throbber
VIA EMAIL
`
`June 17, 2020
`
`David Willingham
`Jeanne A. Fugate
`Zi Wei Hu
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`725 S. Figuora St., 31st Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street, NE
`21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`
`404 892 5005 main
`404 892 5002 fax
`
`Anand Sharma
`Raj Gupta
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Max Gianelli
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`
`Re: UPL NA Inc. v. Tide Int’l (USA), Inc. et al., Case No. 8:19-cv-1201-RSWL-KS
`
`UPL Counsel:
`
`I write regarding the pending litigation in the above-captioned case regarding U.S. Patent No.
`7,473,685. On June 17, 2020, Tide filed a petition for inter partes review against the ’685
`patent. Tide hereby stipulates that, if Tide’s petition is instituted, Tide will not challenge the
`validity of the ’685 patent in this litigation based on the following grounds being advanced in the
`IPR petition:
`
`’685 Patent Claims
`
`Basis for Rejection
`
`§ 103 over Misselbrook and CN ’588 in view
`of JP ’902
`
`§ 103 over Misselbrook and Mayer in view of
`CN ’588
`
`§ 103 over Misselbrook and JP ’902 in view of
`Mayer
`
`Ground
`
`Ground 1
`
`1-4, 7-12
`
`Ground 2
`
`1-4, 7-12
`
`Ground 3
`
`1-4, 7-12
`
`Misselbrook refers to U.S. Patent No. 6,387,388; CN ’588 refers to Chinese Patent Publication
`No. 1127588A; JP ’902 refers to Japanese Patent Publication No. 9-315902A, and Mayer refers to
`U.S. Patent No. 6,030,924.
`
`1
`
`TIDE 1035
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`June 17, 2020
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`Tide also stipulates it will not pursue in the litigation any ground that utilizes, as a primary
`reference, Misselbrook, which is a primary reference in the grounds asserted in the IPR petition,
`or Lescota, which is a divisional application of Misselbrook.
`
`In so stipulating, Tide seeks to avoid duplicative efforts and multiple proceedings addressing the
`validity of the ’685 patent based on grounds having the same primary references. Rather, Tide
`expresses its intent to have the PTAB exclusively address the patentability of the ’685 patent on
`such grounds should an IPR proceeding be instituted.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Thad Kodish
`
`Thad Kodish
`Attorney for Tide Defendants
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket