throbber
146
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`- Can supply
`
`Silberman & Co., Harrisburg, Pa. Can supply us with about 5 tons of rubber
`scrap a week for the next 12 weeks.
`:
`Singer Rubber Co., 296 Watkins Street, Brooklyn, N. Y. Can supply us with
`about 15 tons of scrap tires and tubes a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Sam Baron, New Haven, Conn. Can supply us immediately with 20,000
`pounds of uncured scrap rubber and about 5 tons a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Eastern Scrap Rvbber Co., Park Avenue and One Hundred and Thirty-fifth
`Street, New York City. Can supply us with 20,000 to 30,000 poundsofiscrap
`tires and tubes a week for the next 12 weeks.
`. Advance Scrap & Salvage, 190 Wooster Street, New York City. Accumulate
`about a thousand pounds a week of various types of scrap rubber. However,if
`prices were attractive, could accumulate 10 or 15 tons a week for the next 12
`weeks with no trouble atall.
`Crown Rubber Co., Freemont, Ohio, Accumulates approximately 30 tons of
`black cured trim from automobile mats.
`E. I.du Pont de Nemours & Co.
`In their various branches accumulate con-
`siderable quantities of various types of scrap rubber monthly.
`Gross Manufacturing Co., San Gabriel, Calif. Acecumulates between 4,000
`and 5,000 pounds monthly of scrap rubber.
`Manheim Manufacturing & Belting Co., Manheim, Pa. Accumulates scrap
`rubber at the rate of 4,000 to 5,000 pounds monthly.
`Kobrin & Kerness, 218 Newport Avenue, Brocklyn, N. Y. Can supply us
`with about 10 tons of scrap rubber a week for the next 12 weeks.
`( omen Rubber Co., Ashland, Ohio. Have 2,000 pounds of balloon scrap
`May15).
`Atlantic Tubing & Rubber Co., Providence, R. I. Have 10 tons of scrap
`rubber.
`:
`H. T. Feinberg & Sons, Inc., 42 Auburn Street, Chelsea, Mass.
`us with 20 tons of scrap boots and shoes every month.
`Gans Tire Salvage, 98 Auburn Street, Chelsea, Mass. Can supply us with
`about 20 tons a month of scrap tires.
`Kravetz & Co., 115 Second Street, Chelsea, Mass. Can supply us with 20
`tons of boots and shoes a month.
`David Feinberg Co., Fifth Street, Medford, Mass. Can supply us with about
`40 tons of mixed factory scrap, boots, and shoes a month.
`R. Barnett, 315 Jackson Street, Hoboken, N. J. Can supply us with about
`10 tons of scrap tires, tubes, boots, and shoes every week for the next 12 weeks.
`Gans Tire Co., 181 Third Street, Chelsea, Mass. Can supply us with about 5
`tons of tires and tubes a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Sabberstein Auto Wreckage Co., 210 Newport Avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y. Can
`supply us with about 5 tons of scrap tires and tubes a month.
`Clayton Waste Co., 719 Noble Street, Philadelphia, Pa.
`If price were right,
`eould go out and pick up 40 or 50 tons of scrap tires a month.
`Shapiro, Asher & Sons, 2838 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pa. Can-supply us
`with about 5 tons a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Max Jacob, 300 Tilghman Street, Allentown, Pa. Can give us 7 to 8 tons a
`week for the next 12 weeks. However, if price were more attractive, could give
`us 10 to 15 tons a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Feltex Corporation, Detroit, Mich. Haveoffered us scrap rubber (January 17).
`Huntington Rubber Mills, Inc., Seattle, Wash. Have offered us 2 tons of
`scrap cord fabric trimmings (January 22).
`Isaac Byer & Son, Trenton, N. J. They accumulate quite a bit of cured and
`uncured scrap rubber (February 24).
`Hohwieler Rubber Co., Morrisville, Pa. Have scrap from sporting goods
`items and scrap rubber from toys and novelty goods (Feburary 23).
`Cullens Service Station, Waycross, Ga. Have scrap tubes, camelback trim-
`mings, grooved rubber, and mixed tubes (February 16).
`Cristie’s Repair Shop, Brooklyn, N..Y. After they accumulate 200 pounds,
`they sell it (February 22).
`Ideal Rubber Co., Brooklyn, N. Y. Have 10 tons of hard rubber scrap (May 4).
`American Marsh Pumps, Battle Creek, Mich. Have several hundred pounds
`of CBS sheet scrap (May 9).
`is) Goodman, Chicago, Il}. Cotton fire hose is obtainable there (February
`Hanover Rubber & Metal, Baltimore, Md. One of their accounts have on
`hand two carloads of 3-inch scrap fire hose.
`A. Lowenstein, Newark, N. J. Have 10 tons scrap fire hose on hand (May4).
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 159
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 159
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`147
`
`Latex Fiber Industries, Inc., Beaver Falls, N. ¥. Have 700 pounds of scrap
`rubber (April 29).
`Raw Commodities, Inc., New York City. Have 20 tons of scorched compound
`and 20 tons of cured cable stripping (black and gray).
`Norwalk Tire & Rubber Co., Norwalk, Conn. Have 10 to 20 tons of serap
`rubber a month.
`Baldwin Rubber Co., Pontiac, Mich. Have 10 to 20 tons of scrap rubber a
`
`mont
`John Pilling Shoe Co., Lowell, Mass. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Golden Quality Shoe Co,. Pittsfield, Mass. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Bradley Shoe Co., Lynn, Mass. Ten thousand pounds slab serap.
`Muskin Shoe Co., Westminister, Md. Two thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Supreme Shoe Co., New York City. Ten thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Porter Shoe Co., ‘Milford, Mass. Two thousand pounds slab scrap.
`Silberman & Co., Harrisburg, Pa. Can supply us with about 5 tons of rubber
`scrap a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Singer Rubber Co., 296 Watkins Street, Brooklyn, N. Y. Can supply us with
`about 15 tons of scrap tires and tubes a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Sam Baron, New Haven, Conn. Can supply us immediately with 20,000
`pounds of uncured scrap rubber and about 5 tons a week for the rext 12 weeks.
`Eastern Scrap Rubber Co., Park Avenue and One Hundred Thirty-fifth Street,
`New York City. Can supply us with 20,000 to 30,000 poundsof scrap tires and
`tubes a week for the next 12 weeks.
`Advance Scrap & Salvage, 190 Wooster Street, New York City. Accumulate
`about a thousand pounds a week of various types of scrap rubber. However,
`if prices were attractive, could accumulate 10 or 15 tons a week for the next 12
`weeks with no trouble at all.
`Diane Footwear Co., New York City. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Tower Shoe Co., New York City. Five thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Rialto Shoe Co., New York City. Two thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Holly Shoe Co., Littleton, N. H. Ten thousand poundsslab serap.
`Freeport Shoe Co., Freeport, Maine. Three thousand poundsslab scrap,
`Lenox Shoe Co., Freeport, Maine. Twenty tons slab scrap.
`R & H Shoe Co., Revere, Mass.
`Twotons slab scrap.
`National Shoe & Slipper Co., Lynn, Mass. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Coben Shoe Co., Lynn, Mass. One thousand pounds slab scrap.
`Hubbard Shoe Co. ; Rochester, N.H. Thirty thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Suffolk Shoe Co., Boston, Mass. Two thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Co-ed Shoe Co., Wakefield, Mass. Four thousand poundsslab serap.
`Rockingham Shoe Co., Newmarket, N. H. Five thousand poundsslab scrap.
`1 Inter-Allied Slipper Co., New Jersey (Jersey City). Three thousand pounds
`scrap.
`slab
`Excellent Footwear Co., New York City. Two thousand pounds slab scrap.
`George W. Riley, Clarksburg, W. Va. One hundred pounds camelback trim-
`mings.
`A. 8. Kreider & Sons, Palmyra, Pa. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Phyllis Shoe Co., Lowell, Mass. Five thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Progress Shoe Co., New York City. Ten thousand poundsslab scrap.
`A. Jacobs & Son, Lynn, Mass. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Formfitting Slipper Co., New York City. One thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Gilash Shoe Co., Fitchburg, Mass. Five hundred poundsslab scrap.
`William Heiber & Son, Rochester, N. Y. Five hundred pounds slab scrap.
`Ramsey Shoe Co., New York City. Two thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Kesslen Shoe Co., Biddeford, Maine. Two thousand pounds slab scrap.
`aapneney Shoe Co., Chelsea, Mass. Eight thousand pounds slab scrap (60
`Wearbest Slipper Co., New York City. Four thousand poundsslab scrap.
`Silver Slipper, New York City. One thousand pounds slab scrap.
`Consolidated Slipper Co., Malone, N. Y. Two thousand poundsslab scrap.
`In addition, why don’t they contact the Chief of the Rubber Division
`of the Department of Commerce, Holt? Why don’t they contact the
`A. A. A.? Why don’t they contact Lessing J. Rosenwald, Chief of
`the Conservation Department? Why must I always do their work
`while they only do the things that hinder defense and hold back things *
`the people want? Nevertheless, in order to cooperate with them, I
`
`o
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 160
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 160
`
`

`

`148
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`‘have asked my organization to send out a few thousand inquiries, and
`at the next hearing, will have a very large amountof scrap to offer to
`that official. Why don’t they follow through on my industrial plans?
`They will find that thousands of people hold tremendous quantities of
`scrap that can be turned into reclaimed rubber for use in our war
`machine andour wareffort.
`Regarding Mr. Hunter’s remarksas to my statement that rubber in
`Brazil is the best in the world, I have submitted here today an article
`from the India Rubber World by the great rubber authorities, proving
`conclusively that Para rubbers are better than the younger trans-
`planted heaveia trees in the Far East.
`Regarding facilities in the Amazon Valley being inadequate to
`_ handle large quantities; that is not so.
`It is just a matter of going
`after it as I have explained at previous hearings. Regarding my
`statement as to the chemist being-able to produce every civilian
`requirement from scrap, which they say is misleading, I have previ-
`ously told you that we, for a year and a half have produced soles and
`heels madeoutof scrap which werepreferred againstall the qualities of
`our competitors, and we make moresoling of the sport type in color
`than any otherfirm in the trade. We use scrap alone, not crude
`rubber.
`It is more economical to use scrap rubber than it is to use
`crude for civilian, products.
`In some items you may not get as much wear but we don’tfind it
`so in soling, and you don’tfind it so in a great numberof other prod-
`ucts. We have madeinnertubesoutofall reclaim, and I will behappy
`to submit this tube to the committee.
`Regarding his statement of the retreading compound, Mr. Hunter
`and his collaborators should be informed that we werethefirst to make
`an all-reclaim camelback. We madeit in July 1941 and were makin
`it at the time the War Production Board and the O. P. A. stoppe
`the sale of all camelback for passenger tires. We submitted this
`compound months and months ago to the War Production Board.
`Then totheO.P.A. Even after the W. P. B. approved it and thought
`it was good and wetookit to the O. P. A., they didn’t allow any tires
`to be made for passenger cars. Now, we are the onesthat said 2
`ounces of crude rubber was required with 5 poundsof reclaim to
`make camelback for a retread tire. Let the Congressman and his
`eminent collaborators know that the 2 ounces of rubber is only for
`the cushion to cement the tread to the carcass and wasn’t in the tread
`compound atall.
`The tread which wasrelied on by the automobile contains no crude
`whatsoever, and the 2 ounces that are used has no bearing on the
`wear in any way.
`It is just that we wanted the 2 ounces to make a
`better vulcanization, although we can make the cushion out of all
`reclaimed rubber, and have it cement just as well as with the crude
`with our using a little more effort.
`in reference to equipment
`Regarding Mr. Hunter’s statement
`available, the Naugatuck Chemical Co. attempted in 1940 to enlarge
`their plant, taking them over a year to obtain the major part of their
`order. First, I have submitted this machinery of L. Albert & Sons.
`Second, I have submitted a telegram showing that they are set to
`supply the major part of 25 plants and they have told me, that with
`Government assistance up to 50 plants. Naugatuck Chemical Co.
`knows of the great number of rubber manufacturers that are out of
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 161
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 161
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`149
`
`business and that this equipmentis available for reclaiming plants.
`They know that there is a great deal of equipment in other second-
`hand dealers’ hands which does not require high priorities or take
`anything needed for ships or guns. These plants can be started
`immediately.
`It, of course, would be unfortunate for Naugatuck
`Chemical Co., which is a subsidiary of the United States Rubber Co.,
`and one of the four out of six reclaimers who control the bulk of the
`reclaiming business in the United States, if they were to find 50 other
`reclaiming plants in the country, for they would lose a lot of their
`profits. They would have competition. They would not have com-
`plete control of this important commodity, and of course they would
`not like to see any oneelse reclaiming and possibly that is what has
`caused them to have a different idea as to the erection of other re-
`claiming plants. They would compete with them.
`Regarding the paragraph ‘If used equipment is available” as I
`claimed, why do the Texas bankers mentioned by Mr. Simpson have
`to wait for priorities to buy equipment to build a reclamation plant?
`You see,
`they are bankers. They thought you had to have new
`equipment and when I explained to them that second-hand equip-
`ment was available, they then stopped trying to obtain priorities and
`I understand they made application to one of the departments for a
`Federal loan to finance the contruction.
`I don’t know what the
`status is today, but if the committee would like to know, I will
`ascertain it.
`Regarding Mr. Hunter’s statement that establishing reclamation
`plants and giving to them the millions of dollars worth of dies, tools,
`and machinery necessary to equip them, would deprive our Army and
`Navy of ships, that is not so. By supplying them with the second-
`hand equipment that no one wants and having these plants erected
`at once, we will turn millions of tons of scrap rubber into reclaimed
`rubber for immediate use for the war machinefor ships, for tanks for
`battleships, for tractors and for the people to help them movefast
`and quick in their effort to handle quickly our war production.
`It is astounding how they can ask Americansto sacrifice everything
`for the benefit of the Naugatuck Chemical Co. and a number of
`others.
`Regarding Mr. Hunter putting
`in the record a schedule showing
`the world’s total production in the past years, that means nothing.
`The propaganda that is being put out to the newspapers states that
`‘we received 1 percent of our rubber from Latin America and 1
`percent from Africa in previous years.
`If they showed how much
`rubber was available in the areas. of the Western Hemisphere as
`against that of the Far East, we would be astounded to find that
`many times the quantities of rubber are available in the Western
`Hemisphere than there are in the Far East.
`I am preparing this
`chart for the committee so they can see the difference between this
`wild propaganda and the facts as to where the mature trees are that
`are already developed.
`Efforts should be made and made at once, instead of using obstruc-
`tionist methods to get the rubber out of the Western Hemisphere.
`It
`can be done: It can be done: If they want to be shown, give me 60
`days, and I will show them.
`told the
`Mr. Albert E. Kahn, Department of Justice attorney,
`Senate Patents Committee on May 29 (?)
`that Goodyear, United
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 162
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 162
`
`

`

`150
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`States Rubber and Firestone maintained Far East rubberplantations.
`United States Rubber made in 1938 30 percent profit on its cost of
`producing crude rubber. Mr. Kahn stated that assuming that the
`other companies were making the samelarge profits from the same
`kind of large estates, this may have tended to give them an interest
`in the maintenance in their status quo in the Far East and in the
`operation of restrictions tending to support the price of crude rubber.
`‘This will of course give the committee and the American people a
`great deal to think about.
`It may indicate someof the causesof this
`apparent desire to confuse the figures‘on the amount of rubber that
`is right in this hemisphere, now.
`I had the pleasure of introducing to this committee Dr. Francis
`Cella, an American citizen, a practicing physician in the city of New
`York, of eminent standing. Dr. Cella is probably the only Ameri-
`can physician who has spent 5 years in the interior of the Amazon
`treating the natives running the rubber seringals. As he told you he
`is fully acquainted with the conditions of that area and he knows the
`medications necessary. He has told you about that as well as the
`shipping facilities that are available, and what we should do.
`IL
`think the total of his knowledge and experienceis vitally important to
`the people of the United States, and I believe with his cooperation we
`can get our program started quickly to obtain from Brazil all the rub-
`ber we require.
`It was in order that this committee of Congress,
`representing the people of the United States, may speak with one great
`authority on this situation, that I asked Dr. Cella to come before you
`today, with great hardship on him, because of the many patients de-
`pendent on his experienced treatments. He has addressed you and
`given you facts about the rubber situation in Brazil.
`That concludes my statement, Mr. Chairman.
`The Cuarrman. Thank you, Mr. Simpson. Have you anythingelse
`you wish to comment on?
`Mr. Simpson. Mr. Chairman, I brought with me today Mr. Harold
`Sims, vice president of the South West Rubber Reclaiming Co., of
`Fort Worth, Tex., who has some vital information for this committee,
`Will you let him go on now?
`The CHarnMAN. Yes. You may proceed, Mr. Sims.
`
`STATEMENT OF HAROLD SIMS, FORT WORTH, TEX.
`The CuHarrMaN. Please state your name and address for the record.
`Mr. Sims. I am Harold Sims, of Fort Worth, Tex.
`J and two other
`associates, after Pearl Harbor, looked into the feasibility of putting a
`rubber-reclaiming plant in Texas. There is not a reclaiming plant
`in the whole Southwest. The nearest to Fort Worth are St. Louis,
`Denver, and over in Los Angeles.
`One of my associates was closely identified with Jesse Jones, and
`called him, and Mr. Jones suggested that we come to Washington end
`lay our plans before the War Production Board.
`At that time a Mr. Helburn was the head of the Rubber Division.
`Wesaw him, and he turaed thumbs down andsaid, ‘““There is no scrap
`available; we have closed reclaiming plants down, and we will not ask
`for facilities.”
`So I went back to Fort Worth with that message.
`Then we spent $3,000 of our own money making a survey of the south-
`west part of the United States to ascertain whether or not sufficient
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 163
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 163
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`151
`
`rubber scrap was available to maintain a rubber-reclaiming plant in
`operation. Wetook pictures of junk yards andpiles of old tires, and
`I haveall that data.
`- The CuarrmMan. I wonder if you could submit that.
`
`Mr. Sims. I left my bag at the hotel
`The CuarrMan. You might mailit in.
`Mr. Sims. J have given Mr. Simpson praccically all of that. We
`took pictures of very large piles of scrap in junk yards, and along the |
`roadside, and in the hands of scrap dealers, who had no sale for it
`at all.
`We also went down through the oil: fields, where they use about
`1,000,000 pounds of rubber a year, where it is used in belts, hose,
`sleeves, and various other things, and when they get through with it
`it is oil-soaked and they throw it off in a pile and burn it.
`I took a
`circular trip from Fort Worth, through Stephanville, St. Angelo, to
`Abilene, to Fort Worth, on January 14, and invariably we would see
`the Negroes working on those junked automobiles, where they were
`cutting them up with acetylene torches, and burning rubber to keep
`warm.
`I brought pictures with me that show that very thing, and I
`also have letters from various junk dealers that they would agree to
`furnish scrap rubber at the rate of 25 tons a day for a period of.3
`years, and that it would consist of rubber tires we needed and various
`types of scrap rubber.
`I have brought those pictures and letters to
`Washington, and, by the way, this is my sixth trip here.
`At that time Mr. Helburn had no information, and he was suc-
`ceeded later by a Mr. Arthur B. Newhall as the head of the Rubber
`Division. We submitted all my data to Mr. Newhall, and he thought
`there was a definite need for a reclaiming plant in the southwest por-
`tion of the United States and that we hadsufficient scrap there. Now,
`then, we took it up with a Mr. Holt, who had several compilations on
`thescrap situation, and his answerto the question was that there was
`much more scrap than we showed them. Weshowedat least 50,000
`tons of scrap in Texas; we showed approximately 100,000 tons of scrap
`in Oklahoma; we showedat least 87,000 tons of scrap in Arizona; and
`we showd thousands of tons of scrap in New Mexico; and we have
`facts to supportall this data.
`I took that back to a Mr. Wieland, whoat that time got in the pic-
`ture in rubber and he said,
`‘“‘We will not put any rubber-reclaiming
`plant up there’ and said it was all hokum to him, and hesaid that
`the present facilities were sufficient and he went to great lengths to
`explain to me that the present rubber-reclaiming facilities were shut-
`ting down and they just were not going to expandit.
`On the fourth trip I saw Mr. Klossner, the adviser of Mr. Jones;
`he is the president of the Rubber Reserve. He wentoverit and said,
`“QO. K.; we will finance the plant down there.”
`Wehadfigured at that time a plant to produce 40,000 tons of
`reclaimed rubber a year, requiring about 65,000 tons of scrap and
`costing us $750,000, including buildings, new machinery, and work-
`ing equipment.
`The CuarrmMan. That was a new building?
`Mr. Sims. All new material, that is right; then we run into Robert -
`T. Williams, Chief of Priority Division, who said “I will not recom-
`mend anything; you go back and try to see what you can do with
`second-hand machinery.’”’ Now we were doing this at our own ex-
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 164
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 164
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`152
`I have two sons, one 18 and the other 21, in the Army, and
`pense.
`- we are trying to do something for defense. Mr. Williamssaid:You
`go back andtry to find a Jot of used machinery and a building already
`fabricated, and then come back and I will
`talk to you.”
`I said,
`“Don’t have me go back to Fort Worth, Tex., which is quite a little
`jump,” and I said “If I am up against a brick wall, tell me, and I
`will quit and I will never come back, and you will not see me for the
`duration.” He said, ‘Well, if I were you I would find this used
`machinery and get it written up in a brochure like an engineer would
`have it and build it up and then bring it back.”
`I went back to Fort Worth, Tex., and put up $1,000 option on a
`building that had belonged to Swift & Co.
`It was an ideal situa-
`tion.
`I had pictures made of the building inside and out.
`I went
`to New York and submitted it to an engineer, and he drew me plans
`showing the plant and how the machinery would fit and that we could
`turn out in this plant about 25,000 tons of reclaimed rubber a year.
`Then I went to Akron, Ohio, to L. Albert & Son.
`I went there and
`they showed me every piece of machinery we needed to produce 25,-
`000 tons. All this machinery had been used, and somelittle of it
`perhaps had to be rebuilt, but it would all be used machinery. The
`total money requirement of building and equipment using old mate-
`rials was $486,000; and, by the way, the building I bought for $50,000
`and Swift & Co. had depreciated it as of January 1, 1941,
`to the
`amount of $220,000. That gives an idea of the value of the building,
`which contained a fine ice-manufacturing machine and other good
`materia] that could be thrown back in the machinery pool where they
`need that type of stuff.
`I spent about a day with O. Ww. Jackson, whois the financial adviser
`for the War Defense Corporation. He made all
`the preliminary
`investigations as to the people connected with the plant, as to scrap
`availability, and as to whether or not we could operate successfully.
`I got advice from technical people about coming down to Fort Worth
`to run tbis plant. Mr. Jackson looked at
`the building, checked
`everything up, and advised Bradley March here in Washington, chief
`financial adviser in Washington, that our plan wassolid and he would
`recommendit.
`I went out to Mr. Robert T. Williams in the War Production
`Board. He took all this stuff and looked at it and said, “I will not
`handle it,” and I said, ‘“‘Why not?” and hesaid “It is full of dyna-
`mite.”
`Hesaid, “I will not worry about it’; and referred us to Dr.
`Rogers, who is president of the Brooklyn Polytechnic College of New
`York,
`to handle it. He said that Jesse and Fritz Lanham know
`about it, so he referred us to Dr. Rogers.
`I went to talk to Fritz Lan-
`ham and Fritz said, ‘‘Why not get this going. You men madesix
`trips to Washington and spent $5,000 or $6,000.” Well, Mr. Wil-
`liamssaid, “I would rather have Dr. Rogers handleit.”’
`I went to see Dr. Rogers and he said, “I will call in my indus-
`trial expert.’”’
`I had this man here [indicating J. H. Davidson].
`Dr. Rogers looked my stuff over.
`I thought it was beautifully com-
`piled; I had some good lawyers, and he said,
`‘‘Who fixed up that
`stuff?”
`I know that material had been compiled by someof the best,
`people in this rubber-reclaiming business, who had been in that busi-
`ness all their lives; and so I told him I had gone to several places.
`
`-
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 165
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 165
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`153
`
`Hesaid, “If I had anyone working for me do a job like that I would
`think they were screwy.’’ Then I felt something was wrong.
`The Cuairman. I can understand yourfeeling.
`Mr. Sims. Well, I was so darn dumbfounded”that I did not know
`what to say.
`I said, “Doctor, I do not believe I told you when I
`came here that I was an engineer and had engineering schooling, but
`will you just tell me how to fix it up if you will not bother to look
`at it, and I will get it done that way.”
`I will name
`Hesaid, “I will tell you how to fix it up, Mr. Sims.
`three fellows, and you will take one of those three fellows who will
`be acceptable to me and you tender to him a fee for $50,000.””_
`I said,
`“Yes; after the $50,000, you are prepared then to see that I willget
`
`it
`
`“The Cuarrman. Whois the man?
`Mr. Sims. This is the man: J. H. Davidson, who wasthere, and I
`picked this man up. This man was industrial expert to the War
`Production Board, and this man handled the thing over there.
`I
`was dumbfounded, and this man come over and hesaid, ‘‘You know
`I fixed the deal.” He said he had written four letters before they
`would consent not to throw it out.
`I said I had proved that the
`scrap was there and we could acquire the machinery without taking
`it out of any vital defense plant; that we needed no materials of any
`kind that would help in the war picture; that we offered to put this
`plant up and take $1 a year until after the duration. All we wanted
`was $1 a year for the use of the plant until after the duration.
`The CuairMan. The committee will go in executive session.
`(Thereppon the committee went into executive session.)
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 166
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 166
`
`

`

`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 167
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 167
`
`

`

`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER, ETC.
`
`FRIDAY, JUNE 5, 1942
`
`ComMITTEE on CornaGE, WEIGHTS, AND MEASURES,
`Houser oF REPRESENTATIVES,|
`Washington, D. C.
`(The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:30 a. m., Hon.
`Andrew L. Somers, chairman, presiding, for further consideration of
`H. J. Res. 295.)
`' The CHarrmMan. Well,
`gentlemen,
`I
`think the meeting of
`the
`committee will now be called, Those who were present at the last
`session will recall that we had Harold Simsof Texas here as a witness,
`who madea certain statement that we felt should be verified, and we
`have called on the department head to appear here this morning to
`give his side of the story. The other department head whois in-
`volved in this was not available during this week, because of a leave
`of absence that had been granted him by the Department. The
`witness this morning is Mr. Williams of the War Production Board.
`Mr. WILLiAMs. Yes,sir.
`
`STATEMENT OF ROBERT T. WILLIAMS, PRINCIPAL PRIORITIES
`SPECIALIST AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BUREAU OF PRIORI-
`TIES OF THE WAR PRODUCTION BOARD
`
`The CuHarrman. Mr. Williams, would you mind giving for the
`record your position and history in connection with the rubber
`industry?
`Mr. WiuiaMs. My position at the War Production Board is that
`of principal priorities specialist and representative of the Bureau of
`Priorities of the War Production Board, assigned to the rubber and
`the rubber products branch. My previous connection in the rubber
`industry is a period of approximately 10 months’ service, with the
`Firestone Tire & Rubber Co
`Mr. SautHorr. With what company, please?
`_ Mr. WituraMs. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., beginning in
`July of 1929, and ending in April of 1930.
`‘The Cuarrman. In what capacity did you serve?
`Mr. WiuraMs. I was a generalline salesman.
`The CuarrMan. In what section?
`Mr. Wiuuiams. In Texas.
`The CHarrMan. In Texas?
`Mr. WiuuiaMs. Yes.
`Mr. ANDRESEN. Did you have any rubber experience before you
`went with the Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.? |
`Mr. WixuiaMs. I graduated from the University of Chicago in
`1929, and at that timethe Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. were selecting
`155
`
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 168
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`
`MacNeil Exhibit 2151
`Yita v. MacNeil IP, IPR2020-01139, Page 168
`
`

`

`156
`
`PROCUREMENT OF RAW NATURAL RUBBER
`
`from various colleges throughout the Jand graduates to go into their
`training
`school, and I went into their training school in July, and in
`Decemberof 1929 I wasassignedto that particular position in Houston
`as branch salesman and general line salesman.
`The CuHarrMan. After that you went with whom?
`Mr. Wiuuiams. After leaving the Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.?
`The CHaAtrMAN. Yes.
`Mr. WituiaMs. I was with the Texas Co. in the capacity of an
`accountant.
`Mr. McGeuee. How long were you with the Firestone Tire &
`Rubber Co.?
`1929 until April of 1930.
`Mr. Wiuuiams. From July
`Co. also a rubber company?
`Mr. Reep. Is the Texas
`Mr. Wituiams. No, sir; the Texas Co.
`is a petroleum company.
`I wasaffiliated with them in the capacity of an accountant from April
`1930 until October 1930 at which time I returned to the University
`of Chicago in the post-graduate school of business administration.
`I had a part-time job on the faculty.
`The Cuairman. In your present position are you in sole charge of
`priorities on rubber goods?
`Mr. Wiuuiams. No, sir. May I explain how that operates in our
`branch as well as in the War Production Board. The Bureau of
`Priorities is supposed to establish policies and procedures with respect
`to the granting of priority assistance.
`In carrying out that function
`they assign to the various industrial branches one or more so-called
`priority specialists who serve as consultants to the branch on recom-
`mendations madeby the industrial branches to the Bureau of Priorities
`with respect to individual applications as to priority assistance, as to
`policy, and as to the procedure to be followed.
`The CHainMAN. Then you only establish policy, do you?
`Mr. Wiuiiams. Pardon me?
`The CuarrMan. Then you only establish policy?
`Mr. Wiviuiams. No; I do not establish policy. The policies are
`established by the Chief of the Bureau of Priorities.
`The Cuairnman. Who would that be?
`Mr. Witutams. Charles H. Mathison, Jr., who is Chief of the Bureau
`of Priorities.
`I work under directions and instructions which I
`receive from my superiors.
`The CHairnmMAN. And you hand those down to the various consult-
`ants in the Bureau?
`Mr. Wiuuiams. No; with the consultants in the branch of the
`various industries involved, and we have analysts in the branches
`who review applications for all priorities assistants and make recom-
`mendations on them, and they review them with me before they are
`transferred from the branch to the Bureau of Priorities for action on
`them.
`Mr. McGeues. With your recommendation as to whether the
`action should be favorable or unfavorable?
`Mr. Wituiams. Thatis right.
`The CuarrM

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket