throbber
From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Zullow, Keith A <KZullow@goodwinlaw.com>
`Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:59 PM
`Trials
`SFisher@wc.com; JBerniker@wc.com; BGenderson@wc.com; SMahaffy@wc.com;
`asheh@wc.com; AZolan@wc.com; ebaumgarten@wc.com; mercksitagliptin@wc.com;
`jitty.malik@kattenlaw.com; alissa.pacchioli@kattenlaw.com;
`christopher.west@katten.com; heike.radeke@katten.com; 'Malik, Jitty';
`alissa.pacchioli@katten.com; Van Buskirk, Tedd W.; Teschner, Michael H.; Faegenburg,
`Russell W.; Wong, Jovial; Fundakowski, Claire (CFundakowski@winston.com); Fischer,
`Sarah
`IPR2020-01045 (Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.,)
`
`To the Honorable Board, 
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s June 18, 2020 Order (IPR2020‐01045, Paper 5), we write to inform the Board that counsel for 
`Mylan, Teva/Watson, DRL and Sun (the petitioners in IPR2020‐00040, IPR2020‐01045, IPR2020‐01060 and IPR2020‐
`01072, respectively) have discussed joinder amongst themselves and with counsel for Merck.  Mylan requested that we 
`inform the Board of the following: 
`
`Mylan will not oppose joining Teva/Watson (IPR2020‐01045), DRL (IPR2020‐01060) and/or Sun (IPR2020‐01072) 
`(collectively “joinder petitioners”) with IPR2020‐00040 so long as each joinder petitioner agrees: (1) to a silent, 
`understudy role throughout the IPR proceedings; (2) that none of the joinder petitioners will seek any change to the 
`current IPR schedule; (3) that none of the joinder petitioners will seek or be permitted additional time to ask questions 
`during any deposition; and (4) any other condition the PTAB sees fit to impose.  Subject to any confidentiality 
`obligations, Mylan does not object to the joinder petitioners attending any deposition.   
`
`Teva/Watson agree to abide by Mylan’s conditions.  Sun and DRL have also indicated that they agree to abide by Mylan’s 
`conditions. 
`
`Merck requested that we inform the Board of the following: 
`
`Patent Owner Merck is considering its position in view of the additional information provided by Petitioner Mylan 
`today.  Merck acknowledges application of the default deadline to oppose the motions for joinder provided in the 
`Board’s June 18, 2020 Order (IPR2020‐01045, Paper 5), and will continue to confer with counsel for Petitioners in 
`advance of that deadline to understand how, if at all, the issues may be narrowed. 
`
`Respectfully, 
`
`Keith A. Zullow 
`Counsel for Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Watson Laboratories, Inc. 
`
`Keith A. Zullow 
`
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`
`1
`
`IPR2020-01045, -01060, -01072
`Ex. 3002
`
`

`

`New York, NY 10018
`o +1 212 813 8846
`f +1 646 558 4226
`KZullow@goodwinlaw.com | goodwinlaw.com
`
`*******************************************************************
`This message was sent from Goodwin Procter LLP and is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may
`contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other
`confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this
`message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank
`you.
`*******************************************************************
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket