throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TIDE INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UPL NA INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2020-01113
`Patent 7,473,685
`
`DECLARATION OF BAILEY K. BENEDICT IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`1
`
`TIDE 1038
`Tide v. UPL NA
`IPR2020-01113
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2020-01113
`Attorney Docket: 49321-0001IP1
`DECLARATION OF BAILEY K. BENEDITC IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Bailey K. Benedict, hereby declare the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the state Bar of Texas, as well as the
`
`
`
`1.
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Eastern
`
`District of Texas; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas; and U.S.
`
`District Court for the Western District of Texas.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, as
`
`updated by the August 2018 Updated, 83 Federal Register 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018)
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of Title 37 of the
`
`Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`

`
`2 
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2020-01113
`Attorney Docket: 49321-0001IP1
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in any other
`
`7.
`
`proceedings during the past three years.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney with more than 8 years of experience
`
`representing clients in patent cases with a particular focus on chemicals, oil-and-
`
`gas technology and equipment for exploration, drilling, and production, and
`
`consumer goods. I have also litigated patent cases relating to software,
`
`pharmaceuticals, and 3D printing. I regularly litigate patent cases in various
`
`forums including the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and
`
`federal district courts. Through my experience in patent litigation matters, I have
`
`represented clients in many phases of litigation including discovery, Markman
`
`hearings, jury trials, bench trials, and appeals. My biography is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`I am serving as litigation counsel for Petitioner in the co-pending litigation
`
`against Patent Owner in the Central District of California. My role in the case has
`
`been to use my education and background in chemical engineering to focus on the
`
`relevant technical issues.
`
` hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
` I
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`

`
`3 
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2020-01113
`Attorney Docket: 49321-0001IP1
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 26, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Bailey K. Benedict/
`Bailey K. Benedict
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (713) 654-5300
`Email: BWH@fr.com
`
`
`

`
`4 
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIX A
`
`5
`
`

`

`4/22/2021
`
`Bailey K. Benedict | IP Attorney - Houston, TX | Fish
`
`Stay up to date with COVID-19 related news here
`
`Bailey K. Benedict
`Principal
`
` Houston, TX
`
` Download Bio
`
`
`
`
`
` 713-654-5331
`  benedict@fr.com
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`Insights
`
`Recognition
`
`
`
`
`
`About Bailey
`Bailey Benedict is a principal in the Houston office of Fish & Richardson P.C. Ms.
`Benedict’s practice focuses on all areas of intellectual property litigation in U.S. district
`courts, with a particular focus on patent and trademark litigation. She also has
`experience in trade secret litigation, as well as representing realtors in litigation under
`the False Claims Act.
`
`Ms. Benedict has litigated in a wide variety of technology areas in U.S. district courts
`nationwide, with a particular focus on chemicals, oil-and-gas technology and
`equipment for exploration, drilling, and production, and consumer goods.  She has
`also litigated patent cases relating to software, pharmaceuticals, and 3D printing.  Ms.
`Benedict has led claim construction hearings and motion hearings in the Southern
`District of Texas, the Western District of Texas, and the Central District of California.
`She has taken cases to trial in the District of Delaware, the Middle District of Georgia,
`and the Eastern District of Texas. Ms. Benedict has worked extensively with clients
`and fact witnesses to develop cases and prepare for trial, has worked closely with
`both technical and damages expert witnesses to oversee expert reports and
`testimony, has conducted and defended many depositions, and has managed
`complex discovery.  Ms. Benedict’s experience also includes a number of appeals
`before the Federal Circuit, and one Supreme Court appeal.
`
`Ms. Benedict’s practice focuses on providing efficient, high quality service to clients
`with a particular eye toward adhering to budgets and achieving the goals most
`important to each individual client, be that a litigation win, a favorable settlement, or
`something in between.  She has negotiated many advantageous settlements for her
`clients, both in a formal mediation process and through less formal negotiations with
`opposing counsel. She also has significant experience with multi-defendant litigation,
`
`Focus Areas
`
`Services
`Litigation
`
`Industries
`Chemicals
`
`Energy and Petrochemical
`
`Life Sciences
`
`Manufacturing
`
`Medical Devices
`
`Education
`
`J.D., University of Texas at Austin School of Law
`(2012) Symposium Editor, Texas Intellectual
`Property Law Journal (2011-2012)
`
`B.S. cum laude, Chemical Engineering with
`emphasis in Nanotechnology, minor in Musical
`Theater, University of Southern California (2009)
`
`Admissions
`
`Texas 2012
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`https://www.fr.com/team/bailey-k-benedict/
`
`1/2
`
`6
`
`
`

`

`4/22/2021
`
`Bailey K. Benedict | IP Attorney - Houston, TX | Fish
`
`large joint defense groups, and smaller multi-defendant opportunities that allow
`clients to benefit from cost sharing.
`
`Bailey also devotes her time to pro bono matters, including working with KIND (Kids
`In Need of Defense) to help children remain in the U.S. legally.
`
`U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
`Texas
`
`U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
`Texas
`
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of
`Texas
`
`© 2021 - Fish & Richardson
`
`
`
`https://www.fr.com/team/bailey-k-benedict/
`
`2/2
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket