throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 68
`Entered: September 9, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`YITA LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`MACNEIL IP LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
` IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)1
`
`Before MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, JAMES A. WORTH,
`MICHAEL L. WOODS, and ARTHUR M. PESLAK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.2
`
`WOODS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Setting Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be entered in each
`proceeding. The parties are not authorized to use this caption style.
`2 This listing of Administrative Patent Judges does not reflect an expanded
`panel. Rather, this Order addresses multiple proceedings that collectively
`involve more than three Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`
`I. ORAL ARGUMENT
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both filed a timely request for a
`combined oral argument in these proceedings. Paper 66 (filed September 1,
`2021); Paper 67 (filed September 1, 2021); see also Paper 18, 10 (setting the
`due date for requesting oral argument as September 1, 2021).3 These
`requests are granted.
`
`A. Time and Format
`Oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM, Eastern Time, on October
`12, 2021, by video.4 The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing,
`and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Petitioner will have a total of 60 minutes for both cases to present
`argument and Patent Owner will have a total of 60 minutes for both cases to
`respond. Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its case regarding
`the challenged claims for which the Board instituted trial. Thereafter, Patent
`Owner will respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve
`rebuttal time to respond to arguments presented by Patent Owner. In
`accordance with the Consolidated Trial Practice Guide5 (“CTPG”), issued in
`November 2019, Patent Owner may request to reserve time for a brief sur-
`rebuttal. See CTPG 83.
`The parties may request a pre-hearing conference in advance of the
`hearing. See id. at 82. “The purpose of the pre-hearing conference is to
`
`
`3 Citations are to papers filed in IPR2020-01139. Similar papers were filed
`in IPR2020-01142.
`4 If there are any concerns about disclosing confidential information, the
`parties must contact the Board at Trials@uspto.gov at least ten (10) business
`days before the hearing date.
`5 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`afford the parties the opportunity to preview (but not argue) the issues to be
`discussed at the hearing, and to seek the Board’s guidance as to particular
`issues that the panel would like addressed by the parties.” Id. If either party
`desires a pre-hearing conference, the parties should jointly contact the Board
`at Trials@uspto.gov at least seven (7) business days before the hearing date
`to request a conference call for that purpose.
`
`B. Demonstratives
`As set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstratives shall be served on
`opposing counsel at least seven (7) business days before the hearing date and
`filed no later than October 8, 2021.6
`Demonstratives are not a mechanism for making new arguments.
`Demonstratives also are not evidence, and will not be relied upon as
`evidence. Rather, demonstratives are visual aids to a party’s oral
`presentation regarding arguments and evidence previously presented and
`discussed in the papers. Accordingly, demonstratives shall be clearly
`marked with the words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT
`EVIDENCE” in the footer. See Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC, 884 F.3d 1364,
`1369 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (holding that the Board is obligated under its own
`regulations to dismiss untimely argument “raised for the first time during
`oral argument”). “[N]o new evidence may be presented at the oral
`argument.” CTPG 85; see also St. Jude Med., Cardiology Div., Inc. v. The
`Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Mich., IPR2013-00041, Paper 65, 2–3 (PTAB
`
`
`6 The parties may stipulate to an alternative schedule for serving and filing
`demonstratives, and request that the Board modify the schedule for filing
`and serving demonstratives at least seven (7) business days before the
`hearing date.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`Jan. 27, 2014) (explaining that “new” evidence includes evidence already of
`record but not previously discussed in any paper of record).
`Furthermore, because of the strict prohibition against the presentation
`of new evidence or arguments at a hearing, it is strongly recommended that
`each demonstrative include a citation to a paper in the record, which allows
`the Board to easily ascertain whether a given demonstrative contains “new”
`argument or evidence or, instead, contains only that which is developed in
`the existing record.
`Due to the nature of the Board’s consideration of demonstratives and
`the opportunity afforded for the parties to reach an agreement without
`involving the Board, the Board does not anticipate that objections to
`demonstratives are likely to be sustained. Nevertheless, to the extent that a
`party objects to the propriety of any demonstrative, the parties shall meet
`and confer in good faith to resolve any objections to demonstratives prior to
`filing the objections with the Board. If such objections cannot be resolved,
`the parties may file any objections to demonstratives with the Board no later
`than the time of the hearing. The objections shall identify with particularity
`which portions of the demonstratives are subject to objection (and should
`include a copy of the objected-to portions) and include a one (1) sentence
`statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any objections, and may
`reserve ruling on the objections.7 Any objection to demonstratives that is
`not timely presented will be considered waived.
`
`
`7 If time permits, the Board may schedule a conference call with the parties
`to discuss any filed objections.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`
`Finally, the parties are reminded that each presenter should identify
`clearly and specifically each paper (e.g., by slide or screen number for a
`demonstrative) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of all
`participants appearing electronically.
`
`C. Presenting Counsel
`The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`at the hearing. See CTPG 11. Any counsel of record may present the
`party’s argument as long as that counsel is present by video.
`
`D. Video Hearing Details8
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact the Board at
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least five (5) business days prior to the
`hearing date to receive video set-up information. As a reminder, all
`arrangements and the expenses involved with appearing by video, such as
`the selection of the facility from which a party will attend by video, must be
`borne by that party. If a video connection cannot be established, the parties
`will be provided with dial-in connection information, and the hearing will be
`conducted telephonically.
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the hearing
`telephonically, they must contact the Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov at
`
`
`8 USPTO facilities remain closed to the public. If and when conditions
`allow in-person hearing attendance, the parties will be notified and will be
`permitted to submit a joint request to convert the current video hearing to an
`in-person hearing. The requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis,
`and subject to resource availability.
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`least five (5) business days prior to the hearing date to receive dial-in
`connection information.
`Counsel should unmute only when speaking. The panel will have
`access to all papers filed with the Board, including demonstratives. During
`the hearing, the parties are reminded to identify clearly and specifically each
`paper referenced (e.g., by slide or screen number for a demonstrative) to
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript and for the
`benefit of all participants appearing electronically. In addition, the parties
`are advised to identify themselves each time they speak. Furthermore, the
`remote nature of the hearing may also result in an audio lag, and thus the
`parties are advised to observe a pause prior to speaking, so as to avoid
`speaking over others.
`If at any time during the hearing, counsel encounters technical or
`other difficulties that fundamentally undermine counsel’s ability to
`adequately represent its client, please let the panel know immediately, and
`adjustments will be made.9
`
`E. Remote Attendance Requests
`Members of the public may request to listen to this hearing. If
`resources are available, the Board generally expects to grant such requests.
`If either party objects to the Board granting such requests, for example,
`because confidential information may be discussed, the party must notify the
`Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least ten (10) business days prior to
`the hearing date.
`
`
`9 For example, if a party is experiencing poor video quality, the Board may
`provide alternate dial-in information.
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`
`F. Audio/Visual Equipment Requests
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`related to appearing at a video hearing, such as a request to accommodate
`visual or hearing impairments, and indicate how the PTAB may
`accommodate the special request. Any special requests must be presented in
`a separate communication at least five (5) business days before the hearing
`date.
`
`G. Legal Experience and Advancement Program
`The Board has established the “Legal Experience and Advancement
`Program,” or “LEAP,” to encourage advocates with less legal experience to
`argue before the Board to develop their skills. Either party may request that
`a qualifying LEAP practitioner participate in the program and conduct at
`least a portion of the party’s oral argument. In these proceedings, the Board
`may grant additional argument time to that party. A party should submit a
`request, no later than at least five (5) business days before the oral hearing,
`by email to the Board at PTABHearings@uspto.gov. Additional
`information and a combined LEAP Practitioner Request for Oral Hearing
`Participation and Verification Form is available on the LEAP website,
`www.uspto.gov/leap.
`
`7
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that oral argument for these proceedings shall commence
`
`at 1:00 PM, Eastern Time, on October 12, 2021, by video, and proceed in the
`manner set forth herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01139 (Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01139
`(Patent 8,382,186 B2)
`IPR2020-01142 (Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`IPR2020-01142
`(Patent 8,833,834 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket