throbber
MELTING TECHNOLOGY
`
`Refining Agents, Colourants and
`Decolourisers Used in Container Glass
`
`The refining of glass depends on the gas
`•
`bubbles rising to the surface of the
`glass during the melting process, as well as the
`re-absorption of gases as the glass cools. To assist
`these processes, refining agents are added to the
`batch, with sulphates being the ·most important
`in the soda-lime-silica compositions of container
`glasses. Sulphates also have the added property
`of acting as a wetting agent to help the fluxes
`dissolve silica. Sulphates decompose at high
`temperatures during the melting process,
`resulting in the evolution of sulphur dioxide gas
`bubbles which rise and act as collectors as they
`sweep through the melt, gathering the other
`gases such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Any
`sulphur dioxide bubbles remaining after this
`stage are then redissolved into the glass as it is
`cooled down in preparation for forming.
`By employing a reducing agent in the batch,
`the breakdown of the sulphates can be aided
`chemically, with the result that sulphur dioxide
`is evolved earlier.
`This allows lower melting temperatu!:_es (or
`higher throughputs) and the glass is also easier
`to refine to a higher quality. Thus by balancing
`the sulphates ( oxidising) and reducing agents,
`it is possible to optimise the melting process to
`give a refin ing 'system' capable of giving a well
`refined glass at high pull rates economically.
`
`Sulphates
`The choice of sulphate is generally between
`), as
`anhydrite (CaSO 4 ) and sa~tcake (Na2SO 4
`both can be obtained of sufficient chemical purity
`and·consistency and can act with equal effective(cid:173)
`ness in the batch. Their grading and hence their
`ability to mix intimately with the other batch
`ingredients can greatly influence the effective(cid:173)
`ness of a particular material but other factors
`such as batch plant handling and dusting have
`to be taken into account when specifying the
`required grain size. Price, of course, is also of
`major importance and the relative costs of the
`other sources of lime and soda will have a
`signific.:ant bearing on the final choice.
`
`Reducing agents
`Reducing agents fall into two main types. Carbon
`in its various forms such as carbon black or
`processed cokes are examples of where the
`reducing agent is in a highly concentrated form.
`In the other main type, processed blast furnace
`slag (Calumite), the reducing agent is in this case
`sulphide and is present at a level of 1 %- 1. 5 % .
`As a result, the slag has to be added to the batch
`at a rate of approximately fifty times the
`equivalent carbon weight for the same reducing
`power.
`The choice of reducing agent is dependent not
`
`*MC Brew, United Glass Ltd, St Albans, UK.
`
`G L A S S March 1989
`
`by M C Brew •
`
`The refining agents, colourants and
`decolourisers for flint, green and
`amber container glass are reviewed.
`There is considerable interaction
`between the refining system and the
`way in which the various colourants
`and decolourisers act. Where
`appropriate, the factors governing
`the choice of a particular raw
`material from the various types and
`sources available are discussed.
`
`only on the desired chemical effects but also on
`factors such as chemical and physical consis(cid:173)
`tency, handling characteristics, batch weighing
`and storage facilities and, of course, cost. In the
`case of blast furnace slag, the presence of
`alumina, lime and silica already in a glassy
`phase, the presence of impurities such as iron
`and the cost of alumina from other sources all
`have to be taken into account.
`White flint
`Sulphates are added at a rate of approximately
`15kg-20kg SO 4 per 2000kg of sand and this is
`complemented by the use of 40kg-120kg of blast
`furnace slag. In the UK, the slag is often the
`economical choice and so is widely used whereas
`on the Continent and in the USA, carbon is often
`preferred. As the glass is significantly reduced ,
`there is a relatively high ferrous content which
`has to be decolourised. For this selenium is the
`most important material and is usually added in
`the metallic form . As the material is often
`manually handled, there has been a trend to use
`a coarser grade with as few fines present as
`possible. Much of the selenium is lost from the
`melt through volatilisation and there are claims
`that addition in different forms (ie as selenites
`or incorporated within pellets) results in less
`selenium loss. However, the oxidation/reduction
`(redox) balance can have a very significant effect
`on the selenium and the less oxidising conditions
`currently used do result in less colourless
`selenate and selenite formation. In addition to
`the effective pink from the free selenium, some
`yellow/brown selenides are also formed. The
`blue colour generated by a small amount of
`cobalt helps to complement the other colours to
`give the required overall neutral grey.
`
`The amount of decolouriser added depends on
`the amount of iron present in the raw materials,
`the redox conditions and the standard of colour
`required. Addition rates (based on 2000kg sand)
`are usually in the order of 10g-50g of selenium,
`with approximately one tenth to a twentieth of
`that weight of cobalt. Cobalt is usually added in
`the form of a fine cobalt oxide powder.
`Green glass
`The green colour is generated from the iron and
`chromium, which is obtained from iron chromite
`ore. Iron chromite is reducing in nature and so
`lesser amounts of other reducing agents are
`necessary to obtain the required refining. The
`green colour produced is reasonably stable
`through the range of redox conditions normally
`employed, although the iron present can give
`either a yellowish or bluish hue to the colour,
`dependent on the relative amounts of ferrous
`and ferric species present. While the normal
`rules of consistency of composition apply, it is
`the physical sizing of the iron chromite which
`is of paramount importance. This particularly
`refractory mineral must be ground sufficiently
`finely to ensure complete dissolution.

`Amber glass
`Amber is a highly reduced glass, requiring iron
`and sulphide to generate the colour. The
`sulphide is obtained by two main mechanisms:
`• Strong reduction of sulphate;
`• Added to the batch directly as sulphide.
`In the case of the strong reduction of sulphates,
`relatively high quantities of carbon are added,
`with possibly as much as 10kg per 2000kg of
`sand. Where sulphides are added directly, this
`is by the addition of up to 10 % of the total batch
`weight of blast furnace slag. Another sulphide
`source is iron sulphide, which has the additional
`advantage of being an iron source. During
`melting,· sufficient of the sulphide can be
`converted to SO.) by oxidation to give the
`required refining.-Iron oxide is present in the
`sands, where it has to be controlled to ensure
`composition consistency. It is usual, however ,
`to add an additional amount either as the
`sulphide mentioned above iron oxide powder
`or high iron -bearing slag.
`It is common practice, however , to see amber
`batch recipes being made up on the basis of high
`sulphide addition ( either slag or iron sulphide),
`a source of iron to give approximately 0.30 %
`Fe:_P3 in the glass, a small amount of sulphate
`to aid refining and some carbon which can be
`readily altered to control the colour intensity.
`The final choice will again depend on such
`factors as the cost of alumina from various
`sources but consistency of composition of the
`raw materials, as well as the flexibility of the
`batch plant in the number of ingredients that can
`be handled, are important factors. •
`
`79
`
`O-I Glass, Inc.
`Exhibit 1028
`Page 001
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket