throbber

`

`14 .Ciole ' R382
`
` PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER, ETC.
`
`iq
`HEARING||
`ma
`AL
`‘
`o
`f
`€O)-
`ff
`At
`Ite /
`
`~
`~~"
`COMMITTEE ON
`COINAGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES
`HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
`
`SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
`
`SECOND SESSION
`
`PURSUANT TO
`
`H. J. Res. 295
`
`A JOINT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL
`
`RUBBER FROM SOURCES IN THE
`
`WESTERN HEMISPHERE
`
`——$$—$—$—$<<<—————
`
`MAY AND JUNE, 1942
`
`UNITED STATES
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICH
`WASHINGTON : 1942
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 2
`
`

`

`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 3
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 3
`
`

`

`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 4
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 4
`
`

`

`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 5
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 5
`
`

`

`Oo
`
`14 .Clole' R82
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER,ETC.
`ZORD Ligs
`es
`Ne.
`| f
`ay
`HEARING :
`18
`\
`1942
`COMMITTEE ON “Oe oe
`COINAGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES
`HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
`
`-
`
`ae,
`
`BEFORE THE
`
`5
`
`Seb
`
`SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
`
`SECOND SESSION
`
`PURSUANT TO
`
`H. J. Res. 295
`
`A JOINT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL
`
`RUBBER FROM SOURCES IN THE
`
`WESTERN HEMISPHERE
`
`—_——
`
`MAY AND JUNE, 1942
`
`UNITED STATES
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICH
`WASHINGTON : 1942
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 6
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 6
`
`

`

`COMMITTEE ON COINAGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES
`
`SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
`
`ANDREWL. SOMERS, New York, Chairman
`.
`JOHN J. COCHRAN,Missouri
`CHAUNCEY W. REED, Illinois
`WILLIAM H,. LARRABEE,Indiana
`AUGUST H. ANDRESEN, Minnesota
`COMPTON I. WHITE,Idaho
`E. HAROLD CLUETT, New York
`WILL ROGERS, Oklahoma
`LEONARD W. HALL, New York
`DAN R. McGEHEE, Mississippi
`HUGH D. SCOTT, JR., Pennsylvania
`JOHN F. HUNTER, Obio
`RICHARD P. GALE, Minnesota
`W. F. NORRELL, Arkansas
`WILLIAM H,. STEVENSON,Wisconsin
`ROBERT L, RAMSAY, West Virginia
`JOHN J. MCINTYRE, Wyoming
`FRANCIS R. SMITH, Pennsylvania
`EUGENE WORLEY,Texas
`JAMES DOMENGEAUX,Louisiana
`SAUL C, COHEN, Clerk
`
`HARRY SAUTHOFFP,Wisconsin
`
`Ir
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 7
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 7
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER, ETC.
`
`THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1942
`i
`1
`CoMMITTEE ON Cornacr, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES,
`Hovuseor Representatives,
`Washington, D.C.
`The committee met at 10:30 a. m., Hon. Andrew L. Somers (chaii-
`man) presiding.
`The CxHamman. Gentlemen, while we have no quorum, without
`objection the committee can come to order for the purpose of hearing
`House Joint Resolution 295, a resolution by Mr. Faddis.
`If there is no objection, I will not read the resolution, because it is
`short and most members can read it for themselves, but this morning
`I would like the committee to have Mr. Faddis speak to us about
`this resolution.
`I also have invited a witness to give us a little
`background on the rubbersituation.
`We see from day to day in the newspapers the fact that there is a
`terrific shortage, and yet I do not think that the Members of the
`House of Representatives have sufficient facts at hand to consider
`legislation that might be necessary governing this rubber shortage,
`and therefore I felt that Mr. Faddis’ bill did give us a vehicle that
`would enable us to get into this rubber situation and possibly come
`to someintelligent determination.
`(The resolution referred to by the chairmanis as follows:)
`
`[H. J. Res. 295, 77th Cong., 2d sess. ]
`
`JOINT RESOLUTION Providing for the procurement of raw natural rubber from sources
`in the Western Hemisphere
`
`Whereas it is of the utmost importance that the United States supplement its
`supply of raw rubber in order to enable our workers to go to and from their
`daily work on our farms and in our mines and mills; and
`Whereas raw rubber would be of more practical value to the United States
`in time of this emergency than much of the gold we now hold; and
`Wherens there is raw rubber in South and Central America which can only
`be made available within a reasonable time by extraordinary effort; and
`Whereas there are in other parts of the world many persons who are ac-
`quainted with the acquisition and preparation of raw rubber who can be organ-
`ized and employed in exploiting the raw rubber in Central and South America:
`Therefore be it
`Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
`America in Congress assembled, That there is hereby authorized to be appro-
`priated, out of any unexpended amounts of the stabilization fund established
`by section 10 of the Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934, or out of the gold
`reserve established by section 2 of the Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934,
`the sum of $250,000,°00 for the purpose of securing the services of, from what-
`ever part of the world they can be procured, persons having the experience,
`physique, knowledge, and ability to bring inte the possession of the United
`States as much of the natural rubber as is possible of the nations in Central
`and South America with whom the necessary arrangements can be concluded.
`t
`
`ad
`

`Aw
`
`Fin Hinot to
`
`BQ 7S Tl H
`
`6/99 31150-1839 +.«
`
`8
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 8
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 8
`
`

`

`2
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`Sro, 2. That for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this joint reso-
`lution there shall be established under the War Production Board a bureau for
`the procurement of raw American rubber and that this Board be endowed with
`all the powers necessary to carry out
`the provisions of this joint resolution:
`Provided, That the chief of this bureau must be a man who has been a suc-
`cessful producer of raw rubber in the region of the East Indies, that the fleld
`forces of all grades must be men who have had experience in the production of
`raw rubber either in the East Indies or in Central or South America.
`Sec. 3. There are hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in
`the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to
`provide for the transportation, maintenance, rotation, and storage within the
`United States or any of its Territories or possessions of any materials ac-
`quired under the provisions of this joint resolution.
`Sec. 4. The Department of State is hereby authorized and directed to carry on
`whatever negotiations are necessary with any foreign nation fo assist in or to
`further the purpose of this joint resolution.
`The CHarrman. If Mr. Faddis will take a seat here and review
`arguments in favor of his resolution, the committee will be very
`pleased to hear him.
`
`STATEMENT OF HON. CHARLES I. FADDIS, A REPRESENTATIVE
`FROM THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`Mr. Fappis. Mr. Chairman,I appreciate this opportunity of appear-
`ing before your committee in this connection, and especially at this
`time, when rubber is much in the public eye, and I am sure thatit is
`time some committee in this House was undertaking to do something
`substantial in regard to the matter of rubber.
`Permit meto go back a little and give you someof the early history
`of my interest in this matter.
`Mr. ANpRESEN. Would you permit a question ?
`Mr. Fappis. Yes.
`Mr, ANpresen. You mentioned about doing something substantial.
`Now, we have read in the papers statements from different divisions
`down here in the Government that they are contemplating spending
`$700,000,000 for the production of synthetic rubber, and efforts are
`being made to produce rubber from the guayule tree or shrub. Does
`the gentleman from Pennsylvania feel that this is just a minoreffort
`or is that something substantial ?
`Mr. Fappis, That what is a minoreffort?
`Mr. Anpresen. This $700,000,000 that Jesse Jones threatens to spend
`for synthetic rubber.
`Mr. Fappis. I feel this: That the move to produce synthetic rubber
`is a move that should, of course, be encouraged, but at the same time
`I am very much afraid that it is a move that will not result in pro-
`ducing a large enough amount of synthetic rubber to be of any
`sub-
`stantia] assistance to us in the emergency which we are now facing.
`I feel that if we are to reinforce what little rubber we have we are
`going to have to have more aggressive action than a mere attempt to
`produce synthetic rubber.
`To begin with, you must understand that synthetic rubber, so far
`as we are concerned in this country, is a matter with which we have
`had very little experience. A little has been made in an experimental
`way, but as far as having any machinery is concerned, even in the
`way of actual machinery or in the way of trained personnel, super-
`visory or otherwise, to produce synthetic rubber, it is something that,
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 9
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 9
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`3
`
`as far as I know, we do not have. After all, it will be necessary not
`only
`to erect plants, but it will be necessary to train personnel, and
`undoubtedly a great many disappointments will arise from time to
`time until the quality of this synthetic rubber is raised to the quality
`that we need.
`My understanding of synthetic rubber is that for most purposesit
`must be supplemented or must be mixed with natural rubber in some
`form or another before it will properly adhere to the fabric. I would
`not want for a minute to discourage that.
`Asfor the production of rubber from the guayule shrub, I have been
`interested in that for quite some time. From the best information at
`my command,I madea calculation about a year ago that if we were to
`produce the supply of rubber we have been accustomed to consuming in
`this country, we would haveto put an area into cultivation of the guay-
`ule shrub something about the size of the State of Indiana, if we were
`to produceit inside of a year; and,of course, it would be absolutely im-
`possible to secure enough seed to do that, because the securing of the
`seed would be a matter of quite a bit of time.
`Now,if the committee will permit me, I want to go back intothissit-
`uation and give youthelegislative background of it. I believe I am
`probably better acquainted with that than any other Memberin the
`Congress, because Tbelieve I was the pioneerin legislation of that kind.
`In about 1935 I introduced a bill to provide for the protection of do-
`mestic sources of tin. At that time we were shipping a great deal of
`our tin scrap to Japan, and the Japanese were anxiousto get it, partly
`for the purpose of destroying our domestic detinning industry and
`partly for the purpose of producing high-grade steel, which was made
`from tin, to combine with their low-grade iron ores from Manchukuo
`and make a good grade of iron plate. That led meto the introduction
`of a bill to acquire a stock pile of strategic materials.
`Strategic materials, as, of course, you know, are materials which are
`necessary to our industrial life in time of peace and our defense in time
`of war, which we either do not produce or produce in quantities insuffi-
`cient to meet our needs.
`Among them are rubber—of course, we produce almost no rubber
`except what little we have produced from the guayule shrub—tin,
`tungsten, manganese, silk, quinine, and many others—about23,in fact.
`Copper since that time has almost come into the position of being a
`strategic material. So you can see that what may not have been a stra-
`tegic material yesterday or last year may be a strategic material today.
`Foremost amongall of these is rubber. Our entire national economy
`is built on rubber. Our industrial system functions on rubber.
`Throughoutthe past 15 or 18 years the social life of our people has been
`so changed in a residential way that they must have the automobile.
`People employed in our industries have, because of the automobile,
`been able to tear themselves out of the large metropolitan centers, take
`up residence out in rural districts, where they have a little place, and
`use their own cars to go back and forth to work. Today, if we were
`forced to take these cars from people, so that they could not go back
`and forth to work, I fail to see how they could be transported.
`In
`. some instances, of course, the streetcar and the bus may pick them up
`but, at the same time, it would be a difficult matter to bring all of them
`in. Ourentire civilization is based on rubber.
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 10
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 10
`
`

`

`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 11
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 11
`
`

`

`14 .Ctiole' KS 2
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER, ETC.
`RELig
`LeSRY iG
`x
`Ni
`.
`HEARINGy
`SB ~
`BEFORE THE
`1942 /
`.\a,,
`wes
`COMMITTEE ON “<>”
`COINAGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES
`HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
`
`SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
`
`SECOND SESSION
`
`PURSUANT TO
`
`H. J. Res. 295
`
`A JOINT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL
`
`RUBBER FROM SOURCES IN THE
`
`WESTERN HEMISPHERE
`
`—
`
`MAY AND JUNE, 1942
`
`UNITED STATES
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICH
`WASHINGTON : 1942
`
`“ MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 12
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 12
`
`

`

`COMMITTEE ON COINAGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES
`
`SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS
`
`ANDREWL. SOMERS, New York, Chairman
`*
`JOHN J. COCHRAN,Missouri
`CHAUNCEY W. REED,Illinois
`WILLIAM H, LARRABEE,Indiana
`AUGUST H. ANDRESEN,Minnesota
`COMPTON I. WHITE, Idaho
`E. HAROLD CLUETT, New York
`WILL ROGERS, Oklahoma
`LEONARD W. HALL, New York
`DAN R. McGEHEE, Mississippi
`HUGH D. SCOTT, IR., Pennsylvania
`RICHARD P. GALE, Minnesota
`JOHN F. HUNTER, Ohio
`W. F. NORRELL, Arkansas
`WILLIAM H, STEVENSON,Wisconsin
`ROBERT L. RAMSAY, West Virginia
`JOHN J. MCINTYRE, Wyoming
`FRANCIS R. SMITH, Pennsylvania
`EUGENE WORLEY,Texas
`JAMES DOMENGEAUSX,Louisiana
`SauC. COHEN, Clerk
`
`MARRY SAUTHOFF, Wisconsin
`
`pad
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 13
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 13
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER, ETC.
`
`THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1942
`t
`‘
`ComMMITTEE ON CornacE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES,
`HovseEor RepreseNTATIVES,
`Washington, D.C.
`The committee met at 10:30 a. m., Hon. Andrew L. Somers (chaiz-
`man) presiding.
`The CHarrman. Gentlemen, while we have no quorum, without
`objection the committee can cometo order for the purpose of hearing
`House Joint Resolution 295, a resolution by Mr. Faddis.
`If there is no objection, I will not read the resolution, because it is
`short and most members can read it for themselves, but this morning
`I would like the committee to have Mr. Faddis speak to us about
`this resolution.
`I also have invited a witness to give us a little
`background on the rubbersituation.
`Wesee from day to day in the newspapers the fact that there is a
`terriffic shortage, and yet I do not think that the Members of the
`House of Representatives have sufficient facts at hand to consider
`legislation that might be necessary governing this rubber shortage,
`and therefore I felt that Mr. Faddis’ bill did give us a vehicle that
`would enable us to get into this rubber situation and possibly come
`to some intelligent determination.
`(The resolution referred to by the chairmanis as follows:)
`
`[H. J. Res, 295, 77th Cong., 2d sess. ]
`
`JOINT RESOLUTION Providing for the procurement of raw natural rubber from sources
`in the Western Hemisphere
`
`Whereasit is of the utmost importance that the United States supplement its
`supply of raw rubber in order to enable our workers to go to and from their
`da.ly work on our farms and in our mines and mills; and
`Whereas raw rubber would be of more practical value to the United States
`in time of this emergency than much of the gold we now hold; and
`Whereas there is raw rubber in South and Central America which can only
`be made available within a reasonable time by extraordinary effort; and
`Whereas there are in other parts of the world many persons who are ac-
`quainted with the acquisition and preparation of raw rubber who can be organ-
`ized and employed in exploiting the raw rubber in Central and South America:
`Therefore be it
`Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
`America in Congress assembled, That there is hereby authorized to be appro-
`priated, out of any unexpended amounts of the stabilization fund established
`by section 10 of the Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934, or out of the gold
`reserve established by section 2 of the Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 193-4,
`the sum of $250,000,°00 for the purpose of securing the services of, from what-
`ever part of the world they can be procured, persons having the experience,
`physique, knowledge, and ability to bring into the possession of the United
`States as much of the natural rubber as is possible of the nations in Central
`and South America with whom the necessary arrangements can be concluded.
`1
`
`EG 265
`OU
`
`bao ttt
`ALR
`6/99 31150-1689 ws.
`
`"1 Lui
`
`o
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 14
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 14
`
`

`

`2
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`Seo. 2, That for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this joint reso-
`lution there shall be established under the War Production Board a bureau for
`the procurement of raw American rubber and that this Board be endowed with
`all the powers necessary to carry out
`the provisions of this joint resolution:
`Provided, That the chief of this bureau must be a man who has been a suc-
`cessful producer of raw rubber in the region of the East Indies, that the field
`forces of all grades must be men who have had experience in the production of
`raw rubber either in the East Indies or in Central or South America.
`Sec. 3. There are hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in
`the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to
`provide for the transportation, maintenance, rotation, and storage within the
`United States or any of its Territories or possessions of any materials ac-
`quired under the provisions of this joint resolution.
`Sec. 4. The Department of State igs hereby authorized and directed to carry on
`whatever negotiations are necessary with any foreign nation to assist in or to
`further the purpose of this joint resolution.
`The CuHarrman. If Mr. Faddis will take a seat here and review
`arguments in favor of his resolution, the committee will be very
`pleased to hear him.
`
`STATEMENT OF HON. CHARLES I. FADDIS, A REPRESENTATIVE
`FROM THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`Mr. Fappis. Mr. Chairman,I appreciate this opportunity of appear-
`ing before your committee in this connection, and especially at this
`time, when rubber is much in the public eye, and I am surethatit is
`time some committee in this House was undertaking to do something
`substantial in regard to the matter of rubber.
`Permit me to go back a little and give you someof the early history
`of my interest in this matter.
`Mr. ANpresEeN. Would you permit a question?
`Mr. Fanois. Yes.
`Mr, ANpresen. You mentioned about doing somethingsubstantial.
`Now, we have read in the papers statements from different divisions
`down here in the Government that they are contemplating spending
`$700,000,000 for the production of synthetic rubber, and efforts are
`being made to produce rubber from the guayule tree or shrub. Does
`the gentleman from Pennsylvania feel that this is just a minor effort
`or is that something substantial ?
`Mr. Fappis. That what is a minor effort?
`Mr. Anpresen. This $700,000,000 that Jesse Jones threatens to spend
`for synthetic rubber.
`Mr. Fappis. I feel this: That the move to produce synthetic rubber
`is a move that should, of course, be encouraged, but at the same time
`I am very much afraid that it is a move that will not result in pro-
`ducing a large enough amountof synthetic rubber to be of any
`sub-
`stantial] assistance to us in the emergency which we are now facing.
`I feel that if we are to reinforce what little rubber we have we are
`going to have to have more aggressive action than a mere attempt to
`produce synthetic rubber.
`To begin with, you must understand that synthetic rubber, so far
`as we are concernedin this country, is a matter with which we have
`had very little experience. A little has been madein an experimental
`way, but as far as having any machinery is concerned, even in the
`way of actual machinery or in the way of trained personnel, super-
`visory or otherwise, to produce synthetic rubber, it is something that,
`
`i
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 15
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 15
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`3
`
`as far as I know, we do not have. After all, it will be necessary not
`only
`to erect plants, but it will be necessary to train personnel, and
`undoubtedly a great many disappointments will arise from time to
`time until the quality of this synthetic rubber is raised to the quality
`that we need.
`My understanding of synthetic rubber is that for most purposesit
`must be supplemented or must be mixed with natural rubber in some
`form or another before it will properly adhere to the fabric. I would
`not want for a minute to discourage that.
`Asfor the production of rubber from the guayule shrub, I have been
`interested in that for quite some time. From the best information at
`my command, I made a calculation about a year ago that if we were to
`produce the supply of rubber we have been accustomed to consuming in
`this country, we would haveto put an area into cultivation of the guay-
`ule shrub something about the size of the State of Indiana, if we were
`to produceit inside of a year; and, of course, it would be absolutely im-
`possible to secure enough seed to do that, because the securing of the
`seed would be a matter of quite a bit of time.
`Now,if the committee will permit me, I want to go back intothissit-
`uation and give you the legislative background of
`it. I believe I am
`probably better acquainted with that than any other Member in the
`Congress, because Tbelieve I was the pioneerin legislation of that kind.
`In about 1935 I introduced a bill to provide for the protection of do-
`mestic sources of tin. At that time we were shipping a great deal of
`our tin scrap to Japan, and the Japanese were anxiousto getit, partly
`for the purpose of destroying our domestic detinning industry and
`partly for the purpose of producing high-grade steel, which was made
`from tin, to combine with their low-grade iron ores from Manchukuo
`and make a good gradeof iron plate. That led me to the introduction
`of a bill to acquire a stock pile of strategic materials.
`Strategic materials, as, of course, you know,are materials which are
`necessary to our industrial life in time of peace and our defense in time
`of war, which we either do not produce or produce in quantities insuffi-
`cient to meet our needs.
`Among them are rubber—of course, we produce almost no rubber
`except what little we have produced from the guayule shrub—tin,
`tungsten, manganese, silk, quinine, and many others—about 23, in fact.
`Copper since that time has almost come into the position of being a
`strategic material. So you can see that what may not have been a stra-
`tegic material yesterday or last year may be a strategic material today.
`Foremost amongall of these is rubber. Our entire national economy
`is built on rubber. Our industrial system functions on rubber.
`Throughoutthe past 15 or 18 years the sociallife of our people has been
`so changed in a residential way that they must have the automobile.
`People employed in our industries have, because of the automobile,
`been able to tear themselves out of the large metropolitan centers, take
`up residence out in rural districts, where they have a little place, and
`use their own cars to go back and forth to work. Today, if we were
`forced to take these cars from people, so that they
`could not go back
`and forth to work, I fail to see how they could be transported.
`In
`. some instances, of course, the streetcar and the bus may pick them up
`but, at the same time, it would be a difficult matter to bring all of them
`in, Ourentire civilization is based on rubber.
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 16
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 16
`
`

`

`4
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`In 1939 I succceded in having passed the so-called stock-pile bill.
`That provided for an acquisition ofthese various strategic materials in
`the way of a stock pile, which wasto be placed in control of theofficials
`of the Army and Navy andto be used for the national defense.
`Now.
`Tf see on page 16 of Collier’s Magazine for May 9, 1942,
`an article by George Creel. He makes a statement to this effect
`[reading]:
`in 1939, gave Henry Morgenthau some $70,000.C00 for the
`When Congress,
`purchase of “critical and strategic materials,” rubber received no mention,
`and the money was spent for quinine, tin, mica, chrome,
`tungs:en, etc. Why
`not? Even the Army and the Navy held firmly to the conviction that the
`Far East could always be depended upon for a cheap and inexhaustible
`rubber supply. The possibility that Malaya and the Netherlands Hast Indies
`could be occupied by an invading force was too farfetched for serious con-
`sideration.
`*.
`*
`*
`Rubber did not come into the picture until after May 28, 1940,
`Now, Mr. Creel wrote that article without as much information
`as a man should have in writing about a subject of that kind at
`a time like this.
`If Mr. Creel had been as well informed of pro-
`ceedings here in Washington as he should have been to write an
`article of that kind for a magazine at that time, he would have
`known better than to have made such a statement.
`The fact that rubber was a strategic material and that our sup-
`plies of rubber were all
`too inadequate is fact that has well been
`recognized by the Army and Navy Munitions Board for manyyears,
`and the Army and Navy Munitions Board has made strenuousef-
`forts to bring this matter to the attention of the authorities con-
`cerned in procuring these materials, but have been unsuccessful.
`When westarted out to enact the legislation which finally passed
`in 1939, became a law, and is now known as Public, 117, which was
`approved the 7th of June 1939, we were quite well aware of the
`fact that upward of a billion dollars should be appropriated for
`the acquisition of these strategic materials.
`.
`Of course, you all recognize the fact that before you can get a
`piece of legislation out of committee, or, at least before you can
`get
`it considered on the floor of
`the House,
`it
`is necessary to
`have the approval of the Bureau of the Budget.
`At that time the mind of the Congress for the most part and
`the mind of the Administration was geared more to matters per-
`taining to relief than it was to rearmament. We knewthat it was
`totally impossible to get a bill approved by the Bureau of the
`Budget that carried an appropriation that would at all be adequate
`for this purpose. We did, however, succeed in passing a bill call-
`ing for a hundred million dollars, and we finally received $70,000,000
`of that, over long intervals and by driblets.
`It was scarcely suffi-
`cient to scratch the surface.
`Where we received $70,000,000, we should have had not less than
`$700.000,000. We should have had—and it was well
`recognized
`by the War Department—at all
`times in our stock pile in this
`Nation 2,000,000 tons of rubber, which should have been rotated
`all the time in order to keep it from becoming useless on account
`of age, but
`the money was insufficient
`to secure any appreciable
`amount.
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 17
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 17
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`5
`
`Mr, Anpresen. Cary you inform the committee as to about what
`time the War Department and the Navy Department became conscious
`of the fact that we should have a stock pile of this critical material ?
`Mr. Fappis. Well, to my own certain knowledge, the War Depart-
`ment and the Navy Department were both cognizant of our dangers
`in this respect and of our need for a stock pile of rubber, as well as
`the other strategic materials, back as far as 1935, and were making
`what efforts they could to interest the Congress in that. That is the
`way it came to my attenion, because members of he Army and Navy
`Munitions Board brought it to my attention, because of my interest
`in the original tin bill.
`Mr. ANprESEN. That is when youfirst took it up? That was in
`1935?
`Mr. Fappis. That is right.
`Mr. Anpresen. Now, do you know if the Secretaries of War or the
`members of the staff of the Army and Navy took this up with the
`President of the United States to interest him in it?
`Mr. Fappis. No; I do not.
`1 do not know whether they did or not,
`but I know that Idid. After I introducedlegislation I tried to bring
`the matter to the attention of the President.
`Mr. Anpresen. And you could not interest the President in it at:
`that time to any extent?
`Mr. Fappis. I was unable to doso.
`Mr. Anpresen. Did the Bureau of the Budget approve the $70,000,-
`000——
`;
`,
`Mr. Fapprs. I am not saying that I endeavored to do this in 1935,
`understand, but long before we were able to get any legislation on it,
`and at the time we were trying to do it, I endeavored to interest the
`President in the acquisition of larger supplies.
`Mr. Anpresen. Of course, the average individual would ordinarily
`assume that with the President being the Commanderin Chief of the
`Army and Navy, there would be a certain amount of coordination be-
`tween his departments carrying out the functions of the Army and
`Navy and his ownoffice.
`Mr. Fanppts. Well, of course, the President is a very busy man, and
`many things are brought to his attention. Perhaps Harry Hopkins
`Was more aggressive in pressing the President with his ideas than was
`the Army and Navy Munitions Board; and,after all, it must be said
`that Harry Hopkins was in a better position to do that, because the
`Army and Navy Munitions Board could not be in the same position
`then as he was.
`Mr. ANpRESEN. It may be in the sameposition now.
`Mr. Fapots. I feel he is in a much stronger position now than he was
`at that time and hasagreat deal more poweras the ear of the President
`to a greater extent than he had before.
`Mr. Anpresen. Of course, a great deal of responsibility is being
`placed by cer:ain people on Congress for its failure to provide these
`critical materials.
`I would like to have your observation on that,
`‘because I think it 1s important. Now, Congress is advised on the
`state of the Nation, on the conditions of the War and Navy Depart-
`men‘s, and what they need, by the President himself in his message to
`Congress; and you knowit is very difficult to get through any measure
`in Congress unless it has the approval of the administration.
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 18
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 18
`
`

`

`6
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`Mr. Fanprs. That is all true, but when you say the Congress is ad-
`vised as to the condition of the Nation by the President, that is partly
`true, but only partly true, because the President’s advice and infor-
`mation to the Congress must of necessity be very general. The gentle-
`man recognizes that. But certainly the gentleman recognizes also
`that it is incumbent upon each and every Member of the Congress to
`be acquainted with the broad basics and fundamentals that have to do
`with.our entire conduct of our Government and the safety and security
`of the Nation.
`I say this to the gentleman, and I say this to the committee: That the
`Congress itself has. been as negligent, if not more negligent, than any
`other branch of the Government in this respect, and I want to show
`you that a little more as I go along. Congress failed to inform them-
`selves on this artd failed to listen to those who would tell you about
`that.
`I have been sneered at in the House when I said that 95 percent of
`the rubber came from the Dutch East Indies. You must remember
`that there were people in this country who, because of sectional inter-
`ests, did not wish anything to be done. There was the sugar-beet
`interest and the cotton-seed oil interest and other interests who were
`ready to abandon any policy that would abandon our strength in the
`East. Those men would sneer at you when youtried to tell them that
`95 percent of our rubber came from the Dutch East Indies. They
`tried to pull the curtain down when youtold them that 98 percent of
`our quinine and that most of our tungsten and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket