temperatures, the material behaves like a leathery
`solid. As the temperature decreases below the glass transition temperature, the
`amorphous regions within the semi-crystalline structure solidify, forming a glassy,
`stiff , and in some cases brittle polymer.
`To summarize, Table 3.4 presents the basic structure of several amorphous and
`semi-crystalline thermoplastics with their melting and/or glass transition temper-
`atures.
`Furthermore, Fig. 3.21 [7] summarizes the property behavior of amorphous, crys-
`talline, and semi-crystalline materials using schematic diagrams of material pro-
`perties plotted as functions of temperature.
`
`104
`
`MPa
`
`103
`
`102
`
`101
`
`Shear modulus, G
`
`100
`-160 -120 -80 -40 0
`40 80
`Temperature, T
`
`°C 160
`
` 
`
` Figure 3.20 Shear modulus of a high
`density polyethylene as a function of
`temperature
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 83
`
`

`

`%%
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`100% Amorphous
`
`100% Crystalline
`
`Semi-crystalline
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`V
`
`(cid:95)
`
`cp
`
`(cid:104)
`
`lnG
`
`Volume
`
`Thermal expansion
`
`Specific heat
`
`Heat conductivity
`
`Modulus
`
`Tg
`Tm
`Tg
`T
`T
`T
`Figure 3.21  Schematic of the behavior of some polymer properties as a function of
`temperature for different thermoplastics
`
`Tm
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 84
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`%&
`
`Table 3.4  Structural Units for Selected Polymers with Glass Transition and
`Melting Temperatures
`
`Structural unit
`
`Polymers
`
`CH2 CH2
`
`Linear polyethylene
`
`Tg = -125 °C
`Tm = 135 °C
`
`CH2
`
`CH
`CH3
`
`CH2
`
`CH
`C2H5
`
`CH2
`
`CH
`CH
`CH3
`
`CH3
`
`CH2
`CH
`
`CH2
`
`CH3
`
`CH
`CH3
`
`CH2 CH
`
`Isotactic polypropylene
`
`Tg = -20 °C
`Tm = 170 °C
`
`Isotactic polybutene
`
`Tg = -25 °C
`Tm = 135 °C
`
`Isotactic poly-3-
`methylbutene-1
`
`Tg = 50 °C
`Tm = 310 °C
`
`Isotactic poly-4-
`methylpentene-1
`
`Tg = 29 °C
`Tm = 240 °C
`
`Isotactic polystyrene
`
`Tg = 100 °C
`Tm = 240 °C
`
`CH3
`O
`CH3
`
`Polyphenylether (PPE)
`
`Tg = 210 °C
`Tm = 261 °C
`
`▸
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 85
`
`

`

`%’
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`Table 3.4  Structural Units for Selected Polymers (continued)
`
`Structural unit
`
`Polymers
`
`Polyacetaldehyde
`
`Tg = -30 °C
`Tm = 165 °C
`
`Polyformaldehyde
`(polyacetal,
`polyoxymethylene)
`
`Tg = -85 °C
`Tm ≈ 190 °C
`
`Isotactic
`polypropyleneoxide
`
`Tg = -75 °C
`Tm = 75 °C
`
`Poly-[2.2-bis-(chlormethyl)-
`trimethylene-oxide]
`
`Tg = 5 °C
`Tm = 181 °C
`
`Isotactic polymethylmeth-
`acrylate
`
`Tg = 50 °C
`Tm = 160 °C
`
`Polychlortrifluoroethylene
`
`Tg = 45 °C
`Tm = 220 °C
`
`O
`
`CH
`CH3
`
`O CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`CH
`CH3
`
`O
`
`CH2
`
`Cl
`CH2
`CH2
`C
`CH2 Cl
`
`CH2
`
`CH3
`C
`CO2 CH3
`
`CF F
`
`l F
`CC
`
`CF2 CF2
`
`Polytetrafluoroethylene
`
`Tg1 = -113 °C
`Tg2 = 127 °C
`Tm = 330 °C
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 86
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`%(
`
`Table 3.4  Structural Units for Selected Polymers (continued)
`
`Structural unit
`
`Polymers
`
`Polyvinylidenechloride
`
`Tg = -19 °C
`Tm = 190 °C
`
`Polyvinylidenefluoride
`
`Tg = -45 °C
`Tm = 171 °C
`
`Polyvinylchloride (PVC) -
`amorphous
`
`Tg = 80 °C
`Tm = –
`
`Polyvinylchloride (PVC) -
`crystalline
`
`Tg = 80 °C
`Tm = 212 °C
`
`Polyvinylfluoride (PVF)
`
`Tg = -20 °C
`Tm = 200 °C
`
`Cl
`C
`Cl
`
`F F
`
`C
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`CH
`Cl
`
`CH2
`
`CH
`Cl
`
`FC
`
`H
`
`CH2
`
`CO2
`
`CO2 CH2 CH2 O
`
`Polyethyleneterephtalate
`(PET) (linear polyester)
`
`Tg = 69 °C
`Tm = 245 °C
`
`CO [CH2]4
`
`CO NH
`
`[CH2]6
`
`NH
`
`Polyamide 66
`
`Tg = 57 °C
`Tm = 265 °C
`
`▸
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 87
`
`

`

`&)
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`Table 3.4  Structural Units for Selected Polymers (continued)
`
`Structural unit
`
`Polymers
`
`CO [CH2]8
`
`CO NH
`
`[CH2]6
`
`NH
`
`Polyamide 610
`
`Tg = 57 °C
`Tm = 265 °C
`
`CO [CH2]5 NH
`
`Polycaprolactam,
`Polyamide 6
`
`Tg = 75 °C
`Tm = 233 °C
`
`Polycarbonate (PC)
`
`Tg = 149 °C
`Tm = 267 °C
`
`O
`
`CO
`
`O
`
`CH3
`C
`CH3
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`Poly-(p-xylene) (Parylene
`|| R)
`
`Tg = –
`Tm = 400 °C
`
`C
`O
`
`[CH2]2
`
`O
`
`C
`O
`
`n
`
`C O
`O
`PET
`
`PHB
`
`O
`
`m
`
`Polyethyleneterephtalate /
`p-Hydroxybenzoate-
`copolymers LC-PET,
`polymers with flexible
`chains
`
`Tg = 75 °C
`Tm = 280 °C
`
`N
`
`O
`
`Polyimide (PI)
`
`Tg: up to 400 °C
`
`C CO
`
`O
`
`Polyamidimide (PAI)
`
`Tg ≈ 260 °C
`
`R
`
`N
`H
`
`C O
`
`C CO
`
`O
`
`C CO
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 88
`
`

`

`
`
`%.( Arrangement of Polymer Molecules
`
`&!
`
`Table 3.4  Structural Units for Selected Polymers (continued)
`
`Structural unit
`
`Polymers
`
`Polyetherimide (PEI)
`
`Tg ≈ 215 °C
`
`O
`
`CH3
`C
`CH3
`
`O
`
`C CO
`
`O
`
`N
`
`Polybismaleinimide (PBI)
`
`Tg ≈ 250 °C
`
`HH
`
`CC
`
`CO
`
`C
`
`O
`
`N
`
`R
`
`N
`
`CO
`
`C
`
`O
`
`CC
`
`HH
`
`Polyoxybenzoate (POB)
`
`Tg ≈ 290 °C
`
`O
`
`O
`C
`
`CO
`
`O
`
`Polyetherketone (PEEK)
`
`Tg = 145 °C
`Tm = 335 °C
`
`Polyphenylene-sulfide
`(PPS)
`
`Tg ≈ 230 °C
`
`Polyethersulfone (PES)
`
`Tg = 85 °C
`Tm = 280 °C
`
`O
`
`Polysulfone (PSU)
`
`Tg ≈ 180 °C
`
`O
`C
`
`O
`
`S
`
`CH3
`C
`CH3
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O O
`
`S
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O O
`
`S
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 89
`
`

`

`&*
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`3.5.4 Thermosets and Cross-Linked Elastomers
`
`Thermosets, and some elastomers, are polymeric materials that have the ability to
`crosslink. The crosslinking causes the material to become heat resistant a!er it
`has solidified. A more in-depth explanation of the chemical crosslinking reaction
`that occurs during solidification is given in Chapter 8.
`The crosslinking usually is a result of the presence of double bonds that break,
`allowing the molecules to link with their neighbors. One of the oldest thermoset-
`ting polymers is phenol-formaldehyde, or phenolic. Figure 3.22 shows the che-
`mical symbol representation of the reaction, and Fig. 3.23 shows a schematic of
`the reaction. The phenol molecules react with formaldehyde molecules to create a
`three-dimensional crosslinked network that is stiff and strong. The by-product of
`this chemical reaction is water.
`
`HH
`
`OH
`
`O C
`
`HH
`
`OH
`
`HH
`
`H
`+
`+
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`Formaldehyde
`Phenol
`Phenol
`OH
`
`HH
`
`HO
`
`H
`
`CH2
`H
`H
`+ H2O
`
`H
`
`HH
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`OH
`
`H2C
`
`OH
`
`CH2
`OH
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`OH
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`H
`
`OH
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`H
`
`CH2
`
`
`
`OHOH
`
`CH2
`
`OH
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`OH
`
`CH2
`
`Figure 3.22  Symbolic representation of the condensation polymerization of phenol-
`formal dehyde resins
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 90
`
`

`

`
`
`%.# Copolymers and Polymer Blends
`
`&+
`
`H2O
`
`H2O
`
`Figure 3.23 Schematic representation of the
`condensation polymerization of phenol-formal-
`dehyde resins
`
` (cid:132) 3.6 Copolymers and Polymer Blends
`
`Copolymers are polymeric materials with two or more monomer types in the same
`chain. A copolymer that is composed of two monomer types is referred to as a
`bipolymer, and one that is formed by three different monomer groups is called a
`terpolymer. Depending on how the different monomers are arranged in the polymer
`chain, one distinguishes between random, alternating, block, or gra& copolymers.
`The four types of copolymers are schematically represented in Fig. 3.24.
`A common example of a copolymer is ethylene-propylene. Although both mono-
`mers would result in semi-crystalline polymers when polymerized individually,
`the melting temperature disappears in the randomly distributed copolymer with
`ratios between 35/65 and 65/35, resulting in an elastomeric material, as shown in
`Fig. 3.25. In fact, EPDM7 rubbers are continuously gaining acceptance in industry
`because of their resistance to weathering. On the other hand, the ethylene-propyl-
`ene block copolymer maintains a melting temperature for all ethylene/propylene
`ratios, as shown in Fig. 3.26.
`Another widely used copolymer is high impact polystyrene (PS-HI), which is
`formed by gra!ing polystyrene to polybutadiene. Again, when styrene and buta-
`
`7  The D in EP(D)M stands for the added unsaturated diene component which results in a crosslinked
`elastomer.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 91
`
`

`

`&#
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`diene are randomly copolymerized, the resulting material is an elastomer called
`styrene-butadiene-rubber (SBR). Another classic example of copolymerization is
`the terpolymer acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).
`
`Random copolymer
`
`Alternating copolymer
`
`Block copolymer
`
`Graft copolymer
`
`Figure 3.24 Schematic representation of diff erent copolymers
`
`Tm
`
`Tm
`
`Elastomer
`no melting
`temperature
`
`Tg
`
`20
`
`80
`
`60
`40
`Ethylene
`60
`40
`Propylene
`
`%mol
`
`%mol
`
`100
`
`0
`
`Figure 3.25 Melting and glass transition
`temperature for random ethylene-propylene
`copolymers
`
`200
`
`°C
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Temperature, T
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`-150
`
`0
`
`100
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 92
`
`

`

`
`
`%.) Polymer Additives
`
`&$
`
`Polymer blends belong to another family of polymeric materials that are made by
`mixing or blending two or more polymers to enhance the physical properties of
`each individual component. Common polymer blends include PP-PC, PVC-ABS,
`and PE-PTFE.
`
`Tm
`
`melt begin
`
`200
`
`°C
`
`150
`
`125
`
`100
`
`Melting Temperature, Tm
`
`0
`
`0
`
`100
`
`20
`
`80
`
`60
`40
`Ethylene
`60
`40
`Propylene
`
`%mol
`%mol
`
`100
`
`0
`
` 
`
` Figure 3.26 Melting temperature for
`ethylene-propylene block copolymers
`
` (cid:132) 3.7 Polymer Additives
`
`There are many polymer additives that are mixed into a polymer to improve the
`mechanical, optical, electrical, and acoustic – to name a few – performance of a
`component.
`
`3.7.1 Flame Retardants
`
`Since polymers are organic materials, most of them are fl ammable. The fl ammabil-
`ity of polymers has always been a serious technical problem. A parameter that can
`be used to assess the fl ammability of polymers is the limiting oxygen index (LOI),
`also known as the critical oxygen index (COI). This value defi nes the minimum vol-
`ume percent of oxygen concentration, mixed with nitrogen, needed to support
`combustion of the polymer under the test conditions specifi ed by ASTM D 2863.
`Since air contains 21 % oxygen by volume, only those polymers with an LOI greater
`than 0.21 are considered self-extinguishing. In practice, an LOI value higher than
`0.27 is recommended as the limiting self-extinguishing threshold. Table 3.5 pre-
`sents LOI values for selected polymers.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 93
`
`

`

`&%
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`It is impossible to make a polymer completely inflammable. However, some addi-
`tives containing halogens, such as bromine, chlorine, or phosphorous, reduce the
`possibility of either starting combustion within a polymer component or, once
`ignited, reduce the rate of flame spread. When rating the performance of flame
`retardants, bromine is more effective than chlorine.
`In the radical trap theory of flame retardancy it is believed that bromine or phos-
`phorous containing additives compete in the reaction of a combustion process. To
`illustrate this we examine two examples of typical combustion reactions. These
`are:
`
`CH OH
`+
`4
`
`→
`
`CH H O
`+
`3
`2
`
`and
`
`CH H O
`CH O
`→
`+
`+ +
`3
`2
`4
`2
`where OH and H are active chain carriers. With the presence of HBr the following
`reaction can take place
`
`OH HBr
`+
`
`H O Br
`+2→
`
`Table 3.5 LOI Values for Selected Polymers
`Polymer
`Polyformaldehyde
`Polyethylene oxide
`Polymethyl methacrylate
`Polyacrylonitrile
`Polyethylene
`Polypropylene
`Polyisoprene
`Polybutadiene
`Polystyrene
`Cellulose
`Polyethylene terephthalate
`Polyvinyl alcohol
`Polyamide 66
`Epoxy
`Polycarbonate
`Aramid fibers
`Polyphenylene oxide
`Polysulfone
`Phenolic resins
`
`LOI
`0.15
`0.15
`0.17
`0.18
`0.18
`0.18
`0.185
`0.185
`0.185
`0.19
`0.21
`0.22
`0.23
`0.23
`0.27
`0.285
`0.29
`0.30
`0.35
`
`▸
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 94
`
`

`

`
`
`%.) Polymer Additives
`
`&&
`
`Table 3.5 LOI Values for Selected Polymers (continued)
`Polymer
`Polychloroprene
`Polyvinyl chloride
`Polyvinylidene fluoride
`Polyvinylidene chloride
`Carbon
`Polytetrafluoroethylene
`
`LOI
`0.40
`0.42
`0.44
`0.60
`0.60
`0.95
`
`where the active chain carrier was replaced by the less active Br radical, helping
`with flame extinguishment. Similarly, with the presence of Br the following reac-
`tion can take place
`
`→
`HBr CH
`CH Br
`+
`4 +
`3
`Table 3.6 [8] lists selected polymers and commonly used flame retardants.
`
`Table 3.6 Selected Polymers with Typical Commercial Flame Retardants
`Polymer
`Flame retardants
`Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
`Octabromodiphenyl oxide
`High impact polystyrene
`Decabromodiphenyl oxide
`Polyamide
`Dechlorane plus
`Polycarbonate
`Tetrabromobisphenol A carbonate oligomer
`Polyethylene
`Chlorinated paraffin
`Polypropylene
`Dechlorane plus
`Polystyrene
`Pentabromocyclododecane
`Polyvinyl chloride
`Phosphate ester
`
`3.7.2 Stabilizers
`
`The combination of heat and oxygen will bring about thermal degradation in a
`polymer. Heat or energy will produce free radicals that will react with oxygen to
`form carbonyl compounds, which give rise to yellow or brown discolorations in the
`final product.
`Thermal degradation can be slowed by adding stabilizers such as antioxidants or
`peroxide decomposers. These additives do not eliminate thermal degradation, but
`they slow down the reaction process. Once the stabilizer has been consumed by
`the reaction with the free radicals, the protection of the polymer against thermal
`degradation ends. The time period over which the stabilizer renders protection
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 95
`
`

`

`&’
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`against thermal degradation is called induction time. A test used to measure ther-
`mal stability of a polymer is the Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) by differential scan-
`ning calorimetry (DSC). The OIT test is defined as the time it takes for a polymer
`sample to thermally degrade in an oxygen environment at a set temperature above
`the polymer’s transition temperature. The transitions must occur in a nitrogen
`environment. The standard test is described by ASTM D 3895. Another test used to
`measure the thermal stability of a polymer and its additives is the thermal gravi-
`metric analysis (TGA) discussed in Chapter 4.
`Polyvinyl chloride is probably the polymer most vulnerable to thermal degrada-
`tion. In polyvinyl chloride, scission of the C-Cl bond occurs at the weakest point of
`the molecule. The chlorine radicals will react with their nearest CH group, forming
`HCl and creating new weak C-Cl bonds. A stabilizer must therefore neutralize HCl
`and stop the auto-catalytic reaction, as well as prevent corrosion of the processing
`equipment.
`
`3.7.3 Antistatic Agents
`
`Since polymers have such low electric conductivity, they can build-up electric
`charges quite easily. The amount of charge build-up is controlled by the rate at
`which the charge is generated compared to the charge decay. The rate of charge
`generation at the surface of the component can be reduced by reducing the in -
`timacy of contact, whereas the rate of charge decay is increased through surface
`conductivity. Hence, a good antistatic agent should be an ionizable additive that
`allows charge migration to the surface, at the same time as creating bridges to the
`atmosphere through moisture in the surroundings. Typical antistatic agents are
`nitrogen compounds, such as long chain amines and amides, polyhydric alcohols,
`among others.
`
`3.7.4 Fillers
`
`Fillers can be divided into two categories: those that reinforce the polymer and
`improve its mechanical performance and those that are used to take up space and
`so reduce the amount of actual resin to produce a part – sometimes referred to as
`extenders. A third, less common, category of filled polymers are those where fillers
`are dispersed into the polymer to improve its electric conductivity.
`Polymers that contain fillers that improve their mechanical performance are o!en
`referred to as composites. Composites can be divided into two further categories:
`composites with high performance reinforcements, and composites with low per-
`formance reinforcements. In high performance composites the reinforcement is
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 96
`
`

`

`
`
`%.) Polymer Additives
`
`&(
`
`placed inside the polymer in such a way that optimal mechanical behavior is
`achieved, such as unidirectional glass fibers in an epoxy resin. High performance
`composites usually have 50–80 % reinforcement by volume and the composites are
`usually laminates, tubular shapes containing braided reinforcements, etc. In low
`performance composites the reinforcement is small enough that it can be dis-
`persed well into the matrix, allowing to process these materials the same way their
`unreinforced counterparts are processed. The most common filler used to reinforce
`polymeric materials is glass fiber. However, wood fiber, which is commonly used as
`an extender, also increases the stiffness and mechanical performance of some
`thermoplastics. To improve the bonding between the polymer matrix and the rein-
`forcing agent, coupling agents, such as silanes and titanates are o!en added. Poly-
`mer composites and their performance are discussed in more detail in Chapters 8
`and 9.
`Extenders, used to reduce the cost of the component, o!en come in the form of
`particulate fillers. The most common particulate fillers are calcium carbonate, sil-
`ica flour, clay, and wood flour or fiber. As mentioned earlier, some fillers also
`slightly reinforce the polymer matrix, such as clay, silica flour, and wood fiber. It
`should be pointed out that polymers with extenders o!en have significantly lower
`toughness than the unfilled resin. This concept is covered in more detail in Chap-
`ter 10.
`
`3.7.5 Blowing Agents
`
`The task of blowing or foaming agents is to produce cellular polymers, also referred
`to as expanded plastics. The cells can be completely enclosed (closed cell) or they
`can be interconnected (open cell). Polymer foams are produced with densities
`ranging from 1.6 kg/m3 to 960 kg/m3. There are many reasons for using polymer
`foams, such as their high strength/weight ratio, excellent insulating and acoustic
`properties, and high energy and vibration absorbing properties.
`Polymer foams can be made by mechanically whipping gases into the polymer, or
`by either chemical or physical means. Some of the most commonly used foaming
`methods are [9]:
` (cid:131) Thermal decomposition of chemical blowing agents, which generates nitrogen
`and/or carbon monoxide and dioxide. An example of such a foaming agent is
`azodicarbonamide, which is the most widely used commercial polyolefin foaming
`agent.
` (cid:131) Heat induced volatilization of low-boiling liquids such as pentane and heptane in
`the production of polystyrene foams, and methylene chloride when producing
`flexible polyvinyl chloride and polyurethane foams.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 97
`
`

`

`’)
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
` (cid:131) Volatilization by the exothermic reaction of gases produced during polymeri-
`zation. This is common in the reaction of isocyanate with water to produce car-
`bon dioxide.
` (cid:131) Expansion of the gas dissolved in a polymer upon reduction of the processing
`pressure.
`The basic steps of the foaming process are nucleation of the cells, expansion or
`growth of the cells, and stabilization of the cells. The nucleation of a cell occurs
`when, at a given temperature and pressure, the solubility of a gas is reduced, lead-
`ing to saturation, expelling the excess gas to form a bubble. Nucleating agents are
`used for initial formation of the bubbles. The bubble reaches an equilibrium shape
`when the pressure inside the bubble balances with the surface tension surround-
`ing the cell.
`
`Examples
`
`1. What is the maximum possible separation between the ends of a high
`density polyethylene molecule with an average molecular weight of
`100,000.
`Our first task is to estimate the number of repeat units, n, in the poly-
`ethylene chain. Each repeat unit has  carbon and  hydrogen atoms. The
`molecular weight of carbon is  and that of hydrogen . Hence,
`MW/repeat unit = () + () = .
`The number of repeat units is computed as
`n = MW/(MW/repeat unit) = ,/ = , units.
`Using the diagram presented in Fig. ., we can now estimate the length
`of the fully extended molecule using
`(
`) =
`
`0 252.
`nm
`3571
`890
`nm
`
`0 89.
`μm
`
`l =
`
`=
`
`0.252 nm
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`CH2
`Polyethylene repeat unit
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`Figure 3.27  Schematic diagram of a polyethylene molecule
`
`As we know, even high density polyethylene molecules are branched and
`therefore our result is an overprediction.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 98
`
`

`

`
`
`Problems
`
`Problems
`
`’!
`
` 1. Estimate the degree of polymerization of a polyethylene with an average
`molecular weight of 150,000. The molecular weight of an ethylene
`mono mer is 28.
` 2. What is the maximum possible separation between the ends of a poly-
`styrene molecule with a molecular weight of 160,000?
` 3. To enhance processability of a polymer, why would you want to decrease
`its molecular weight?
` 4. Why would an uncrosslinked polybutadiene flow at room temperature?
` 5. What role does the cooling rate play in the morphological structure of
`semi-crystalline polymers?
` 6. Explain how crosslinking between the molecules affect the molecular
`mobility and elasticity of elastomers.
` 7. Increasing the molecular weight of a polymer increases its strength and
`stiffness, as well as its viscosity. Is too high of a viscosity a limiting factor
`when increasing the strength by increasing the molecular weight? Why?
` 8. Given two polyethylene grades, one for extrusion and one for injection
`molding, which one should have the higher molecular weight? Why?
` 9. A fractional analysis of a commercial polypropylene sample has a distri-
`bution of chain lengths from which the following data is obtained:
`
`
`Table 3.7 Chain Length Distribution of a Commercial Polypropylene
`Degree of Polymerization
`Mole fraction
` 200
`0.08
` 400
`0.12
` 600
`0.15
` 900
`0.34
`1500
`0.16
`2000
`0.15
`
`What is the number-average molecular weight? What is the weight ave-
`rage molecular weight and what is the polydispersity index of the samp-
`le? Derive the equations that can also represent these molecular weights
`using the mole fraction (xi) and weight fraction (wi) of polymers with simi-
`lar molecular weight.
`10. Which broad class of thermoplastic polymers densifies the least during
`cooling and solidification from a melt state into a solid state? Why?
`11. What class of polymers would you probably use to manufacture frying
`pan handles? Even though most polymers could not actually be used for
`this particular application, what single property do all polymers exhibit
`that would be considered advantageous in this particular application.
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2178
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 99
`
`

`

`’*
`
`3 Structure of Polymers
`
`12. In terms of recycling, which material is easier to handle, thermosets or
`thermoplastics? Why?
`13. Polymers are considered flammable materials. How can flammability of a
`polymer

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket